mirror of
https://github.com/deepseek-ai/deepseek-harness
synced 2026-08-15 21:04:50 +00:00
e6fad266a6
Define the in-file RFC contract in docs/rfc/README.md § The file format: the header block (`# RFC: <title>` plus a dateless Status enum cross-checked against the lifecycle folder), the per-lifecycle body skeleton (a Problem opener everywhere; Proposal/Alternatives considered/ Acceptance criteria/Risks in proposed/; present-tense Decision/ Consequences with proposal-era headings banned in implemented/; the frozen proposal shape in rejected/), and a mandatory Alternatives considered section with a date-fenced grandfather comment for pre-format RFCs whose alternatives are not reconstructible from the record. Enforce it with a new doc-sync gate, scripts/verify-rfc-format.ts, and normalize all 112 RFCs to it: ~15 Status-line spellings collapse to the enum, 29 Context openers become Problem, the 39 legacy-format XXX debt markers are resolved and banned from reappearing, proposal-era sections in implemented RFCs are rewritten to shipped reality (including the web/fs/subagent seam RFCs' migration plans and test checklists, closing the doc-tiers deferred-work item on the web seam), every RFC gains an Alternatives considered section or the grandfather comment, and the bilingual pair is re-mirrored and re-recorded. Move the generated index tables out of README.md into a fully generated docs/rfc/INDEX.md — gen-rfc-index now writes the whole file, and verify-rfc-classification checks its freshness and rejects index-shaped rows in the curated README — which makes room for the format contract to live in the README front door instead of a separate FORMAT.md. The decision record, and the first RFC written in the new format, is docs/rfc/implemented/process/2026-07-05-uniform-rfc-format.md.
16 lines
2.5 KiB
Markdown
16 lines
2.5 KiB
Markdown
# AGENTS.md — Implemented RFCs
|
|
|
|
These are RFCs whose decision has **shipped**. The repo-wide and docs-wide rules still apply ([root AGENTS.md](../../../AGENTS.md) § "Type safety and documentation", [docs/AGENTS.md](../../AGENTS.md)), and the in-file skeleton — including the proposal→implemented rewrite a lifecycle move owes — is [README.md § The file format](../README.md#the-file-format), gated by `verify-rfc-format`; this file adds one rule specific to this folder.
|
|
|
|
## Keep an implemented RFC current with what actually shipped
|
|
|
|
An RFC in `implemented/` describes a decision that is now **live code**. Keep its description of the shipped reality accurate: when the implementation later moves a file, renames a package or symbol, changes a config key/default/error code, or relocates a plugin, update the RFC in the **same change** that touches the code — exactly as you would a package README. A stale implemented RFC (pointing at a path that no longer exists, naming a package that was renamed, describing a structure that was refactored) is worse than no RFC: a future reader trusts it and is misled.
|
|
|
|
Update it **in place** to state the current truth. Do **not** leave the outdated text in and bolt on a "superseded / now actually…" note — that makes the document a changelog of its own drift and forces the reader to reconstruct the present from a pile of corrections. Write what is true now.
|
|
|
|
### This is not a license to rewrite the *decision*
|
|
|
|
Keeping the shipped-state description current is about **facts** (paths, names, structure, defaults) — not about silently flipping the **decision and its rationale** into a different one. The "new RFC" escape hatch is for **macro** changes — a genuine reversal of *what was decided* or its rationale — NOT for renames, moves, or structural relocations. A rename is always a fact to fix **in place**: leaving a package/symbol/path at its old name (even with a "was renamed to…" aside) only confuses a reader who greps the current tree for a name that no longer exists. So: the package was renamed, a symbol changed, a plugin moved, the decision is now realized through a different mechanism → edit this RFC to state the current names and structure. Only a reversal of *what was decided* → a new RFC and cross-link, per [rfc/README.md](../README.md) ("An RFC is never edited into a different decision").
|
|
|
|
When in doubt, ask whether a reader following this RFC to the code would land on something real. If not, it needs updating.
|