deepseek-harness/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-05-dynamic-workflows.md

# Agent Note: Dynamic workflows — a script-driven multi-agent orchestration seam

Status: implemented

English | [中文](2026-07-05-dynamic-workflows.zh.md)

## Problem

The harness can delegate ONE task to ONE child (`dsh-tool-subagent`), but work that fans out across many independent pieces — an audit over many files, a migration, multi-angle research, adversarial verification of findings — forces the model to orchestrate turn by turn: every intermediate result lands in the parent context, the plan lives nowhere durable, and coordination costs a model round-trip per step. Claude Code ships this capability as [dynamic workflows](https://code.claude.com/docs/en/workflows): the model writes a JavaScript orchestration script, a runtime executes it, and the script — not the conversation — holds the loop, the branching, and the intermediate results.

## Decision

A workflow capability family at `packages/workflow/` in the bash seam shape (Service Definition / Service Provider / Consumer), plus the structured-output foundation it needs on the subagent seam.

### The script contract (Claude Code-compatible)

A workflow call contains JSON `meta` (`name`, `description`, and optional `whenToUse`/`phases`) and a JavaScript `script` body with top-level `await` that returns a JSON value. Metadata is validated as data and never evaluated. The body receives `agent(prompt, options)`, `parallel(thunks)`, `pipeline(items, ...stages)`, `phase(title)`, `log(message)`, and `args`. Pipeline stages receive `(prev, item, index)` with no cross-stage barrier; failed children and ordinary stage errors resolve the affected item to `null` and skip its remaining stages. Claude Code's determinism restrictions are deferred with journaling, so compatible bodies may use clock and randomness after moving their meta header into the parameter.

One deliberate strictness DIVERGENCE from CC: hook misuse — unknown or deferred options (`effort`/`isolation`/`agentType`), malformed arguments, schemas outside the supported subset, tripped caps, seam start failures — throws a `WorkflowError` with `fatal: true`, and the combinators RE-THROW fatal errors instead of nulling the item. Without this, a typo'd option dissolves into a `null` indistinguishable from a child failure — the accepted-then-ignored failure mode this repo bans. One addition: the tool's `args` parameter is a JSON OBJECT (a bare list is wrapped as a field) so the wire schema stays honest.

### The seam (dsh-workflow)

`ctx.workflowEngine` is an abstract `WorkflowEngine` in the bash shape — one engine per context, no named-provider registry (engines are deployment swaps, not co-residents). `start(request)` throws synchronously for a script that cannot begin; a returned `WorkflowRun`'s `result` NEVER rejects (failures resolve as `stopReason: 'error' | 'cancelled'`). The `workflow/*` events are observe-only emits carrying DATA SNAPSHOTS (id + meta; `workflow/end` omits the result value), per-listener contained, mirroring `subagent/start`/`subagent/end` — control stays with the run's holder. Vocabulary details: [subsystems/workflow.md](../../../../docs/subsystems/workflow.md).

### The engine (dsh-workflow-worker-thread): one worker thread per run

**Trust premise**: workflow scripts have the same trust as the model's bash access. The engine contains buggy scripts and guarantees settled results, JSON-safe values, and cancellation quiescence; it does not defend against hostile code. A vm context and worker thread are not security boundaries: a script can escape to Node APIs with process-wide authority. Sandboxing requires a separate-process or isolated-vm engine behind this seam.

**Why `node:worker_threads`**: each run gets one unpooled worker. A vm context limits the documented script API, while message-port RPC bridges `agent()` to host-side child loops. The worker prevents synchronous script work from blocking the host, provides a serialization boundary, and permits forced termination after cancellation. `isolated-vm` was rejected because of its maintenance state and deployment requirements.

The host validates metadata and parses the body before publication. Private enum-keyed payload maps define the wire protocol; pending starts, published child records, one cancellation signal, worker-death reaping, result precedence, and disposal quiescence preserve the subagent run contract across it. The [agent-scope runtime-design Agent Note](../architecture/2026-07-12-agent-scope-runtime-design.md#workflow-children-are-pending-starts-or-published-records) owns those race algorithms.

The engine exposes an in-process `MessageChannel` test path because main-process V8 coverage cannot see worker execution.

**Meta is data**: the schema-validated `meta` field reaches the seam as JSON and is only shape-validated. The host never evaluates a metadata literal, which would let script-controlled accessors run outside the worker's isolation.

**Value boundary**: `materializeFromRealm` copies outbound values and rejects functions, symbols, nested `undefined`, exotic prototypes, cycles, sparse arrays, and non-finite numbers. Data-property copies make `"__proto__"` safe; getters are read normally and a throwing getter fails loudly. `args` crosses through `workerData` and is cloned again before exposure. Realm functions are invoked rather than copied, and thrown values use a total renderer so `result` cannot reject. Hook errors are host-realm `WorkflowError`s, so scripts branch on `name` or `code` rather than `instanceof Error`, as documented in the engine README. Concurrency, total-agent, item, timeout, and grace limits are validated config.

### The Consumer (`dsh-tool-workflow`)

A `workflow` tool mirroring `dsh-tool-subagent`'s synchronous shape: start, await, `try/finally` dispose, abort-bridge `exec.signal`, non-`completed` → `isError`. Render intent: a `generic` card titled by the call's `meta.name` parameter (presentation is a pure function of args). The tool description IS the model-facing authoring spec. The usage policy ships with the tool as its own `tool:<toolName>` prompt section (explicit-ask-only guidance — tool guidance lives in tool plugins, never in the deployment persona); the harness has no ultracode-style effort gate.

For a top-level tool execution, the same consumer also writes the run and actual member lifecycle into the calling parent Session as four log-only `tool-workflow/*` events. The recording path observes rather than controls execution: its first append failure disables later writes for that run and leaves a legal prefix without changing the tool result. [`ui-workflow-run`](../../../../packages/client/ui-workflow-run/README.md) rebuilds those facts through the Conversation Node engine as a separate keyed Chat row; the existing generic tool row remains its own presentation owner. The detailed persistence, replay, disclosure, and live-navigation decision lives in [durable workflow runs in Chat](2026-08-10-durable-workflow-runs-in-chat.md).

### The foundation: structured output on the subagent seam

`SubagentStartRequest.outputSchema` is implemented by `dsh-subagent-in-process-driver` for both in-process backends. Each structured child receives its own scoped capture tool, instruction, and enforcement registrations on `child.ctx`; concurrent children can use different schemas without sharing mutable policy, and disposing the child removes the entire attachment.

An output schema makes a schema-valid committed capture mandatory for successful child completion. The scoped runtime presents the capture tool and instruction, commits only a successful final outcome—including the enclosing `run_code` outcome for an SDK call—denies later side effects after capture becomes pending, and stops the child without another model step after commit. A validation failure remains a retryable tool error; clean completion without a committed capture settles as an error.

`ObjectJsonSchema` is the object-rooted consumer view of the unified enforceable raw JSON Schema subset in `dsh-tools`; unsupported keywords fail loudly because that wire data becomes the capture tool's parameters verbatim. The [unified JSON-value schema Agent Note](../architecture/2026-07-20-unified-json-value-schema-dsl.md) owns the vocabulary and validation semantics, while the [agent-scope runtime-design Agent Note](../architecture/2026-07-12-agent-scope-runtime-design.md#structured-output-commits-only-authoritative-outcomes) owns the assembly, commit, guard, and terminal-stop algorithms.

## Testing

Worker-side logic runs through an in-process `MessageChannel` so V8 coverage measures it. Unit tests cover script helpers, fatal and nullable failures, JSON boundaries, caps, cancellation, child ownership, and structured output through real loops. A built-bin smoke runs the separately bundled `lib/worker.cjs` under plain Node, a with-key e2e drives real child agents, and model-facing workflow behavior is snapshot-covered through its owning example.

## Deferred (documented non-goals)

- **Background collection** (start tool → run id → completion notice → collect), designed alongside shell/subagent background unification.
- **Journaling + resume** (`resumeFromRunId`, cached agent() prefixes) — implementing it reintroduces CC's determinism bans as a script-contract tightening (scripts may read the clock today).
- **Saved/bundled workflows** (a `.deepseek/workflows/` registry, slash-command API) and **script persistence to a run directory** (the tool-call event already records the script durably).
- **Nested `workflow()`**, **token `budget`**, and the `effort`/`isolation`/`agentType` agent options (each rejects loud with a message naming it deferred).
- **An overall run wall-clock timeout** — cancellation always frees the caller (result settles within the grace), so a cap on total run time is a policy knob for the background redesign, not a correctness need here.
- **Engine hardening beyond worker threads**: an isolated-vm or separate-process engine behind the same seam (actual sandboxing; memory limits).
- **ACP-backend structured output** and **`toolFilter`** (both still capability-gated `false`).

## Alternatives considered

- **Hostile-value containment in the host** (trap-free proxy rejection, accessor-never-invoked descriptor walks, realm-side pre-rendering of thrown values, realm-built promises/arrays/error clones with structural fatal recognition): rejected because every defense targets an author the trust premise accepts, while the thread's serialization boundary already makes cross-realm values total by construction.
- **In-process `node:vm` execution**: mechanically simplest — no RPC, no thread — but `start()` blocks the caller for the script's initial synchronous slice, a synchronous spin past the first await cannot be killed in-process (the vm `timeout` covers only that first slice), and `dispose()` could only abandon an unsettling script on the host loop. The worker-thread engine keeps the same vm-context script API while unblocking the host and making termination real.
- **Background execution as the default** (CC's shape): deferred; foreground-synchronous matches `dsh-tool-subagent`'s cut, and background semantics should be designed ONCE across shell/subagent/workflow rather than per-tool.
- **Workflow-layer JSON parsing for `agent({schema})`**: duplicating a seam concern at one consumer while the seam's capability flag stayed dishonestly `false`.
- **Meta embedded in the script as `export const meta = {...}`** (CC's exact format): keeps scripts self-contained and CC scripts drop-in, but obtaining meta requires evaluating model-written text on the host. Even an empty timed vm context cannot bound script-controlled getters when the host reads the resulting object. A JSON parameter removes the scanner, evaluation, and host-spin hole; the cost is that a CC script's meta header must move into the parameter (the body stays drop-in).
- **`ValueSchemaSpec` as the `outputSchema` wire type**: the author form now has equivalent vocabulary, but a workflow supplies realm-foreign raw JSON Schema data; pretending that runtime data is a trusted author declaration would skip the raw-schema assertion boundary.
- **A schema-object library (zod, or the repo's schemastery) for the structured-output subset**: the schema is wire data — plain JSON that crosses the vm realm boundary in `agent({schema})` and lands verbatim in the forced tool's parameters — exactly where live schema objects cannot sit; consuming raw JSON Schema at runtime would need a third-party converter on top (zod core only emits JSON Schema, not the reverse), and it would put a second schema language beside schemastery's config role.
- **ajv for value validation**: it validates FULL JSON Schema, so the subset gate — the module's actual point, since every accepted keyword must be one the harness enforces — would remain hand-written regardless; it compiles validators through `new Function`; and it would be dsh-tools' first runtime dependency, all to replace the ~70-line value walker while the path-qualified, every-violation error reporting stays custom either way.
- **Provider JSON mode instead of the capture tool:** it guarantees valid JSON, not schema conformance, and its interaction with tool calling is unclear. The capture tool preserves in-turn validation retries. Provider-side strict tool schemas can later narrow the accepted subset without changing this design.

## Consequences

Fan-out plans now live in rerunnable scripts, and `outputSchema` provides authoritative structured child results. Each run pays worker startup and message-port RPC costs, but host startup stays non-blocking, cancellation can terminate the worker, and serialization enforces the value boundary. Worker threads are not a security boundary. Invalid options fail rather than degrading to Claude Code's `null`; consumers retain control through the run handle while observers receive snapshots only. Top-level Web users also receive a durable, replayable workflow record without widening the execution seam or coupling the original tool card to workflow-specific UI.