Review caught a real divergence the earlier measurements missed: mirroring
an offset is only correct while both layers can reach it, and for a draft
ending in a newline the backdrop could not.
A textarea reserves a line box for the caret after a final newline.
`white-space: pre-wrap` collapses a text node's trailing newline and
generates none. So a draft ending in a newline made the backdrop exactly one
line shorter than the textarea — measured 628 against 652 — and the mirrored
assignment clamped, leaving the glyphs one line behind the caret at the very
bottom of the draft.
The backdrop now carries the same trailing-line sentinel the mirror div has
carried all along: its content is the decoration walk plus one newline. The
same pre-wrap collapse absorbs it when the draft does not end in a newline,
so it costs no height in the ordinary case, and it supplies the missing line
box when it does. Verified in isolation first: a bare pre-wrap div measures
180/180/198 against a textarea's 180/198/216 for zero, one and two trailing
newlines, and 180/198/216 with the sentinel.
Coverage for the shape that exposed it: the browser scenario asserts the two
extents are equal before asserting the glyphs reach the end, observing each
layer's maximum by asking for an impossible offset and reading back the
clamp rather than computing it from scrollHeight, and the golden records the
relation. The unit spec pins the backdrop's text as the draft plus exactly
one newline. Removing the sentinel fails both, the e2e with the same 628
against 652.
The scrollbar-gutter half of the same review point does not reproduce here:
both layers measure clientWidth 776 against a border box of 776 while the
draft overflows, so this engine's textarea scrollbar is an overlay and takes
no width out of the wrap.
The first version coupled the layers from two places: a `scroll` listener
and a layout effect keyed on the committed draft. Mutation-testing each
hook alone against the built client shows the effect never fires the only
assignment that matters — with just the layout effect disabled the browser
scenario stays green, while disabling just the listener fails it.
Both premises behind the effect were wrong. Typing scrolls the caret into
view, which is an ordinary `scroll`. A draft that shrinks past the current
offset clamps both layers to the same maximum, because their extents are
equal — measured in chromium at 964/964, 1012/1012, 844/844 and 820/820 for
plain, soft-wrapped, unbreakable-run and highlighted drafts — and the
textarea's clamp fires `scroll` too.
The hazard the effect was imagined to cover does not exist either: React
replacing every child of the backdrop when the decoration set changes shape
preserves `scrollTop` (measured: 300 stays 300 through a full child
replacement), and the only replacement that zeroes it shrinks the content
below the offset, which is the clamp case already covered.
The e2e's edit case survives, retitled to say what it actually pins: that
typing is not a separate case needing its own mirror. The unit spec now
asserts the backdrop tracks a second move back to the top, which a one-shot
mirror would fail.
A composer draft past the 14-line cap could not be scrolled: the caret and
the selection moved, but the words stayed frozen at line 1, so the tail of
anything longer than the cap was unreachable while writing it.
The composer paints its text in two stacked layers. The textarea owns the
value, the selection and the caret but renders its own glyphs transparent;
every visible character is painted by the decoration backdrop beneath it,
which also carries the claim-token highlight, the chips and the ghost hint.
The backdrop is `inset: 0; overflow: hidden` — clipped, not scrolled — and
nothing linked its offset to the textarea's. Below the cap both layers rest
at 0, which is why the defect hid behind every short-draft screenshot and
fixture.
InputBar now mirrors the textarea's scrollTop onto the backdrop, from a
`scroll` listener (every gesture and every caret-driven scroll) and from a
layout effect keyed on the committed draft (an edit reflows both layers
without necessarily firing a scroll event).
Scrolling is layout, so jsdom cannot show this: the unit spec stubs both
offsets and proves the mirroring paths run, while a new browser scenario
measures the user-visible fact against the built client with a DOM Range
over the backdrop's own text — after a wheel gesture over a 40-line draft
the last line is on screen and the first has scrolled out. Confirmed both
directions: with the mirroring reverted and the packages rebuilt, the
golden reads `last draft line is on screen: false` while `textarea moved:
true`.
- Split DSH_COVERAGE_MAX_WORKERS between the two parallel gates
(instrumented gets ~2/3, exempt gets ~1/3, both at least 1) so the
lane never exceeds the budget the failover pool's 8 x 6-instance
bound assumes; a budget of 1 pairs with DSH_GATE_CONCURRENCY=1 on
the serial reference lanes, which already prevents gate overlap.
- Fail loud on a set-but-not-'1' DSH_COVERAGE_EXEMPT_HEAVY value in
vitest.config.ts instead of silently ignoring it.
- Add coverage-exempt.spec.ts: each roster entry's filter and exclude
must select the same non-empty spec set and entries must not
overlap, so a renamed suite breaks the gate instead of silently
returning to the instrumented run with a stale roster.
Agent Note (both languages, pairing recorded): what is exempted, the
per-entry reconciliation showing no threshold input changes, the
membership contract, and why the per-file 100% thresholds police the
roster automatically.
The coverage lane's wall clock was pinned by a few compiler- and
subprocess-bound suites whose v8 instrumentation tax is a multiple of
their runtime while contributing nothing the per-file thresholds need:
typert generator fixtures (whole-workspace compiler analysis; its src is
threshold-excluded) and three scripts/ child-process fixture suites
(scripts/ sources are never coverage-measured; in-process imports are
covered by their owning package tests).
Split ci-coverage into two parallel gates: the instrumented run sets
DSH_COVERAGE_EXEMPT_HEAVY=1 and vitest.config.ts drops the exempt suites
from both projects (CLI --exclude cannot reach per-project include
resolution); a second uninstrumented gate runs exactly those suites, so
the aggregate still executes every test. Membership contract and the
filter/exclude pairs live in scripts/coverage-exempt.ts.
Local 6-worker A/B: instrumented gate 900s -> 260s wall; exempt gate
262s wall runs beside it, so the lane converges near the slower of the
two (~4.4min vs ~7min single-gate). DSH_GATE_CONCURRENCY now has two
schedulable gates in this lane.
