A source-of-truth link did not make the review obligation explicit, so reviewers could treat green documentation checks as sufficient. Make dsh-prose-standard a blocking requirement for every added or changed prose form and require semantic comparison with the owning code or behavior.
The original PR branch merged the same current master while the inline-feedback work was in progress. Preserve that remote ancestry and combine it with the local review-fix commit instead of overwriting or rewriting either history.
The public kill result used the awkward phrase already-terminal. Rename it to already-finished and keep the model-facing response aligned; not-alive would be inaccurate because a force-failed registry record can still correspond to orphaned producer work.
Task kinds were open strings even though producer namespaces are an extension point. Add the merge-extensible TaskKindMap and derived TaskKind, cover consumer declarations in task and bundle tests, and retain the runtime non-empty check for untyped callers.
With exactOptionalPropertyTypes, owner?: Agent | undefined allowed an explicit undefined value that no caller needs. Tighten the property to owner?: Agent so unowned work is expressed by omitting it.
Record the requested task-service/backend split as a follow-up, using a systemd-backed runtime as a concrete candidate without guessing its durability and ownership contract in this PR. Regenerate the type and Cordis catalogs so public docs match the declarations.
Comparing a feedback-time PR commit directly with the landing merge lets unrelated target-branch changes satisfy a review comment and creates false adoption evidence.
Define feedback-time and final PR-specific patch snapshots, fail closed when the landing shape cannot be reconstructed, and require a target-only negative control before implementation.
A saved complete-file candidate could overwrite newer skill guidance, while a provider-wide outage was indistinguishable from a healthy no-op run. Record the source blob and provenance, reject drift during promotion, and make total adapter failure visible.
Align cadence and feedback acquisition with the evidence contract, and narrow the borrowed-state and negative-control checks so they do not contradict the package and testing standards.
Refresh the background-task branch onto the latest repository baseline before applying review feedback. This preserves merge ancestry, incorporates the current CI and package-structure changes, and ensures the review fixes are validated against the code that will actually receive the PR.
The background-task change repeated its lifecycle design across implemented RFCs, package READMEs, JSDoc, test commentary, and model-visible schemas. That repetition obscured the contracts that maintainers must preserve and added avoidable prompt tokens.
Rewrite the implemented RFCs around the current design, keep authorization, exact-owner cleanup, wait/abort ordering, producer quiescence, and teardown-failure guarantees at their owning surfaces, and remove peer surveys, review history, control-flow narration, and emphatic restatement.
Shorten the task and subagent schema wording, synchronize the bilingual tool cookbook, and regenerate the config, service, RFC, tool, and replay snapshot derivatives. Runtime behavior is unchanged; test edits update prose-only assertions and descriptions.
Entry point for the skill's operator and for any future handoff: what the
private periodic tool produces, where the saved candidate diff and SKILL.md
land on the operator's machine, and how the promote helper turns the
operator's decision into a draft PR from a clean master checkout. Companion
to the maintenance RFC.
A private out-of-repo maintainer tool turns adopted human review feedback
into candidate skill updates. Only the resulting SKILL.md diff enters this
repository through normal PR review; the tool source, adapter binaries,
provider credentials, and scheduler stay on the maintainer's machine to
keep this repository focused on shipped product code. Kept in proposed/
until end-to-end verification against master lands a candidate PR; the
acceptance criteria list the exact observations that unlock promotion.
