|
|
|
|
@@ -103,11 +103,11 @@ pnpm run knip # dead-code / unused-dependency check
|
|
|
|
|
pnpm run publint # package.json publish-correctness check (publishable packages/*)
|
|
|
|
|
pnpm run hygiene # knip + publint + workspace constraints
|
|
|
|
|
pnpm run doc-typecheck # typecheck every ```ts block in README.md, docs/**/*.md,
|
|
|
|
|
# packages/*/README.md (doc/code drift gate)
|
|
|
|
|
# packages/*/*.md (doc/code drift gate)
|
|
|
|
|
pnpm run verify-event-taxonomy # assert the event-taxonomy table in docs/architecture.md
|
|
|
|
|
# matches the interface Events declarations in source
|
|
|
|
|
pnpm run verify-md-wrap # assert no hard-wrapped prose paragraphs in README.md,
|
|
|
|
|
# docs/**/*.md, packages/*/README.md, AGENTS.md (one line per paragraph)
|
|
|
|
|
# docs/**/*.md, packages/*/*.md, AGENTS.md (one line per paragraph)
|
|
|
|
|
pnpm run doc-sync # doc-typecheck + verify-event-taxonomy + verify-md-wrap (CI runs this)
|
|
|
|
|
pnpm run demo:echo # run examples/echo-agent (no API key; type "echo hi" to
|
|
|
|
|
# see a tool call) — the mock skeleton
|
|
|
|
|
@@ -174,11 +174,11 @@ This codebase aims to be **very type-safe and well documented** for maintainabil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the **core** packages (`packages/llm`, `packages/tools`, `packages/agent`, `packages/agent-loop`, `packages/session`, `packages/system-prompt`), **type gymnastics are acceptable when they improve the DX of plugin authors** for common plugin types. The `defineTool` typed schema DSL in `dsh-tools` is the canonical example: the `SchemaSpec` to `InferArgs<S>` type-level mapping gives tool authors zero-cast typed `execute` args, and the cost of the conditional types stays inside the core package.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Verbose documentation is fine **as long as docs and code stay strictly in sync**. Out-of-sync docs are worse than no docs. **When you change code, update its docs in the SAME change** — grep the package README and the module/JSDoc comments for the old behavior (config keys, defaults, error codes, wire field names, event names) and fix every hit. CI runs `pnpm run doc-sync` (`doc-typecheck` + `verify-event-taxonomy` + `verify-md-wrap` + `verify-md-links`), which typechecks every fenced `ts` block in `README.md`, `docs/**/*.md`, and `packages/*/README.md`, verifies the event-taxonomy table against source, asserts no hard-wrapped prose paragraphs, and checks that every relative Markdown cross-link resolves — across those files plus `AGENTS.md` / `packages/AGENTS.md` — but that scope does NOT catch prose drift in `AGENTS.md` / `packages/AGENTS.md` / `packages/README.md` (config keys, defaults, error codes), so keeping those in sync remains on the author. Every module has a module-level doc comment explaining its role. Every exported class, interface, type, function, and non-obvious method has a JSDoc that explains semantics (not just the name) — contracts (what events fire when), disposal behavior, error behavior, and extension intent. Internal helpers get docs only where non-obvious. Prefer one-liners when one line suffices.
|
|
|
|
|
Verbose documentation is fine **as long as docs and code stay strictly in sync**. Out-of-sync docs are worse than no docs. **When you change code, update its docs in the SAME change** — grep the package README and the module/JSDoc comments for the old behavior (config keys, defaults, error codes, wire field names, event names) and fix every hit. CI runs `pnpm run doc-sync` (`doc-typecheck` + `verify-event-taxonomy` + `verify-md-wrap` + `verify-md-links`), which typechecks every fenced `ts` block in `README.md`, `docs/**/*.md`, and `packages/*/*.md`, verifies the event-taxonomy table against source, asserts no hard-wrapped prose paragraphs, and checks that every relative Markdown cross-link resolves — across those files plus `AGENTS.md` / `packages/AGENTS.md` — but that scope does NOT catch prose drift in `AGENTS.md` / `packages/AGENTS.md` / `packages/README.md` (config keys, defaults, error codes), so keeping those in sync remains on the author. Every module has a module-level doc comment explaining its role. Every exported class, interface, type, function, and non-obvious method has a JSDoc that explains semantics (not just the name) — contracts (what events fire when), disposal behavior, error behavior, and extension intent. Internal helpers get docs only where non-obvious. Prefer one-liners when one line suffices.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**Document the CURRENT state — the "what" and "why" — never the PROCESS or HISTORY of how it got there.** A comment, JSDoc, or doc paragraph describes what the code *is* and why it is that way, as if it had always been so. Do NOT narrate the change that produced it: no "previously X, now Y", "changed from", "used to", "this replaces", "the old map", "renamed", "moved here", "as of this PR", or "(was …)". **In particular, NEVER name the change unit a reader cannot see — the PR, commit, or stack position that introduced the code — in a comment, JSDoc, OR a test name/description.** A `// (PR D's per-agent teardown)` aside, a `* Tests for the cancel primitive (PR C).` module doc, or an `it('… identity no longer matters')` title that only makes sense relative to a prior design are all the same violation: the reader of the current tree has no "PR D" or "old design" to anchor against, and the reference rots the moment the stack merges. Name the *mechanism* (`the session's AgentHandle teardown`), not the PR. Such phrasing rots the instant the next change lands, and a reader of the current code does not need the diff narrated in prose — that belongs in the commit message, the PR description, or an RFC (the durable home for "why we moved away from X"). Write "the owner token lives on the task in the executor" — not "ownership *now* lives on the executor instead of a plugin-local map". When a contrast genuinely aids understanding (a non-obvious choice between live alternatives), frame it against the alternative as a standing fact ("stored on the executor, NOT the tool plugin, so it survives an HMR reload"), not against the codebase's past. The same rule governs review-fix commits: the *commit message* records what the review caught; the *code comment* it touches states only the resulting truth. RFCs (`docs/rfc/`, grouped into `proposed/` / `implemented/` / `rejected/`) record the *why* behind choices a future reader would otherwise re-litigate (the vendoring policy, event-sourcing, the schema DSL are the existing examples). A PR that introduces such a decision — a new third-party runtime dependency over the vendoring default, a cross-package contract, a security/isolation model, a deviation from a documented architecture rule — writes the RFC in `implemented/` **in the same PR**, and links it from the relevant code. A proposal for future work not yet built goes in `proposed/`. A PR whose changes are mechanical, self-evident, or already covered by an existing RFC needs none — do not manufacture an RFC for a routine change. When unsure, the test is: would a competent maintainer six months from now ask "why was it done this way?" and be unable to answer from the code alone? If yes, write it. See [docs/rfc/README.md](docs/rfc/README.md) for the naming scheme and [docs/AGENTS.md](docs/AGENTS.md) for the cross-link convention.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**Markdown is not hard-wrapped**: write one line per paragraph and let the editor soft-wrap. Hard line breaks mid-paragraph make docs harder to edit and diff — a one-word change reflows and re-diffs the whole paragraph. This applies to prose only: leave fenced code blocks, tables, and list structure intact (a wrapped list item folds to one line per bullet). Code comments / JSDoc are exempt — they stay under the linter's column limit. `pnpm run verify-md-wrap` (part of `doc-sync`) enforces this across `README.md`, `docs/**/*.md`, `packages/*/README.md`, and `AGENTS.md` / `packages/AGENTS.md`; `pnpm run verify-md-links` (also part of `doc-sync`) checks that every relative cross-link in those files resolves.
|
|
|
|
|
**Markdown is not hard-wrapped**: write one line per paragraph and let the editor soft-wrap. Hard line breaks mid-paragraph make docs harder to edit and diff — a one-word change reflows and re-diffs the whole paragraph. This applies to prose only: leave fenced code blocks, tables, and list structure intact (a wrapped list item folds to one line per bullet). Code comments / JSDoc are exempt — they stay under the linter's column limit. `pnpm run verify-md-wrap` (part of `doc-sync`) enforces this across `README.md`, `docs/**/*.md`, `packages/*/*.md`, and `AGENTS.md` / `packages/AGENTS.md`; `pnpm run verify-md-links` (also part of `doc-sync`) checks that every relative cross-link in those files resolves.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**Editing these instructions**: `AGENTS.md` is the real file; `CLAUDE.md` is a symlink to it (at the repo root and in `packages/`). Always edit `AGENTS.md` — never write through the `CLAUDE.md` symlink or replace it with a regular file.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|