docs(subagent): keep intent note current

The PR appended a superseded warning to one obsolete durability clause while leaving the same active decision record with mutually incompatible claims about Task-backed continuations, provider resume dispatch, and persistence guarantees. Because implemented Agent Notes are current authority rather than a review-history log, readers could still derive an API and ownership model that no longer exists.

Rewrite the affected decision, alternatives, and consequences in place around the activation-based implementation: ordinary starts remain holder-owned one-shot runs; continuable starts return durable child and accepted message identities; the manager owns materialization, follow-up/report routing, cold resume, and teardown; providers only contribute detached first-create data through prepareContinuable; and flush participation is observable but is not proof that a persistence backend stored state.

Keep the English and Chinese records equivalent, move the Chinese dispose glossary to its new first use, and refresh the pairing sidecar. This commit changes documentation authority only; it does not change runtime behavior.

Validated with the scoped translation-pairing writer and checker, verify-md-wrap, verify-agent-note-format, verify-agent-note-classification, and git diff --cached --check.

.agents/notes/implemented/simplification/2026-07-27-intent-named-subagent-continuation-operations.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/simplification/2026-07-27-intent-named-subagent-continuation-operations.md
-2026-07-27-intent-named-subagent-continuation-operations.md: 00340ac53443741e9857cb238ddf95bced504c7f
-2026-07-27-intent-named-subagent-continuation-operations.zh.md: 3184a066de98fb442cb5e2d305191419c27f278c
+2026-07-27-intent-named-subagent-continuation-operations.md: e74d62b7582e92f8e5ce68327a677259c8453d24
+2026-07-27-intent-named-subagent-continuation-operations.zh.md: dae4dd37fa9950f0b8d1ba6ec5c46b99977a7201

.agents/notes/implemented/simplification/2026-07-27-intent-named-subagent-continuation-operations.md

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Status: implemented
 
 English | [中文](2026-07-27-intent-named-subagent-continuation-operations.zh.md)
 
-The `followup` operation this record names is retained by [Continuable subagents](../feature/2026-07-28-continuable-subagent-conversations.md), which replaces its Task-backed return value with the accepted `MessageId`, retains its bare `Agent` parameter as exact live-direct-parent authority, and replaces provider `resume` dispatch with `prepareContinuable`.
+The current activation-based realization is owned by [Continuable subagents](../feature/2026-07-28-continuable-subagent-conversations.md). It retains the `followup` operation this record names, returns the accepted `MessageId`, uses the bare `Agent` parameter as exact live-direct-parent authority, and limits provider participation in continuable children to `prepareContinuable`.
 
 ## Problem
 
@@ -14,25 +14,25 @@ The durability boundary also exposed both `SessionStore.flush()` and `flushRequi
 
 ## Decision
 
-`SubagentService` exposes three execution intents: `start(name, request)` for an ordinary holder-owned run, `startContinuable(spec)` for a durable Task-backed child, and `followup(parent, childId, content, { source, signal })` for later content. The last verb matches `Agent.followup()`, while `SubagentRun.steer()` remains the narrower confirmed live-activation capability. The model-facing tool keeps its stable `send_message` name and delegates routing to `followup()`.
+`SubagentService` separates four execution intents: `start(name, request)` returns an ordinary holder-owned one-shot run; `startContinuable(spec)` establishes a durable child and returns its id plus the accepted initial `MessageId`; `followup(parent, childId, content, { source, signal })` sends later parent content; and `reportFrom(child, content, { delivery, signal })` sends selected child content to its direct parent. `followup` matches `Agent.followup()`, while `SubagentRun.steer()` remains the narrower confirmed live-run capability. The model-facing tools keep their stable `send_message` and `report` names and delegate routing to the corresponding intent methods.
 
-Caller and provider requests are distinct. `SubagentStartRequest` contains only caller-supplied start data; `SubagentProviderStartRequest` adds service-resolved continuation state. Ordinary `start()` clears that state before provider dispatch. `SubagentProviderResumeRequest` remains part of the provider seam, but `SubagentService.resume()` is absent: the continuation manager loads the descriptor, authorizes the parent, and invokes private provider start/resume closures owned by the service. Provider dispatch still receives the same capability checks and run lifecycle observation without becoming a caller operation.
+Caller and provider requests are distinct. `SubagentStartRequest` contains caller-supplied one-shot data; `ResolvedSubagentStartRequest` adds the service-resolved descriptor before `SubagentProvider.start()`. For continuable creation, the manager passes a `ContinuableCreateRequest` to optional `SubagentProvider.prepareContinuable()` and receives detached creation data only. `SubagentService.resume()` and provider resume dispatch are absent: the continuation manager loads the descriptor, authorizes the parent, and owns Agent materialization, prompt delivery, cold resume, and teardown.
 
-`SessionStore.flush(session)` returns `Promise<boolean>`. It resolves `true` after at least one scoped durability listener participates successfully, resolves `false` for an empty listener snapshot, and rejects with the first registered listener failure after all listeners settle. Ordinary checkpoints may ignore the boolean. A continuable provider requires `true` at its final result boundary and maps `false` or rejection to `DURABILITY_FAILED`. **Superseded** by the activation-based record [2026-07-28-continuable-subagent-conversations](../feature/2026-07-28-continuable-subagent-conversations.md): the continuation manager awaits the final `flush()` as a best-effort barrier and deliberately ignores the boolean, because listener participation cannot identify a persistence backend; a rejection is logged without changing the lifecycle result or host-drain outcome.
+`SessionStore.flush(session)` is the single durability barrier and returns `Promise<boolean>`. It resolves `true` after at least one scoped listener participates successfully, resolves `false` for an empty listener snapshot, and rejects with the first registered listener failure after all listeners settle. Participation cannot identify whether a selected persistence backend stored the state. Ordinary checkpoints may ignore the boolean; the continuation manager also treats its final flush as a best-effort barrier, deliberately ignores participation, logs rejection, and still disposes the child and releases ownership.
 
 ## Alternatives considered
 
-**Keep public provider resume dispatch.** No production caller outside the continuation manager owns the descriptor lookup, direct-parent authorization, Task cancellation, and activation association needed to call it safely. A public method would expose resolved implementation data without a valid independent intent.
+**Keep public provider resume dispatch.** No production caller outside the continuation manager owns descriptor lookup, direct-parent authorization, Agent materialization, Activation ownership, and child-first teardown. A public method would expose resolved implementation data without a valid independent intent; providers instead contribute detached first-creation data through `prepareContinuable` and never participate in cold resume.
 
 **Keep `sendMessage` on the service.** The model tool sends a message, but the service operation represents a follow-up that may steer or cold-resume. `followup` aligns with the structural `Agent` interface and does not promise a particular route.
 
 **Keep `flushRequired()`.** A second method hides only an empty-listener check. Returning participation from the existing barrier keeps dispatch in one implementation and lets each caller state whether absence is acceptable.
 
-**Fold ordinary and continuable starts together.** A flag would make one method return either an awaited holder-owned run or immediate child/Task identities. Separate intent methods preserve the ownership and timing distinction without a return union.
+**Fold ordinary and continuable starts together.** A flag would make one method return either an awaited holder-owned one-shot run or immediate durable child and message identities. Separate intent methods preserve the ownership and timing distinction without a return union.
 
 ## Consequences
 
-- The Cordis service catalog contains only caller operations; provider reconstruction remains extensible through `SubagentProvider.resume?()` without exposing its resolved request as a service method.
+- The Cordis service catalog contains only caller operations; a provider can opt into continuable first creation through `SubagentProvider.prepareContinuable?()` without receiving Agent lifecycle authority or a public resume operation.
 - Follow-up source and cancellation travel in one options object, matching the intent-helper shape on `Agent` while retaining the existing live-delivery and cold-resume semantics.
-- Session durability has one barrier operation. Callers that require a backend must inspect its participation result rather than selecting a second dispatch method.
-- The `send_message` schema, route results, Task ownership, durable event vocabulary, and model-visible transcript remain unchanged.
+- Session durability has one barrier operation. Its participation result remains observable, but no continuable-child path treats arbitrary listener participation as proof that a persistence backend stored the state.
+- The `send_message` and `report` schemas, accepted message identities, `AgentHandle` ownership, durable event vocabulary, and model-visible transcript follow the activation-based realization linked above.

.agents/notes/implemented/simplification/2026-07-27-intent-named-subagent-continuation-operations.zh.md

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Status: implemented
 
 [English](2026-07-27-intent-named-subagent-continuation-operations.md) | 中文
 
-本记录命名的 `followup` 操作由[可继续的 subagent](../feature/2026-07-28-continuable-subagent-conversations.md)保留，但后者以已接受的 `MessageId` 替换其基于 Task 的返回值，保留裸 `Agent` 参数作为准确的实时直属父级权限，并以 `prepareContinuable` 替换提供方 `resume` 派发。
+当前基于 Activation 的实现由[可继续的 subagent](../feature/2026-07-28-continuable-subagent-conversations.md)负责。它保留本记录命名的 `followup` 操作，返回已接受的 `MessageId`，使用裸 `Agent` 参数作为确切的在线直属父级权限，并将提供方对可继续 child 的参与限制为 `prepareContinuable`。
 
 ## 问题
 
@@ -14,25 +14,25 @@ Status: implemented
 
 ## 决策
 
-`SubagentService` 公开三种执行意图：`start(name, request)` 用于普通的、由持有方负责的 run；`startContinuable(spec)` 用于具备持久性且由 Task 支撑的 child；`followup(parent, childId, content, { source, signal })` 用于投递后续内容。最后一个动词与 `Agent.followup()` 一致，而 `SubagentRun.steer()` 仍是范围更窄的能力，仅向已确认仍在运行的激活提供 steering（中途引导）。面向模型的工具保留稳定的 `send_message` 名称，并将路由委托给 `followup()`。
+`SubagentService` 分离四种执行意图：`start(name, request)` 返回普通的、由持有方负责的 one-shot run；`startContinuable(spec)` 建立持久化 child，并返回其 id 与已接受的初始 `MessageId`；`followup(parent, childId, content, { source, signal })` 发送后续 parent 内容；`reportFrom(child, content, { delivery, signal })` 将选定的 child 内容发送给其直接 parent。`followup` 与 `Agent.followup()` 一致，而 `SubagentRun.steer()` 仍是范围更窄的能力，仅向已确认仍在运行的 run 提供 steering。面向模型的工具保留稳定的 `send_message` 与 `report` 名称，并将路由委托给对应的意图方法。
 
-调用方请求与提供方请求相互分离。`SubagentStartRequest` 只包含调用方提供的启动数据；`SubagentProviderStartRequest` 则加入由服务解析的继续执行状态。普通 `start()` 在分发给提供方之前会清除该状态。`SubagentProviderResumeRequest` 仍属于提供方 seam，但 `SubagentService.resume()` 不对外公开：继续执行管理器加载描述符、对 parent 进行鉴权，并调用由服务持有的私有提供方启动与恢复闭包。提供方分发仍会经过相同的功能检查和 run 生命周期观测，而无需将其变成调用方操作。
+调用方请求与提供方请求相互分离。`SubagentStartRequest` 包含调用方提供的 one-shot 数据；`ResolvedSubagentStartRequest` 会在调用 `SubagentProvider.start()` 前加入由服务解析的描述符。创建可继续 child 时，管理器将 `ContinuableCreateRequest` 传给可选的 `SubagentProvider.prepareContinuable()`，且只接收分离的创建数据。`SubagentService.resume()` 与提供方恢复分发均不存在：继续执行管理器加载描述符、对 parent 进行鉴权，并负责 Agent 实体化、提示词投递、冷恢复与 teardown。
 
-`SessionStore.flush(session)` 返回 `Promise<boolean>`。至少一个作用域内的持久性监听器成功参与后，它解析为 `true`；监听器快照为空时解析为 `false`；所有监听器结算后，如有失败，则以注册顺序最靠前的监听器错误拒绝。普通检查点可以忽略该布尔值。可继续提供方在最终结果边界要求该值为 `true`，并将 `false` 或拒绝映射为 `DURABILITY_FAILED`。**已被取代**：激活化记录 [2026-07-28-continuable-subagent-conversations](../feature/2026-07-28-continuable-subagent-conversations.md) 规定延续管理器把最终 `flush()` 作为 best-effort 屏障并有意忽略布尔值——监听器参与度无法识别持久化后端；拒绝只记日志，不改变生命周期结果或宿主 drain 结果。
+`SessionStore.flush(session)` 是唯一的持久性屏障，并返回 `Promise<boolean>`。至少一个作用域内监听器成功参与后，它解析为 `true`；监听器快照为空时解析为 `false`；所有监听器结算后，如有失败，则以注册顺序最靠前的监听器错误拒绝。参与结果无法表明所选的持久化后端是否已经存储状态。普通检查点可以忽略该布尔值；继续执行管理器同样将最终 flush 视为 best-effort 屏障，有意忽略参与结果，记录拒绝日志，并仍会对 child 执行 dispose（资源释放）并释放所有权。
 
 ## 已考虑的替代方案
 
-**保留公开的提供方恢复分发。** 继续执行管理器之外没有任何生产调用方负责安全调用所需的描述符查找、直接 parent 鉴权、Task 取消与激活关联。公开方法会暴露已解析的实现数据，但并不存在与之对应的合理独立调用意图。
+**保留公开的提供方恢复分发。** 继续执行管理器之外，没有任何生产调用方同时负责安全调用所需的描述符查找、直接 parent 鉴权、Agent 实体化、Activation 所有权与 child-first teardown。公开方法会暴露已解析的实现数据，却没有合理的独立调用意图；提供方改为通过 `prepareContinuable` 贡献分离的首次创建数据，且从不参与冷恢复。
 
 **在服务上保留 `sendMessage`。** 面向模型的工具发送消息，但服务操作表达的是后续操作，既可能对运行中的激活执行 steering，也可能从持久化存储恢复。`followup` 与结构化 `Agent` 接口保持一致，也不承诺特定路由。
 
 **保留 `flushRequired()`。** 第二个方法只封装了空监听器检查。由现有屏障返回是否有监听器参与，可以让分发只保留一套实现，并让每个调用方自行判定缺少监听器是否可接受。
 
-**合并普通启动与可继续启动。** 一个标志会让同一方法要么等待由持有方负责的 run 就绪后返回，要么立即返回 child 和 Task 标识。按意图拆分的方法无需返回值联合类型即可保留所有权与时序差异。
+**合并普通启动与可继续启动。** 一个标志会让同一方法要么等待由持有方负责的 one-shot run 就绪后返回，要么立即返回持久化 child 与消息标识。按意图拆分的方法无需返回值联合类型即可保留所有权与时序差异。
 
 ## 影响
 
-- Cordis 服务目录只包含调用方操作；提供方的重建能力仍可通过 `SubagentProvider.resume?()` 扩展，同时不会将已解析的请求暴露为服务方法。
+- Cordis 服务目录只包含调用方操作；提供方可以通过 `SubagentProvider.prepareContinuable?()` 选择参与可继续 child 的首次创建，但不会获得 Agent 生命周期权限或公开恢复操作。
 - 后续操作的来源与取消信号通过同一个选项对象传递，与 `Agent` 上按意图命名的辅助方法形态一致，同时保留在线投递与从持久化存储恢复的语义。
-- 会话持久性只保留一个屏障操作。需要后端参与的调用方必须检查参与结果，而不是选择第二种分发方法。
-- `send_message` schema、路由结果、Task 所有权、持久化事件词汇与模型可见的 transcript（文本记录）保持不变。
+- 会话持久性只有一个屏障操作。参与结果仍可观测，但任何可继续 child 路径都不会将任意监听器参与视为持久化后端已存储状态的证明。
+- `send_message` 与 `report` schema、已接受的消息标识、`AgentHandle` 所有权、持久化事件词汇与模型可见的 transcript（文本记录）遵循上文链接的基于 Activation 的实现。