Merge branch 'master' into code-mode-ui/host-foundation

This commit is contained in:
Tianyi Cui
2026-07-26 20:07:43 +08:00
committed by GitHub
964 changed files with 23815 additions and 4506 deletions

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
README.md: 4db9f16956b9c569cf5f9b53f04cb650f6058668
README.zh.md: 60ec5421e7f271460daebc966aa6548f6ef8a511
README.md: d2f6d216b151673d818337c67a78dbe908786c8b
README.zh.md: 4c7f785ba7478f35cade742409d87746ddcdf8ec

View File

@@ -37,7 +37,11 @@ The `architecture` / `process` line: **architecture** is about the source we shi
Every non-trivial change MUST add or update at least one Agent Note in the same PR. A change is non-trivial when it alters behavior, architecture, a cross-file or cross-package contract, process or tooling, testing strategy, an on-disk, wire, or configuration format, or another decision a maintainer may reasonably revisit. A proposal for substantial future work starts in `proposed/`; a decision already made starts in `implemented/`. Pick the class folder that matches the decision (see [Classification](#classification)).
Updating the Agent Note that already owns the decision satisfies the rule; do not create a duplicate. Only a purely mechanical or local edit with no behavioral, contractual, structural, process, or rationale change is exempt. An Agent Note is never edited into a *different decision*: supersede it with a new one and cross-link. Editing an `implemented/` Agent Note to track where its existing decision lives is required, not forbidden; see [implemented/AGENTS.md](implemented/AGENTS.md).
Updating the Agent Note that already owns the decision satisfies the rule; do not create a duplicate. Only a purely mechanical or local edit with no behavioral, contractual, structural, process, or rationale change is exempt. An Agent Note is never edited into a *different decision*: supersede it with a new one, and keep both notes cross-linked unless the old note is later fully consolidated under the rule below. Editing an `implemented/` Agent Note to track where its existing decision lives is required, not forbidden; see [implemented/AGENTS.md](implemented/AGENTS.md).
An implemented Agent Note that is fully superseded may be consolidated into the current owning note and deleted. Before deletion, the owner must preserve every unique rationale, alternative, consequence, verification contract, and named coverage gap; repair every inbound link; and delete the Chinese counterpart and consistency record in the same change. Partial supersession does not qualify: keep both notes cross-linked and update every fact that remains current. Consolidation must not rewrite the old file into its opposite or rely on git history as the only copy of rationale.
A feature-addition note may be consolidated into the later removal note only when the feature is absent from production code, configuration, schemas, durable or wire formats, migration, and compatibility behavior; no current documentation presents it as available; and no test exercises it as supported behavior. Removal rationale and tests that verify absence may remain. The removal owner preserves the original motivation, why it no longer justified the feature, alternatives to full removal, the capability given up, conditions for reintroduction, and verification of complete absence. Obsolete implementation inventories and tests that only verified the deleted behavior are not current verification contracts. Removing one transport, default, implementation, or presentation is partial supersession, as is any surviving durable data or compatibility handling.
## The file format

View File

@@ -39,7 +39,11 @@
每个非平凡变更都必须在同一 PRPull Request中新增或更新至少一份 Agent Note。如果变更修改了行为、架构、跨文件或跨包契约、流程或工具、测试策略、磁盘、协议或配置格式或者其他维护者可能合理重新审视的决策就属于非平凡变更。对未来重大工作的提案从 `proposed/` 开始;已经做出的决策从 `implemented/` 开始。选择与决策匹配的类别文件夹(见[分类](#classification))。
更新已经拥有该决策的 Agent Note 即可满足规则不要创建重复记录。只有不涉及行为、契约、结构、流程或理由变化的纯机械性或局部编辑才可豁免。Agent Note 永远不会被编辑为一个*不同的决策*:用新 Agent Note 取代旧的,并互相链接。编辑 `implemented/` Agent Note 以跟踪其现有决策的所在位置是必需的,而非禁止的;见 [implemented/AGENTS.md](implemented/AGENTS.md)。
更新已经拥有该决策的 Agent Note 即可满足规则不要创建重复记录。只有不涉及行为、契约、结构、流程或理由变化的纯机械性或局部编辑才可豁免。Agent Note 永远不会被编辑为一个*不同的决策*:用新 Agent Note 取代旧记录,并让两个记录保持互相链接,除非后续依据下方规则完全合并旧记录。编辑 `implemented/` Agent Note 以跟踪其现有决策的所在位置是必需的,而非禁止的;见 [implemented/AGENTS.md](implemented/AGENTS.md)。
被完全取代的 implemented Agent Note 可以合并到当前持有该决策的记录中,并删除原文件。删除前,当前记录必须保存所有独有的决策依据、备选方案、影响、验证契约和明确指出的覆盖缺口;修复所有入站链接;并在同一变更中删除中文对侧文件和一致性记录。仅部分被取代的记录不符合此条件:保留两个记录并让它们互相链接,同时更新所有仍然适用的事实。合并不得将旧文件改写成与其相反的决策,也不得让 git 历史成为决策依据的唯一副本。
只有当一项功能已从生产代码、配置、schema、持久化格式或协议格式、迁移和兼容行为中完全消失当前文档不再将其描述为可用且没有测试把它作为受支持行为来执行时新增该功能的 Agent Note 才可合并进后续的移除记录。移除决策的依据和验证该功能已不存在的测试可以保留。移除决策的持有记录必须保留最初动机、为什么该动机已不足以证明保留该功能的合理性、完全移除之外的备选方案、放弃的能力、重新引入的条件,以及证明已彻底移除的验证。过时的实现清单和只验证已删除行为的测试不属于当前验证契约。仅移除一种传输、默认值、实现或展示属于部分取代;仍有任何持久数据或兼容处理也同样如此。
<a id="the-file-format"></a>

View File

@@ -8,4 +8,4 @@ Keep paths, symbols, defaults, and mechanisms current in the same change that al
### This is not a license to rewrite the *decision*
Update factual realization in place. A reversal of the decision or its rationale requires a new Agent Note and cross-link; see the [Agent Note contract](../README.md).
Update factual realization in place. A reversal of the decision or its rationale requires a new Agent Note and cross-link; a fully superseded old note may be deleted only through the consolidation rule in the [Agent Note contract](../README.md).

View File

@@ -1,23 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: Custom typed tool-schema DSL instead of schemastery
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-06-11-custom-schema-dsl.zh.md)
## Problem
Tool parameters must reach the model as standard JSON Schema while giving tool authors typed `execute(args)` without casts. Schemastery already serves plugin config, but the tool-author API needs per-property `required: true` booleans rather than JSON Schema's separate `required` array.
## Decision
This decision is superseded by the [unified JSON-value schema DSL](2026-07-20-unified-json-value-schema-dsl.md), which retains the small authoring surface while making parameters and typed values share one vocabulary. `ParameterSchemaSpec` keeps per-property `required: true`; `InferArgs<S>` maps required keys to non-optional properties; `parameterSchemaSpecToJsonSchema()` compiles the implicit open object root; and `defineTool()` ties inference, compilation, and validation together. Raw JSON-Schema `ToolDefinition`s remain accepted by `ToolRegistry.register()` for MCP and other external tools.
## Alternatives considered
**Schemastery** (already vendored, used for plugin Config) was evaluated and rejected for this use: it targets validation / transformation against StandardSchema, not JSON Schema *generation*, so it would add indirection without producing the wire format cleanly.
## Consequences
- First-party tool authors get zero-cast typed args; the type gymnastics cost stays inside the core package (sanctioned by the AGENTS.md type-safety policy).
- The owning unified note defines the current nodes, literal constraints, unions, JSON-value boundary, and object-openness rules.
- The `InferArgs` mapping is regression-tested at the type level after an early optionality bug.

View File

@@ -1,23 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: 使用自定义类型化工具 schema DSL 替代 schemastery
Status: implemented
[English](2026-06-11-custom-schema-dsl.md) | 中文
## 问题
工具参数必须以标准 JSON Schema 形式到达模型,同时让工具作者在 `execute(args)` 中获得类型化的参数而无需类型断言。Schemastery 已用于插件配置,但工具作者 API 需要逐属性的 `required: true` 布尔值,而非 JSON Schema 的独立 `required` 数组。
## 决策
该决策已由[统一 JSON 值 schema DSL](2026-07-20-unified-json-value-schema-dsl.md)取代;新设计保留小型编写接口,同时让参数与类型化值共享一套词汇。`ParameterSchemaSpec` 保留逐属性的 `required: true``InferArgs<S>` 将必需键映射为非可选属性;`parameterSchemaSpecToJsonSchema()` 编译隐式开放的对象根;`defineTool()` 则将类型推导、编译与校验串联起来。原始 JSON Schema 的 `ToolDefinition` 仍是 `ToolRegistry.register()` 接受的输入,供 MCP 和其他外部工具使用。
## 曾考虑的替代方案
**Schemastery**(已作为 vendor 引入,用于插件 Config经评估后被否决它面向的是基于 StandardSchema 的校验/转换,而非 JSON Schema *生成*因此会增加间接层却无法干净地产出协议格式wire format
## 后果
- 第一方工具作者获得零类型断言的类型化参数;类型体操的成本留在核心包内部(符合 AGENTS.md 的类型安全策略)。
- 当前节点、字面量约束、联合类型、JSON 值边界与对象开放性规则均由上述统一说明定义。
- `InferArgs` 映射在类型层面有回归测试,源于早期一个可选性 bug。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-06-20-package-hierarchy.md: 7cd07ff90225872f2a17b9a678e52fcee416b09a
2026-06-20-package-hierarchy.zh.md: 9ef89bd56144b39bb3240a22a2bb1e9216e24115
2026-06-20-package-hierarchy.md: 4e05e3487483ab8d710959c1888ec1f5c3b37432
2026-06-20-package-hierarchy.zh.md: f57704ad082c4961aa48056af1b4b279d2f2c055

View File

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-06-20-package-hierarchy.zh.md)
The later [fold-stdio-helper](../simplification/2026-07-04-fold-stdio-ui-helper.md) decision superseded the original `support/ui-stdio` placement, and the [redundant-agent removal](../simplification/2026-07-20-remove-stdio-and-echo-agents.md) subsequently removed that surface entirely. The [automation-only ACP decision](../simplification/2026-07-23-acp-automation-only-protocol.md) places ACP under `packages/acp/acp` instead of the human-UI group. The uniform depth-two hierarchy remains the decision owned here.
The [redundant-agent removal](../simplification/2026-07-20-remove-stdio-and-echo-agents.md) deletes the original `support/ui-stdio` surface instead of relocating it, and the [automation-only ACP decision](../simplification/2026-07-23-acp-automation-only-protocol.md) places ACP under `packages/acp/acp` instead of the human-UI group. The uniform depth-two hierarchy remains the decision owned here.
## Problem

View File

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Status: implemented
[English](2026-06-20-package-hierarchy.md) | 中文
后续的[折叠 stdio helper](../simplification/2026-07-04-fold-stdio-ui-helper.md)决策取代了最初的 `support/ui-stdio` 放置方式,[冗余 agent 移除](../simplification/2026-07-20-remove-stdio-and-echo-agents.md)随后又彻底移除了该接口。[仅面向自动化的 ACP 决策](../simplification/2026-07-23-acp-automation-only-protocol.md)把 ACP 放在 `packages/acp/acp` 下,而不是面向人类的 UI 组。这里拥有的决策仍是统一的二层目录深度。
[冗余 agent 移除](../simplification/2026-07-20-remove-stdio-and-echo-agents.md)直接删除最初的 `support/ui-stdio` 接口,而不是将其迁移;[仅面向自动化的 ACP 决策](../simplification/2026-07-23-acp-automation-only-protocol.md)把 ACP 放在 `packages/acp/acp` 下,而不是面向人类的 UI 组。这里拥有的决策仍是统一的二层目录深度。
## 问题

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-06-21-bounded-llm-request-recovery.md: 22a56dc6d69340ca1b5f7b77edb4731066c9b2f5
2026-06-21-bounded-llm-request-recovery.zh.md: 09ebce376a206591ac766067cc41497b74ed1545

View File

@@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-06-21-bounded-llm-request-recovery.zh.md)
## Problem
`dsh-llm` can report provider failures either by throwing during adapter dispatch or iteration or by ending with `finish { kind: 'error' | 'aborted' }`. The final adapter boundary tags thrown failures so `dsh-agent-loop` can distinguish them from middleware and result-processing defects, and the loop normalizes both delivery forms into `agent/request-error` after closing the failed step. The default decision is `fail`; `dsh-compact-basic` is the only shipped recovery listener, and it retries a canonical context-window overflow only after compaction proves that the durable surface shrank.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,148 @@
# Agent Note: LLM大语言模型暂时性请求失败的有界恢复
Status: implemented
[English](2026-06-21-bounded-llm-request-recovery.md) | 中文
## 问题
`dsh-llm` 可能在适配器分发或迭代时抛出异常,也可能以 `finish { kind: 'error' | 'aborted' }` 结束,以这两种形式报告提供方失败。最终适配器边界会标记抛出的失败,使 `dsh-agent-loop` 能将其与中间件和结果处理缺陷区分开。循环关闭失败步骤后,会把两种交付形式统一规范化为 `agent/request-error`。默认决策为 `fail``dsh-compact-basic` 是唯一已交付的恢复监听器它仅在压缩compaction证明持久表层已缩减后才会对规范化的上下文窗口溢出进行重试。
该边界已能安全地再次发起请求。原始 `assistant/chunk` 事件携带失败的 `turn``step`;除非某条成功的 `assistant/message` 引用这些事件,否则消息派生会忽略它们。只有终止性 finish 成功且组装完成后系统才会分发工具调用重试则会从持久日志开启新的编号步骤。因此harness 无需引入第二套响应生命周期或暂定输出协议,即可分隔两次尝试。
此前的边界还留有三个较窄的缺口。
- 提供方失败只保留消息,通常还会保留一个 code。HTTP 状态、重试延迟和提供方请求 id 会被丢弃,或者只能通过提供方专用错误对象恢复,因此通用恢复机制如果不解析文本,便无法作出决策或解释决策。
- 重试的归属因适配器而异。手写 DeepSeek 适配器只尝试一次pi-ai profile 则可以启用库内部的不透明重试。如果把隐藏的传输重试与 `agent/request-error` 监听器结合,尝试次数会成倍增加,中间失败也不会记入会话日志。
- 恢复后的失败没有持久状态事实。失败的步骤和分片仍可重建,但观察者无法得知 agent智能体是否在有意退避、将等待多久以及等待原因。长时间的静默等待看起来与循环停滞无异。
本决策的目标是从同一个显式提供方/模型请求的暂时性失败中进行有界恢复。提供方或模型故障转移、响应拼接和语义输出修复都属于其他问题,目前没有消费方。
## 决策
### 保留失败事实,不嵌入策略
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-llm` 导出唯一的可 JSON 序列化 `LlmFailure` 载荷:
```ts ignore-check
type ProviderRequestId = Branded<'ProviderRequestId'>
interface LlmFailure {
message: string
code: string
status?: number
providerRetryAfterMs?: number
requestId?: ProviderRequestId
}
```
`code` 仍是 `HarnessError` 建立的提供方无关机器路由分类体系;新字段是在提供方边界观测到的事实。`ProviderRequestId` 由 `dsh-llm` 拥有并构造,序列化后为提供方发放的字符串。该载荷有意不包含 `retryable`、`failover`、`partialOutput`、提供方、模型、阶段或路由 id 字段。是否可重试属于策略,提供方/模型已位于持久请求头中,部分输出则从失败步骤的 `assistant/chunk` 事件派生。
`LlmError` 携带 `failure: LlmFailure`,并保持 `failure.code === error.code`。`FinishReasonMap.error` 和 `FinishReasonMap.aborted` 携带同一载荷,而不是并行的失败形状。适配器抛出的 `Error` 保留其精确的对象标识:最终适配器 scope 在调用局部的伴随状态中把规范化事实与该对象关联,然后原样重新抛出;非 `Error` 抛出值则依旧被包装。`llmFailureOf(stream, error)` 会在现有来源检查旁取回这些事实,而没有错误对象的带内 finish 则会成为新的 `LlmError`。这既保留了按错误类型或标识分流的监听器,又使所有最终适配器失败(包括未知 SDK 异常)都获得 `UNKNOWN` 终止载荷。
agent loop智能体循环会保留 `RequestError` 作为该精确的错误对象,并将 `LlmFailure` 作为独立参数传给 `agent/request-error`;它不会改动可能已冻结的第三方错误。在转换带内 finish 以及记录未恢复的 `turn/end.reason` 时,循环也会使用该载荷。
适配器会先提取结构化事实,再回退到消息检查。它们会验证 HTTP 状态,将 `Retry-After` 的秒数或日期解析为正的有限毫秒延迟,在提供方公开请求 id 时将其品牌化,并区分自身超时与调用方中止。提供方专用 code 和消息可以细化映射,但恢复监听器不会解析它们。
共享的暂时性 code 集有意保持很小:适配器针对 `RATE_LIMIT` 和 `SERVER` 的映射,远程失败使用的显式 `TIMEOUT` 和 `TRANSPORT` code以及提供方响应已完成却没有内容块时使用的 `EMPTY_RESPONSE`。两个适配器都会把最后一种情况归类为错误 finish详见[空模型响应可重试](../bug-fix/2026-07-24-empty-model-response-is-retryable.md)。身份验证、配额、无效请求、上下文溢出、协议、中止和未知失败都保留不同的稳定 code且默认不属于暂时性失败。新增 code 需要适配器 fixture测试前置数据和已记录的策略决策无需扩展第二个失败类枚举。
### 将重试策略放在现有失败步骤 seam 上
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-llm-retry` 是监听 `agent/request-error` 的函数插件。它不引入服务或新的循环分支agent-loop 包仅会更改通过现有失败步骤恢复控制流携带的数据。
`agent/request-error` seam 携带当前 `LlmFailure`,以及在这段连续恢复序列中导致再次请求的不可变先前失败列表。`dsh-llm-retry` 只计数 code 位于已配置暂时性集合中的先前失败,`dsh-compact-basic` 则只计数先前的上下文溢出失败。模型请求成功后会清空历史。因此,暂时性失败与上下文溢出交替出现时,两种策略会独立消耗各自预算;最大请求数等于 1 加上已加载恢复策略的有限预算总和。
该插件在加载时解析并验证以下部署配置:
```ts ignore-check
interface Config {
maxTransientRetries?: number
initialDelayMs?: number
maxDelayMs?: number
jitterRatio?: number
retryableCodes?: string[]
}
```
默认值为两次暂时性重试、500 毫秒初始延迟、10 秒延迟上限、10% 抖动,以及上述五个暂时性 code`RATE_LIMIT`、`SERVER`、`TIMEOUT`、`TRANSPORT` 和 `EMPTY_RESPONSE`)。计数与延迟边界参考了所调查实现中较保守的一端:[OpenCode 使用两次请求重试,延迟边界为 500 毫秒10 秒](https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/blob/9976269ab1accfc9f9dc98a4a688c516934de422/%70ackages/llm/src/route/executor.ts#L36-L39)[Pi 将三次 agent 级重试与提供方重试分开,且提供方重试默认为零](https://github.com/earendil-works/pi/blob/3da591ab74ab9ab407e72ed882600b2c851fae21/%70ackages/coding-agent/docs/settings.md#L139-L147)[Codex 使用有限请求/流预算以及五分钟空闲超时](https://github.com/openai/codex/blob/0fb559f0f6e231a88ac02ea002d3ecd248e2b515/codex-rs/model-provider-info/src/lib.rs#L25-L33)。10% 抖动参考 [Codex 的有界抖动](https://github.com/openai/codex/blob/0fb559f0f6e231a88ac02ea002d3ecd248e2b515/codex-rs/codex-client/src/retry.rs#L40-L47)。在没有其他恢复策略时,两次重试表示最多发起三次提供方请求。`maxTransientRetries` 是非负整数,延迟是正的有限数且满足 `initialDelayMs <= maxDelayMs``jitterRatio` 位于 `[0, 1]`code 非空且不重复。这些都是 Cordis 配置字段,而不是隐藏常量,使部署能够选择不同的成本与延迟预算。
对于预算未耗尽的合格失败,从 1 开始的暂时性重试计数使用有界指数退避。有效的 `providerRetryAfterMs` 只有在不超过 `maxDelayMs` 时才会取代指数退避;提供方延迟更长时,系统会委托给下一监听器,而不会违反提供方指令提前重试。本地退避乘以 `[1 - jitterRatio, 1 + jitterRatio]` 内的注入随机因子,并将最终值限制到 `maxDelayMs`;提供方延迟不加抖动。
插件拥有一个全生命期 `AbortController`,并跟踪每个活跃的退避回调。每次等待都会融合 waterfall瀑布式事件的轮次信号与该生命期信号。effect 清理会先注销监听器,再中止并等待活跃回调;被捕获回调的生命期信号中止时,回调会返回 `fail`,既不能重试,也不能在插件释放后进入其捕获 waterfall 的剩余部分。尽管 Cordis 已捕获该监听器,此设计仍能使 HMR热模块替换释放达到完全停稳。
休眠前,`dsh-llm-retry` 会追加一条不进入表层的 `llm/retry` 会话事件,其中包含轮次、失败步骤、从 1 开始的暂时性重试编号、已配置上限、计划延迟和 `LlmFailure`。该插件拥有 `SessionEventMap` 声明合并;`dsh-session` 继续负责通用持久化,不会吸收可选策略的词汇。事件记录已安排的内容,而不是下一个请求已完成;延迟期间取消随后会在 `turn/end` 中可见。因为该事件的目的是表示运行状态,而不是收集跟踪数据,所以它仅与生产渲染器及回放/快照覆盖一起交付。
对非暂时性 code、耗尽的策略预算或超出上限的提供方延迟监听器会调用 `next()`。这保留了与上下文溢出恢复及后续策略插件的组合能力。只有在两个信号下完成延迟后,它才会返回 `{ action: 'retry' }`;轮次取消和插件释放会返回 `fail`,此后仍以循环的取消/释放检查为准。
agent-spine 演示组合包加载该插件,因此共享的 stdio/TUI、一次性 CLI命令行界面和 ACPAgent Client Protocol示例组合使用同一有界策略。库消费方仍需显式组合插件省略该插件时`agent/request-error` 保持现有的 fail 默认值。
### 由单一层负责可见的尝试
适配器每次调用 `stream()` 只执行一次提供方请求。pi-ai 适配器移除公开的 `maxRetries` 和 `maxRetryDelayMs` profile 字段,并禁用库内部重试;手写适配器保持现有的单次尝试行为。这样既避免 SDK 预算成倍放大 agent 预算,又能确保每次暂时性重试都由一个已关闭的失败步骤加 `llm/retry` 表示。
`ctx.llm.stream()` 仍是原始的单次尝试 waterfall。压缩摘要等直接调用方会收到结构化失败但不会自动获得重试因为它们没有 agent 步骤边界,也没有可供分隔尝试的通用持久位置。未来的直接调用消费方可能会需要一个缓冲辅助函数,仅在尚未发出任何分片时重试;本决策不增加此类辅助函数。
### 在能够终止停滞流的位置施加边界
每个适配器都公开一个经过验证的 `streamIdleTimeoutMs` 配置字段,默认值采用上文引用的五分钟先例。该间隔不超过 Node 的最大定时器延迟,因此不会被钳制为 1 毫秒。它覆盖每个尚未完成的迭代器 `next()`:从消费方请求下一项开始,到下一条有效 `StreamChunk` 到达为止;消费方在两次 `next()` 调用之间花费的时间不属于提供方空闲时间。
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-timeout` 公开一个可重新布防的空闲看门狗原语。一个稳定的局部 `AbortController` 会与调用方信号融合,并在整个适配器调用期间传给传输层;每个尚未完成的 `next()` 都会布防看门狗,该调用完成时解除布防,下一次请求数据时再重新布防。超时会使用能力自身拥有的 `TimeoutReason` 中止这个稳定控制器,`finally` 则会清除定时器。适配器将自身看门狗归类为 `TIMEOUT`,将更早发生的上游中止归类为 `ABORTED`。现有的一次性 `deadline()` 不会被描述为滑动计时器。
边界测试证明两个实际传输层都能终止。手写适配器会中止其 fetchreaderpi-ai 适配器会把稳定信号映射到 SDK并证明 SDK 会关闭响应。如果定时器只拒绝消费方 promise却让请求继续运行就不满足此契约。
### 在现有日志中分隔尝试
一次失败尝试可以在已关闭的步骤中留下 `assistant/chunk` 事件,但绝不会追加 `assistant/message`也不会分发工具。重试会开启下一个编号步骤从持久表层重建请求并生成自己的分片。步骤仍处于打开状态时UI 可以渲染实时分片;当 `llm/retry` 标识失败步骤,或 `turn/end` 记录终止失败时UI 再标记或清除这份暂时视图。消息派生仍会忽略失败分片。
如果恢复预算耗尽,最终失败会连同结构化事实在 `turn/end.reason` 中存储一次。如果暂时性恢复继续,`llm/retry` 就是该次尝试的失败与延迟的持久归属位置。本决策不增加独立的最终错误事件或响应 id 词汇。
## 不在范围内
- 自动提供方或模型故障转移。请求已显式选择一个提供方和模型,提供方注册表也有意规定每个提供方只由一个适配器负责。
- 在成功的终止性 finish 后重试或继续,或将两次尝试的分片拼接成一条 assistant 消息。
- 修复格式错误的工具参数、拒答、内容过滤或其他语义模型输出。
- 无界重试、无人值守地持续重试直至取消、熔断器、共享提供方健康状态或跨 agent 重试预算。
- 在没有生产消费方的情况下,把 `llm/stream` 改造成响应生命周期或增加便利的生成 API。
## 考虑过的替代方案
- **在 `llm/stream` 或提供方 SDK 内部重试**:拒绝采用,因为原始流一旦发出分片便没有持久尝试边界,隐藏的 SDK 重试会成倍放大预算,而且两条路径都无法一致地记录每次失败尝试。
- **向 `dsh-llm` 增加响应开始、中断、丢弃、失败和提交事件**:拒绝采用,因为 agent 日志已经分隔原始分片、成功消息和编号尝试。第二套状态机会重复归属关系,又不能支持有界的同路由重试。
- **增加逻辑路由、能力矩阵和故障转移选择**:拒绝采用,因为当前请求已经显式指定提供方和模型,每个提供方由一个适配器负责,而且没有当前消费方要求自动回退或能够证明语义兼容性。
- **把 `retryable` 或 `failover` 放在 `LlmFailure` 上**:拒绝采用,因为适配器报告事实,部署策略决定动作。同一个 429 可以在交互式组合包中重试,也可以在成本受限的批处理中被拒绝。
- **只要调用方仍处于活跃状态就无限重试**:拒绝采用,因为这会让一次请求产生无界成本和延迟。可见状态能使有界等待易于理解,却不能让无限预算变得安全。
- **只通过进程 logger 记录重试状态**:拒绝采用,因为进程日志无法重建会话行为,也不能驱动回放后的 UI 状态。
- **只保留扁平 code**:拒绝采用,因为重试延迟和提供方请求 id 是结构化的提供方事实,而当不同协议失败共用一个稳定 code 时,诊断还需要 HTTP 状态。
## 验证
- `LlmFailure` 是最终适配器抛出失败、错误 finish 和中止 finish 使用的唯一可序列化载荷;在可用时,规范化保留稳定 code、状态、重试延迟、品牌化的提供方请求 id、错误原因以及调用方中止与适配器超时之间的分类。
- 适配器抛出的 `Error` 会以完全相同的对象抵达 `agent/request-error`,其伴随的 `LlmFailure` 则抵达相邻参数;测试保留针对可扩展及冻结第三方错误的现有对象标识断言。
- DeepSeek 和 pi-ai 适配器测试覆盖具有代表性的 400、401/403、429、5xx、连接、格式错误截断流、超时、中止、Retry-After 秒数/日期、请求 id 和未知 SDK 错误路径,恢复策略无需解析消息文本。
- Pi 将 SDK 选项固定为零次重试,并针对可重试的提供方响应执行一次可观测的实际网络请求;独立测试确保移除任一边界都会失败。
- `agent/request-error` 携带当前失败事实以及不可变的先前已重试失败事实;成功会清除该历史,暂时性失败/上下文溢出交替发生的集成测试证明两种策略只消耗各自的有限预算。
- `dsh-llm-retry` 在 Loader 启动时验证每个配置字段,使用 `next()` 委托所有不合格路径,而且在没有其他策略时最多发起 `maxTransientRetries + 1` 次提供方请求。
- 退避期间执行 HMR 的测试证明:释放过程会注销监听器、中止并等待其捕获的回调,释放后不发出重试决策,也不留下存活的定时器或 promise。
- 纯单元测试覆盖暂时性 code 选择、指数退避和抖动边界、有效及超出上限的 `Retry-After`、耗尽的预算、确定性定时器/随机数 seam以及退避期间中止。
- 真实 agent-loop 测试覆盖分片前失败、部分分片后失败、抛出及带内失败、在新步骤中重试至成功、耗尽后写入结构化 `turn/end.reason`,以及与 `dsh-compact-basic` 上下文溢出恢复的组合。
- 部分分片集成测试证明:失败分片仍归属于失败步骤,该步骤不会提交 assistant 消息或工具副作用,成功的重试具有不同的来源信息。
- 插件拥有的不进入表层的 `llm/retry` 事件可在 JSONL 和 SQLite 往返后保留,被消息派生忽略,并驱动 TUI 撤回和计划重试渲染。无密钥快照覆盖调度、取消、成功和耗尽ACP 自动化快照确认,被丢弃的尝试不会通过协议发出,而恢复后的回复会正常发出。
- 空闲看门狗测试证明:只有 `next()` 尚未完成时才会重新布防稳定信号;在消费方思考期间及 `finally` 中会解除布防;它与总调用 deadline 以及更早发生的调用方中止分开分类。适配器测试证明该信号会终止底层请求,而不只是与其脱离。
- `ctx.llm.stream()` 的直接调用方仍只尝试一次,并收到相同的结构化失败事实。
## 后果
- 每次暂时性恢复尝试都以一个已关闭步骤加 `llm/retry` 的形式可见,有界策略还会防止隐藏的 SDK 重试成倍增加成本。即使没有分片到达,重试仍可能造成提供方重复计费;有限的尝试预算只能限制而无法消除此风险。
- 提供方 SDK 可能隐藏状态或重试标头。适配器会保留 SDK 公开的稳定事实,否则使用粗粒度 code而不会让恢复策略解析脆弱的文本。
- 持久重试事件扩展了会话协议和 UI 状态机。事件与其消费方一同交付,可避免产生无人使用的遥测词汇;但以后更改 schema 仍需要同步完成持久化和回放工作。
- 清除失败步骤的实时分片可能会明显撤回输出。与把丢弃的文本或不完整工具 JSON 呈现为已提交历史相比,这是更好的选择;快照固定这一转换。
- 适配器局部的空闲强制机制可以终止停滞的传输,而不会计入消费方思考时间。每个传输边界的契约测试会防止 SDK 漂移。
- 多个恢复插件会叠加各自的有限预算。此处它们的分类器互不重叠;重叠的分类器会形成依赖注册顺序的策略,必须由引入它们的插件记录并测试。
## 相关资料
- [结构化错误分类体系](../../implemented/architecture/2026-06-11-structured-error-taxonomy.md)负责稳定、可供机器路由的 code 与 cause chaining。
- [可重建请求](../../implemented/architecture/2026-07-05-reconstructable-requests.md)使提供方/模型和完整请求输入在分发前持久化。
- [超时 deadline 库](../../implemented/architecture/2026-07-06-timeout-deadline-library.md)将共享的 deadline 分类与能力自身拥有的终止操作分开。
- [调用后压缩压力与上下文溢出恢复](../../implemented/architecture/2026-07-10-after-call-compaction-pressure-and-overflow-recovery.md)负责当前已关闭步骤的请求恢复 seam 与有界溢出重试。
- [提供方路由的 LLM 适配器](../../implemented/architecture/2026-07-14-provider-routed-llm-adapters.md)负责显式提供方/模型路由与每个提供方仅有一个适配器的不变量。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-02-tool-render-intent-union.md: 6cfd8921decbe16343f963574edd52173c2f8698
2026-07-02-tool-render-intent-union.zh.md: d0414c5f15995192df898e968d054933f82d2ab4
2026-07-02-tool-render-intent-union.md: 84423e9000526848a111591c1bb2ab92067bbe50
2026-07-02-tool-render-intent-union.zh.md: 43873c622fc8483b4a7033d17b4b4fab1342a56b

View File

@@ -54,6 +54,8 @@ interface TerminalResultView { card: 'terminal'; title?: string; output?: string
`TerminalResultView` carries only `output`/`exitCode`/`signal`. A UI without the terminal capability needs a fenced ` ```console ` text fallback; that derivation moves to the **bridge** (it wraps `output` in a fenced block on the no-capability path), rather than the tool double-encoding it. This keeps the bash tool's result a single structured shape and preserves the existing capability-gated behavior byte-for-byte.
The terminal intent is display-only. The harness still executes the command through its bash service, preserving sandboxing, environment scrubbing, task ownership, and per-session cwd; a UI projects the completed call and never becomes a second execution backend.
### Purity preserved
`presentCall`/`presentResult` remain pure functions of `args` (+ the result for `presentResult`) — they run on live streaming AND session-log replay, so they must be replay-deterministic. Every view is derived from args alone: write's diff is new-file style (`oldText:null`) because the tool has no old content at call time; edit's diff is `old_string``new_string`.
@@ -61,6 +63,7 @@ interface TerminalResultView { card: 'terminal'; title?: string; output?: string
## Alternatives considered
- **Delete tool-owned presentation entirely** — [the rejected collapse proposal](../../rejected/simplification/2026-06-20-generic-tool-rendering.md); its own verdict deferred to exactly this union once two real tools and two real consumers existed, and that bar is now met.
- **Let a UI execute terminal intents** — rejected because it would bypass the harness's bash policy and ownership contracts and fork command execution across backends. A terminal card describes harness-owned execution; it never authorizes client-side execution.
- **A merge-extensible union** (the `ContentBlockMap` pattern) — rejected: a new render intent needs new bridge code to render it anyway, so a plugin-added variant the bridge silently drops would be worse than the compile error the closed union raises at the bridge's `assertNever` switch.
- **Keeping the optional-field bag** — the status quo the Problem dissects: invalid states representable, undocumented field interactions, and no way to ask for a diff card at all.

View File

@@ -54,6 +54,8 @@ interface TerminalResultView { card: 'terminal'; title?: string; output?: string
`TerminalResultView` 只携带 `output`/`exitCode`/`signal`。不具备终端能力的 UI 需要一个围栏 ` ```console ` 文本回退;该推导移至 **bridge**(在无能力路径上将 `output` 包裹在围栏代码块中),而非由工具双重编码。这使 bash 工具的结果保持单一结构化形状,并逐字节保留既有的能力门控行为。
terminal 意图只用于展示。harness 仍通过自身的 bash 服务执行命令,从而保留沙箱、环境清理、任务归属和每会话 cwdUI 只呈现已完成的调用,绝不会成为第二个执行后端。
### 纯函数性保持不变
`presentCall`/`presentResult` 仍然是 `args``presentResult` 还有 result的纯函数——它们在实时流式输出和会话日志回放中都会运行因此必须具备回放确定性。每个 view 仅从 args 推导write 的 diff 是新文件风格(`oldText:null`因为工具在调用时没有旧内容edit 的 diff 是 `old_string``new_string`
@@ -61,6 +63,7 @@ interface TerminalResultView { card: 'terminal'; title?: string; output?: string
## 曾考虑的替代方案
- **完全删除工具自有的展示**:即[被否决的 collapse 提案](../../rejected/simplification/2026-06-20-generic-tool-rendering.md);其自身的结论正是推迟到两个真实工具和两个真实消费方存在后再做此联合类型,该条件现已满足。
- **让 UI 执行 terminal 意图**:否决。这样会绕过 harness 的 bash 策略与归属契约并把命令执行分裂到不同后端。terminal 卡片描述的是 harness 拥有的执行,绝不授权客户端侧执行。
- **可合并扩展的联合类型**`ContentBlockMap` 模式):否决。新的渲染意图无论如何需要新的 bridge 代码来渲染,因此一个被 bridge 静默丢弃的插件添加变体,比封闭联合类型在 bridge 的 `assertNever` switch 处引发的编译错误更糟糕。
- **保留可选字段集合**:即「问题」一节所剖析的现状:无效状态可表达、字段交互无文档、且完全无法请求 diff 卡片。

View File

@@ -1,31 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: Windows write-permission semantics — inherited DACLs, not mode bits
Status: implemented
The replacement-file decision in this record is superseded by [Windows DACL preservation](../bug-fix/2026-07-19-windows-atomic-write-dacl-preservation.md).
## Problem
`writeFileAtomic` in `@deepseek-ai/dsh-fs-local` protects write-in-progress content with POSIX mode bits: the staging directory is created `0o700`, the temp file is opened `0o600`, and new files default to `0o600`. On POSIX this keeps temporary content owner-only regardless of the parent directory's permissions.
Windows has no working equivalent behind the same API. Node's `chmod` there drives only the read-only attribute (every mode this package passes carries owner-write, so the calls are benign no-ops), and `stat().mode` reports synthetic `0o666`/`0o444` bits. The real security state is the file's DACL: a newly created file or directory inherits from its parent, while replacement needs the explicit handling owned by the superseding Agent Note.
## Decision
New Windows files use directory inheritance rather than synthetic mode bits: the staging directory is created inside the target's parent directory (`dirname(absolutePath)`), so it and the temp file inherit the destination directory's DACL. Replacement files follow the stricter [DACL preservation contract](../bug-fix/2026-07-19-windows-atomic-write-dacl-preservation.md).
Tests assert mode bits on POSIX only. Native Windows coverage pins the package-owned replacement behavior; new-file inheritance remains an operating-system contract rather than a machine-specific ACL allowlist.
## Alternatives considered
**Explicit owner-only DACLs for new files.** Rejected because they would break inheritance and surprise users whose project directories are deliberately shared. Replacement writes copy the target's existing DACL rather than inventing an owner-only policy.
**Test-side ACL verification.** A `Get-Acl` SID allowlist or `icacls` would verify Windows inheritance and the machine's `%TEMP%` ACL rather than package behavior; `icacls` also localizes well-known account names, making parsing locale-fragile.
**Skip `chmod` on Windows.** Platform-guarding benign no-op calls adds branches without changing behavior.
## Consequences
POSIX keeps owner-only temp content regardless of the parent directory. A new Windows target inside a broadly accessible directory inherits that accessibility by design; a replacement retains the target's narrower DACL when one exists.
Mode preservation across a replace degenerates to a no-op on Windows: a writable file probes as `0o666`, and replaying that through `chmod` leaves the read-only attribute clear. A read-only target cannot be replaced there because publication fails before the synthetic mode would matter.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-05-windows-jsonl-durable-publish.md: 38c4adc7a4f85d45e53e70fcac84073ab4e50775
2026-07-05-windows-jsonl-durable-publish.zh.md: 8dc77a0ab1b9273cf3f6ecb26916c7861ee81ec4

View File

@@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-05-windows-jsonl-durable-publish.zh.md)
## Problem
`dsh-session-persistence-jsonl` publishes a session log lazily on the first append. The POSIX protocol writes a temp file, fsyncs it, links it to the final name, fsyncs the parent directory, and then removes the temp link. The parent-directory fsync is part of the durability contract: a crash after the namespace change must not lose the committed final name while leaving callers believing the session log materialized.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
# Agent Note: Windows 原生持久 JSONL 发布
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-05-windows-jsonl-durable-publish.md) | 中文
## 问题
`dsh-session-persistence-jsonl` 在首次追加时延迟发布会话日志。POSIX 协议会写入临时文件,对其执行 fsync将其链接至最终名称对父目录执行 fsync然后移除临时链接。对父目录执行 fsync 是持久性契约的一部分:命名空间变更后发生崩溃时,已经提交的最终名称不能丢失,否则调用方会误以为会话日志已经物化。
Windows 具备原子命名空间操作,但 Node 没有暴露与 POSIX 等价的父目录 fsync 契约。如果把 Windows 目录同步失败视为成功就会在无提示的情况下削弱持久化后端。因此Windows 路径需要采用不同的发布原语,而不是在 POSIX 的 `syncDir` 辅助函数中添加条件分支。
## 决策
JSONL 后端会在 `materialize()` 内部、任何命名空间变更之前分流。共享代码计算会话目录、最终日志路径,以及编码后的 header 和初始事件批次;随后 POSIX 与 Windows 分别执行各自的发布协议。
POSIX 保留现有协议:创建根目录、项目目录与会话目录,并对其父目录执行 fsync写入临时文件并对其执行 fsync使用 `link()` 发布,确保绝不覆盖已有的最终日志;对会话目录执行 fsync最后移除多余的临时硬链接。
Windows 通过持久的暂存发布来创建缺失目录:在固定的 `.dsh-mkdir-` 前缀下创建一个随机同级目录,其名称与目标基本名无关;随后使用 `MoveFileExW(..., MOVEFILE_WRITE_THROUGH)` 将其发布为最终目录名称,且不使用 `MOVEFILE_REPLACE_EXISTING``MOVEFILE_COPY_ALLOWED`。文件物化先写入临时日志并对其执行 fsync再以同一个启用写穿透的 `MoveFileExW` 调用将临时文件发布到最终路径,并且同样不允许替换。`koffi` 是覆盖这组 API 所需的最小 Win32 桥接层;`pnpm-workspace.yaml` 允许执行它的安装脚本因为该包package会分发原生 loader 和预构建的平台模块。
## 考虑过的替代方案
**忽略 Windows 目录同步失败。** 不予采纳,因为这会在没有强制将已发布的命名空间条目写入稳定存储时,就把首次追加报告为持久化成功。
**使用 `CreateHardLinkW`。** 不予采纳,因为硬链接依赖文件系统、不能发布目录,并且没有提供写穿透选项。
**使用替换或事务型 API。** `ReplaceFileW` 的替换语义与拒绝同一 id 冲突的要求相悖,而新应用设计不应使用 Transactional NTFS。
## 影响
该后端在各平台上维持同一项外部契约:首次追加要么把完整日志发布到最终名称,要么失败且不覆盖已有日志。平台分流只是实现细节;`SessionPersistence` API 和 JSONL 逻辑记录格式均不改变。后续的 [Zstandard 编码决策](2026-07-19-zstandard-jsonl-session-logs.md)会先作用于不透明字节,然后才由任一平台执行发布。
Windows 测试会在原生 Windows 上执行真实的 Win32 发布路径。断电行为属于 API 契约属性单元测试无法证明可测试的不变量包括Windows 物化不会调用目录 fsync、最终路径冲突会失败、达到最大长度的目标路径组件仍可物化、临时日志在发布前已经执行 fsync并且生成的日志可以正常加载。
两个平台的追加和修复仍使用普通文件句柄 fsync。追加失败后系统会关闭仅追加句柄以读写模式重新打开日志将文件截断到追加前的大小并对回滚结果执行 fsync因为 Windows 不允许在仅追加句柄上调用 `ftruncate`

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-06-tool-result-retention-library.md: 5e42660360e5a23b419c75b9c8006bec459bc322
2026-07-06-tool-result-retention-library.zh.md: 6e824667f17b361efb57b173c44f489da2cab3b3

View File

@@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-06-tool-result-retention-library.zh.md)
## Problem
Several model-facing tools already bound the amount of context they return, but each one owns a different local mechanism and vocabulary: bash keeps a tail plus spill files, web search caps source lists, web fetch caps body content, and `glob` / `grep` discovery needs an inline first page while keeping exact omission metadata for the full result set. A single `truncate(text)` helper cannot cover those cases: item tools need item counts and grouping outside the primitive, while text tools need byte budgets and UTF-8-safe head/tail cuts.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,157 @@
# Agent Note: 工具结果保留库
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-06-tool-result-retention-library.md) | 中文
## 问题
多个面向模型的工具已经限制其返回的上下文量但每个工具都拥有不同的局部机制和词汇bash 保留尾部并提供落盘文件web search 限制来源列表web fetch 限制正文内容;`glob``grep` 发现工具需要在行内提供第一页,同时为完整结果集保留精确的省略元数据。单一的 `truncate(text)` 辅助函数无法覆盖这些情况:条目型工具需要条目计数,并在原语之外分组;文本型工具则需要字节预算和 UTF-8 安全的首尾裁切。
这些工具需要共享的抽象是**保留**,而不是通用集合。调用方向一个有界对象输入条目或文本分片,稍后取得保留内容与精确的省略元数据。工具专用代码仍负责业务语义:文件分组、行号、退出码、提供方错误状态、落盘文件和面向模型的说明。公共库只负责一个机械问题:「保留了什么,又省略了什么?」
## 决策
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-retention` 位于 `packages/util/` 下,与 `dsh-brand``dsh-timeout` 同级,负责有界的模型可见输出。它是一组纯类与函数构成的库,**不是** Cordis 服务或插件:不接收 `ctx`、不注册任何内容、不持有跨调用状态也不发出事件。各工具包package需要限制输出时直接导入它。
该库包含两个相互独立的 retainer
- `ItemRetainer<T>` 处理有序逻辑单元例如路径、grep 匹配项或搜索来源。v1 只支持 `head` 保留,同时维持 retainer 形态,以便未来加入其他保留策略。
- `TextRetainer` 处理面向字节的文本流,例如 bash stdoutstderr 或 web 响应正文。它支持 `head``tail``headTail` 保留,并在 `finish()` 时维持 UTF-8 边界。
两个 retainer 都会返回一个小型 `PushDecision`;每次调用 `push()` 后,调用方都能得知该单元/分片是否完整保留,以及累积结果此时是否已被截断。因为调用方会继续输入每一个已观察到的条目/分片,所以省略计数是精确的。
```ts ignore-check
/**
* How much content the retainer omitted.
*
* `unknown` is reserved for callers that omit without a count; the retainers
* themselves return `none` or `exact`.
*/
type Omitted =
| { kind: 'none' }
| { kind: 'exact'; count: number }
| { kind: 'unknown' }
interface PushDecision {
kept: boolean
truncated: boolean
}
/**
* Final result for ordered logical units.
*/
interface RetainedItems<T> {
items: T[]
truncated: boolean
seen: number
kept: number
omitted: Omitted
}
/**
* Final result for text streams.
*
* The returned `text` is safe to send to a formatter; the retainer does not add
* tool-specific headers, exit markers, XML tags, or recovery instructions.
*/
interface RetainedText {
text: string
truncated: boolean
omittedBytes: Omitted
}
```
### 策略
条目保留支持头部窗口。文本保留支持头部、尾部与首尾字节窗口。
```ts ignore-check
type ItemRetentionStrategy =
| {
/** Keep the first `maxItems` units. Use for `glob`, `grep`, and web sources. */
kind: 'head'
maxItems: number
}
type TextRetentionStrategy =
| {
/** Keep the first `maxBytes` bytes. */
kind: 'head'
maxBytes: number
}
| {
/** Keep the final `maxBytes` bytes. Requires reading to the end. */
kind: 'tail'
maxBytes: number
}
| {
/** Keep a stable prefix and suffix, omitting the middle. Requires reading to the end. */
kind: 'headTail'
headBytes: number
tailBytes: number
}
```
### 工具映射
`read` 被有意排除在 v1 保留库之外。它的 `read-render` 辅助函数拥有文件专用的分页契约:`offset``limit`、行号、`totalLines`、offset 越界错误、逐行预览截断,以及能够在窗口中途停止扫描的所选输出字节上限。这是行窗口渲染器,不是通用保留原语。它未来可以共享中性的提示辅助函数,但不应把已经选定的窗口再传入 `ItemRetainer`。
下文的 `FsGlobEntry` 与 `FlatGrepMatch` 是预期由发现工具使用的条目形态,不是现有保留库的导出。`FsGlobEntry` 是一个由后端派生的路径;`FlatGrepMatch` 是后端将保留匹配项按文件分组之前的一条未分组 grep 匹配。
`glob` 收集完整的排序路径列表后,使用 `ItemRetainer<FsGlobEntry>`,并将其配置为 `{ kind: 'head', maxItems: globMaxResults }`。工具在行内保留第一页,并可以通过落盘 seam 保存完整列表。路径映射、跳过的候选项与 `incomplete` 均位于 retainer 之外。
`grep` 在分组前使用 `ItemRetainer<FlatGrepMatch>`,并将其配置为 `{ kind: 'head', maxItems: grepMaxMatches }`。执行器解析 ripgrep 输出、映射路径、应用逐行预览截断,并输入扁平匹配项。调用 `finish()` 后,工具按文件对保留的匹配项分组;如果行内结果达到上限,还可以通过落盘 seam 保存完整匹配列表。分组不属于 retainer因为上限针对匹配总数而不是文件数逐匹配项的预览截断和 `incomplete` 也与结果级保留相互独立。
`bash` 可以使用 `TextRetainer`,配置为 `tail` 或 `headTail`并读取至进程结束。bash 执行器仍负责落盘文件、退出状态、信号、超时与后台任务行为;保留辅助函数只在需要该行为时替换临时实现的内存首尾核算。长时间运行任务的所有权与[通用长时间运行工具的运行时](2026-06-20-generic-long-running-tool-runtime.md)相互独立。
`web_fetch` 可以使用 `TextRetainer`,配置为 `head` 或 `headTail`如果提供方必须在内部读取和解码也可以保留由提供方负责的正文上限。无论采用哪种方式fetch 结果中的 `truncated` 仍是提供方/工具事实,该库只提供保留文本与省略元数据。
`web_search` 可以使用 `ItemRetainer<WebSearchSource>`,配置为 `head`。当前提供方通常返回数组,所以这属于事后处理,但仍能统一提示信息。
### 提示
该库公开一个中性的提示结构和一个小型格式化钩子但面向用户的措辞由工具提供。grep 页脚会提示「缩小 pattern、path 或 include」web fetch 页脚会提示「获取更具体的 URL 或章节」bash 则可以指向落盘文件。retainer 无法得知这些恢复操作。
```ts ignore-check
interface RetentionNotice {
scope: string
strategy: 'head' | 'tail' | 'headTail'
unit: 'items' | 'bytes' | 'chars' | 'lines'
limit: number | { head: number; tail: number }
kept: number
omitted: Omitted
}
const formatGrepNotice = (notice: RetentionNotice): string =>
formatRetentionNotice(
notice,
({ kept }) => `Results capped at ${kept}. Narrow the pattern, path, or include to see more.`,
)
```
格式化钩子刻意保持精简:工具把 `RetentionNotice` 转换为自己的页脚文本。辅助函数可以统一省略措辞,但不负责恢复指引。
`truncated` 表示 retainer 因预算省略了原本可用的内容,不表示上游结果不完整。工具会为权限失败、跳过的二进制文件、提供方局部失败、不可读候选项、无效 UTF-8以及其他任何「无法检查」状况保留独立字段。
## 影响
**已交付内容。** `@deepseek-ai/dsh-retention` 导出 `ItemRetainer`、`TextRetainer`、结果类型(`RetainedItems`、`RetainedText`)、策略类型(`ItemRetentionStrategy`、`TextRetentionStrategy`)、`Omitted`、`PushDecision`、`RetentionNotice`,以及中性的提示辅助函数 `describeOmitted``formatRetentionNotice`,且不依赖 Cordis 或任何工具包。单元测试覆盖具有精确省略计数的条目头部保留、文本头部保留、文本尾部保留、首尾字节保留、零预算、UTF-8 边界处理2、3、4 字节码位,以及每个裁切位置上的无效起始字节)和未知省略量的措辞。
**已记录但尚未迁移的内容。** `glob`、`grep`、`bash`、`web_fetch` 与 `web_search` 的映射已记录在[包 README](../../../../packages/util/retention/README.md) 中,但本次改动并未把每个工具都迁移到该库;迁移工作刻意留作独立的后续任务。`read` 被明确记录为不在范围内:其 `read-render` 行窗口契约(`offset``limit`、`totalLines`、offset 范围错误、逐行预览截断,以及针对所选窗口的字节上限)不属于通用保留,而一个 `Omitted` 计数也无法同时表达行窗口两侧。
**该库维持的边界。** `truncated` 表示 retainer 因预算省略了原本可用的内容,绝不表示上游不完整。工具专用状态,包括 `incomplete`、权限失败、提供方局部失败、跳过二进制文件、bash 落盘路径恢复和无效 UTF-8均留在工具领域字段中、位于 retainer 之外。未来改动迁移某项工具时,该包的 README 与测试必须证明,除了有意改变的提示措辞外,模型可见的结果文本没有变化。
**接受的取舍。** v1 接口刻意只支持条目的 `head` 保留,以及文本的 `head``tail``headTail` 保留;窗口、分组预算、感知排序的上限和上游停止控制,要等第二个消费方证明需求后再引入。文本保留按字节计数,以保障进程/正文安全;字符级和行级预览预算继续由具体工具负责。
## 考虑过的替代方案
**只进行事后 `truncate(text)`。** 不予采纳:它适合 Codex 的历史工具输出截断场景却会丢失条目计数、分组边界、UTF-8 安全的字节窗口与精确省略元数据。
**使用一个带可插拔回调的通用 `Collector<T>`。** v1 不予采纳,因为它会掩盖两种重要的资源模式。逻辑条目保留按条目计数;文本保留按字节计数并维持 UTF-8 边界。独立的 `ItemRetainer` 与 `TextRetainer` 名称明确表达这种差异,同时保持 API 精简。
**把 `read` 窗口交给 `ItemRetainer`。** v1 不予采纳:`read` 是当前唯一的窗口消费方,其语义属于文件分页,而不是通用保留。一个 `Omitted` 计数无法表示行窗口两侧,而且 `read` 还携带 `totalLines`、offset 范围错误、逐行预览截断和针对所选输出的字节上限。让 `read-render` 由工具所有,可以避免共享库围绕一项特例膨胀。
**让截断成为 `ToolExecutionResult` 的一部分。** 不予采纳:工具注册表将不得不理解工具专用的恢复指引、分组、行号、退出状态和提供方语义。保留是由工具的 Native renderer 使用的库;模型可见投影继续由工具所有,而[规范值](2026-07-20-canonical-tool-output-contract.md)可以保留完整的已采集结果。
**在每个面向模型的工具 schema 中公开上限。** 不作为默认方案Claude Code 的 grep 公开 `head_limit``offset`,但本 harness 会把常规预算保留为部署配置,除非模型确实需要控制分页。未来可以为具体工具增加类似 read 的续传字段;它不属于共享保留原语。

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-08-tool-output-spill-files.md: 7c0ca90452645d251559be25108d12883210d00e
2026-07-08-tool-output-spill-files.zh.md: 917d710eb8650e2797287578edd1b0d62813bbd3

View File

@@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-08-tool-output-spill-files.zh.md)
## Problem
Tool outputs need bounded model-facing previews, but some oversized results are still useful later. A fetched page body or a verbose tool response should not consume the next model request in full, but the model should be able to inspect the complete formatted result later with existing file-reading tools.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,195 @@
# Agent Note: 工具输出落盘策略
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-08-tool-output-spill-files.md) | 中文
## 问题
工具输出需要有界的模型可见预览,但部分超大结果仍可能在之后有用。抓取的页面正文或冗长的工具响应不应完整占用下一次模型请求,但模型应能使用现有文件读取工具,在之后查看经过格式化的完整结果。
这项改动之前的行为并不一致。`dsh-bash-local` 已经会在内存尾部溢出时,把完整 stdoutstderr 流写入私有的临时落盘文件;普通文本工具结果则仍以内联形式返回,除非工具自行临时实现上限。[工具结果保留库](2026-07-06-tool-result-retention-library.md)负责预览机制,但不负责存储,也不负责把这些机制应用于最终工具结果的执行流水线策略。
其形态与超时策略设计一致:工具作者声明规范值与 Native renderer由策略插件在渲染后的内容上执行部署默认的上下文预算。工具仍可在提供方采集上限处提前落盘由工具负责的展示落盘可以保留已完整采集的规范值而只替换展示内容。[规范工具输出契约](2026-07-20-canonical-tool-output-contract.md)规定了这项区分。
## 决策
在新的 `packages/spill/` 分组下增加一层轻量落盘存储 seam 和一个默认落盘策略插件:
| 包package | 角色 |
|---|---|
| `@deepseek-ai/dsh-spill` | 接口:`ctx.spillStore`、词汇类型,不包含存储实现。 |
| `@deepseek-ai/dsh-spill-local` | 本地后端:在宿主文件系统中提供私有、会话作用域的文件存储。 |
| `@deepseek-ai/dsh-spill-policy` | 工具结果策略插件:包装分发后的最终文本结果,并以保留预览和落盘定位符替换超大结果。 |
系统不增加专用的面向模型消费方包。消费方是现有 `ctx.tools` 执行流水线:`dsh-spill-policy` 通过 `tools/post-execute` waterfall瀑布式事件使用最终工具结果模型则按照后端随定位符返回的检索提示读取内容。
### 落盘 seam
存储 seam 保持最小化:保存文本,并返回定位符与检索提示。
```ts ignore-check
interface SpillStore {
saveText(input: SaveTextSpill): Promise<SpillRef>
}
interface SpillSource {
toolName: string
callId: CallId
label: string
}
interface SaveTextSpill {
owner: { sessionId: SessionId }
source: SpillSource
suggestedName: string
content: string
}
type SpillLocator = Branded<'SpillLocator'>
interface SpillRef {
locator: SpillLocator
bytes: number
retrievalHint: string
}
```
`SpillLocator` 是一个[品牌化的](../../../../packages/util/brand)模型可见句柄,由后端返回。本地后端将其渲染为文件系统路径;远程或数据库后端可以渲染 URI、键或命令 token。消费方把它视为不透明值并使用 `retrievalHint` 渲染,而不是假定 `read` 始终是正确的检索机制。`SpillOwner.sessionId` 是保存时的存储命名空间fork 后的会话会从种子日志继承已有的落盘定位符无需复制它们或重新取得所有权fork 后的新落盘使用子会话 id。保留期清理可以连同其他旧会话产物一起使旧定位符失效落盘 seam 不定义逐会话的清理策略。
`dsh-spill-local` 只负责存储细节:选择会话作用域的目录、安全名称、防止路径遍历、执行写入,以及返回 `{ locator, bytes, retrievalHint }`。它不负责保留策略、工具结果替换、搜索或文件检查。文件写入 `<root>/session-<hash>/<random>-<safeName>``root` 是配置路径或延迟创建的私有0700进程级临时目录会话子目录是 `sha256(sessionId)` 的短前缀;叶节点由随机十六进制前缀与调用方的 `suggestedName` 组成,后者会被清理成单一路径段(与 JSONL 后端的 `encodeSegment` 一致)。系统使用 `open(path, 'wx', 0o600)` 写入,确保独占且仅所有者可访问,因此预先植入的符号链接无法重定向写入。定位符就是该路径,检索提示则告知模型可以在该路径上使用 `read` 或 `grep`。
### 落盘策略
`dsh-spill-policy` 是一个 `tools/post-execute` 结果转换器,只提供一个配置项:
```ts ignore-check
interface Config {
/** Omitted means no automatic spill policy. Present means apply to oversized plain text tool results. */
maxInlineBytes?: number
}
```
省略 `maxInlineBytes` 时,插件不会注册任何内容,是真正的无操作。设置该值后,它会对最终的纯文本工具结果应用默认策略:
1. 让工具正常运行,通过 `next()` 委托,使下游监听器先结算结果。
2. 仅当已接受的最终 `ContentBlock[]` 全部是纯文本时,才将其展平;含任何非文本块的结果保持不变。
3. 如果 UTF-8 字节大小不超过 `maxInlineBytes`,保持不变。
4. 如果超出上限,使用完整的最终文本调用 `ctx.spillStore.saveText()`。
5. 把模型可见结果替换为保留的首尾预览和落盘引用。
预览属于策略所有的实现默认值:以 `maxInlineBytes` 为上限,使用保留库的 `TextRetainer` 进行首尾分割。只有第二种部署证明有此需求后,未来配置才会公开预览大小。
替换文本刻意保持通用,因为策略只知道最终格式化的工具结果,不了解工具的内部资源:
```text
<retained preview>
(Omitted N bytes. Full formatted result stored at: /.../session-.../....txt. Use read with offset/limit, or grep this path to search within it.)
```
如果 `ctx.spillStore.saveText()` 失败权限、ENOSPC、后端不可用或调用没有会话所有者或未加载后端插件会记录原因并原样返回结果。落盘失败绝不会把成功的工具调用变为 `isError` 结果,也不会隐藏内联结果。
策略跳过 `read`,以避免形成 `read -> spill file -> read again` 循环。额外的选择退出配置要等确实出现第二个有此需求的工具后再引入。
## 示例web_fetch
`web_fetch` 是首个示例,因为它天然会返回较大的文本结果,而且无需工具专用的落盘代码。该工具本身无需特殊处理:
```ts ignore-check
ctx.tools.register(defineTool({
name: 'web_fetch',
output: {
schema: WEB_FETCH_RESULT_SCHEMA,
render: (_args, value) => [{ type: 'text', text: formatFetchOutput(value) }],
},
async execute(args, exec) {
const result = await ctx.web.fetch({ url: args.url }, exec.signal ? { signal: exec.signal } : undefined)
return result
},
}))
```
配置 `dsh-spill-policy` 后,格式化后的大型 fetch 结果会自动保留并落盘。部署通过把提供方资源上限设得高于策略上限来展示此行为:
```yaml
- id: web-fetch-local
name: '@deepseek-ai/dsh-web-fetch-local'
config:
maxBodyChars: 500000
- id: spill-local
name: '@deepseek-ai/dsh-spill-local'
- id: spill-policy
name: '@deepseek-ai/dsh-spill-policy'
config:
maxInlineBytes: 50000
```
这项分离很重要。`web-fetch-local` 仍负责资源上限(`maxResponseBytes`、`maxBodyChars`),用来保护网络、内存和解码工作。`spill-policy` 只负责结果已经存在后针对模型上下文的上限。如果提供方已经返回 `truncated: true`,落盘文件包含的是工具返回的完整格式化结果,而不是原始网页全文;策略不会做出其他承诺。
## 与保留和提前落盘的关系
保留与落盘存储相互独立:
- `@deepseek-ai/dsh-retention` 负责预览机制(`TextRetainer`、`ItemRetainer` 和省略元数据)。
- `@deepseek-ai/dsh-spill` 负责保存最终文本,并返回定位符与检索提示。
- `@deepseek-ai/dsh-spill-policy` 在工具流水线中应用默认的最终结果策略,将前两者组合起来。
最终结果策略不能取代由工具负责的提前落盘。部分有用内容并不存在于最终 `ToolExecutionResult.content` 中:
- `bash` 的最终输出已经是尾部内容加临时落盘路径;完整的 stdoutstderr 流位于执行器文件中。
- `subagent` 的最终输出是子 agent智能体的最终回答而不是子 agent 的执行轨迹。
- 未来的工具可能生成从未出现在最终 `ToolExecutionResult.content` 中的运行时产物。
这些场景可以在后续工作中直接使用 `ctx.spillStore`,不属于首个示例的范围。
## 非目标
- v1 不增加面向模型的 `artifact_read` 或 `artifact_search` 工具。
- v1 不增加逐工具的保留配置。
- 不增加面向模型的超时/截断参数。
- 不把 `read` 输出迁移到落盘文件。
- 不取代 `web-fetch-local.maxBodyChars` 等提供方/资源上限。
- 第一版不统一 bash 临时文件,也不采集 subagent 执行轨迹。
## 延后事项
- 用于现有执行器落盘文件的 `saveFile()``linkOrCopy`,这是统一 bash 行为所必需的。
- 由工具负责的 subagent 执行轨迹落盘(`await run.result`,在 `run.dispose()` 前读取进程内子会话,保存 JSONL
- 如果内置的 `read` 跳过规则不足,再增加逐工具退出或逐工具策略声明。
- 面向 ACPAgent Client Protocol或远程环境的远程数据库存储后端因为本地路径在这些环境中没有意义。
- 旧落盘文件的清理和保留策略,很可能与会话清理绑定。
## 测试
- `dsh-spill` 单元测试锁定 seam 契约:注册为 `ctx.spillStore`、每个上下文只允许一种实现,并在 dispose资源释放时释放。
- `dsh-spill-local` 单元测试覆盖 `saveText`、`encodeSegment` 清理(分隔符/波浪号/完整路径段的点/空值)、会话哈希目录、仅所有者权限、每次保存生成不同路径、配置根目录/私有根目录,以及存储失败时的拒绝。
- `dsh-spill-policy` 单元测试通过 `ctx.tools.execute` 驱动真实工具:禁用模式下无操作、替换超大文本、小结果/非文本结果保持不变、跳过 `read`、尽力回退(保存失败/无后端/无所有者),以及下游组合(限制已替换结果、保留 `additionalContexts`)。
- `dsh-tool-web` 集成测试驱动 `web_fetch`,其实际执行路径经过 `ctx.tools.execute`,并使用真实的 `spill-local` 后端与策略;测试证明只有刻意加入的落盘提示会改变模型可见文本,而落盘文件保存完整的格式化结果。
- `tui-agent` 示例加载 `spill-local` 与 `spill-policy`,因此其无密钥 LoaderPTY 冒烟测试会执行真实加载路径namespace-plugin 导出形态与 `inject`)。
## 影响
默认策略只能看见最终格式化文本。它无法保留已经由提供方限制的内部内容,也无法保留从未成为结果一部分的运行时产物。第一版聚焦最终结果落盘而不是提前落盘,因此可以接受这一限制;由工具负责的提前落盘仍属于后续工作。
本地后端返回真实路径,使 v1 保持简单并符合已经验证的 agent 工具行为seam 本身只承诺一个不透明定位符加检索提示,所以远程后端可以返回非文件定位符。
本地后端的价值取决于现有 `read``grep` 工具能否检查返回的本地路径,即使落盘目录位于会话 cwd 之外。目前这一条件成立,因为文件系统策略会记录观察结果并设置写保护,但不会把读取限制在工作区内。未来的工作区限制策略必须显式允许本地落盘路径,或改用检索提示指向受支持读取器的非文件落盘后端。
**快照缺口。** 目前没有 ACP 快照场景覆盖 transcript文本记录可见的 `web_fetch` 落盘提示。ACP 快照 harness 在无密钥环境中回放,无法访问实时 web而 `web_fetch` 落盘需要一个真实的超上限 HTTP 正文;确定性场景需要一个预置的 loopback fetch 目标,但当前回放树尚未接线(示例根本没有加载 `tool-web`)。该行为改由 `dsh-tool-web` 针对 loopback server 的集成测试覆盖。弥补该缺口属于后续工作:把 `tool-web` 和预置 fetch 目标接入 ACP 示例,然后录制 `web-fetch-spill` 场景。
如果策略开始负责工具专用语义,就会膨胀得过大。它必须保持狭窄:只处理纯文本最终结果。由工具负责的提前落盘仍留作未来工作。
## 考虑过的替代方案
**要求每个工具通过保留声明选择加入。** v1 不予采纳,因为目标是实现类似 Claude Code 通用工具结果持久化的默认行为。只需一个 `maxInlineBytes` 部署配置项即可验证该形态。
**把 `tool-results` 建成宽泛的工具结果平台。** 不予采纳:宽泛的包名会诱使系统把保留策略、结果替换、预览措辞、搜索和提前落盘合并进一个 seam。可共享的存储部分更小保存文本并返回定位符与检索提示。
**使用 `ctx.fs.writeText` 或面向模型的 `write` 工具。** 不予采纳:工作区文件系统写入带有项目文件语义、写入/编辑策略、观察状态和面向用户的副作用。落盘文件是运行时产物,不是由模型编写的工作区改动。现有 `read` 工具之后可以检查它们,但创建操作属于运行时落盘 seam。
**让 `web-fetch-local` 不受限地抓取,只依靠 spill-policy。** 不予采纳spill-policy 在最终工具结果已经存在之后才运行,无法保护网络、内存或解码资源。提供方资源上限仍然必须存在。
**把保留合并进落盘机制。** 不予采纳:保留与落盘职责不同。`TextRetainer``ItemRetainer` 决定保留哪部分预览、又省略了什么;落盘存储只负责保存策略要求的最终文本。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-20-unified-json-value-schema-dsl.md: 09945c413ffe5924c74076648cdf3da60c3e18c9
2026-07-20-unified-json-value-schema-dsl.zh.md: 00a7a199613ea857a7815f1c7794781f143a3896
2026-07-20-unified-json-value-schema-dsl.md: 5de3523eab15a91ea32dc09e2e239146fadea6f1
2026-07-20-unified-json-value-schema-dsl.zh.md: 321136c31a6aa6c0268150fcde2d97dcdbb0ac58

View File

@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ Object-rooting is a consumer rule rather than a vocabulary restriction. Subagent
## Alternatives considered
- **Keep separate parameter and structured-output schema systems:** rejected because every added output construct would require parallel inference, compilation, validation, and code-generation changes with no useful ownership boundary.
- **Use Schemastery for tool parameters:** rejected because Schemastery targets validation and transformation through Standard Schema rather than JSON Schema generation. It would add an adapter layer without producing the model-facing wire schema or the shared output vocabulary.
- **Adopt full JSON Schema or Ajv:** rejected because the harness must fail on every construct it cannot project into its generated SDK and validators; accepting a larger language would make enforcement and model guidance dishonest.
- **Make every object implicitly open or closed:** rejected because either choice hides a consequential author decision. Only the legacy-shaped implicit parameter root and external raw schema retain an intentional default.
- **Define `oneOf` as first-match:** rejected because branch ordering would change validation semantics and allow overlapping branches to hide ambiguous values.
@@ -32,4 +33,5 @@ Object-rooting is a consumer rule rather than a vocabulary restriction. Subagent
- Explicit object openness and type-correct literal constraints make malformed declarations fail during authoring or registration rather than during a later model call.
- Bounded type inference retains useful exact types for ordinary declarations and degrades unusually deep tails to `JsonValue`; runtime schema enforcement remains exact at every depth.
- Raw tools may still register broader JSON Schema directly, but unified code generation treats unsupported schemas as unknown instead of pretending to enforce them.
- Per-property `required: true` remains the tool-author contract, and type-level regression coverage pins required keys as non-optional after the original inference path exposed an optionality bug.
- Runtime and compile-time tests cover every root, exact-one overlap/no-match behavior, raw open defaults, explicit openness, lossy JSON values, inference, deep nesting across core and dynamic projections, JSON-invisible dynamic keys, and exotic schema arrays.

View File

@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ Status: implemented
## 备选方案
- **保留两套独立的参数与结构化输出 schema 系统:**不予采纳。每新增一种输出结构,都必须分别修改类型推导、编译、校验和代码生成,而这种重复并未形成有意义的职责边界。
- **使用 Schemastery 处理工具参数:**不予采纳。Schemastery 通过 Standard Schema 面向校验与转换,而不是生成 JSON Schema。采用它会增加一层适配器却不能产出面向模型的协议 schema 或共享的输出词汇。
- **采用完整 JSON Schema 或 Ajv**不予采纳。harness 必须拒绝所有无法投影到生成 SDK 和校验器中的结构;如果接受更大的语言子集,强制执行能力和模型指引就会与事实不符。
- **让所有对象默认开放或默认封闭:**不予采纳。这两种选择都会隐藏一项影响重大的作者决策。只有保持旧有形态的隐式参数根对象和外部原始 schema 才有意保留默认值。
- **把 `oneOf` 定义为首个匹配分支:**不予采纳。这样一来,分支顺序会改变校验语义,重叠分支也会掩盖值的歧义。
@@ -32,4 +33,5 @@ Status: implemented
- 显式的对象开放方式和类型正确的字面量约束会让格式错误的声明在编写或注册阶段快速失败,而不是拖到后续模型调用时才失败。
- 有界类型推导会为常规声明保留有用的精确类型,并将异常深的尾部结构退化为 `JsonValue`;运行时 schema 强制执行在任意深度仍保持精确。
- 原始工具仍可直接注册范围更广的 JSON Schema但统一代码生成会把不受支持的 schema 视为未知类型,不会假装自己能够强制执行。
- 每个属性的 `required: true` 仍是工具作者契约;原有推导路径暴露可选性缺陷后,类型级回归覆盖会锁定必填键不得为可选。
- 运行时和编译期测试覆盖所有根类型、恰好匹配一个分支时的重叠/无匹配行为、原始 schema 的默认开放语义、显式开放方式、有损 JSON 值、类型推导、核心投影和动态投影中的深层嵌套、动态注册中 JSON 不可见的键,以及非普通 schema 数组。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-19-windows-atomic-write-dacl-preservation.md: 013119508da9be426c417797cf7a0ec14e276814
2026-07-19-windows-atomic-write-dacl-preservation.zh.md: 8ae82884c3b80409d07d3bbcfc8c273e8b227dc8
2026-07-19-windows-atomic-write-dacl-preservation.md: be9f82174300a7d605c6a6e63878728f08cb37be
2026-07-19-windows-atomic-write-dacl-preservation.zh.md: fc6ec5232c992f3a230ee0de89439c869b8b46f9

View File

@@ -6,13 +6,13 @@ English | [中文](2026-07-19-windows-atomic-write-dacl-preservation.zh.md)
## Problem
On Windows, creating the staging directory and temp file under the target's parent and relying only on inherited DACLs is sufficient for a new file, but not for replacing an existing file whose explicit or protected DACL is narrower than its parent: content is written under the broader parent DACL, and rename carries that staging descriptor onto the replacement.
Atomic writes protect POSIX staging directories with `0o700` and temp files with `0o600`, but Windows mode bits expose only a synthetic read-only view of the actual DACL. Creating staging under the target's parent and relying on inheritance is sufficient for a new file, but not for replacing an existing file whose explicit or protected DACL is narrower than its parent: content is written under the broader parent DACL, and rename carries that staging descriptor onto the replacement.
## Decision
`dsh-fs-local` reads an existing target's DACL with `GetFileSecurityW`, applies it to the empty temp file with inheritance protected before writing content, and publishes the closed temp with `ReplaceFileW`. The protected staging descriptor prevents the temp directory's inherited entries from broadening access; `ReplaceFileW` preserves the original target access policy and other replacement metadata. Its ACL merge may reserialize auto-inheritance state or duplicate equivalent ACEs, so self-relative descriptor buffers are not a stable equality contract. New files have no prior descriptor to preserve and continue to inherit the destination directory's DACL.
`dsh-fs-local` reads an existing target's DACL with `GetFileSecurityW`, applies it to the empty temp file with inheritance protected before writing content, and publishes the closed temp with `ReplaceFileW`. The protected staging descriptor prevents the temp directory's inherited entries from broadening access; `ReplaceFileW` preserves the original target access policy and other replacement metadata. Its ACL merge may reserialize auto-inheritance state or duplicate equivalent ACEs, so self-relative descriptor buffers are not a stable equality contract. New Windows files have no prior descriptor to preserve and continue to inherit the destination directory's DACL; their staging directory therefore lives beside the target. POSIX keeps the owner-only staging modes and preserves an existing target mode.
Native Windows coverage protects a target DACL, inspects the written staging file, and compares the final replacement's ordered, de-duplicated ACE policy. Host-independent binding tests cover Win32 error translation and every native call boundary.
Native Windows coverage protects a target DACL, inspects the written staging file, and compares the final replacement's ordered, de-duplicated ACE policy. Host-independent binding tests cover Win32 error translation and every native call boundary. Mode-bit assertions remain POSIX-only; new-file DACL inheritance is an operating-system contract rather than a machine-specific account allowlist.
## Alternatives considered
@@ -22,6 +22,10 @@ Native Windows coverage protects a target DACL, inspects the written staging fil
**Install an owner-only DACL for every write.** Rejected because it would discard deliberate project sharing. Copying the target DACL preserves the deployment's existing access policy instead of inventing one.
**Assert inherited accounts with `Get-Acl` or `icacls`.** Rejected because such a test verifies machine policy rather than package behavior, and localized well-known account names make the output unstable across hosts.
**Skip the existing `chmod` calls on Windows.** Rejected because Node maps these writable modes to benign no-ops; platform guards add branches without changing DACL behavior.
## Consequences
Replacing a Windows file now requires permission to read the target DACL and set the temp DACL; failure is loud before content is written. The package carries Koffi for the narrow Win32 calls, loaded only on Windows replacement paths. New-file behavior remains directory-inherited, and POSIX mode behavior is unchanged.
Replacing a Windows file now requires permission to read the target DACL and set the temp DACL; failure is loud before content is written. The package carries Koffi for the narrow Win32 calls, loaded only on Windows replacement paths. A new Windows file inherits broad directory access when the directory is broad by design, while POSIX temp content stays owner-only; a read-only Windows target still fails publication before synthetic mode replay could matter.

View File

@@ -6,13 +6,13 @@ Status: implemented
## 问题
在 Windows 上,在目标文件的父目录下创建暂存目录和临时文件,并且只依赖继承的 DACL足以满足新建文件的需要但无法安全替换显式或受保护 DACL 比父目录更严格的现有文件:内容会在权限更宽松的父目录 DACL 下写入,而重命名又会把这个暂存安全描述符带到替换后的文件上。
原子写入在 POSIX 上以 `0o700` 保护暂存目录、以 `0o600` 保护临时文件,但 Windows mode 位只呈现实际 DACL 的合成只读视图。在目标文件的父目录下创建暂存目录和临时文件,并且只依赖继承的 DACL足以满足新建文件的需要但无法安全替换显式或受保护 DACL 比父目录更严格的现有文件:内容会在权限更宽松的父目录 DACL 下写入,而重命名又会把这个暂存安全描述符带到替换后的文件上。
## 决策
`dsh-fs-local` 通过 `GetFileSecurityW` 读取现有目标文件的 DACL在写入内容前将其以禁止继承的形式应用到空临时文件并通过 `ReplaceFileW` 发布已关闭的临时文件。受保护的暂存安全描述符可防止暂存目录中的继承条目扩大访问权限;`ReplaceFileW` 会保留原目标文件的访问策略及其他替换元数据。其 ACL 合并过程可能重新序列化自动继承状态或复制等价 ACE因此不能把自相对安全描述符缓冲区的逐字节相等作为稳定契约。新文件没有既有描述符需要保留,因此仍继承目标目录的 DACL。
`dsh-fs-local` 通过 `GetFileSecurityW` 读取现有目标文件的 DACL在写入内容前将其以禁止继承的形式应用到空临时文件并通过 `ReplaceFileW` 发布已关闭的临时文件。受保护的暂存安全描述符可防止暂存目录中的继承条目扩大访问权限;`ReplaceFileW` 会保留原目标文件的访问策略及其他替换元数据。其 ACL 合并过程可能重新序列化自动继承状态或复制等价 ACE因此不能把自相对安全描述符缓冲区的逐字节相等作为稳定契约。新的 Windows 文件没有既有描述符需要保留,因此仍继承目标目录的 DACL其暂存目录也因此位于目标文件旁。POSIX 继续使用仅所有者可访问的暂存 mode并保留现有目标文件的 mode
Windows 原生覆盖率测试会保护目标文件的 DACL、检查写入完成的暂存文件并对比最终替换文件中保持顺序且去重后的 ACE 策略。与宿主平台无关的绑定测试覆盖 Win32 错误转换以及每个原生调用边界。
Windows 原生覆盖率测试会保护目标文件的 DACL、检查写入完成的暂存文件并对比最终替换文件中保持顺序且去重后的 ACE 策略。与宿主平台无关的绑定测试覆盖 Win32 错误转换以及每个原生调用边界。mode 位断言仍仅适用于 POSIX新文件的 DACL 继承由操作系统契约规定,不应通过特定机器的账户允许列表来断言。
## 备选方案
@@ -22,6 +22,10 @@ Windows 原生覆盖率测试会保护目标文件的 DACL、检查写入完成
**每次写入都设置仅所有者可访问的 DACL。** 不予采用,因为这会破坏项目有意设置的共享权限。复制目标文件的 DACL 可以保留部署中已有的访问策略,无需另行创设策略。
**使用 `Get-Acl` 或 `icacls` 断言继承账户。** 不予采用,因为这类测试验证的是机器策略,而不是包行为;系统内置账户名会本地化,使输出在不同宿主上不稳定。
**在 Windows 上跳过现有 `chmod` 调用。** 不予采用,因为 Node 会把这些可写 mode 映射为无害的空操作;平台条件判断只会增加分支,不会改变 DACL 行为。
## 影响
替换 Windows 文件现在要求调用方有权读取目标 DACL 并设置临时文件 DACL如果权限不足系统会在写入内容前明确失败。该包package引入 Koffi 以执行少量 Win32 调用,并且只在 Windows 替换路径上加载。新建文件仍按目录继承POSIX mode 行为保持不变
替换 Windows 文件现在要求调用方有权读取目标 DACL 并设置临时文件 DACL如果权限不足系统会在写入内容前明确失败。该包package引入 Koffi 以执行少量 Win32 调用,并且只在 Windows 替换路径上加载。新的 Windows 文件会在目录按设计开放较宽访问权限时继承该权限,而 POSIX 临时内容仍仅允许所有者访问;只读 Windows 目标文件仍会在发布时失败,早于重放合成 mode 可能产生影响的时点

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-26-intent-draft-same-tick-echo.md: 1a4fdb48c0434bd37d7771dddb640720e1b610e6
2026-07-26-intent-draft-same-tick-echo.zh.md: 9ecdf7154f5014de242021f99d2e51959c2a3169

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
# Agent Note: Intent draft echoes in the same tick
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-26-intent-draft-same-tick-echo.zh.md)
## Problem
The hero composer ("Let's start building") is a controlled textarea whose value is the frontend Session Intent's retained prompt, read from the sessions **list** snapshot (`EmptyState` binds `intent.prompt` via `useSessions`). Typing routed through `SessionManager.updateIntent → Session.updatePendingPrompt`, which flushes the **Session's own** notifier synchronously — but the list snapshot the composer actually renders from only heard about the change through the intent watch subscription in `startIntent`, which calls `markDirty()`, a microtask-deferred flush.
A deferred echo violates the controlled-input contract documented on the Notifier (see the [web client architecture note](../architecture/2026-07-19-gui-web-client-architecture.md)): React compares the DOM value against the still-stale snapshot during the same tick as `onChange` and rolls the textarea back. With plain typing this shows as caret jumps; with an IME it corrupts input — every composition update gets rolled back and re-applied against a stale value, so typing Pinyin "nihao" commits fragments like "nnini hni hani hao你好". The resident composer (`ConversationRoot`) was not affected: its draft lives in the chat store (sync flush) or comes from `updateSessionPrompt`, which reads the Session snapshot directly rather than the list projection.
## Decision
`SessionManager.updateIntent` calls `this.notifier.notifyNow()` after `updatePendingPrompt`, flushing the list snapshot in the same tick as the change event. This matches the Notifier's channel rule: a direct echo of a user gesture whose controlled input renders from this snapshot uses `notifyNow`; the intent watch keeps `markDirty` for every other (async) intent transition.
## Alternatives considered
**Change the intent watch callback in `startIntent` to `notifyNow`.** Wrong channel for that seam: the watch also fires on frame-driven Session changes (publication, send phases), and the architecture note bans `notifyNow` for frame-driven sources because it collapses batching.
**Have `EmptyState` read the prompt from the Session snapshot instead of the list.** Restructures the slot contract (EmptyState is deliberately bound to the standard `useSessions` feed and has no session scope yet — the frontend Session is page-local) for no gain over flushing the projection it already reads.
**Suppress the rollback in `InputBar` with local uncontrolled state.** Hides the symptom, forfeits the single-source-of-truth draft (the retained prompt must survive workspace retargeting and send/retry), and leaves every other list-snapshot-controlled input exposed.
## Consequences
Typing in the hero composer, IME composition included, echoes synchronously. `updateIntent` on a no-intent state stays a no-op with no notification. The web workspace-flow snapshot's composer helper now asserts the same-tick echo instead of waiting for it, so a regression to a deferred echo fails the keyless snapshot gate; a runtime unit test pins the same contract at the manager seam.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
# Agent Note: Intent draft echoes in the same tick
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-26-intent-draft-same-tick-echo.md) | 中文
## Problem
hero composer「Let's start building」是一个受控controlled的 textarea它的值取自前端 Session Intent 保留下来的提示词,读自会话**列表**快照(`EmptyState` 通过 `useSessions` 绑定 `intent.prompt`)。输入经由 `SessionManager.updateIntent → Session.updatePendingPrompt`,后者会同步刷新 **Session 自身的** notifier——但 composer 实际渲染所依据的那份列表快照,只能通过 `startIntent` 中的 intent watch 订阅得知这次变更,而该订阅调用的是 `markDirty()`,即一次延迟到微任务的刷新。
延迟的回显违反了 Notifier 上所记录的受控输入契约(见 [web 客户端架构笔记](../architecture/2026-07-19-gui-web-client-architecture.md)React 在与 `onChange` 相同的 tick 内,把 DOM 值与仍然陈旧的快照相比对,随后把 textarea 回滚。普通输入时这表现为光标跳动使用输入法IME它会损坏输入——每一次 composition 更新都会被回滚并针对陈旧的值重新应用因此输入拼音「nihao」会提交出类似「nnini hni hani hao你好」这样的片段。resident composer`ConversationRoot`)不受影响:它的草稿存放在 chat store 中(同步刷新),或来自 `updateSessionPrompt`,后者直接读取 Session 快照,而不是列表投影。
## Decision
`SessionManager.updateIntent``updatePendingPrompt` 之后调用 `this.notifier.notifyNow()`,从而在与变更事件相同的 tick 内刷新列表快照。这符合 Notifier 的通道规则:当某个用户手势的受控输入正是从该快照渲染时,对它的直接回显使用 `notifyNow`;而 intent watch 对其余所有异步的intent 状态转换仍保留 `markDirty`
## Alternatives considered
**把 `startIntent` 中的 intent watch 回调改为 `notifyNow`。** 对那个 seam 而言是错误的通道:该 watch 也会在帧驱动的 Session 变更(发布、发送阶段)时触发,而架构笔记禁止对帧驱动的来源使用 `notifyNow`,因为那会瓦解批处理。
**让 `EmptyState` 从 Session 快照而非列表读取提示词。** 这会重构槽位契约EmptyState 有意绑定到标准的 `useSessions` 数据源,且尚无 session 作用域——前端 Session 是页面本地的),相比刷新它本就读取的那份投影并无收益。
**在 `InputBar` 中用本地的非受控状态抑制回滚。** 这只是掩盖症状,放弃了单一真源的草稿(保留下来的提示词必须在工作区重定向以及发送/重试后依然存在),并让其余每一个由列表快照控制的输入都暴露在同一问题之下。
## Consequences
在 hero composer 中输入(包括输入法 composition 在内)会同步回显。在无 intent 的状态上调用 `updateIntent` 仍是一次空操作不发出任何通知。web workspace-flow 快照的 composer 辅助函数现在断言的是同一 tick 内的回显,而不是等待它,因此一旦回退成延迟回显,就会让无密钥快照门禁失败;一个运行时单元测试在 manager 这一 seam 处钉住了同一份契约。

View File

@@ -1,61 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: Agent Client Protocol (ACP) support — drive the coding agent from external editors
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-06-14-acp-agent-client-protocol.zh.md)
> Superseded by [ACP as an automation-only protocol](../simplification/2026-07-23-acp-automation-only-protocol.md). This note records the retired editor-facing bridge design.
## Problem
The harness originally exposed agents only through a readline loop. That surface could carry text, but it gave an editor no structured way to create or resume sessions, correlate prompt completion, stream reasoning and tool activity, render tool-specific UI, ask for permission, or cancel one conversation without disturbing another. ACP defines those interactions as JSON-RPC over stdio, and Zed is the target client used to make concrete compatibility decisions.
The bridge must preserve the harness's existing ownership boundaries. It cannot depend on the concrete agent loop, bypass the tool registry, execute shell commands in the editor, or invent a second source of session truth. stdout is also the protocol transport, so any accidental log output corrupts the connection.
## Decision
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-acp` was a UI/client-driver plugin in the `ui` package group (it now lives in `acp`). It used `@agentclientprotocol/sdk`'s `AgentSideConnection` over stdin/stdout and programmed only interface services: the agent create/resume factory, session persistence, tool registry, user interaction, and optional approval/bash capabilities. It did not change the agent loop and was not a capability-seam implementation.
The bridge implements the following stable session path:
- `initialize` negotiates the protocol version, advertises text plus `resource_link` prompts, and advertises `loadSession`.
- `session/new` validates an absolute `cwd`, stores it in `SessionHeader`, creates an agent through `ctx.agents`, and returns any composition-backed config options.
- `session/load` validates the requested cwd against persisted metadata before constructing an agent, reserves the id across the asynchronous resume, replays user/assistant/tool events as ACP updates, and reports the resumed config-option fold.
- `session/prompt` accepts text and resource links, rejects unsupported or empty content, allows one in-flight prompt per session, and settles against that prompt's owning `turn/end`. An error turn rejects the RPC; other closed turn reasons map through a total ACP stop-reason codec.
- `session/cancel` calls the queue-aware agent cancel path and settles only the addressed session's prompt.
Tool-call presentation remains tool-owned. A tool's `presentCall` and `presentResult` return the `generic`, `terminal`, or `diff` render-intent variants; the bridge switches on that union and maps it to ACP. Presenter-less tools receive a generic fallback. Bash terminal cards use Zed's capability-gated `_meta.terminal_info`, `_meta.terminal_output`, and `_meta.terminal_exit` convention; the harness still executes the command through `ctx.bash`, preserving sandbox, environment scrub, ownership, and cwd. Clients without that extension receive ordinary text content. Filesystem tools provide diff cards and file locations without hard-coded tool-name branches in the bridge.
Permission handling is an answerer on the [user-approval seam](2026-07-06-approval-seam.md), not an ask-every-tool policy in ACP. An `approval/request` for a bridge-owned agent with a call id becomes `session/request_permission` on that agent's editor session, with one-shot allow/reject choices. Foreign or call-less requests delegate; a missing or failed answerer remains fail-closed. The plugin that asks—such as a pre-execute policy or bash escalation—owns the decision to ask.
When `ctx.permission` is composed, the bridge exposes one `permission` select from the deployment's preset table. The shipped `workspace-write` and `danger-full-access` presets each bundle a sandbox mode with an approval policy; unmatched effective knobs produce the switch-away-only `custom` state. `session/set_config_option` validates through `PermissionService.set()` and writes both owning knob events. A switch during an open turn appends immediately; an idle switch is overlaid in responses and anchored at the next `agent/prompt-submit`, before request assembly. Until then it is memory-only, so a crash restores the durable fold. ACP session modes are not modeled because config options are the forward protocol surface; `AcpConfig.model` remains connection-wide.
The bridge also provides the ACP-backed `UserInteractionProvider`: `ask_user_question` requests become form elicitations on the owning session. Select, multi-select, option descriptions, and custom-answer override semantics are preserved.
Lifecycle ownership is explicit. The bridge holds an `AgentHandle` per live session. Disconnect and Cordis disposal cancel pending prompts, dispose every handle in parallel, await loop quiescence and persistence flush, and then remove the records. Stream notification failures are contained so a vanished client cannot corrupt an agent turn. The ACP app composition loads no stdout logger; a test guards stdout as framed JSON-RPC only.
The current protocol contract lives in the [`dsh-acp` package README](../../../../packages/acp/acp/README.md).
## Alternatives considered
**A prepended `tools/execute` listener that asks on every ACP-owned call** — rejected. It would hard-code permission policy into the UI bridge, ask even when no policy requires it, and could not serve approval requests that arise after execution begins. The shared user-approval seam keeps mechanism, asking policy, and UI answerer separate.
**Inject the concrete `agentLoop`** — rejected. Agent creation, resume, idle observation, and disposal are interface-level ownership operations on `dsh-agent`; a UI plugin does not need a dependency-rule exception.
**Execute bash through ACP `terminal/*`** — rejected. That would move execution outside the harness and bypass its sandbox, credential scrub, task ownership, cwd resolution, and session log. Terminal metadata is presentation only.
**Represent permission presets as ACP session modes** — rejected. The deployment-defined preset is already one config-option select, while session modes are the legacy surface slated for removal in ACP v2.
**Hijack stdout defensively** — rejected. Process-wide monkey-patching is outside Cordis effect ownership and races the protocol transport. The app composition owns stdout purity.
## Consequences
Editors can create, load, prompt, cancel, render, ask, and reconfigure multiple harness sessions over one ACP connection without a loop-specific dependency. The session event log remains the durable source for replay, prompt settlement, cwd, and per-session configuration. Tool presentation and human-answer channels remain extensible plugin contracts instead of ACP-specific behavior.
The bridge deliberately does not implement session list/delete/resume/close capabilities, MCP passthrough, additional directories, image/audio/embedded-resource prompts, plans, slash commands, usage updates, editor filesystem delegation, or the ACP terminal execution sub-protocol. Runtime model selection was added later through standard session config options by the [LLM catalog and ACP selection Agent Note](../architecture/2026-07-15-llm-model-catalog-and-acp-selection.md).
An idle config selection is truthful in the live response but not durable until the next `agent/prompt-submit` anchors it inside the open turn. Crashing before that boundary loses the pending selection; this is the cost of keeping session events turn-enclosed and replay-safe.
## Verification
The ACP suites cover the in-memory protocol codec, create/load replay, exact prompt settlement, cancellation races, unsupported content, tool presentation, terminal capability fallback, permission outcome mapping, config-option validation and persistence, multi-session isolation, disconnect/disposal quiescence, and HMR cleanup. Snapshot and built-bin tests exercise the app composition, while the real-API e2e self-skips without a key.

View File

@@ -1,61 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: Agent Client ProtocolACP支持——从外部编辑器驱动编码 agent
Status: implemented
[English](2026-06-14-acp-agent-client-protocol.md) | 中文
> 已被 [ACP 作为仅面向自动化的协议](../simplification/2026-07-23-acp-automation-only-protocol.md)取代。本 Agent Note 记录已退役的面向编辑器的桥接层设计。
## 问题
harness 最初仅通过 readline 循环暴露 agent。该接口能传输文本但编辑器无法以结构化方式创建或恢复会话、关联提示词完成、流式输出推理reasoning与工具活动、渲染工具专属 UI、请求权限或在不干扰其他对话的前提下取消某个对话。ACPAgent Client Protocol将这些交互定义为基于 stdio 的 JSON-RPCZed 是用于做出具体兼容性决策的目标客户端。
桥接层必须保持 harness 既有的所有权边界。它不能依赖具体的 agent loop智能体循环不能绕过工具注册表不能在编辑器中执行 shell 命令也不能发明第二个会话真源。stdout 同时也是协议传输通道,因此任何意外的日志输出都会破坏连接。
## 决策
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-acp` 曾是 `ui` 包组中的 UI/客户端驱动插件(现位于 `acp`)。它使用 `@agentclientprotocol/sdk``AgentSideConnection`(基于 stdin/stdout仅编排接口服务agent 创建/恢复工厂、会话持久化、工具注册表、用户交互,以及可选的审批/bash 能力。它不修改 agent loop也不是能力 seam 的实现。
桥接层实现以下稳定的会话路径:
- `initialize` 协商协议版本,声明支持 text 与 `resource_link` 类型的提示词,并声明 `loadSession` 能力。
- `session/new` 校验绝对路径 `cwd`,将其存入 `SessionHeader`,通过 `ctx.agents` 创建 agent并返回由组合层支持的配置选项。
- `session/load` 在构造 agent 之前校验请求的 cwd 与持久化元数据是否一致,在异步恢复期间保留 id将用户/助手/工具事件作为 ACP update 回放,并报告恢复后的 config-option 折叠结果。
- `session/prompt` 接受文本和 resource link拒绝不支持的或空的内容每个会话同时只允许一个 in-flight 提示词,并在该提示词所属的 `turn/end` 时结算。错误轮次拒绝 RPC其他关闭轮次的原因通过一个全覆盖的 ACP stop-reason 编解码器映射。
- `session/cancel` 调用队列感知的 agent 取消路径,仅结算被寻址会话的提示词。
工具调用的展示仍由工具自身负责。工具的 `presentCall``presentResult` 返回 `generic``terminal``diff` 渲染意图变体;桥接层对该联合类型做 switch 并映射到 ACP。没有 presenter 的工具获得通用回退。Bash 终端卡片使用 Zed 的能力门控约定 `_meta.terminal_info``_meta.terminal_output``_meta.terminal_exit`harness 仍通过 `ctx.bash` 执行命令,保留沙箱、环境清洗、所有权和 cwd。不支持该扩展的客户端收到普通文本内容。文件系统工具提供 diff 卡片和文件位置,桥接层中无需硬编码工具名分支。
权限处理是[用户审批 seam](2026-07-06-approval-seam.md)上的一个 answerer而非 ACP 中的「每次工具调用都询问」策略。对桥接层所属 agent 且带有 call id 的 `approval/request`,会变为该 agent 编辑器会话上的 `session/request_permission`,提供一次性允许/拒绝选项。外部请求或无 call id 的请求委托给下游;缺失或失败的 answerer 会在故障时保持拒绝。发起询问的插件(如预执行策略或 bash 升级)拥有「是否询问」的决策权。
`ctx.permission` 被组合时,桥接层从部署的预设表中暴露一个 `permission` select。已发布的 `workspace-write``danger-full-access` 预设各自捆绑一个沙箱模式与一条审批策略;无法匹配的有效旋钮组合产生只能切走的 `custom` 状态。`session/set_config_option` 通过 `PermissionService.set()` 校验并写入两个所属旋钮事件。在开放轮次中的切换立即追加;空闲时的切换叠加在响应中,并在下一次 `agent/prompt-submit` 时锚定到开放轮次之前的请求组装阶段。在此之前它仅存于内存因此崩溃后恢复的是持久化的折叠结果。ACP session mode 不被建模,因为 config option 是面向未来的协议表面;`AcpConfig.model` 保持连接级别。
桥接层还提供基于 ACP 的 `UserInteractionProvider``ask_user_question` 请求变为所属会话上的表单引导。select、multi-select、选项描述与自定义回答覆盖语义均被保留。
生命周期所有权是显式的。桥接层为每个活跃会话持有一个 `AgentHandle`。断连和 Cordis dispose资源释放会取消待处理的提示词并行 dispose 所有 handle等待循环完全停稳与持久化刷写然后移除记录。流通知失败被隔离因此消失的客户端不会破坏 agent 轮次。ACP 应用组合不加载 stdout logger一个测试守卫 stdout 仅包含帧化的 JSON-RPC。
当前的协议契约见 [`dsh-acp` 包 README](../../../../packages/acp/acp/README.md)。
## 曾考虑的替代方案
**在 `tools/execute` 监听器前置一层,对每个 ACP 所属调用都询问权限**:否决。这会将权限策略硬编码到 UI 桥接层,即使没有策略要求也会询问,且无法服务于执行开始后才产生的审批请求。共享的 user-approval seam 将机制、询问策略和 UI answerer 分离。
**注入具体的 `agentLoop`**否决。agent 的创建、恢复、空闲观察与释放是 `dsh-agent` 上的接口级所有权操作UI 插件不需要依赖规则例外。
**通过 ACP `terminal/*` 执行 bash**:否决。这会将执行移到 harness 之外绕过其沙箱、凭证清洗、任务所有权、cwd 解析与会话日志。终端元数据仅用于展示。
**将权限预设表示为 ACP session mode**:否决。部署定义的预设已经是一个 config-option select而 session mode 是 ACP v2 计划移除的遗留接口。
**防御性劫持 stdout**:否决。进程级 monkey-patching 超出 Cordis 副作用所有权范围,且与协议传输存在竞争。应用组合拥有 stdout 纯净性。
## 后果
编辑器可以通过一条 ACP 连接创建、加载、提交提示词、取消、渲染、询问和重新配置多个 harness 会话无需依赖特定的循环实现。会话事件日志仍是回放、提示词结算、cwd 与每会话配置的持久真源。工具展示与人工回答通道仍是可扩展的插件契约,而非 ACP 专属行为。
桥接层有意不实现会话列表/删除/恢复/关闭能力、MCP 透传、附加目录、图片/音频/嵌入资源提示词、plan、斜杠命令、用量更新、编辑器文件系统委托或 ACP 终端执行子协议。后续已通过标准会话配置选项加入运行时模型选择,见 [LLM 目录与 ACP 选择 Agent Note](../architecture/2026-07-15-llm-model-catalog-and-acp-selection.md)。
空闲时的配置选择在实时响应中是真实的,但在下一次 `agent/prompt-submit` 将其锚定到开放轮次之前不具持久性。在该边界之前崩溃会丢失待定选择;这是保持会话事件封闭于轮次内且回放安全的代价。
## 验证
ACP 测试套件覆盖内存协议编解码器、创建/加载回放、精确的提示词结算、取消竞争、不支持的内容、工具展示、终端能力回退、权限结果映射、config-option 校验与持久化、多会话隔离、断连/释放后的完全停稳,以及 HMR热模块替换清理。快照测试与 built-bin 测试验证应用组合,真实 API 的 e2e 测试在无 key 时自动跳过。

View File

@@ -1,50 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: Rich ACP bash rendering — the terminal card via the `_meta` convention
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-06-18-acp-terminal-and-tool-rendering.zh.md)
> Superseded for ACP by [ACP as an automation-only protocol](../simplification/2026-07-23-acp-automation-only-protocol.md). Tool render intents remain available to UI transports, but ACP no longer projects them into terminal cards.
## Problem
The ACP bridge lets each tool own its call rendering via `presentCall`/`presentResult` (see [tool-call UI presentation](2026-06-14-acp-agent-client-protocol.md) and `packages/core/tools`). For `bash` we surface the exact command as the `tool_call` title, the model's `description` as a content text block, `kind: 'execute'`, and the completed output wrapped in a fenced ` ```console ` text block.
Reference editors render terminal metadata as a dedicated card with cwd, command, live-style output, and exit status; plain text loses that structure. The command is the title because execute cards hide raw input, while the human-readable description remains a separate block above the card.
## Key finding: agent-executed terminals use a `_meta` convention, NOT `terminal/create`
The ACP spec has a *client-side* terminal sub-protocol — the agent calls the client's `terminal/create` with `{ command, args, cwd, env }` and the **editor** executes the process, then the agent reads `terminal/output` / `wait_for_exit`. That model is wrong for us: our harness executes bash itself through `dsh-bash` (sandboxed env-scrub, background-task ownership, per-session cwd). Routing execution to the editor would bypass all of that and fork execution into two backends.
Studying the two reference agents (2026-06-18) shows neither uses `terminal/create` for their own shell tool — **both keep agent-side execution and emit a `_meta` convention** that Zed special-cases:
- **`claude-agent-acp`** (`tools.ts`, `acp-agent.ts`): gated on `clientCapabilities._meta.terminal_output`. The `tool_call` carries `content: [{ type: 'terminal', terminalId }]` and `_meta.terminal_info.{ terminal_id, cwd }`; output/exit arrive on the `tool_call_update`'s `_meta.terminal_output.{ terminal_id, data }` and `_meta.terminal_exit.{ terminal_id, exit_code, signal }`.
- **`codex-acp`** (`CodexToolCallMapper.ts`, `TerminalOutputMode.ts`): same `terminal_info` on the call; output via `_meta.terminal_output` (full) or `_meta.terminal_output_delta` (incremental), selected from the same `_meta.terminal_output` capability.
Zed's side (`crates/agent_servers/src/acp.rs`, verified): on a `ToolCall` whose `_meta.terminal_info.terminal_id` is set, it registers a **display-only** terminal (header = `terminal_info.cwd`, label = `tool_call.title`); on a `ToolCallUpdate`, `_meta.terminal_output.data` writes to that terminal and `_meta.terminal_exit.{exit_code,signal}` sets the status. It advertises the capability as `clientCapabilities._meta.terminal_output = true`. `_meta` itself is a spec-blessed ACP extensibility point (typed `{[k]: unknown} | null` on `ToolCall`/`ToolCallUpdate`); the *specific keys* here (`terminal_info`/`terminal_output`/`terminal_exit`) are a Zed convention, not part of the ACP spec — but they are the de-facto contract for the Zed integration and the only way to get the terminal card while keeping execution agent-side.
## Decision
Keep `dsh-bash` agent-side execution; render the terminal card via the `_meta` convention, capability-gated, with the ` ```console ` text block as the guaranteed fallback.
1. **Capability.** `initialize` reads `clientCapabilities._meta.terminal_output` and the bridge remembers it per connection.
2. **Neutral presentation vocabulary.** `dsh-tools` gains a terminal-shaped presentation a tool can return — provider-neutral (`cwd`, the output `data`, an `exitCode`/`signal`), NO ACP types. `dsh-tool-bash` returns it for `bash` (cwd from the resolved workdir; output + exit parsed from the run result).
3. **Bridge mapping.** When the client advertised the capability, the bridge maps that presentation to: on `tool_call`, `content:[…, {type:'terminal', terminalId}]` (any tool `content`, e.g. the description, rendered BEFORE the terminal block) + `_meta.terminal_info.{terminal_id,cwd}`; on `tool_call_update`, `_meta.terminal_output.{terminal_id,data}` (the captured output) + `_meta.terminal_exit.{terminal_id, exit_code|signal}` (the parsed exit), with the update's text `content` OMITTED (an ACP `tool_call_update.content` REPLACES the call's content collection, so re-sending the fenced block would clobber the terminal content block). `terminalId` is derived from the harness `callId` (stable, unique per call). When the capability is absent, the bridge sends the description content block on the call and the existing ` ```console ` text content on the update — unchanged.
4. **The exit pill is parsed from the rendered output; no new execution path, no live streaming.** Output is attached at completion (from the agent's own `tool/result`), not streamed token-by-token. The exit-status pill (`_meta.terminal_exit.{exit_code,signal}`) IS emitted: the pure `presentResult(args, result)` seam sees only content blocks, so `dsh-tool-bash` recovers the structured exit by parsing the status markers (`[exit code: N]` / `[killed by signal: …]`) that `renderResult` appended — the parse is the exact inverse of the marker emission, the two co-evolve in one file, and a round-trip test guards the pair. Disposal is unaffected: nothing new to tear down, since the bridge never creates a client-side terminal.
## Alternatives considered
- **The ACP client-side terminal sub-protocol (`terminal/create`)** — explicitly rejected: the editor would execute the process, bypassing `dsh-bash`'s env scrub, background-task ownership, and per-session cwd, and forking execution into two backends. Both reference agents reject it the same way (the key finding above); agent-side execution plus the `_meta` convention is the only shape that yields the terminal card while keeping the harness's execution policy.
- **Threading a structured exit through the event schema** — rejected in favor of the marker round-trip: the pure `presentResult(args, result)` seam sees only content blocks, and the parse is the exact inverse of the marker emission, co-evolving in one file under a round-trip test.
## Consequences
- **Zed-convention `_meta` keys.** The terminal card rides on Zed-specific keys (`terminal_info`/`terminal_output`/`terminal_exit`) inside ACP's spec-blessed `_meta` extensibility point, NOT on the ACP terminal sub-protocol. A client that doesn't recognize the keys still gets the text fallback (the capability gate ensures we only emit them when the client opted in via `_meta.terminal_output`), so a non-Zed client is never worse off. If ACP later standardizes agent-executed terminals, migrate to that and drop the convention keys.
- **Capability honesty.** Emit terminal metadata ONLY when the client advertised `_meta.terminal_output`; the text fallback is the contract for everyone else and must never regress. Covered by a no-capability test asserting the ` ```console ` path.
- **terminalId collisions.** Deriving it from the per-call `callId` keeps it unique within a session and stable across the call/result pair; never reuse one across calls.
- **Exit parsed from rendered text.** The exit pill recovers `exit_code`/`signal` by parsing `renderResult`'s status markers rather than threading a structured exit through the event schema (which the pure `presentResult` seam never sees). The parse is the exact inverse of the marker emission and lives in the same file; a round-trip test pins the pair so a marker-format change that breaks the parse fails the suite. If the markers ever need to diverge from what the pill wants, surface a structured exit on the result event instead.
- **Provider-neutral vocabulary creep.** The terminal presentation widens the `dsh-tools` surface; keep it neutral (no ACP types leak into `dsh-tools`) and only as rich as a second UI consumer would also want.
## Out of scope / non-goals
The text-block baseline stays the no-capability default. Two follow-ups are deliberately NOT built here and would each warrant their own Agent Note when someone takes them on: **live incremental streaming** (`_meta.terminal_output_delta` as chunks arrive, which needs an incremental-output seam on `dsh-bash`), and **command classification** (parsing a `cat`/`sed` as a `read` card with a file location, a `grep` as a `search`, etc., falling back to the terminal card — display-only, must never change what executes).

View File

@@ -1,50 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: 富 ACP bash 渲染——通过 `_meta` 约定实现终端卡片
Status: implemented
[English](2026-06-18-acp-terminal-and-tool-rendering.md) | 中文
> 就 ACP 而言已被 [ACP 作为仅面向自动化的协议](../simplification/2026-07-23-acp-automation-only-protocol.md)取代。工具渲染意图对 UI 传输层仍然可用,但 ACP 不再将其投影为终端卡片。
## 问题
ACPAgent Client Protocol桥接层允许每个工具通过 `presentCall`/`presentResult` 自行控制调用渲染(见[工具调用 UI 呈现](2026-06-14-acp-agent-client-protocol.md)与 `packages/core/tools`)。对于 `bash`,我们将确切命令作为 `tool_call` 标题呈现,模型的 `description` 作为一个内容文本块,`kind: 'execute'`,完成后的输出包裹在 ` ```console ` 围栏文本块中。
参考编辑器将终端元数据渲染为一张专用卡片,包含 cwd、命令、实时风格的输出和退出状态纯文本则丢失了这些结构。命令之所以作为标题是因为执行卡片隐藏原始输入而人类可读的描述保留为卡片上方的独立块。
## 关键发现agent 执行的终端使用 `_meta` 约定,而非 `terminal/create`
ACP 规范有一个*客户端侧*终端子协议agent智能体调用客户端的 `terminal/create`(传入 `{ command, args, cwd, env }`),由**编辑器**执行进程,然后 agent 读取 `terminal/output` / `wait_for_exit`。这个模型不适合我们:我们的 harness 通过 `dsh-bash` 自行执行 bash沙箱化的环境清理、后台任务所有权、按会话的 cwd。将执行路由到编辑器会绕过所有这些机制并将执行分叉到两个后端。
研究两个参考 agent2026-06-18发现二者都没有为自己的 shell 工具使用 `terminal/create`——**两者都保持 agent 侧执行,并发出一套 `_meta` 约定**,由 Zed 特殊处理:
- **`claude-agent-acp`**`tools.ts``acp-agent.ts`):以 `clientCapabilities._meta.terminal_output` 为门控。`tool_call` 携带 `content: [{ type: 'terminal', terminalId }]``_meta.terminal_info.{ terminal_id, cwd }`;输出和退出通过 `tool_call_update``_meta.terminal_output.{ terminal_id, data }``_meta.terminal_exit.{ terminal_id, exit_code, signal }` 到达。
- **`codex-acp`**`CodexToolCallMapper.ts``TerminalOutputMode.ts`):调用上同样携带 `terminal_info`;输出通过 `_meta.terminal_output`(完整)或 `_meta.terminal_output_delta`(增量),由同一个 `_meta.terminal_output` 能力选择。
Zed 侧(`crates/agent_servers/src/acp.rs`,已验证):收到 `ToolCall` 且其 `_meta.terminal_info.terminal_id` 已设置时,注册一个**仅展示**的终端header = `terminal_info.cwd`label = `tool_call.title`);收到 `ToolCallUpdate` 时,`_meta.terminal_output.data` 写入该终端,`_meta.terminal_exit.{exit_code,signal}` 设置状态。客户端通过 `clientCapabilities._meta.terminal_output = true` 声明此能力。`_meta` 本身是 ACP 规范认可的扩展点(在 `ToolCall`/`ToolCallUpdate` 上类型为 `{[k]: unknown} | null`);这里的*具体键*`terminal_info`/`terminal_output`/`terminal_exit`)是 Zed 约定,不属于 ACP 规范,但它们是 Zed 集成的事实契约,也是在保持 agent 侧执行的前提下获得终端卡片的唯一方式。
## 决策
保持 `dsh-bash` 的 agent 侧执行;通过 `_meta` 约定渲染终端卡片,以能力声明为门控,以 ` ```console ` 文本块作为保底回退。
1. **能力声明。** `initialize` 读取 `clientCapabilities._meta.terminal_output`,桥接层按连接记住它。
2. **提供方无关的展示词汇。** `dsh-tools` 新增一种终端形态的展示结构,工具可返回它——提供方无关(`cwd`、输出 `data``exitCode`/`signal`),不含 ACP 类型。`dsh-tool-bash``bash` 返回该结构cwd 来自解析后的工作目录;输出与退出从运行结果解析)。
3. **桥接映射。** 当客户端声明了该能力时,桥接层将展示结构映射为:在 `tool_call` 上,`content:[…, {type:'terminal', terminalId}]`(工具的任何 `content`,如描述,渲染在终端块之前)+ `_meta.terminal_info.{terminal_id,cwd}`;在 `tool_call_update` 上,`_meta.terminal_output.{terminal_id,data}`(捕获的输出)+ `_meta.terminal_exit.{terminal_id, exit_code|signal}`(解析后的退出),且 update 的文本 `content` 被省略ACP 的 `tool_call_update.content` 会替换调用的 content 集合,因此重新发送围栏块会覆盖终端内容块)。`terminalId` 由 harness 的 `callId` 派生(稳定、每次调用唯一)。当能力未声明时,桥接层在调用上发送描述内容块,在 update 上发送既有的 ` ```console ` 文本内容——行为不变。
4. **退出信息从渲染输出中解析;无新执行路径,无实时流式传输。** 输出在完成时附加(来自 agent 自身的 `tool/result`),不逐 token 流式传输。退出状态(`_meta.terminal_exit.{exit_code,signal}`)确实会发出:纯 `presentResult(args, result)` seam 只能看到内容块,因此 `dsh-tool-bash` 通过解析 `renderResult` 追加的状态标记(`[exit code: N]` / `[killed by signal: …]`)来恢复结构化退出信息——解析是标记发出的精确逆操作,二者在同一文件中共同演进,一个往返测试守护这对关系。资源释放不受影响:无需新增拆除逻辑,因为桥接层从未创建客户端侧终端。
## 曾考虑的替代方案
- **ACP 客户端侧终端子协议(`terminal/create`**:明确否决。编辑器将执行进程,绕过 `dsh-bash` 的环境清理、后台任务所有权和按会话的 cwd并将执行分叉到两个后端。两个参考 agent 以同样的方式否决了它见上述关键发现agent 侧执行加 `_meta` 约定是在保持 harness 执行策略的同时获得终端卡片的唯一形态。
- **通过事件 schema 传递结构化退出信息**:否决,改用标记往返方案。纯 `presentResult(args, result)` seam 只能看到内容块,而解析是标记发出的精确逆操作,二者在同一文件中共同演进,由往返测试守护。
## 后果
- **Zed 约定的 `_meta` 键。** 终端卡片依赖 Zed 特有的键(`terminal_info`/`terminal_output`/`terminal_exit`),位于 ACP 规范认可的 `_meta` 扩展点内,而非 ACP 终端子协议。不识别这些键的客户端仍然获得文本回退(能力门控确保我们仅在客户端通过 `_meta.terminal_output` 声明支持时才发出这些键),因此非 Zed 客户端不会变差。如果 ACP 日后标准化了 agent 执行的终端,则迁移到该标准并移除约定键。
- **能力诚实。** 仅在客户端声明了 `_meta.terminal_output` 时才发出终端元数据;文本回退是对其他所有客户端的契约,绝不可退化。由一个无能力测试覆盖,断言 ` ```console ` 路径。
- **terminalId 冲突。** 从每次调用的 `callId` 派生,保证在会话内唯一且在 call/result 对之间稳定;绝不跨调用复用。
- **退出信息从渲染文本解析。** 退出信息通过解析 `renderResult` 的状态标记恢复 `exit_code`/`signal`,而非通过事件 schema 传递结构化退出(纯 `presentResult` seam 看不到后者)。解析是标记发出的精确逆操作,且位于同一文件中;往返测试固定了这对关系,标记格式变更若破坏解析则测试套件失败。如果标记格式日后需要与退出信息分道扬镳,则改为在 result 事件上暴露结构化退出。
- **提供方无关词汇的蔓延。** 终端展示结构扩大了 `dsh-tools` 的接口面;保持其中立性(不让 ACP 类型泄漏到 `dsh-tools`),且只提供第二个 UI 消费方同样需要的丰富度。
## 超出范围 / 非目标
文本块基线仍为无能力声明时的默认行为。以下两项后续工作有意不在此处构建,各自需要单独的 Agent Note**实时增量流式传输**(在分片到达时发出 `_meta.terminal_output_delta`,需要在 `dsh-bash` 上新增增量输出 seam**命令分类**(将 `cat`/`sed` 解析为带文件位置的 `read` 卡片,将 `grep` 解析为 `search`,回退到终端卡片——仅展示,绝不改变实际执行内容)。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-06-11-custom-schema-dsl.md: 947d53555df078bfa9f3dac48eab4b8c0074007c
2026-06-11-custom-schema-dsl.zh.md: 26ebfe2fb15a6c034e809b3f51187342fa500193
2026-06-24-workspace-context.md: 6acdb6241bcc57250e217cfc8856e8b0598d4622
2026-06-24-workspace-context.zh.md: f165d08108931df21697c7895523f10ef816297f

View File

@@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-06-24-workspace-context.zh.md)
## Problem
Repository guidance such as `AGENTS.md` belongs in a coding session's effective context so project conventions, build commands, and review rules arrive without repeated user pasting. The stdio and ACP products need the same behavior, isolated by session cwd: a global system-prompt section leaks one workspace's files into another live ACP session.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
# Agent Note: 工作区上下文指令文件
Status: implemented
[English](2026-06-24-workspace-context.md) | 中文
## 问题
`AGENTS.md` 等仓库指引应当进入编码会话的有效上下文使项目约定、构建命令和评审规则无需由用户反复粘贴即可生效。stdio 与 ACPAgent Client Protocol产品需要具备相同行为并按会话 cwd 隔离:全局系统提示词章节会把一个工作区的文件泄漏到另一个仍在运行的 ACP 会话中。
相邻产品形成了值得借鉴的约定但具体做法各不相同。Codex 原生使用 `AGENTS.md`Claude Code 使用 `CLAUDE.md`,并采用熟悉的 system-reminder 风格用户上下文opencode 同时支持这两个名称每个目录只选一个胜出者并延迟发现嵌套文件。harness 需要跨工具兼容,同时避免从同一作用域加载重复或互相矛盾的文件。
生命周期中有两类截然不同的内容。初始适用文件链足够稳定,可以放入请求前缀并受益于提供方前缀缓存。嵌套文件、编辑、候选项切换和移除都发生在会话启动后,应进入持久的仅追加历史,而不是被冻结的前缀。
## 决策
该实现在 `packages/context/workspace-context`package名为 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-workspace-context`。它是请求上下文扩展,不是核心服务或文件系统后端。共享 demo 主干与 Host Runtime 根据显式的 `{ maxBytes } | false` 部署选择挂载它;`dsh web` 启用 65,536 字节预算Host Runtime 的 headless 消费方则禁用它。该插件使用 `agent/session-prefix``tools/post-execute` 和可选的 `ctx.fs` 功能。
插件不会静态注入 `fs`。因此,不带提供方的产品树仍能正常启动;在文件系统提供方出现之前,插件保持无操作。所有生产读取都通过该提供方完成。候选项探测会解析每个路径并对结果执行 stat因此会跟随最终路径组件的符号链接至其目标指向普通文件的链接会被加载缺失路径或非文件目标则确认为不存在。允许仓库拥有的链接跨越信任边界是对最初不跟随探测方式的刻意反转[跟随指令符号链接记录](2026-07-21-follow-instruction-symlinks.md)负责说明该决策及其残余风险。会话前缀信号与动态工具执行信号会贯穿解析、元数据探测和流式读取,因此取消不会等待无关的文件系统扫描。解析或 stat 异常归类为不可用:它只跳过该候选项,绝不被解释为已经加载的作用域被删除。
### 文件名与优先级
默认的逐目录候选列表是 `['AGENTS.md', 'CLAUDE.md']`。该列表可通过 `instructionFileCandidates` 配置;`AGENTS.md` 是普通的第一候选项,而不是隐藏优先级。一个目录中只加载第一个存在的普通文件候选项。使用默认值时,`AGENTS.md` 是原生文件,`CLAUDE.md` 是兼容性回退。第二个列表 `localInstructionFileCandidates`(默认为 `['AGENTS.local.md', 'CLAUDE.local.md']`)会在同一目录的基础文件后加载叠加式本地覆盖层;[默认本地覆盖层记录](2026-07-21-local-instruction-overlay.md)负责说明该决策。
候选条目必须是同一目录中的文件名。空条目、`.``..`,以及包含 `/``\` 的条目会被忽略。其他同目录名称可以显式选择加入;规则目录和导入语义不属于本契约。
用户全局文件固定为 `$DSH_HOME/AGENTS.md`,不受任一候选列表影响,也没有本地覆盖层。`$DSH_HOME` 默认为 `~/.dsh`,与 `~/.codex``~/.claude` 在 harness 层的 home 角色一致,而不会引入插件专用 home。波浪号展开与默认值位于 `dsh-paths` 中,以便未来的 harness 功能共享同一约定。
### 基线前缀
agent loop智能体循环实例的第一次请求会让插件通过 `agent/session-prefix` 提供一条 user 角色消息。它先加载用户全局文件,再从 `agent.session.header.cwd` 向上遍历至配置的根标记(默认为 `.git`)以确定项目根目录,随后从根目录至 cwd 的每级目录各加载一个候选项。`.git` 文件与 `.git` 目录都是有效标记,因而能覆盖链接 worktree 和 submodule。找不到标记时cwd 本身就是根目录。
插件会在 `await next()` 返回前前置其贡献,因此会话前缀贡献按插件注册顺序出现。在产品主干中,工作区指令的注册先于 skill 目录,所以它排在前面。循环会深度冻结组合后的前缀,将其记录在 `EpochHeader.messagePrefix` 中,并在该实例内逐字复用。它是请求状态,不是 `Session.deriveMessages()` 历史。
恢复 agent 会创建新的循环实例,并使用当前文件重新组合基线;新的前缀由恢复请求 header 锚定。这样,恢复时可以使用当前基线内容,而无需修改先前实例已经使用过的前缀。
基线是一条 user 角色的 `<system-reminder>`,包含 `Instructions from: <path>` 章节,以及明确的权威性与优先级说明。这种熟悉的模型可见框架避免引入 harness 专用的 XML 词汇。项目路径相对于根目录;使用默认 home 时,用户全局路径为 `~/.dsh/AGENTS.md`,使用已配置 home 时则为 `$DSH_HOME/AGENTS.md`。文件内容中的字面量 `</system-reminder>` 会被转义。包 README 负责规定当前准确的[提示词形态](../../../../packages/context/workspace-context/README.md#prompt-shape)。
### 动态发现与刷新
第一方 `read``write``edit` 调用成功后,`tools/post-execute` 监听器会协调被触及的后代路径链,以及该会话已经知道的每个作用域。新到达的作用域通过 `additionalContexts` 返回,并在下一次请求中使用 `Additional instructions from: <path>` system-reminder。在 Code Mode 下,`run_code` 会把子分发上下文延后至其外层结果,因此同一更新只会在父结果之后追加,而不会在调用中途注入。
内容编辑会追加 `Updated instructions from: <path>`,说明新内容取代先前内容,并包含当前的完整文件。如果优先级从一个候选项变为另一个,消息还会指出先前路径并说明它不再适用。如果没有候选项保留,插件会追加 `Instructions removed: <path>`,并说明先前加载的指令不再适用。
动态消息在 `content` 中携带完整的 system-reminder 框架;每个 `context/message` 都作为 user 角色消息逐字抵达模型,核心层不会再添加可选择退出的包装。`context/message.meta` 携带不透明 JSON 状态,该状态会持久化,但绝不会渲染给模型。
shell 命令不会触发发现。本地 bash 调用会启动全新的 shell而从任意命令字符串推断已到达路径需要实现提示词插件并不拥有的 shell 语义。
### 重复抑制与变更检测
每个动态工作区上下文事件都会存储带版本的元数据,其形态为 `{ action, scope, path, digest? }``digest` 是对已加载内容计算的 SHA-1。模型可见提示词中没有 HTML 注释、隐藏标记,也没有会被解析回状态的标题。
协调时,插件扫描自身拥有的 `context/message` 事件,并派生每个可见作用域的最新状态。一个简短的逐会话待处理映射只会在不可变的顶层 `tools/result` 证明某个 `additionalContexts` 条目经过所有 post-execute 监听器后仍然保留时开始记录;随后,它覆盖循环将该上下文追加到日志之前的间隔。每个条目记录开启状态的 `{ turn, step }`:如果相同的持久 `context/message` 出现在其序列边界或之后,该条目得到确认并被移除;如果匹配的 `step/end` 先到达,则说明循环丢弃了上下文缓冲区,插件会同时移除待处理条目及其版本缓存快速路径。嵌套的 Code Mode 结果会把变更暂存在父级的不透明执行 token 下,确保一次运行中的重复子分发不会产生重复项;父级结果会回滚这份临时状态,并且只提交外层策略保留的上下文。
路径和 digest 均未变化时会被抑制。日志中的移除操作是一条墓碑记录,因此重新出现的候选项会成为新的 `set`。恢复操作从持久化元数据继续工作。如果压缩compaction从可见表面移除某条指令事件该状态不再抑制后续加载这与模型已经无法看见它的事实一致。只有真正纳入字节预算的变更才会进入元数据或待处理状态因此被省略的文件在之后的触碰中仍有资格加载。
被冻结的基线会保留一个内存中的 pathdigest map 以供比较。后续成功的文件系统触碰会把基线编辑或移除操作追加为动态消息,绝不重写前缀。恢复时重新组合前缀的过程中,插件还会协调可见的动态作用域,因此 agent 离线期间发生的嵌套变更可以在第一次恢复请求前追加更新。
系统刻意不使用文件监视器。检测发生在下一次成功的结构化文件系统触碰或恢复时的前缀组合。提供方失败不会产生移除;只有该作用域中的全部已配置候选项都成功完成探测后,系统才接受「不存在」这一结论。
### 字节预算与有界读取
`maxBytes` 是必填项,分别作用于渲染后的基线或单个动态协调批次;系统不存在隐式或无界的渲染预算。非正数或非有限值会禁用加载。内容超过预算时,系统会先省略较宽泛的文件,再截断最具体的文件。可见的 `Workspace instruction budget ...` 提示会指出被省略和截断的路径与字节数,并且输出绝不超过配置字节数。
`maxSourceBytes` 是正数的逐文件上限,默认为 1 MiB。loader 会在读取前检查报告的大小,同时仍通过 `streamText()` 消费内容并持续统计 UTF-8 字节数,因此缺失/陈旧的元数据无法迫使其进行无界分配。过大的胜出候选项会被视为不可用,而不是改为同目录中的下一个名称。插件刻意不保留进程级缓存,也绝不保留指令正文。它只为每个有效作用域保存 `{ path, version, digest }`,并将这些状态放在 `WeakMap<Session, Map<scope, state>>` 中:提供方 `FsVersion` 与有效提示词状态同时匹配时跳过读取;版本变化则触发有界读取和 SHA-1 确认。SHA-1 仍是持久化在可见结构化元数据中的跨提供方内容标识;提供方版本只作为内存中的失效快速路径。模型可见变更的缓存转换只有在相应上下文通过完整的工具结果策略链后才会提交;如果该已接受上下文随后与中止步骤一起被丢弃、未能进入日志,缓存转换就会失效。
## 考虑过的替代方案
**使用全局 `ctx.systemPrompt.section()`。** 不予采纳,因为同一个 Cordis 上下文可以承载 cwd 不同的多个会话,而仓库所有的文本属于低权威用户上下文,不是最高权威的提供方系统内容。
**在每次 `agent/pre-step` 时注入基线。** 不予采纳,因为重复注入历史会浪费 token、使重复状态复杂化并妨碍提供方前缀保持结构稳定。前缀组合提供冻结、已记录且逐实例的基线动态仅追加消息则负责变更。
**在一个目录中同时加载 `AGENTS.md` 和 `CLAUDE.md`。** 不予采纳,因为正在迁移的仓库通常会在两个文件中重复指引。按顺序排列的候选项让优先级显式且可配置。
**解析渲染后的标题或隐藏注释以恢复已加载状态。** 不予采纳,因为指令正文可能包含相同文本,导致无提示的误报。持久化 JSON 元数据提供明确且对模型不可见的状态通道。
**使用模型总结文件。** 不予采纳,因为指令文件本身已经是经过整理的摘要;再执行一次模型调用既不确定,也可能抹掉边界情况要求。使用带字节预算的确定性全文更简单。
## 影响
工作区指引按会话隔离,并由 demo 前端、Web Host 与每一种工具展示模式共享。初始指令受益于稳定的前缀缓存,嵌套与变更内容则保持持久且可回放。通用的 sessionagent 上下文契约通过 prompt-submit 与工具执行后的 `additionalContexts` 数组携带 JSON 元数据,而不会把条目展平。
仓库文本仍是不受信任的输入。低权威 user 角色框架、显式优先级说明和分隔符转义可以降低风险,但无法消除提示词注入。跟随候选符号链接到目标,会把该接口扩大至树外内容;因此,把 `ctx.fs` 限制在可信根目录内的权限与沙箱层才是真正的边界,它们让系统把工作区文件当作数据而不是权威([跟随指令符号链接记录](2026-07-21-follow-instruction-symlinks.md)负责说明残余风险)。
系统由事件驱动,而不是文件监视器驱动。除非文件系统变更通过结构化工具完成,否则编辑不会在确切的文件系统变更时刻可见;外部文件变更会在下一次成功的结构化触碰或恢复时被发现。这使设计保持确定性并且与提供方无关。
## 延后事项
从 bash 派生路径报告、递归启动扫描、文件监视器、小写默认名称、`.claude/CLAUDE.md``.claude/rules/*.md`、导入指令、ACP `additionalDirectories`、信任确认和模型生成摘要均延后处理。项目目录中的 `.local.` 覆盖层现已默认加载([默认本地覆盖层记录](2026-07-21-local-instruction-overlay.md)负责说明该决策);用户全局覆盖层、目录规则系统和导入仍需要各自的优先级与信任设计。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-06-approval-seam.md: 852108f22be22eeba4578032924adb546ee10985
2026-07-06-approval-seam.zh.md: 9a08f333e0859e6d71f40b039f4b441028c38dc3
2026-07-06-approval-seam.md: 70ccd4d486ad6e0126fa2eb638a064e9fc89bba6
2026-07-06-approval-seam.zh.md: d218f79888957735305db14cd97cc74480297d29

View File

@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ The seam also owns the session-scoped `'ask' | 'never'` policy described by [the
The ACP bridge answers only for an exact agent object owned by its session map. It sends `session/request_permission` with the existing `callId`, advertises one-shot allow/reject options, maps cancellation separately, and never grants an unknown option. Foreign or call-less requests delegate; a failed client RPC becomes `unavailable`. Hooks and `tools/pre-execute` decide whether a call asks at all. This channel is machine policy between an automated client and its agent, not ACP presentation.
The answerer routes through the bridge's exact-agent ownership check described by [the ACP support Agent Note](2026-06-14-acp-agent-client-protocol.md), preserving the per-session permission ownership required by [the multi-session Agent Note](2026-06-14-acp-multi-session.md).
The answerer routes through the bridge's exact-agent ownership check described by [the automation-only ACP Agent Note](../simplification/2026-07-23-acp-automation-only-protocol.md), preserving the per-session permission ownership required by [the multi-session Agent Note](2026-06-14-acp-multi-session.md).
#### Audit, and what the model sees
@@ -135,5 +135,5 @@ In-repo precedents this design copies or contrasts with:
- The `fs/write-intent` gate (`packages/fs/fs/`) — the documented single-occupancy decision-slot waterfall semantics (first answer wins, delegate via `next()`) the answerer contract reuses.
- `hook/invoked`/`hook/result` — the log-only audit-pair precedent `approval/asked`/`approval/decided` follows; [the hook-bridges Agent Note](2026-06-30-hook-bridges.md) ships `permissionDecision: ask`, the first producer.
- [The interception-seams Agent Note](2026-06-30-interception-seams.md) — the `tools/pre-execute` `allow`/`deny`/`ask` vocabulary whose `ask` this seam services.
- [The ACP support Agent Note](2026-06-14-acp-agent-client-protocol.md) — the exact-agent ownership check against the session map that the answerer routes through; [the multi-session Agent Note](2026-06-14-acp-multi-session.md) — the per-session permission-ownership blocker this implements.
- [The automation-only ACP Agent Note](../simplification/2026-07-23-acp-automation-only-protocol.md) — the exact-agent ownership check against the session map that the answerer routes through; [the multi-session Agent Note](2026-06-14-acp-multi-session.md) — the per-session permission-ownership blocker this implements.
- The opportunistic `ctx.get()` consumption pattern (`tool-bash`'s owner-token lookup, the loop's persistence probe) — how `dsh-tools` consumes the seam without gating its fiber on it.

View File

@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ seam 还拥有[沙箱 Agent Note](2026-07-06-sandbox.md) 所描述的会话级 `
ACP 桥只应答其会话映射所拥有的精确 agent 对象。它携带既有 `callId` 发送 `session/request_permission`,声明一次性的 allow/reject 选项,单独映射取消,并且绝不批准未知选项。外部或无调用标识的请求会委派;客户端 RPC 失败变为 `unavailable`。钩子和 `tools/pre-execute` 决定一次调用是否需要询问。该通道是自动化客户端与其 agent 之间的机器策略,不是 ACP 展示层。
应答者通过 [ACP 支持 Agent Note](2026-06-14-acp-agent-client-protocol.md) 描述的桥精确 agent 归属检查进行路由,保留了[多会话 Agent Note](2026-06-14-acp-multi-session.md) 要求的每会话权限归属。
应答者通过[仅面向自动化的 ACP Agent Note](../simplification/2026-07-23-acp-automation-only-protocol.md)描述的桥精确 agent 归属检查进行路由,保留了[多会话 Agent Note](2026-06-14-acp-multi-session.md) 要求的每会话权限归属。
#### 审计,以及模型看到什么
@@ -135,5 +135,5 @@ ACP 桥只应答其会话映射所拥有的精确 agent 对象。它携带既有
- `fs/write-intent` 门禁(`packages/fs/fs/`)——文档化的单占用决策槽 waterfall 语义(先到先得,通过 `next()` 委派),应答者契约复用了它。
- `hook/invoked`/`hook/result`——仅日志审计对先例,`approval/asked`/`approval/decided` 沿用了它;[钩子桥 Agent Note](2026-06-30-hook-bridges.md) 交付了 `permissionDecision: ask`,即第一个生产者。
- [拦截 seam Agent Note](2026-06-30-interception-seams.md)——`tools/pre-execute``allow`/`deny`/`ask` 词汇,本 seam 服务其中的 `ask`
- [ACP 支持 Agent Note](2026-06-14-acp-agent-client-protocol.md)——应答者路由时对会话映射执行的精确 agent 归属检查;[多会话 Agent Note](2026-06-14-acp-multi-session.md)——本设计实现的每会话权限归属阻塞项。
- [仅面向自动化的 ACP Agent Note](../simplification/2026-07-23-acp-automation-only-protocol.md)——应答者路由时对会话映射执行的精确 agent 归属检查;[多会话 Agent Note](2026-06-14-acp-multi-session.md)——本设计实现的每会话权限归属阻塞项。
- 机会性 `ctx.get()` 消费模式(`tool-bash` 的 owner-token 查找、loop 的持久化探测)——`dsh-tools` 消费该 seam 而不阻塞其 fiber 的方式。

View File

@@ -1,194 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: Plan mode — a logged per-agent session mode
Status: implemented
> **Superseded vocabulary (2026-07-22):** [Collapse named session modes into plan mode](../simplification/2026-07-22-plan-specific-collaboration-state.md) replaces this note's generic `dsh-mode`, `mode/set`, definition map, and `ctx.modes` design with the current plan-specific `dsh-plan-mode`, `plan/mode`, `{ section }`, and `ctx.planMode` contract. The review, boundary, reconstructability, and sandbox-orthogonality decisions below remain in force; generic API examples are retained as the historical design this simplification removed.
> **Superseded ACP mapping:** [ACP as an automation-only protocol](../simplification/2026-07-23-acp-automation-only-protocol.md) removes the picker, config-option, and elicitation mappings described below. Plan mode remains available to human-facing interfaces.
## Problem
Before this change, the harness had no durable way to put one agent into a distinct working stance. Plan mode needs the agent to explore and design under planning guidance, produce a reviewable artifact, cross an explicit approval boundary, and restore that state across resume and fork without making the model-visible request diverge from the session log.
The extension seams already supplied the surrounding pieces: [`system-prompt/assemble`](../../../../packages/core/system-prompt/README.md) shapes guidance per step and the shipped request is logged in `request/header*` events ([reconstructability](../../implemented/architecture/2026-07-05-reconstructable-requests.md)); [`ctx.userInteraction`](../../../../packages/ui/user-interaction/README.md) carries the approval question and corrective feedback ([ask-user precedent](../../implemented/feature/2026-06-25-ask-user-question.md)); `SessionEventMap` carries durable per-agent facts ([the `todo/write` precedent](../../implemented/feature/2026-06-29-todo-write-tool.md)). The missing piece was the named session state that joins those seams while leaving execution enforcement on the independent sandbox and approval axes.
## Decision
The deliverable is **plan mode**. It ships as the first **session mode** — a named, logged, per-agent COLLABORATION state: a mode definition is deployment-configured guidance the model sees, while the mode IN FORCE for an agent is session state folded from its log. Modes are one axis and the enforcement knobs — the sandbox mode, the approval policy — are others: they never read or write each other, matching how Codex keeps its Plan/Default collaboration presets separate from its sandbox and approval settings. One new product package, `@deepseek-ai/dsh-mode` at `packages/mode/mode/`, owns the event vocabulary, a thin `ctx.modes` service, and every listener; the loop does not change. `plan` is the only required definition — the mode-shaped vocabulary exists so a second mode never renames durable event types, not because more modes ship now.
The state is one `SessionEventMap` member: **`mode/set`**, a log-only, non-surface event carrying `{ mode: string }` with whole-value-replace semantics, plus a pure `foldMode(events)` that returns the mode in force — the last `mode/set`, or the default mode when none exists. Because [the log is the fact channel](../../implemented/architecture/2026-06-30-event-domain-semantics.md), resume, fork, and compaction restore the mode with no extra machinery, and UIs read flips off `session/event`. The default mode is the absence of mode guidance — no section, filtering, or gate. Loading `dsh-mode` still contributes one stable `exit_plan_mode` schema in every mode; that fixed cost avoids tool-catalog churn at mode boundaries.
A mode's whole surface is soft: a `mode:policy` prompt section renders the active definition's guidance, while `exit_plan_mode` remains in the registered tool catalog across every mode and rejects at execution unless the folded mode is `plan`. A transition therefore changes only the system-prompt portion of the attributable `request/header` on the next step, keeping [reconstructability](../../implemented/architecture/2026-07-05-reconstructable-requests.md) green without changing native schemas or Code Mode's SDK. A mode deliberately enforces NOTHING: no execution gate, no tool filtering, no reach into the sandbox or approval knobs — a user who wants a hard read-only floor while planning switches the sandbox-mode option beside the mode picker, in either order, and neither axis disturbs the other. There is likewise NO per-mode tool allow/deny list — which tools a mode admits is an effects question, parked until tool definitions declare their effects ([Deferred](#deferred)); a mode's restraint is its section's guidance plus the exit review.
The model leaves plan mode through the **`exit_plan_mode`** tool: its single argument is the plan text, which makes the plan reconstructable from the log, and the tool conducts the review itself through the user-interaction seam — a question whose supporting detail carries the exact plan, with options and a free-text channel, not a bare permission — so an approval flips the logged mode back to the default, and a rejection becomes the corrective error carrying the user's feedback verbatim, which keeps the model planning with direction. A user flips the mode from any surface through `ctx.modes.set()`; the flip is applied at the next turn boundary (session events are turn-enclosed) and narrated to the model once, only when the model-visible state actually changed.
## High-level API
### A plan-mode session end to end
The user switches the session to plan mode through the ACP mode picker or `/plan [message]` in a terminal front door, and from the next step every request ships the configured plan guidance section. When the optional message is present, that same command submits it into the affected step. The `exit_plan_mode` schema was already present in default and remains byte-identical.
The model explores and designs; the section's guidance is what defers changes into the plan. The sandbox and approval knobs keep whatever the user set them to — a deployment (or user) that wants kernel-enforced read-only during planning pairs plan mode with the independent sandbox-mode option.
When ready, the model calls `exit_plan_mode` with the plan markdown as its argument; the review question carries that exact markdown as supporting detail — approve, or keep planning, with free-text feedback welcome. A native call also renders the plan card; a Code Mode nested dispatch has no native card, so the review detail is the common presentation surface.
On approve, the tool flips the logged mode back to the default: the next step drops the plan section while retaining the same tool catalog (the changed header is in the log), and execution tracking from there is already `todo_write`'s job. On keep-planning, the model receives a corrective error carrying the user's feedback text, revises, and re-presents.
### Deployment configuration
Mode definitions are validated plugin Config — per repo convention, changeable from `cordis.yml` with no code edit. The deployment must provide the complete `plan` section; the package embeds no model instructions. Additional modes use the same config map:
```yaml
- id: mode
name: '@deepseek-ai/dsh-mode'
config:
modes:
plan:
section: |
You are in plan mode: explore and design, then present the
plan for approval through exit_plan_mode.
```
A definition is exactly `{ section }` — there is deliberately no per-mode tool list and no enforcement field ([FAQ](#faq)). Definition names use the lowercase slash-command subset `/^[a-z][a-z0-9_-]*$/u`; `default` is reserved (the absence of policy) and rejected as a key. An invalid name or unknown definition key — a `tools` list or an `access` cap included — fails validation at load; an unknown mode name fails loudly at `set()` time.
### In the terminal
Terminal front doors get one entry command per configured definition through the plugin-owned command registry (`@deepseek-ai/dsh-commands`): `dsh-mode` registers `/plan [message]` for the required definition and, for example, `/review [message]` when `review` is configured. Each command records its named switch; a non-empty optional message is trimmed and passed to `agent.steer()`, which places it in a running agent's next step or delegates to `send()` for a new idle turn. The command name and result stay out of model history, while that explicit message is logged as an ordinary user message under the selected mode. The synthetic `default` entry contributes no command. The exit review prompts right in the terminal with no new machinery: it is an ordinary user-interaction question, so it rides the composed user-interaction provider's prompt queue that `ask_user_question` already uses.
### Over ACP
The mode PICKER is this package's surface: `session/new`/`session/load` advertise `availableModes`/`currentModeId` from `ctx.modes` (consumed opportunistically via `ctx.get`, the `tool-bash` pattern), `session/set_mode` calls `set()` and notifies `current_mode_update` optimistically (the pending mode IS the user's selection; the logged `mode/set` follows at the boundary), and a `session/event` listener re-notifies on each logged flip that differs from the last sent. The exit tool reuses the user-interaction ACP provider's elicitation flow; its ACP mapping carries the review `detail` because Code Mode nested dispatches have no native plan card, while native calls may additionally stream the plan card. Individual environment knobs — sandbox mode, approval policy, the model — are NOT modes and belong to `session/set_config_option` ([FAQ](#faq)).
### For agent creators
`ctx.modes` is the whole programmatic surface: `list()` returns the configured definitions plus the synthetic `default` entry (for pickers), `get(agent)` returns the folded mode plus any pending intent, and `set(agent, mode)` validates the name against `list()`'s vocabulary and records the boundary-applied intent — `default` is always a valid target, so exiting a mode is the same call as entering one. There is no creation-time mode option — a caller selects through `set()` before the first turn, which flushes identically. There is no live `agent/*` mirror to subscribe: UIs read `mode/set` off `session/event`, per [event-domain semantics](../../implemented/architecture/2026-06-30-event-domain-semantics.md).
## Detailed design
### Vocabulary
```text
'mode/set': { mode: string } // SessionEventMap merge in dsh-mode: log-only, non-surface,
// whole-value replace — the last one in the log wins
DEFAULT_MODE = 'default' // the fold of a log with no mode/set; reserved, not definable
```
The payload carries no reason/provenance field: a tool-driven flip sits next to its `tool/call` in the log and a user flip sits at its turn boundary, so the cause is log-adjacent — the same "narrative fields are derivable" call the [reconstructability Agent Note](../architecture/2026-07-05-reconstructable-requests.md) made for request-header facts (the in-flight `env/state` event carries a `source` precisely because its drift variant has NO log-adjacent cause — a contrast, not a conflict). Mode names are config-declared vocabulary, not opaque cross-boundary ids, so they stay bare strings (no `Branded<B>`).
### Config and the resolve step
```text
interface ModeDefinition { section: string } // prompt text — a mode's whole vocabulary
interface ModeConfig { modes: Record<string, ModeDefinition> } // plan is required and owns its complete prompt
resolveConfig(config): ResolvedModes // explicit resolve (the dsh-bash template), fail-loud:
// missing plan, 'default', blank sections, and unknown keys rejected
```
The one-field shape is deliberate minimalism, not the final vocabulary: a per-tool policy dimension returns as effects metadata on tool definitions ([Deferred](#deferred)), read here rather than re-declared per mode — the config shape must not need a migration when it arrives.
### The fold, the service, and the flush
`foldMode(events)` is pure (exported for reconstructors and tests) and folds the append-only session log directly; `mode/set` is not a surface node, so compaction cannot shadow it. `set(agent, mode)` validates the name against `list()`'s vocabulary — the configured definitions plus the reserved `default`, which is rejected as a config KEY but always accepted as a `set()` TARGET — drops a no-op (target equals pending, else current), and otherwise records `{ mode, narrate }` in a `WeakMap` pending-intent slot. It cannot append immediately because [every session event is turn-enclosed](../../implemented/architecture/2026-06-15-turn-enclosure-invariant.md) and an idle agent has no open turn.
Contained listeners on the loop's interception seams ([defensive patterns](../../../../docs/defensive-patterns.md): a policy plugin must not block a prompt or a turn) flush the pending intent as a `mode/set` append — `agent/prompt-submit` fires inside the just-opened turn before its first assembly, and `agent/turn-continuation` fires after an ordinary step closes before its successor. Automatic request recovery bypasses continuation, so a prepended `agent/request-error` wrapper delegates through the composed policy and asynchronous backoff, then flushes only a `retry` decision before the waterfall returns to the loop; an effect-scoped lifetime guard suppresses a captured wrapper that resumes after plugin disposal. All three paths sit outside tool execution and log publication (post-commit `session/event` observers are observe-only), so every step runs under the mode its assembly folded. When the flushed mode differs from the fold at the last `request/header`, the flush appends one coalesced `context/message` notice in the same frame ("The user switched this session to plan mode."); the user-visible narration cases are enumerated in the [FAQ](#faq).
### The soft layer: a computed section and a stable exit schema
The registered prompt section reads the calling agent's mode from `AssembleContext.agent` and resolves to the active definition's guidance or `''`. The loop renders per step and logs a complete `request/header` whenever the rendered header changes, so entering or leaving a mode is attributable. The section is static per mode and the plan itself stays in the conversation as messages and tool arguments; re-injecting separate plan state on every request ([Prior art](#prior-art)'s compaction-survival hack) is unnecessary prompt churn.
The guidance contribution is `{ name: 'mode:policy', order: 50, text: context => … }`: after persona (0), before tool guidance (100199), and empty for default or agent-less assembly. `exit_plan_mode` is registered once through `ctx.tools` and never filtered, so native schemas and Code Mode's generated SDK remain byte-identical across mode switches; a deployment without `dsh-mode` lacks that one binding. There is NO `tools/pre-execute` listener: a mode gates nothing, while the exit tool's own folded-mode check rejects out-of-plan calls. The exit review is a question with options and feedback, not a permission, so it lives inside the tool's execution over the user-interaction seam.
### `exit_plan_mode`
`defineTool` has one required `plan: string` argument. Native execution records it in the ordinary `tool/call`; Code Mode records the outer `run_code` source before execution and appends the normalized nested arguments in `tool/code-dispatch` after the dispatch settles. `execute` rejects an agent-less call (the [`todo_write` precedent](../../implemented/feature/2026-06-29-todo-write-tool.md)), rejects any folded mode other than `plan`, rejects an empty or heading-less plan before asking the reviewer, then conducts one single-select `ctx.userInteraction.ask()` review whose `detail` is the exact plan — approve or keep planning — with free-text feedback open. Only exactly one `Approve` selection consents; every other shape fails closed. Approval records a SILENT boundary-applied intent to switch to `default` and returns a short confirmation. The deployment guidance tells the model to make this the only and final tool call in its response; if a model violates that rule, the runtime still holds plan guidance for the rest of the batch, and the next step logs a changed header with the guidance removed and tool schemas unchanged. Every non-approval outcome returns a corrective `isError` and leaves the mode in `plan`.
Its [render intent](../../implemented/architecture/2026-07-02-tool-render-intent-union.md), decided up front: `presentCall` is a `generic` card titled by the plan's first heading with the plan markdown as content, plus a `generic` result card. Native front doors show that card before the question; Code Mode nested dispatches do not produce native call-card events, so the user-interaction `detail` independently carries the same plan on every provider. The seam is consumed opportunistically (`ctx.get('userInteraction')`), so `dsh-mode` composes without it and degrades to the manual exit pinned in the [FAQ](#faq).
### Dependencies and surfaces
`dsh-mode` is one product package, not a capability-seam trio ([Alternatives considered](#alternatives-considered)): it peers on `cordis`, `dsh-session`, `dsh-agent`, `dsh-tools`, and `dsh-system-prompt`, injects `['tools', 'systemPrompt']`, and reads `ctx.userInteraction` opportunistically at execute time (a type-only peer edge on `dsh-user-interaction`); its only UI-facing edges are optional type-only peers (`dsh-commands` for the per-definition entry commands). Beyond the `ctx.modes` call surface everything participates through listeners, so dropping the package gracefully removes modes rather than breaking a consumer. Terminal front doors need no mode-specific code: `dsh-mode` itself registers each definition's command on the command registry when one is composed (an optional type-only peer edge on `dsh-commands`), and the exit review rides the composed user-interaction provider's prompt queue. The ACP wire mapping is pinned in [High-level API](#over-acp); package-wise the bridge takes a type-only peer edge on `dsh-mode` and reads the service opportunistically, so a bridge without the plugin behaves exactly as today.
### The recorded scenario and the harness op
`input.json` gains one step op, `{ "op": "setMode", "modeId": "plan" }`, driven through the real `session/set_mode` RPC, and a scripted `elicitationAnswers` queue. The `plan-mode` scenario enters plan before turn 1, runs a real `cat` under the independently configured sandbox, presents a plan through `exit_plan_mode`, receives scripted approval, then edits on the next step. The first `request/header` contains the full stable toolset plus the configured mode section; the post-approval changed header retains byte-identical tool schemas and removes only that section. `plan-mode-reject` pins corrective free-text feedback and the unchanged plan state. Both recordings replay host commands under Seatbelt or bwrap; backend-specific sandbox denial stays at the bash-tool unit tier.
### The mechanical tail
No new cordis event is declared (`mode/set` rides `session/event`; the listeners attach to existing waterfalls), so the events catalog is untouched. Regenerated in the same change: the persistence log catalog (`mode/set`), the services catalog (`ctx.modes`, JSDoc-complete), the config catalog (`ModeConfig`), the tool catalog (`exit_plan_mode`), the producer/consumer map and doc graphs, and the module graph. Repo plumbing: a root tsconfig `paths` entry, the new group's README plus a [packages map](../../../../packages/README.md) row (a new top-level group is the deliberate act that table names), an `architecture.md` capability-services row for `ctx.modes` (budget-checked), and the cookbook row upgrade.
## Deferred
Each behind its own decision: subagent mode inheritance via a forwarded creation-time mode option (removed as unconsumed; it returns with its first consumer), preset modes beyond `plan` (read-only, accept-edits), the idle-record primitive if pending-intent loss proves real, and — the big one — **effects self-declaration on tool definitions**: a per-tool read-only/mutating classification (the MCP `ToolAnnotations` vocabulary — `readOnlyHint`/`destructiveHint` — is the natural template, with its untrusted-hint caveat implying trust tiers). That item is what a general per-mode tool policy waits on: this Agent Note first shipped an interim per-mode name allowlist and removed it before release — a hand-maintained list mislabels the effects question, must track every tool a deployment composes, and rots silently as tools arrive — so mode-scoped tool availability (and per-tool `ask` policies) returns as a CONSUMER of declared effects, which is its restart trigger.
The ACP automation composition does not mount plan mode or the question tool. Human-facing compositions own plan selection and review; focused plan-mode tests and interactive-interface snapshots pin its logged state, guidance, review, and stable tool schemas.
## FAQ
Behavioral clarifications of the chosen design; rejected designs live in [Alternatives considered](#alternatives-considered), accepted costs in [Consequences](#consequences).
**When does a user's mode flip take effect?** At the next pre-assembly boundary: `agent/prompt-submit` covers the first step, `agent/turn-continuation` covers a normal successor, and the post-composed `agent/request-error` retry decision covers automatic recovery. A mode selected while a request or retry backoff is in flight therefore shapes the following model request. This is the "applies to subsequent requests" semantics every product in [Prior art](#prior-art) ships.
**When is a mode change narrated to the model?** Only when the model-visible state actually changed: the flush compares the flushed mode against the fold at the last `request/header` and narrates once, coalesced. A net-zero flip sequence (plan then back, all before the boundary) narrates nothing; a tool-driven exit narrates through its own tool result instead; a mode set before the first turn narrates nothing — the section is the state statement. The principle is the in-flight env-state proposal's boundary narration: a silently flipped prompt surface leaves the transcript arguing from a state the header no longer has.
**What happens on resume when the config no longer defines the folded mode?** A folded mode name the current config no longer defines behaves as the default mode without a notice, so the session neither gains a substitute restriction nor becomes unusable. `set()`'s loud validation covers only the write path; a resumed log answers to the config it finds.
**What if a deployment composes no user-interaction provider?** Plan mode stays safe but manual: `ctx.userInteraction.ask()` throws `NO_PROVIDER` (and an absent seam never resolves at all), the tool returns the corrective `isError`, and the exit degrades to the user toggling modes — never to an unreviewed exit. The mode section tells the model to present its plan through `exit_plan_mode` — and to ask the user in prose if that fails — so it keeps presenting instead of stalling.
**Why is there no per-mode tool allowlist?** Because "which tools are safe in a planning mode" is a property of each TOOL (its effects), not of the mode — a per-mode name list re-declares that fact in the wrong home, must enumerate every tool the deployment composes (MCP servers included), and rots silently as tools arrive. Until tool definitions declare their effects ([Deferred](#deferred), where the removed interim allowlist is archived with its restart trigger), a mode restrains by its section and the exit review; the exposure is an accepted cost ([Consequences](#consequences)).
**Do subagents inherit the parent's mode?** A fork child inherits for free — the parent's `mode/set` is inside the seeded prefix. A spawn child starts in the default mode; a creation-time mode option and automatic forwarding by subagent providers are deferred together ([Deferred](#deferred)).
**How does plan mode relate to the sandbox's read-only mode?** They are separate axes that never touch: the mode is the collaboration stance (a `mode/set` fold), the sandbox mode is an enforcement knob (a `bash/sandbox-mode` fold, [the sandbox Agent Note](2026-07-06-sandbox.md)) — plan mode neither reads nor caps it, exactly as Codex keeps its Plan/Default presets separate from its sandbox and approval settings. A user who wants kernel-enforced read-only while planning sets both: flip the mode picker AND the sandbox-mode option, in either order; each switch changes only its own fold, so there is no interference and no restore step to crash out of. The log attributes each axis to its own event — the stance to `mode/set`, the confinement to `bash/sandbox-mode`.
**Why aren't sandbox mode, approval policy, or the model themselves modes?** They are individual environment knobs independent of collaboration state. The retired ACP mapping is recorded by the [automation-only protocol decision](../simplification/2026-07-23-acp-automation-only-protocol.md). A mode definition may later bundle env facts (applied through `ctx.envState` where mounted) so a Codex-style preset stays a single mode; fusing approval policy into the mode CONCEPT itself is rejected in [Alternatives considered](#alternatives-considered).
## Prior art
A survey of shipped plan modes (Claude Code, Cursor, Copilot, OpenCode, Gemini CLI, Cline, Windsurf, Codex) shows the same five parts everywhere — the low-authority tool policy, plan artifact, approval moment, execution-state switch, and durable state that [Problem](#problem) builds on.
The mode surface is a LIST everywhere it is advertised, never a boolean: Claude Code's picker offers `plan` beside `acceptEdits` (plus an auto-mode entry into plan), and Codex exposes `Plan` beside `Default` as collaboration-mode presets while keeping approval and sandbox settings separate. The ACP transport does not advertise this human-facing control.
The deployment-owned example prompt borrows the instrumental behavior, not product-specific mechanics. From Codex: remain in plan mode despite imperative implementation language, explore before asking, distinguish repository facts from user-owned choices, and make the plan decision-complete across APIs, data flow, failures, tests, and assumptions. From Claude Code: prohibit mutations and commits, prefer existing patterns, use questions only for requirements or approach choices, and finish through the exit tool rather than a prose approval request. It deliberately omits Codex protocol tags and Claude's plan-file or phased-subagent machinery because those belong to their runtimes, not this plugin contract.
The ecosystems that leave modes to convention show the failure shapes to avoid. Pi-style mode extensions fight over a last-wins global active-tool list, enforce "read-only" by prompt text alone (a hallucinated call to a still-registered tool executes), and re-inject plan state into every request to survive compaction. The contested global list and the re-injection hack close structurally here — per-agent folded state, and a log-only non-surface event compaction cannot shadow. The prompt-only shape, by contrast, is deliberately KEPT — it is what Codex ships for Plan, and it is why the mode axis composes freely with the enforcement axes: a deployment that wants a hard floor pairs the mode with the independent sandbox knob instead of the mode carrying its own enforcement ([FAQ](#faq)).
## Alternatives considered
**Permission modes as the concept (the Claude Code shape).** One `permissionMode` fusing approval policy and tool policy. Here those are two axes with two owners: the approval seam owns "who answers this question", modes own "what surface does the model get". ACP models them as related but distinct (a mode may select an approval policy later — a mode definition gains a field, not a merger).
**A capability-seam trio.** Interface/implementation/consumer fits a swappable backend; a mode's variable parts are config values, not implementations. Splitting would manufacture an empty implementation package — the same "don't split preemptively" call the approval seam and [`todo/`](../../implemented/feature/2026-06-29-todo-write-tool.md) made.
**Loop-owned mode state.** Rejected on the standing rule (plugins, not loop changes): every hook the feature needs — assemble, pre-execute, turn boundaries, session events — is already a documented seam, so a loop edit would buy nothing but coupling.
**A per-mode tool allowlist with a deny-by-default gate (the first shipped shape).** Removed before release. A hand-maintained name list re-declares a per-TOOL fact (its effects) per MODE: it must enumerate every tool the deployment composes — MCP servers and future registrations included — and it rots silently as tools arrive (a new read-only tool is blocked until someone edits every mode; the author burden lands on whoever knows the mode, not whoever knows the tool). It also over-promises: the list looks like a security boundary while the real boundary for anything non-shell does not exist. The general dimension is parked on effects self-declaration ([Deferred](#deferred)); the consequence — plan mode is guidance-only, the very Pi hole the gate once closed — is accepted deliberately, priced in [Consequences](#consequences).
**An `access` sandbox cap on the mode (the second shipped shape).** Also removed before release. `ModeDefinition.access` clamped the bash seam's per-call sandbox resolution to a mode-declared ceiling (a `bash/resolve-mode` waterfall + ladder-min listener, with guards withholding bash under an unconfinable executor and denying escalation mid-mode). The state stayed orthogonal — the clamp never wrote the sandbox knob — but the AXES did not: entering plan changed what the sandbox enforced, fusing the collaboration stance with an enforcement level and contradicting the Codex-shaped separation the review converged on (Plan/Default presets never touch sandbox or approval settings). One user-visible symptom of the fusion: flipping the sandbox option to `workspace-write` while planning silently did nothing. The cap, the waterfall, and the mode→bash dependency edge were removed together; a deployment gets kernel-enforced read-only planning by pairing the mode with the independent sandbox-mode option, and a mode-triggered PRESET (a mode definition bundling suggested knob values, applied as ordinary knob switches) can return later without re-fusing the axes.
**Runtime-only mode (UI- or bridge-local, unlogged).** Resume and fork would silently drop the mode, and the header deltas a mode causes would have no attributable cause in the log. Logged state is what makes the mode auditable and restorable for free.
**Mode flips as `context/message` via `agent.inject()`.** Reuses an existing turn-enclosure path, but puts policy state into the model transcript — the model does not need to be told twice (the section already tells it), and a log-only fact should not occupy surface.
**A plan-file store (`.plans/` directory).** A second durable home for what the log already carries replayably; a deployment wanting files can add a tool that writes them. One home per fact.
**A boolean `planMode` instead of named modes.** Too narrow for the surface the repo already tracks: ACP advertises a mode LIST and the shipped pickers fill it with more than plan ([Prior art](#prior-art)); generalizing later would rename durable event vocabulary. The string-shaped mechanism costs nothing extra now; only `plan` ships as a definition.
**A tool-policy-stack service (the Pi-critique remedy).** A dedicated composition service for tool policies is premature: this implementation performs no mode-scoped tool filtering, and future effect policies can compose through the existing guarded execution seams. Formalize only when declared tool effects create a concrete composition requirement.
**Exit approval through the approval seam (a `{ kind: 'ask' }` gate decision).** The original sketch, natural while the approval seam was the only asking machinery in flight — but it seats a review in a permission chair: the seam's outcome vocabulary is deliberately closed and one-shot (`allowed-once`/`rejected`), so a rejection carries no feedback and an approval can never grow options (approve-and-accept-edits). The exit moment is a question, not a permission — the user-interaction seam gives it options plus the free-text channel, and the rejection feedback reaches the model verbatim. The approval seam remains the right seat for genuine permission gates (the sandbox escalation), and the registry's `ask` vocabulary stays available to deployments that want one there.
**Exit by prose or steering instead of a tool.** No artifact and no approval moment — the tool's argument IS the reviewable plan, and its review question is what gives the human a structured yes/no attached to the exact transition.
## Consequences
What holds now, pinned by the unit, protocol, snapshot, and real-API tiers:
- The mode in force is a pure function of the session log: resume and fork restore it with no extra machinery, and a `mode/set` is followed by a matching complete `request/header` on the next changed step.
- A user-driven flip narrates exactly once at the next boundary and a net-zero flip sequence narrates nothing; a tool-driven exit narrates only through its tool result.
- In default mode the plugin contributes no mode section but does contribute the stable `exit_plan_mode` schema; a deployment without `dsh-mode` lacks that binding.
- Native tool schemas and Code Mode's SDK stay byte-identical across default, plan, and custom-mode transitions; only the configured guidance section changes.
- Plan mode changes nothing on the enforcement axes: the toolset, the sandbox mode, escalation, and the approval policy behave identically in plan and default — pairing the mode with the independent sandbox/approval knobs is how a deployment hardens planning.
- Mode definitions are changeable from `cordis.yml` with no code edit; the complete plan instructions are required there, while missing plan config, malformed definitions, and unknown keys fail at load and unknown mode names fail at `set()`.
- `exit_plan_mode` is always advertised, rejects outside plan, drops only plan guidance after approval, and carries keep-planning feedback in a corrective `isError`; each human-facing surface's user-interaction provider carries the review.
- The docs tail shipped with the landing: READMEs, regenerated catalogs (persistence log, config, cordis services, tools), the packages map and architecture rows, and the cookbook row.
The accepted costs: a pending user flip set while idle is lost if the process dies before the next turn (the UI re-applies; the idle-record primitive is the escape hatch if this bites in practice). A mode transition changes the system prompt at order 50, so the cache path from that point onward changes, but the tool schemas and Code Mode SDK no longer churn. **A mode restrains by guidance alone**: a model that ignores the section CAN mutate during plan — the review moment, the session log, and independent sandbox, approval, and filesystem policies are the containment surface. Hardening planning means setting those knobs, not widening the mode; the removed enforcement shapes and their effects-declaration restart trigger remain in [Alternatives considered](#alternatives-considered) and [Deferred](#deferred). Human-facing interfaces own the plan picker and review interaction; the ACP automation transport carries neither.

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-06-14-acp-agent-client-protocol.md: da23bbfa247bc2423072477cc4b6277485df1c9c
2026-06-14-acp-agent-client-protocol.zh.md: ec55922e0aee57169d8bbf44c3d91b18ea83041e
2026-07-08-background-subagent-tasks.md: 12b34f2a28cfa311a48904cd5396ec16d9123641
2026-07-08-background-subagent-tasks.zh.md: 58f035a14d55bc0b4e7f670111909074c3f53b2b

View File

@@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-08-background-subagent-tasks.zh.md)
## Problem
The [subagent seam](2026-06-21-subagent-capability-seam.md) returns a `SubagentRun`, but the model-facing tool originally collected every run synchronously. Independent, slow delegations therefore held the parent call open or ran serially.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
# Agent Note: 后台 subagent 任务
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-08-background-subagent-tasks.md) | 中文
## 问题
[subagent seam](2026-06-21-subagent-capability-seam.md) 会返回 `SubagentRun`,但原先面向模型的工具会同步收集每一次运行。因此,各自独立的慢速委派要么一直占用父调用,要么按串行方式运行。
subagent 需要与其他长时间运行的工具相同的启动、收集、列出、停止、归属、通知和清理行为,但不应采用进程流语义。子会话仍是详细记录;父级只需最终答案和任务状态。后台子级的存活时间还会超过启动它的工具调用,因此必须明确其取消和拥有者资源释放契约。
## 决策
每个 `dsh-tool-subagent` 实例都可以公开 `run_in_background`,由 `enableRunInBackground` 控制,且默认启用。禁用该功能的实例不包含此参数,并会在执行时拒绝强制传入的后台参数。提供方选择仍属于部署配置,因此一个实例仍然只为一个提供方注册一个名称可区分的工具。
后台 subagent 使用[通用后台任务运行时](../architecture/2026-06-20-generic-long-running-tool-runtime.md)。`task_output``task_list``task_kill` 负责收集、列出、取消、完成通知和提示词引导;系统不提供 subagent 专用的配套工具。
前台调用保留其同步契约:等待提供方启动和 `run.result`;仅当状态为 `completed` 时返回最终文本;将其他终止原因映射为出错的工具结果;并且始终在返回前释放该运行。
对于后台调用,工具会验证父级,并在调用 `ctx.tasks.start()` 前拒绝已中止的执行信号。任务运行时会在调用生产者启动器前,预检控制接口和拥有者清理。该启动器创建独立的 `AbortController` 并启动 `ctx.subagents.start()`;返回 id 之后,工具调用的信号不再拥有该子级。
任务注册按以下方式映射 subagent seam
- `kind``subagent``label` 为模型提供的描述,`owner` 为父 agent智能体
- `cancel(reason?)` 中止任务自有的控制器。同一个信号同时覆盖尚未完成的提供方启动和已就绪的子级。
- `done` 等待提供方启动、子级结果和 `run.dispose()`。已完成的运行返回最终文本,已中止的运行变为 `killed`,其他停止原因变为 `failed`。启动、结果和资源释放失败会转换为失败结果,而不是被拒绝的任务 Promise。
- `readOutput` 不存在。任务存活期间,`task_output` 只返回状态;结算后,它以幂等方式返回最终输出。中间的子级活动仍保留在子会话中。
## 生命周期
后台 subagent 归属于其父 agent不会在拥有者关闭后持久存续。任务运行时将清理附加到对应拥有者的确切作用域。agent 资源释放会取消任务,并在 `AgentHandle.dispose()` 完成前等待启动回滚或子级资源释放,避免泄漏子 agent 和会话。
完成通知会发送给启动时捕获的确切拥有者。如果拥有者清理过程已经释放了注入目标,该通知将被丢弃;生命周期保证是清理,而不是通知。
## 模型引导
通用任务提示词教会模型一套共享的做法:保留 id继续独立工作而不是忙等轮询在回答前收集相关任务终止无关工作。subagent schema 只补充说明:后台模式返回 task id`task_output` 用于收集结果。无论模型是否遵循提示词,授权和拥有者清理都会强制执行运行时边界。
## 备选方案
### subagent 专用的等待、输出和停止工具
能力专用工具会重复任务协议,再教一套收集与停止习惯,并增加多个提供方实例的复杂度。通用运行时在不改变工具「每个实例对应一个提供方」形态的前提下,提供了所需行为。
### 在拥有者关闭后存续
该方案需要持久化的任务状态、子会话恢复、延迟结果交付通道,以及对被遗弃拥有者的处理策略。以拥有者为作用域的清理为进程内工作界定了明确生命周期。持久作业需要单独设计。
### 隔离客户端不做拥有者检查
agent 和日志可能以会话为作用域,但任务注册表和可预测 id 属于运行时全局范围。因此,通用拥有者防线同样适用于 subagent 和所有其他生产者。
### 增量子 transcript 输出
将子级历史以流式方式写入父级,会模糊日志边界,并使提供方行为分化。此接口只公开最终输出;更丰富的观察应由会话或 UI 工具承担。
## 测试
单元测试覆盖固定了停止原因映射、在报告前释放资源、启动与结果失败、对预中止的拒绝、从启动调用信号分离、在提供方就绪前后取消、通过真实任务工具收集、无控制接口的预检防线、运行时缺失失败,以及每实例 schema 开关。快照覆盖固定了面向模型的 schema。
## 影响
父级可以并行分派慢速委派任务,并通过与 bash 共用的任务控制来收集结果。子级工作不再占用启动它的工具调用,但在收集、终止或拥有者释放之前可以继续消耗资源。提示词引导鼓励收集;拥有者清理则提供硬性生命周期边界。需要同步委派的部署可以按工具实例禁用后台模式。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-06-18-acp-terminal-and-tool-rendering.md: e8426dbf1a0e3e4f9d9857baa19945cee6eee4b3
2026-06-18-acp-terminal-and-tool-rendering.zh.md: ff269e002a0ecea8c0bacf53fe85e553a6b9b9d5
2026-07-09-bash-backed-grep-glob-discovery.md: 9c25afb44885ca2519c5d74a3d721b34fe3561de
2026-07-09-bash-backed-grep-glob-discovery.zh.md: d0dee8e49e0a500c87afbd59423fb65416c1dcc8

View File

@@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-09-bash-backed-grep-glob-discovery.zh.md)
## Problem
The harness needs model-facing `glob` and `grep` tools, but making them `ctx.fs` provider methods turns a local product convenience into a universal filesystem backend contract. Local workspace discovery is naturally a process-backed `rg` workflow; remote or virtual filesystem backends may expose their own search API, may not share a local `ripgrep` view, or may not support discovery at all. The v1 should not require every filesystem backend to implement search before the file read/write/edit seam has proven that need.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,170 @@
# Agent Note: 由 Bash 支持的 grep 与 glob 发现工具
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-09-bash-backed-grep-glob-discovery.md) | 中文
## 问题
harness 需要面向模型的 `glob``grep` 工具,但如果将它们实现为 `ctx.fs` 提供方的方法,就会把本地产品便利功能变成所有文件系统后端都必须实现的契约。本地工作区发现天然适合由进程支持的 `rg` 工作流;远程或虚拟文件系统后端可能公开自己的搜索 API可能无法共享本地 `ripgrep` 视图,也可能完全不支持发现。文件读取/写入/编辑 seam 尚未证明此需求前v1 不应要求每个文件系统后端都实现搜索。
搜索输出还受到两层不同的预算约束。工具需要足够多的原始 `rg` 输出,才能计算稳定的逻辑结果;模型则只能收到有界预览,并在格式化结果超出内联预算时获得恢复路径。通用落盘策略只能看到最终工具结果,因此无法恢复搜索工具已经省略的匹配项。搜索工具必须自行负责保留,并尽力落盘格式化结果。
## 决策
`glob``grep``@deepseek-ai/dsh-tool-fs-search` 中的条件式面向模型工具,由 bash seam 支持,不会成为新的 `ctx.fs` 提供方方法。加载插件时该包package执行 `command -v rg >/dev/null 2>&1`:先通过 `ctx.bash.resolve(request)` 解析请求,再通过 `ctx.bash.run(spec)` 运行;如果命令以非零状态退出,该包会记录警告,并且既不注册工具,也不注册提示词章节。如果探针无法启动、超时、中止、被终止,或没有产生退出码,插件加载会明确失败,因为这意味着 bash 执行器损坏,而不是可选二进制文件缺失。注册后,执行流程同样依次调用 `ctx.bash.resolve(request)``ctx.bash.run(spec)`,并使用工具组装的固定 `rg` 命令模板。工具层负责 schema、参数验证、shell 引用、结果解析、结果格式化、保留、格式化结果落盘交接以及超时声明。bash 执行器负责请求默认值解析与上限控制、子进程执行、进程组终止、环境清理、原始输出捕获,以及在本地、沙箱或远程 bash 实现之间替换后端。
这些工具不使用 `ctx.bash.start()`,也不创建模型可见的后台任务。从 agent loop智能体循环的视角看它们是普通前台工具只有当 `rg` 命令退出、超时、中止或失败后,工具调用才返回。`defineTool({ timeoutMs })` 声明协作式工具调用预算,`@deepseek-ai/dsh-timeout-policy` 通过 `exec.signal` 强制执行;工具会在 `resolve()``run()` 前将该信号转发给 bash 请求。bash 后端自身的超时仍作为第二层安全上限;先触发的中止生效。
这些工具使 `path` 与 Claude Code 的搜索工具保持一致,但将解析绑定到 bash workdir而不是 `ctx.fs`。工具从 `exec.agent?.session.header.cwd` 派生 bash 请求 workdir`dsh-tool-bash``dsh-tool-fs` 一致;如果会话没有 cwd它会省略 `request.workdir`,由 bash 实现通过 `resolve()` 应用其配置的 cwd 或进程 cwd。对于 `grep``path` 是可选的 ripgrep 目标,可以是文件或目录;省略时使用已解析的 bash workdir。对于 `glob``path` 是可选的目录搜索根;省略时同样使用已解析的 bash workdir。相对 `path` 值基于该 workdir 解析。只要可行,返回路径就会显示为相对于已解析 bash workdir 的形式只有在共置部署中bash workdir 与文件系统 `read` 根指向同一个工作区时这些路径才保证可以继续读取。v1 会记录这项部署要求,但不执行跨服务运行时验证。在形成共享工作区/根契约或提供方专用搜索后端之前,远程或虚拟文件系统搜索保持暂缓。
该包不注入 `fs`,而是注入 `tools``systemPrompt``bash`;它有意读取 `spillStore` 时使用 `ctx.get('spillStore')`,而不使用静态注入,因为格式化结果落盘是可选功能。现有 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tool-fs` 部署若只需要 `read``write``edit`,则无需加载 bash。加载搜索功能的部署则必须让 bash 执行器环境可以使用 `rg`,这些工具才会进入模型可见 schema。
### 包结构
v1 包保持精简。`@deepseek-ai/dsh-tool-fs-search` 内部的源代码布局如下:
```text
src/index.ts
src/glob.ts
src/grep.ts
src/search-core.ts
src/shell-quote.ts
```
`glob.ts``grep.ts` 各自负责参数验证、命令构造、结果解析、格式化和注册。`shell-quote.ts` 是一个共享辅助模块,因为 shell 引用是两个工具都必须经过的安全边界;`search-core.ts` 是另一个共享模块(实现时对原四文件方案所作的修订):`SEARCH_*` 错误词汇、bash 运行与原始输出获取、格式化结果落盘交接,以及 workdir 相对显示,在两个工具中完全相同。若在每个工具中重复这套精细管道,正是对称性约定所指出的漏提取问题。命令构造器禁止自行拼凑引用,也不能把未经引用、由模型控制的值直接连接到 shell 命令中。
### Schema 与配置
`glob` 公开精简的发现形状:
```ts
interface GlobArgs {
pattern: string
path?: string
}
```
`grep` 公开 OpenCode 风格的最小形状:
```ts
interface GrepArgs {
pattern: string
path?: string
include?: string
}
```
常规预算不会进入面向模型的 schema。`@deepseek-ai/dsh-tool-fs-search` 拥有以下带默认值并经过验证的配置字段:
| 字段 | 默认值 | 作用 |
|---|---:|---|
| `globMaxResults` | `100` | 内联保留的最大路径数;与 Claude Code 的默认 `GlobTool` 结果上限一致。 |
| `grepMaxMatches` | `250` | 内联保留的最大扁平匹配数;与 Claude Code 的默认 `GrepTool` `head_limit` 一致。 |
| `grepMaxLineBytes` | `2000` | 每条匹配行预览保留的最大字节数,通过 `TextRetainer({ kind: 'head', maxBytes: grepMaxLineBytes })` 应用。 |
| `rawOutputMaxBytes` | `20000000` | 工具会解析的完整原始 `rg` stdout 最大字节数;与 Claude Code 的 ripgrep 原始缓冲区一致。 |
| `timeoutMs` | `30000` | 附加到两个工具定义并由 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-timeout-policy` 强制执行的工具调用超时。 |
`globMaxResults``grepMaxMatches` 使用 `ItemRetainer({ kind: 'head' })``grepMaxLineBytes` 针对每条匹配行使用 `TextRetainer({ kind: 'head', maxBytes: grepMaxLineBytes })`,使预览截断保留 UTF-8 边界。这遵循[工具结果保留库](../architecture/2026-07-06-tool-result-retention-library.md)对发现条目的映射收集完整结果在内联结果中保留头部条目并将路径映射、分组和逐行预览放在保留器外部。v1 的 `grep` 不公开 `case_insensitive``head_limit``offset``count`、多行、上下文行、输出模式或文件类型过滤器。模型如需周边上下文,可使用 `read` 读取匹配文件;如需后续结果,则遵循返回的落盘定位符所给出的检索提示。
Claude Code 的数值只是两层预算的参考点,并非面向模型 schema 的先例。其专用搜索工具会缓冲最多 20 MB 的原始 ripgrep 输出用于内部处理;在非 WSL 平台上使用 20 秒 ripgrep 超时,在 WSL 上使用 60 秒,之后才在模型看到结果前应用搜索专用上限:`GrepTool` 默认 `head_limit = 250`,并持久化超过 20,000 个字符的格式化结果;`GlobTool` 默认最多 100 条路径,并持久化超过 100,000 个字符的格式化结果。此 Agent Note 采用同样的原始缓冲区和内联数量默认值,将默认搜索超时设为 30 秒,并通过本 harness 的 `ctx.spillStore.saveText()` 路径恢复格式化结果。
`path` 字段沿用与 Claude Code 相同的区分方式:`grep.path` 是文件或目录形式的 ripgrep 目标,`glob.path` 则是目录搜索根。v1 不为这些工具公开单独的 cwdworkdir 参数。
`include` 是一个正向 glob 过滤器,不是列表,也不是排除语法。系统会预先拒绝逗号分隔或取反的 include 模式并返回结构化参数错误。shell 命令中使用的每个模型控制值,包括 `pattern``path``include`,都必须经过包私有的 shell 引用辅助模块。
### 执行
`glob` 构建固定的 `rg --files` 命令,并以解析后的目录搜索根为根(提供 `path` 时使用该值,否则使用 bash workdir`rg --files --glob <pattern> --sort=modified --no-ignore --hidden`,另加针对 `.git``.svn``.hg``.bzr``.jj``.sl` 的 VCS 元数据排除项。这样既与 Claude Code 的隐藏/忽略文件发现和修改时间排序保持一致,也避免宽泛搜索包含 VCS 内部文件。工具逐行解析路径,只要可行就将结果映射为相对于 bash workdir 的路径,将每条路径推入 `ItemRetainer({ kind: 'head', maxItems: globMaxResults })`;当保留结果达到上限时,它会格式化完整的已排序路径列表,作为落盘产物。
`grep` 构建固定的逐行 `rg --json` 命令,作用于所提供的文件/目录目标(提供 `path` 时使用该值,否则使用 bash workdir从而无需按冒号拆分就能解析文件路径、行号和行文本。它消费 `match` 记录,将格式错误的 JSON 或匹配记录视为 `SEARCH_FAILED`;只要可行,就将结果路径映射为相对于 bash workdir 的路径;通过 `grepMaxLineBytes` 应用逐行预览保留,将每个匹配推入 `ItemRetainer({ kind: 'head', maxItems: grepMaxMatches })`,然后只按文件分组内联输出中保留的预览匹配。落盘产物保存完整的格式化匹配列表,而不是只保存省略的尾部,因此检索提示指向模型已经看到的同一逻辑结果。
原始 `rg` stdout 是内部传输细节。工具请求 `stdoutMaxBytes: rawOutputMaxBytes`,并通过 `ctx.bash.resolve()` 解析;只有当执行器在该上限内返回未截断的 stdout 时,工具才解析 `stdout.text`。如果 stdout 超过 `rawOutputMaxBytes`,或者执行器仍返回 `stdout.truncated`,工具会以明确的搜索错误失败,要求模型缩小 `pattern``path``include`。工具绝不向模型公开原始 `rg` 输出或 bash 原始落盘路径。
只有 stdout 是解析源。对于无效模式、注册后运行时 `rg` 消失以及搜索失败stderr 作为诊断文本;如果 bash 截断 stderr工具会使用保留的 stderr 尾部并附加截断说明,不会读取 `stderr.spillPath`
如果 `ctx.bash.run()` 因工具超时或调用方取消触发而报告 `aborted`,工具会返回结构化失败,而不是假装没有匹配项。如果 bash 自身的超时先触发,工具同样会以明确的超时消息失败。非零 ripgrep 退出语义由工具负责:退出码 0 表示存在匹配并成功;退出码 1 表示没有匹配但成功;无效模式、运行时 `rg` 消失或无法访问搜索 workdir 则表示失败。
搜索失败使用包自有的 `HarnessError` 子类与 `SEARCH_*` 代码,而不使用 `FsErrorCode`,因为这些工具不是 `ctx.fs` 提供方操作。v1 的词汇包括 `SEARCH_INVALID_PATTERN``SEARCH_FAILED``SEARCH_RAW_OUTPUT_OVERFLOW``SEARCH_ABORTED`。缺少必填字段、空字符串或不支持的取反/列表式 `include` 值等模型参数验证失败,仍作为普通工具参数错误处理。
### 格式化结果落盘
`ctx.spillStore` 是可选服务,仅用于面向模型的格式化结果。这是代码库中首个工具自有落盘调用模式;此设计有意为之,因为搜索保留属于条目级策略:`globMaxResults` 限制路径数,`grepMaxMatches` 限制匹配数,而工具此时仍持有完整逻辑结果。通用 `dsh-spill-policy` 会在 `tools/post-execute` 阶段限制最终文本字节数;到那时搜索工具已经省略后续路径或匹配,策略无法恢复它们。
当搜索产生的逻辑结果数超过内联上限,且 `ctx.spillStore` 存在时,工具会通过 `saveText()` 保存完整的格式化结果。落盘所有者是调用 agent 的会话头 id`exec.agent?.session.header.id`);缺少该所有者时,搜索会保留内联结果,并报告完整结果无法保存。落盘来源是工具执行身份:`{ toolName: exec.name, callId: exec.callId, label: 'result' }`。建议文件名为 `grep-results.txt``glob-results.txt`;落盘后端仍将它们视为提示,而不是路径。
如果落盘存储不存在、调用没有会话所有者,或保存失败,工具仍返回内联页和页脚,说明完整结果无法保存。格式化结果落盘存储不可用本身绝不能把搜索成功变为 `isError` 结果。
bash 原始输出流与格式化搜索落盘产物是两个不同的产物。原始 `rg` stdout 只会在所请求的 bash stdout 上限内于内存中解析;格式化落盘产物则是 `ctx.spillStore.saveText()` 生成的稳定、面向模型的恢复定位符。
### 结果形状
带有成功格式化落盘的受限 `glob` 结果会返回内联页与落盘通知:
```text
<first N paths>
(Showing N of M paths. Full sorted result stored at: /.../session-abc123/9f8e7d-glob-results.txt. Use read with offset/limit, or grep this path to search within it.)
```
带有成功格式化落盘的受限 `grep` 结果会返回分组后的预览匹配与落盘通知:
```text
Found N of M matches
<file>
Line 12: ...
(Full grep result stored at: /.../session-abc123/9f8e7d-grep-results.txt. Use read with offset/limit, or grep this path to search within it.)
```
如果完整逻辑结果未超过内联上限,系统不会创建格式化落盘产物。如果完整逻辑结果过大但无法格式化落盘,页脚会说明结果已受限,完整结果无法保存。`truncated`/省略计数是预算事实,并不表示搜索不完整;超时、无效正则表达式、运行时 `rg` 消失、无法访问 workdir、原始输出溢出、跳过二进制文件和解析失败仍属于工具领域的错误或不完整字段。
## 考虑过的替代方案
**将 `glob``grep` 放在 `ctx.fs` 上。** v1 不采用:这会迫使每个文件系统后端增加搜索 API并使本地 ripgrep 行为成为提供方 seam 的一部分。搜索是有用的产品行为,但不像 `readText``writeText` 那样属于通用文本存储原语。
**直接从 `dsh-fs-local` spawn ripgrep。** 此 Agent Note 的 v1 不采用:直接 spawn 提供最简洁的 argv 边界、stdoutstderr 控制与提前停止控制,但会重复 bash seam 已负责的进程执行事项,包括环境清理、进程组终止、超时传播、沙箱/远程执行器替换,以及有界输出捕获。如果 bash 支持的搜索被证明过于依赖 shell 字符串,或必须支持前台流式输出,该方案仍是合理优化。
**通过 `ctx.bash.start()` 实现流式提前停止。** 不采用:`start()` 会创建模型可见的后台任务语义,包括 task id、所有者 token、`bash_output``bash_kill`、完成通知,并且没有内置超时。`grep` 需要前台工具结果,而不是后台 bash 工作流。如果将来必须流式搜索,正确的抽象是在 bash进程 seam 上增加前台流式进程句柄,而不是借用公开后台任务 API。
**向模型公开 bash 原始落盘路径。** 不采用bash 原始落盘路径包含原始 `rg` stdout对于 grep 即 `rg --json` 记录),并非稳定的格式化搜索结果。搜索只把原始 stdout 当作内部传输;模型恢复使用通过 `ctx.spillStore.saveText()` 保存的格式化结果。
**先为 bash 输出规范化增加 `spillStore.saveFile()`。** 此 Agent Note 的 v1 不采用:未来规范化 bash 时,`saveFile()` 可以帮助将现有执行器落盘文件移动到会话范围的落盘存储,但搜索只需在生成面向模型的产物前,在内存中获取有界的原始 `rg` stdout。`saveText()` 足以保存格式化搜索结果。
**依赖通用 `dsh-spill-policy`。** 不采用:通用 post-execute 落盘只能看到最终工具结果。如果 `grep``glob` 内联返回第一页,通用策略无法恢复省略的结果。搜索工具必须在返回有界的面向模型文本前,自行保存完整的格式化结果。
**公开 Claude Code 的完整 `GrepTool` schema。** v1 不采用:`output_mode`、上下文标志、多行、`head_limit``offset``case_insensitive` 和类型过滤器会使面向模型的接口变成 ripgrep 包装层。本 harness 将常规预算与续传机制保留在部署策略和落盘产物中。
**保留提前停止搜索,并省略格式化落盘产物。** 此提案不采用:提前停止效率更高,却不给模型检查后续结果的路径。所选 v1 优先保证结果可恢复性与实现简洁性,并以 `timeoutMs``rawOutputMaxBytes`、bash 后端上限和格式化落盘产物作为安全后备。
**先扩展 bash seam增加原始输出读取器。** 不采用:可移植的 `readRawOutput(ref, maxBytes)` API 会增加引用生命周期、权限和后端存储语义。逐次运行的 `stdoutMaxBytes` 请求是更窄的 seam搜索要么在 `rawOutputMaxBytes` 内收到完整 stdout要么明确失败。
**始终注册,只有执行时才报告缺少 `rg`。** 不采用:模型可见工具 schema 是部署能够尝试该能力的承诺。如果 bash 执行器在加载时找不到 ripgrep更安全的接口是完全没有 `glob``grep` 工具或提示词指引。对于注册后发生环境变化的情况,执行时的 `rg` 缺失分类仍作为防御性回退。
## 测试
- 测试覆盖注册时 `rg` 探测(探测成功会注册两个工具和提示词章节;非零探测会跳过工具与提示词章节并发出警告;基础设施探测失败会拒绝插件加载),证明中止的 `exec.signal` 会到达 bash 后端(通过同一引用的 spec 断言和 `SEARCH_ABORTED` 结果并覆盖命令构造引用恶意模式、带空格路径、以短横线开头的值、引号、换行、glob 元字符:既有单元断言,也针对每个恶意值执行真实 `bash -c` 往返)、将 `grep.path` 用作文件与目录目标、将 `glob.path` 用作目录搜索根、无效模式处理、无匹配、格式错误的 `rg --json` 输出、匹配行预览截断、原始输出溢出、超时/中止、格式化落盘成功/失败、包自有 `SEARCH_*` 错误代码,以及无后台任务不变量。
- 直接覆盖第一方工具自有落盘先例:落盘后端存在、落盘后端缺失、`saveText()` 失败,以及缺少落盘所有者。
- 该包通过真实 Loader 路径覆盖命名空间插件的导出形状(`name``inject``Config``apply`,且没有默认导出)。
- 真实执行器集成测试(`dsh-bash-local` + 真实 `rg`)验证外部世界:恶意模式保持惰性、逐会话 cwd 解析、VCS 元数据排除、按修改时间排序,以及真实 ripgrep stderr 分类。如果测试进程的 PATH 中没有 `rg`,该测试会自行跳过(这是与无密钥 e2e 跳过相似的 CI 兼容措施);伪执行器测试覆盖注册和执行时缺少 `rg`,并由逐文件 100% 覆盖率门禁兜底。
- transcript 可见落盘通知仍有快照缺口:此功能合入时记录了缺口说明,没有快照。快照层会回放 acp-agent 树;在其中加入搜索插件会改变组装的系统提示词,必须使用真实密钥重新录制每一份预期输出,而实现环境没有密钥。落盘通知的确切 transcript 文本由单元测试固定(`formatGlobOutput``formatGrepOutput` 以及通过注册表执行的落盘测试);下一次拥有密钥的会话应把插件接入 acp-agent 树,并运行一次 `test:snapshot:record`
## 后果
- `glob``grep``@deepseek-ai/dsh-tool-fs-search` 中的条件式面向模型工具,不是 `ctx.fs` 提供方方法,也不属于现有 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tool-fs` 根插件。只有 bash 执行器能找到 `rg` 时才会注册;该包注入 `tools``systemPrompt``bash`,不注入 `fs`,并使 `ctx.spillStore` 保持可选,读取时使用 `ctx.get('spillStore')`
- Schema 严格为 `glob(pattern, path?)``grep(pattern, path?, include?)`;搜索上限与超时是带默认值并经过验证的 Config 字段(`globMaxResults``grepMaxMatches``grepMaxLineBytes``rawOutputMaxBytes``timeoutMs`)。
- 工具通过 `ctx.bash.resolve(request)``ctx.bash.run(spec)` 执行,转发 `exec.signal`,绝不调用 `ctx.bash.start()`,也绝不公开 bash task id。如果存在 `exec.agent?.session.header.cwd`bash 请求 workdir 来自该值;解析后的 `spec.workdir` 决定执行与相对路径显示。
- 工具向 bash seam 请求 `stdoutMaxBytes: rawOutputMaxBytes`,只解析上限内未截断的 stdout并将超限或仍被截断的原始输出视为明确的搜索失败绝不向模型公开原始 `rg` 输出。
- 只要可用,过大的完整格式化结果会通过 `ctx.spillStore.saveText()` 保存,而内联结果保持有界;落盘失败、后端缺失或所有者缺失时,系统保留内联结果并报告未保存的剩余内容,绝不会返回 `isError`
- 包 README、生成的配置目录与导出 JSDoc 会记录 Config 字段和 `SEARCH_*` 代码tui-agent 示例会提供条件式工具插件acp-agent 树等待完成上述快照重新录制fs 组 README 会记录 `rg` 可用性以及 bash文件系统共置部署要求。
## 风险
在宽泛模式下,完整运行的 `grep` 可能比提前停止搜索更慢。v1 为了简化实现并恢复完整结果而接受这项成本同时通过工具超时、bash 超时、`rawOutputMaxBytes` 和输出上限加以约束。如果实际运行过慢,仍可采用直接 ripgrep 或前台流式替代方案。
Shell 命令构造是最尖锐的安全边界。`ctx.bash` 接受命令字符串而不是 argv 向量,因此实现必须集中处理 shell 引用,并测试恶意模式、带空格路径、以短横线开头的模式、引号、换行和 glob 元字符。
v1 假设 bash 与文件系统共置部署。如果 bash 搜索一个工作区,而 `read` 工具基于另一个根解析路径,返回路径可能无法继续读取。该包会记录这项要求,但不在运行时验证。
落盘定位符由后端负责。当前本地后端返回本地文件系统路径,适用于 `read``grep` 能打开这些文件的部署;远程或工作区受限部署可以使用另一种后端,让其定位符和检索提示指向受支持的检索机制。

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-10-agent-session-identity-and-log-location.md: a55bf276bff998a94f84ec1af078022e4881903c
2026-07-10-agent-session-identity-and-log-location.zh.md: 84b8b22187ccd1078ff13e39f4a345efbecfaeac

View File

@@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-10-agent-session-identity-and-log-location.zh.md)
## Problem
An agent can identify its workspace through `session.header.cwd`, but a model using bash cannot reliably identify the session that owns the call or the durable transcript that records it. Searching `./.sessions` guesses deployment config and JSONL layout; custom roots, alternate persistence backends, resume, forks, and concurrent parent/child agents make that guess unreliable. Hooks have the same need for transcript location, while future plugins may need to expose other harness-owned environment facts to shell commands.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
# Agent Note: 向工具与钩子公开 agent智能体会话标识和 JSONL 位置
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-10-agent-session-identity-and-log-location.md) | 中文
## 问题
agent 可以通过 `session.header.cwd` 识别其工作区,但使用 bash 的模型无法可靠识别当前调用所属的会话,也无法找到记录该调用的持久 transcript文本记录。搜索 `./.sessions` 等同于猜测部署配置和 JSONL 布局自定义根目录、替代持久化后端、恢复、fork以及并发运行的父子 agent都会让这种猜测失效。钩子同样需要 transcript 位置,而未来的插件也可能需要向 shell 命令公开其他由 harness 所有的环境事实。
这项边界必须维持两个属性:事实的所有者决定如何解析该事实;每个子进程接收每次执行的快照,而不是进程级可变全局状态。尤其是嵌套 harness 不能把环境中的 `DSH_*` 值泄漏给当前 agent、持久化后端或配置均可能不同的子进程。
## 决策
在 [`SessionPersistence`](../architecture/2026-06-14-session-persistence.md) seam 上增加同步、无副作用的位置查询:
```ts
import type { SessionHeader } from '@deepseek-ai/dsh-session'
interface SessionLocation {
readonly kind: string
readonly path: string
}
interface SessionPersistence {
locate(meta: SessionHeader): SessionLocation | undefined
}
```
`path` 是指向该后端为 `meta` 保留的专用日志的绝对本地路径;`kind` 标识其表示形式。JSONL 使用解析后的根目录和路径辅助函数返回 `{ kind: 'jsonl', path }`。SQLite 以及任何无法诚实提供逐会话本地产物的后端均返回 `undefined`。该查询不会创建或刷写任何内容,因此即使文件尚不存在,也可以报告延迟创建的目标路径。
面向模型的 bash 包package拥有一个 `ctx.bashEnv` 注册表。贡献方声明稳定名称、它可能返回的每个 `DSH_*` 键、每个键的说明,以及 `resolve(execution: ToolExecution)`。贡献方名称重复、键所有权重复、使用保留键、声明格式错误、运行时输出未声明或输出不是字符串时,系统都会明确失败。注册属于 Cordis effect并随贡献插件的 fiber 一同移除。`list()` 无需运行解析器即可公开声明从而让环境接口可供诊断工具和未来的提示词UI 消费方枚举。
注册表会为每次前台和后台 bash `ToolExecution` 重新构建受信任的覆盖层:
- `DSH_HOME` 始终是配置的 Harness home 绝对路径。独立的 [`@deepseek-ai/dsh-paths`](../../../../packages/util/paths/README.md) 工具库规定其优先级:显式 `dshHome`,其次是环境中的 `$DSH_HOME`,最后是 `~/.dsh`
- `DSH_SHELL=1` 始终存在,用于标识由 DeepSeek Harness 管理、面向模型的 bash 子进程。
- 执行具有关联 agent 时,`DSH_SESSION_ID` 存在并等于 `agent.session.header.id`
- 内置的持久化转换层提供 `DSH_SESSION_JSONL` 的条件是 `ctx.sessionPersistence.locate(header)` 返回 `kind: 'jsonl'`
会话持久化仍然是事实所有者JSONL 不依赖 tool-bash也不会自行注册 shell 变量;钩子继续直接使用 `locate()`。tool-bash 是把持久化事实转换为 shell 约定的转换层。其他需要向 shell 公开事实的插件依赖该注册表,并注册各自的键;它们不修改 `process.env`
bash seam 导出 `DSH_ENV_PREFIX` 作为唯一的命名空间来源,并派生 `DshEnvironmentKey`,其来源是该常量的 `typeof`。tool-bash 从该常量派生内置名称与模型指引执行器则使用该常量进行过滤和通道校验。seam 通过 `BashExecRequest.dshEnv``BashExecSpec.dshEnv` 单独传递受管理的覆盖层。普通 `env` 仍是钩子所用的通用进程内插件接口,但不能包含受管理的键;对称地,`dshEnv` 不能包含普通键。本地执行器会在 spawn 前拒绝任一错误通道,移除环境中继承的全部受管理键,依次应用普通清理、终端环境和显式 `env`,最后合并受信任的 `dshEnv` 快照。这保证了值缺失表示它当前确实不存在,而不是从外层或先前的 harness 继承而来。面向模型的工具仍忽略模型提供的 `env``stdin` 参数。
bash 工具说明只讲解持久约定:当前 harness 环境事实通过受管理的 `$DSH_*` 变量提供,可以在需要时查看。它不会枚举持久化专用键,也不会添加永久的系统提示词章节。工具 schema 已记录在请求 header 中,工具输出则记录为 `tool/result`,因此无需新增会话事件。
[Claude Code 和 Codex 钩子桥接层](2026-06-30-hook-bridges.md)在构造 payload 时,从同一持久化 seam 解析 transcript 位置。Codex 使用 `transcript_path: string | null`Claude Code 保留其字符串字段,并回退为 `''`。钩子查询不会物化或刷写会话。
## 同类产品调研
同类产品把稳定标识与物理存储分开处理。Codex 向 spawn 的 shell 注入稳定的 `CODEX_THREAD_ID`,而 recorder 和钩子接口负责提供 transcript 路径。Claude Code 通过结构化的钩子/状态输入提供 `session_id``transcript_path`。OpenCode 在结构化工具上下文中携带标识Kimi Code 展开会话占位符Reasonix 则把活动会话路径保存在控制器上。可移植的规则是:在调用边界注入标识,由存储层解析位置,绝不在并发 harness 中使用进程级的当前会话全局变量。
## 生命周期与持久化语义
新会话在第一个轮次之前获得 id因此它的首次 bash 调用即可读取 `DSH_SESSION_ID` 和 JSONL 目标。JSONL 文件可能要等到第一次成功的轮次结束检查点后才存在,而且在一个轮次仍未结束时,它只包含上次刷写的前缀。`DSH_SESSION_JSONL` 是位置提示,不是授权凭据或新鲜度保证。
恢复操作复用已加载的 header因此 id 和位置不变。fork 和 spawn 会创建新的会话 id 与位置。父子调用分别从自己的 `ToolExecution.agent` 解析事实;即使调用重叠,每条命令也会收到不可变快照。替换持久化服务会影响后续收集,因为转换层在执行时查询 `ctx.get('sessionPersistence')`;注册表本身受 effect 作用域约束,并且可安全用于 HMR热模块替换
`dshHome` 是与会话无关的部署上下文。agent-core 通过 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-paths` 解析出一个值,并将其同时传给 tool-bash 和本地 skill技能发现独立消费方调用同一解析器。如果顶层 `dshHome``skills.local.dshHome` 均已提供但解析结果不同,组合会失败,而不会公开互相矛盾的 home。持久化可以独立变更无需把其事实冻结到会话前缀中。
## 测试
单元测试覆盖注册表声明校验、effect 释放、逐次执行收集、`dshHome` 优先级,以及本地执行器清理并重建 `DSH_*` 的顺序。请求录制测试覆盖前台/后台快照、无 agent 调用、持久化不存在或为 JSONL、忽略模型 `env`以及父子隔离。JSONLSQLite 定位器契约测试与两套钩子桥接测试均锁定 transcript 可用和不可用两种方言。
一项无密钥的完整循环集成测试会在第一个轮次驱动真实的 agent loop、JSONL 持久化、tool-bash 与 bash-local。子进程打印 `DSH_HOME``DSH_SHELL`、会话 id、JSONL 目标和继承的陈旧哨兵值;测试校验当前值、陈旧变量不存在、刷写前文件不存在,并最终检查持久化 header。快照覆盖会锁定录制请求 header 中的通用 bash 说明。该契约属于确定性的本地执行,不涉及模型选择,因此无需带密钥测试。
## 考虑过的替代方案
**只提供 id再用 `find`。** 搜索无法得知自定义根目录或后端布局,并且在多会话环境下存在竞态。
**只提供绝对路径。** 路径可能不可用、延迟创建或取决于表示形式,不能作为稳定的会话标识。
**使用全局 `process.env`。** 并发 agent 会互相覆盖,嵌套 harness 也会继承陈旧的当前会话值。
**把持久化说明放入会话前缀。** 活动服务可以在 HMR 或未来的后端切换中改变,而会话前缀保持冻结;持久化专用指引会因此变得陈旧。
**使用类型化 waterfall 事件。** 监听器不运行就无法声明所有权,而后续监听器可以无提示地覆盖键。注册表能在注册时检测键冲突,并且保持可枚举。
**让每个持久化后端直接注册 bash 环境。** 这会反转依赖方向,让存储层依赖某一个消费方,并迫使未使用 bash 的部署也引入它。钩子仍然需要 `locate()`
**增加面向模型的 `session_info` 工具。** bash 已经提供查询接口,新增工具只会多出 schema 和一次调用;注册表可以扩展至未来的环境事实,无需为每项事实增加一个工具。
## 影响
每个面向模型的 bash 子进程都会收到当前 Harness home 和 shell 标识,关联 agent 的调用还会收到稳定的会话标识。使用 JSONL 后端的调用可以获得可选的目标路径;非文件持久化会如实省略该值。这些子进程中的完整 `DSH_*` 命名空间由 harness 管理:系统移除环境中已有的受管理值、重新加入当前受信任的值,并禁止普通调用方通过 `env` 绕过所有权检查。
该命名空间可被发现,但并非秘密。路径可能泄露配置的根目录,延迟创建的目标也可能不存在或处于陈旧状态,而且命令可以在自己的 shell 语法中覆盖变量。消费方应把这些值视为关联信息和环境事实,在归属关系重要时校验 transcript 元数据,并依靠沙箱/文件系统策略而不是变量保密性来完成授权。

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-10-parallel-tool-call-execution.md: c67ae61939a3e7974f9bf729058a57f5576308a1
2026-07-10-parallel-tool-call-execution.zh.md: a80317aa951cbf3a9cae0651348c99712a4193d5

View File

@@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-10-parallel-tool-call-execution.zh.md)
## Problem
An assistant message may contain several sibling `tool-call` blocks. Running them serially adds the latency of independent reads and web requests even though the model has already requested them together.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,103 @@
# Agent Note: 按单次调用安全性并行执行工具调用
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-10-parallel-tool-call-execution.md) | 中文
## 问题
一条 assistant 消息可以包含多个并列的 `tool-call` 块。尽管模型已经同时请求了这些调用,串行执行仍会叠加各个独立读取和 Web 请求的延迟。
并发属于宿主调度范畴,不是面向模型的工具元数据。循环需要在不硬编码工具名称、不向 JSON Schema 暴露调度策略的前提下,判断哪些调用可以重叠执行。
会话日志仍是权威记录:每个已启动的调用都有审计事件,都会获得结果;无论完成顺序如何,模型历史都按原始调用顺序观察结果。
## 决策
每个工具都可以提供可选的 `isConcurrencySafe(args)` 分类器。该分类器必须是同步纯函数:它只检查当前调用已解析的参数,不执行 I/O 或任何变更。只有显式返回 `true` 才表示选择并行;分类器缺失、参数无效、分类器抛错或返回任何其他值,都会使该调用按独占方式执行。规范类型契约见[工具数据结构](../../../../docs/core-data-structures/tools.md)。
分类器有意设计为一元函数。返回 `true` 表示工具承诺:此调用可以与任何同样返回 `true` 的并列调用重叠执行。调度器不会比较调用,也不会证明它们的资源访问相容。
这个一元分类器仍然可以感知输入。工具可以将只读操作分类为并行,将变更操作分类为独占。该接口无法表达「仅当路径不同时,这些写入才安全」之类的关系规则,因此,安全性依赖并列调用的调用仍按独占方式执行。
`defineTool()` 先验证参数,再调用类型化分类器。无效参数会被归为独占,且只有该调用真正执行时才会产生常规参数错误。`ctx.tools.executionMode(exec)` 会解析当前有效的工具定义,并返回带标签的 `parallel``exclusive` 模式;未知工具将以安全方式退化为独占。
使用带标签的模式,而不是公开布尔型调度器 API使得以后可以表达感知资源的变体无需改变分类器契约。
## 调度与顺序
循环会等待完整的 assistant 消息,对每个调用只解析一次,为每个调用创建独立的 `ToolExecution`,再按模型顺序扫描。连续的并行调用组成一组;每个独占调用单独组成一组,并构成顺序屏障。各组按顺序执行。分类采用惰性方式:每经过一个屏障,调度器都会解析下一个调用;补充并行池之前,还会重新分类每个后续调用。如果注册表变更使该调用变为独占,当前池会先完全排空,然后该调用才作为下一个屏障启动。
例如:
```text
[parallel read(A), parallel read(B), exclusive write(A), parallel read(C)]
→ [read(A), read(B)]
→ [write(A)]
→ [read(C)]
```
`read(A)``read(B)` 可以重叠执行。`write(A)` 要等两者都完成后才启动,`read(C)` 则要等写入完成后才启动。
每组都使用一个由 `maxParallelToolCalls` 限制上限的滚动池:循环先按模型顺序启动调用,直到达到上限;每有一个调用结算,就再启动一个。独占组是容量为 1 的池。将上限设为 `1` 可保持串行执行。
只有派发和工具主体会重叠执行。`tools/pre-execute``tools/post-execute` 按模型顺序运行,因为中间件可能维护对顺序敏感的状态。`tools/execute` 包装层会环绕并发派发运行,因此必须能在不同执行之间重入。
每个已启动的调用都会在进入 pre-execute 门禁之前立即追加 `tool/call`。已完成的派发占据模型顺序的槽位;提交游标只有在下一个槽位就绪时,才会追加 `tool/result` 并收集 `additionalContexts`。实时界面可以显示多个待处理调用,但结果和工具执行后的上下文仍按模型顺序排列。
如果在一组启动前中止,系统不会记录该组的任何调用。如果在一组执行期间中止,系统会停止补充池,等待已启动的调用,按顺序提交其结果,在这些结果之后排空已接受的批次上下文,然后通过现有中止路径结束该步骤。从未启动的调用没有审计事件。
Code Mode 仍不使用此调度器,因为模型只会发出一个原生 `run_code` 调用。`run_code` 及其内部派发队列仍按串行方式执行;`mode: 'both'` 中的原生并列调用使用常规调度器。
## 安全契约
工具返回 `true` 即承诺:其主体可以与其他并行调用同时运行。它不得直接变更父会话或其他由父级拥有的状态;它将输出返回给循环,由循环按模型顺序提交。
执行期间触及的任何共享状态都必须支持并发。这也包括工具包装层和提供方:它们可以在内部串行化,也可以实施自身容量限制,但必须在并发派发时不破坏状态。
## 配置与声明
`maxParallelToolCalls` 是 AgentLoop 的正整数部署上限,由工厂创建的所有 agent智能体共享。默认值为 `10``1` 保持串行执行。字段和默认值的精确定义见生成的[配置目录](../../../../docs/config-catalog.md)。
当前实现中的声明保持保守。Web 搜索、Web 获取和文件系统读取选择并行。文件系统写入与编辑、bash 工具、subagent 委派、工作流、用户交互、todo 变更、Code Mode 以及 Cordis 变更工具仍按独占方式执行。subagent 可能共享父级的工作区或外部资源而一元分类器无法证明并列委派的作用互不重叠。Bash 没有已证明的输入敏感分类器,因此仍按独占方式执行。
文件系统读取依赖一个范围很窄的记录器例外:其同步观察更新可以不按顺序结算,但写入和编辑在变更前会重新检查已观察的版本,因此陈旧状态只会导致 `FS_STALE_VERSION`
## 验证
单元测试覆盖固定了安全退化的分类、类型化参数验证、分组、屏障、替换注册表后的实时重新分类、滚动上限、独立执行对象、中间件顺序、有序结果与上下文,以及中止排空。第一方测试固定每项并行声明。
快照覆盖固定了可见的多调用 transcript文本记录待处理调用可以重叠执行已完成结果仍按模型顺序排列。Code Mode 覆盖固定其串行边界。此调度属于确定性循环行为,因此无需依赖提供方的 e2e 测试。
## 备选方案
**保持串行执行。** 这可以避免新的顺序和中止情形,但会保留独立并列调用所产生的不必要延迟。
**使用一个工具级布尔值。** 固定的 `supportsParallelToolCalls` 标志更小,但无法区分同一工具的只读操作和变更操作。感知参数的分类器保留了这项区分。
**使用有状态的分类。** 向分类器提供实时 agent、注册表或 I/O 访问,会使决策依赖分类器的运行时机,并在分类与派发之间留下缺口。可变授权和陈旧状态检查仍属于执行时职责。
**使用感知并列调用或感知资源的分类。** 调度器可以成对比较调用,或让每个调用声明资源读写要求。这样可以并行化不冲突的写入,却要求不相关工具共享资源标识和冲突语义。一元契约选择放弃这部分并发性,并在安全性取决于关系时安全退化。
**并行执行完整的工具流水线。** 这样可以让循环继续使用公开的单调用 API但会并发运行 pre-execute 和 post-execute 中间件。现有防护和钩子桥可能承载有序状态,因此只允许派发重叠。
**公开分阶段方法或调度 waterfall。** 公开的 `prepare` / `dispatch` / `finalize` 方法或 `tools/execution-mode` 事件,会在出现另一个消费方之前扩大扩展接口。循环使用内部调度器视图,而 `executionMode(exec)` 为策略 seam 保留了插入点。
**在模型流式输出时启动调用。** 这可能进一步降低延迟,但会改变 assistant 消息的权威性、回放以及调用/结果配对。调度器只在 assistant 消息完成后才启动。
**使用固定大小的窗口。** 如果在启动下一个窗口前等待当前窗口的每个调用,一个缓慢调用就会使容量闲置。滚动池在保持上限的同时避免了这项延迟。
**向模型暴露并发元数据。** 模型已可以发出并列调用。宿主调度元数据会扩大请求,却无助于工具选择。
## 影响
该设计以安全退化为原则,对工具作者而言也很简单,但无法利用必须通过比较并列调用才能确认安全的并发性。工具过于宽泛地选择并行,可能暴露潜在的共享状态竞态。
在某些情形下,并行调用会先行启动,而串行执行原本会在轮到这些调用之前中止。因此,调度器只记录已启动的调用,在中止时将其排空,且取消后绝不启动替换调用。
有序提交可能会让快速结果等待较慢的早期并列调用。这保留了回放和模型历史顺序,同时实时界面仍可显示待处理进度。
并发外部调用可能会争用配额或进程容量。提供方负责自身容量控制;循环上限只限制一个 agent 步骤中的调用数量。
工具注册是调度边界。调度器会在每个屏障之后以及每次补充池之前重新分类,因此注册表变更会影响尚未启动的调用。已启动的调用保留它们进入池时所依据的调度决策。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-21-tui-auto-pane-title.md: 069fd33a8874d9ad3d4472dd13f5130b2df65f08
2026-07-21-tui-auto-pane-title.zh.md: 580f36b2563e21231a22cab3f0c1689c6f3e8d9d
2026-07-13-session-query-tracing.md: 47c12824a331546676d3bc79920f861afe648431
2026-07-13-session-query-tracing.zh.md: 485060f9e57b5644f7b364e2120bfe30607b1945

View File

@@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-13-session-query-tracing.zh.md)
## Problem
Session relationships are encoded across immutable headers, positional surface operations, and logged provenance arrays. A consumer reconstructing those relationships directly would need to duplicate corpus precedence, surface folding, malformed-log handling, deterministic lineage ordering, and cloning. Positional replacement and provenance are different graphs, so collapsing them into one generic edge type would also lose meaning.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
# Agent Note: 会话查询关系追踪
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-13-session-query-tracing.md) | 中文
## 问题
会话关系分散编码在不可变 header、位置式表面操作和已记录的来源数组中。消费方如果直接重建这些关系就必须重复实现语料优先级、表面折叠、格式错误日志的处理、确定性的谱系顺序和克隆。位置替换与来源属于不同的图因此把两者合并为一种通用边类型也会丢失含义。
## 决策
`ctx.sessionQuery` 除精确读取外,还公开 `traceSession(sessionId)``traceEvent({ sessionId, seq })`。两者都是基于现有「实时数据优先」语料的一次性视图:会话追踪读取一次完整语料列表,事件追踪读取一份逻辑日志并执行一次规范表面折叠。服务在调用结束后不会保留谱系、反向索引或替换状态。
`SessionLineageTrace` 返回目标、按从直接父级到外层父级排序的已知父级,以及递归的后代树;同级节点先按创建时间排序,再按 session id 排序。`complete: true` 会携带已知根节点;`complete: false` 会携带第一个无法解析的父级 id。与目标相连的循环会以 `SESSION_QUERY_INVALID_LINEAGE` 失败。
`SessionEventTrace` 将位置关系与来源关系分开保留。`replacedBy` 是直接的位置替换者,`replacementChain` 沿替换者追踪至最终节点,`replacedEventSeqs` 则列出目标直接移除的真实表面节点。`sourceEventSeqs` 保留日志中直接来源的顺序,而 `derivedEventSeqs` 按日志顺序列出后续的直接反向引用。来源关系不会传递展开。
## 校验边界
事件追踪会在分析表面之前检查目标是否存在。随后,事件列表与追踪都会使用 `dsh-session` 的单遍表面折叠,对加载的日志整体进行接受或拒绝:事件 seq 从零开始且连续;表面标记符合事件类型的适用范围;只有表面事件类型可以携带来源;存在的数组必须非空且没有重复项;每个来源必须是更早的 seq每次位置替换必须指明并引用它所移除的全部表面节点。任何契约违例都使用 `SESSION_QUERY_INVALID_SURFACE`;系统不存在只用于分类、要求更弱的表面标准。
所有返回的记录与数组都与内部状态分离。已知的实时事件追踪绝不查询持久化;持久化事件追踪保留精确读取所要求的列表/加载一致性检查。会话谱系必然属于跨语料操作,因此也保留跨语料的持久化失败语义。
## 考虑过的替代方案
- **公开独立的追踪辅助函数**:不予采纳,因为源优先级与状态分离边界属于 `ctx.sessionQuery`;公开辅助函数会诱使调用方绕过该边界。
- **合并替换边与来源边**:不予采纳,因为位置替换可以遮蔽表面节点,同时引用不在表面上的构造输入,而消费方需要区分这两种含义。
- **返回传递来源闭包**:不予采纳,因为这会掩盖日志中直接记录的证据、增大结果,并让一条遥远的格式错误边改变原本局部的输出。
- **在格式错误的来源关系上返回尽力而为的追踪结果**:不予采纳,因为结构上看似合理的局部图会显得具有权威性。当规范的关系契约损坏时,精确检查必须快速失败。
## 影响
消费方无需缓存或引入第二份语料,即可获得确定性的关系视图。事件追踪每次调用都会执行全日志校验和分配,而谱系追踪每次调用都会列出完整的逻辑语料。这些成本让真源保持明确,并且与承载内容的全文搜索及过滤 API 相互独立。
该功能具备单元测试和服务层覆盖率,但没有快照或端到端 fixture测试前置数据因为它没有引入面向模型的消费方、transcript文本记录变更或跨进程协议。

View File

@@ -1,59 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: Optional time-context plugin
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-14-time-context-plugin.zh.md)
## Problem
The dynamic system-prompt storage and refresh decision in this record is superseded by [Durable per-step time context](2026-07-16-durable-per-step-time-context.md). The opt-in package, zoned formatting, and validation remain; the follow-up owns the current model-visible and durability contract.
An agent request has no live clock unless a deployment puts one in prompt text or gives the model a query tool. Static text becomes stale, while a tool call adds overhead to ordinary reasoning about dates, deadlines, or idle time. Without elapsed time, the model cannot distinguish an immediate follow-up from one sent hours after the preceding message.
Prompt assembly can derive both facts per step from durable session timestamps, and request-header logging can record the exact rendered value. Accumulating stale readings in conversation history or waking idle agents would violate the existing request lifecycle.
## Decision
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-time-context` is an opt-in function plugin at `packages/context/time-context/`. The `context/` product group holds bounded request-context enrichments that define neither a tool nor a service. `dsh-agent-spine-demo` and shipped examples do not load the package; deployments mount it explicitly when its token and disclosure costs are acceptable.
The plugin registers the global `context:time` system-prompt section at order 10, after the deployment persona and before tool guidance. For an active turn it emits an ISO-shaped timestamp with numeric UTC offset and IANA zone, plus a compact whole-second duration since the last model-visible message before the turn opened. Bare and idle assemblies receive an empty section.
### Previous-message baseline
At a turn's first assembly, the provider scans before `turn/start` for the latest `user/message`, `assistant/message`, `tool/result`, `context/message`, or `steering/message`. It excludes the current prompt so the duration expresses the inter-turn gap instead of approximately zero. Every refresh in that turn keeps the same baseline, and the first turn reports `unavailable (no earlier message in this session)`.
The baseline is the session event's append time, not an unlogged client timestamp. Resume and fork behavior are therefore deterministic from the durable log, and the model-visible value remains reconstructable without a new event. A backward wall-clock adjustment clamps the duration to zero.
### Refresh policy
`refreshIntervalMs` defaults to 60,000 and must be a non-negative safe integer. Every turn's first request refreshes. Later assemblies in that turn reuse the block until its age reaches the interval; `0` refreshes every step. No timer creates work during model calls, tools, or idle time because refresh is request-bound.
When `timeZone` is omitted, `Intl.DateTimeFormat` resolves the Node process's system zone once at plugin load. Node honors `TZ`; without that override, the host or container supplies the zone. An explicit value must be an IANA identifier and is validated at load. The captured zone remains stable until plugin reload, and the ISO-shaped local timestamp includes its current numeric offset so daylight-saving changes stay explicit. This is the deployment process's zone, not a remote user's zone.
### Logging and token shape
The loop records the temporal block in full `request/header` snapshots before transmission, satisfying the [reconstructable-requests contract](../architecture/2026-07-05-reconstructable-requests.md). Each request carries one current block; earlier readings do not remain in conversation history. The plugin owns the fact and contributes it through the prompt registry, following the [prompt-variables Agent Note](../architecture/2026-07-05-prompt-variables-and-tool-guidance-ownership.md) without a loop special case.
## Testing
Unit tests pin formatting, baselines, refresh policy, validation, per-agent state, disposal, and load-time system-zone capture. A real agent-loop test pins the transmitted prompt and full `request/header` snapshots. A keyless subprocess e2e boots a test-only `cordis.yml` through the real Loader and stdio app, omits `timeZone` under a controlled `TZ`, drives two turns, and verifies the persisted request headers externally. Default snapshot compositions omit the plugin, so their transcript fixtures contain no temporal block.
## Alternatives considered
- **Append a `context/message` on every turn or refresh** — rejected because readings and token cost would accumulate in history. Replacing a prior surface node would preserve its old position, while replacing the tail would hide intervening conversation.
- **Use `agent/session-prefix`** — rejected because the session-stable prefix cannot represent a per-turn or per-step clock.
- **Mutate requests in `agent/request`** — rejected because that seam shapes call config after the message boundary; inserted model content would bypass prompt-pressure accounting and request-header logging.
- **Register separate `{{current_time}}` and `{{elapsed}}` variables** — rejected because independent providers can sample different instants and require shared caching. One section records the pair atomically without a deployment-authored template.
- **Refresh from a background timer** — rejected because a new value has no consumer outside request assembly. Timer-driven `agent.inject()` would create turns and wake idle sessions merely to report time passing.
- **Keep UTC as the omitted default** — rejected because an explicitly enabled clock should follow its deployment environment unless the operator chooses UTC. `timeZone: UTC` remains available when a deployment requires it.
- **Add a time-zone detection library** — rejected because Node's `Intl` runtime already exposes the process's IANA zone. Another dependency cannot infer a remote user's zone either.
- **Mount the plugin in `dsh-agent-spine-demo`** — rejected because time zone, disclosure, token budget, and freshness are deployment policy. Opt-in keeps default context stable.
- **Place the package in `core/`** — rejected because `core/` owns the product API spine, while this plugin is an optional leaf with no service key.
## Consequences
- Opted-in models receive a zoned clock and inter-turn duration without a tool call. The system-prompt cost is fixed per request instead of growing with the session.
- An omitted `timeZone` follows the process's `TZ`, host, or container zone as observed at plugin load. Operators must configure an explicit zone when the deployment environment does not represent the intended user.
- A refresh changes the request header and can add a full `request/header` snapshot with reason `change`. `refreshIntervalMs` trades freshness against the number and size of durable full snapshots; `0` records a new value on every step whose whole-second rendering changes.
- No request exists solely to refresh time. A long-running tool leaves the prior reading until the next step assembles.
- Duration reflects harness processing time at durable append boundaries, not client-network latency before logging. Preserving a client-origin timestamp requires a separate durable input contract.

View File

@@ -1,59 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note可选时间上下文插件
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-14-time-context-plugin.md) | 中文
## 问题
本记录中的动态系统提示词存储和刷新决策已由[持久的逐步骤时间上下文](2026-07-16-durable-per-step-time-context.md)取代。需要显式启用的包package、分区时间格式和校验仍然保留后续 Agent Note 负责当前的模型可见与持久性契约。
如果部署方既未在提示词中提供时钟也未给模型提供查询工具agent智能体请求就无法获得实时准确的时间。静态文本会变得陈旧而对于日期、截止时间或闲置时长等常规推理调用工具会增加开销。缺少已经过去的时长时模型无法区分紧接着发送的消息与上一条消息几小时后才发送的消息。
提示词组装流程可以在每个步骤中根据持久会话时间戳派生这两项信息,请求头日志则可以记录实际渲染的确切值。在会话历史中累积陈旧读数或唤醒空闲 agent 都会违反现有请求生命周期。
## 决策
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-time-context` 是位于 `packages/context/time-context/`、需要显式启用的函数插件。`context/` 产品分组用于容纳既不定义工具、也不定义服务的有界请求上下文增强。`dsh-agent-spine-demo` 和仓库提供的示例都不会加载该包;只有当 token 与信息披露成本可接受时,部署方才显式挂载它。
该插件注册顺序值为 10 的全局系统提示词区段 `context:time`,位置在部署方角色设定之后、工具指导之前。对于活跃轮次,它会输出带数字 UTC 偏移和 IANA 时区、形似 ISO 的时间戳,以及从轮次开始前最后一条模型可见消息起算的紧凑整秒时长。未绑定 agent 或 agent 处于空闲状态时,该区段为空。
### 上一条消息基线
在轮次首次组装时,提供方会在 `turn/start` 之前查找最近的 `user/message``assistant/message``tool/result``context/message``steering/message`。它会排除当前提示词,使时长表达轮次间隔,而不是接近零。同一轮次中的每次刷新都保留这条基线;首个轮次报告 `unavailable (no earlier message in this session)`
基线采用会话事件的追加时间,而不是日志中不存在的客户端时间戳。因此,恢复和 fork 行为可以从持久日志中确定性重现,模型可见值也无需新增事件即可重建。系统挂钟向后调整时,插件会将时长钳制为零。
### 刷新策略
`refreshIntervalMs` 默认值为 60,000并且必须是非负安全整数。每个轮次的首次请求都会刷新。同一轮次中的后续组装会复用该区块直至其存在时间达到该间隔设为 `0` 时每个步骤都刷新。刷新仅由请求驱动,因此在模型调用、工具运行或空闲期间,计时器不会创建任务。
省略 `timeZone` 时,`Intl.DateTimeFormat` 会在插件加载时解析一次 Node 进程的系统时区。Node 会遵循 `TZ`;没有该覆盖值时,时区由主机或容器提供。显式值必须是 IANA 标识符,并在加载时接受校验。捕获的时区在插件重新加载前保持稳定,形似 ISO 的本地时间戳包含其当前数字偏移,使夏令时变化保持显式可见。该默认值代表部署进程的时区,而不是远程用户的时区。
### 日志与 token 形态
agent loop智能体循环会在发送前通过完整的 `request/header` 快照记录时间区块,从而满足[可重建请求契约](../architecture/2026-07-05-reconstructable-requests.md)。每个请求只携带一个当前区块;先前的读数不会保留在会话历史中。该插件拥有时间信息,并按照[提示词变量 Agent Note](../architecture/2026-07-05-prompt-variables-and-tool-guidance-ownership.md)通过提示词注册表贡献该信息,无需为循环添加特殊分支。
## 测试
单元测试固定格式化、基线、刷新策略、校验、逐 agent 状态、资源释放行为,以及系统时区在加载时的捕获行为。使用真实 agent loop 的测试固定实际发送的提示词和完整的 `request/header` 快照。无密钥子进程端到端测试通过真实 Loader 和 stdio 应用启动测试专用 `cordis.yml`,在受控 `TZ` 下省略 `timeZone`,驱动两个轮次,并从外部校验持久请求头。默认快照组合不包含该插件,因此其中的 transcript文本记录fixture测试前置数据不包含时间区块。
## 考虑过的替代方案
- **每个轮次或每次刷新都追加一条 `context/message`**——不予采纳,因为读数和 token 成本会在历史中累积。替换先前的表层节点会保留其旧位置,而替换尾部节点会隐藏中间的会话内容。
- **使用 `agent/session-prefix`**——不予采纳,因为会话期间保持稳定的前缀无法表示逐轮次或逐步骤变化的时钟。
- **在 `agent/request` 中修改请求**——不予采纳,因为该边界在消息边界之后塑造调用配置;插入模型可见内容会绕过提示词压力核算和请求头日志。
- **注册独立的 `{{current_time}}``{{elapsed}}` 变量**——不予采纳,因为独立提供方可能在不同时间点采样,并且需要共享缓存。单个区段会以原子方式记录两项信息,也不需要部署方编写时间模板。
- **通过后台计时器刷新**——不予采纳,因为请求组装之外没有消费新值的对象。由计时器驱动 `agent.inject()` 会创建轮次,并且只为报告时间流逝就唤醒空闲会话。
- **省略配置时仍默认使用 UTC**——不予采纳,因为显式启用的时钟应跟随部署环境,除非运维方选择 UTC。需要 UTC 的部署仍可配置 `timeZone: UTC`
- **引入时区探测库**——不予采纳,因为 Node 的 `Intl` 运行时已经能够提供进程的 IANA 时区,而且额外依赖同样无法推断远程用户的时区。
- **在 `dsh-agent-spine-demo` 中挂载插件**——不予采纳因为时区、信息披露、token 预算和新鲜度都属于部署策略。选择加入能保持默认上下文稳定。
- **将包放入 `core/`**——不予采纳,因为 `core/` 负责产品 API 主干,而该插件是没有服务键的可选叶节点。
## 后果
- 选择加入的模型无需调用工具,即可获得分区时钟和轮次间隔时长。每个请求的系统提示词成本固定,不会随会话增长。
- 省略 `timeZone` 时,插件采用加载时观察到的进程 `TZ`、主机或容器时区。当部署环境不能代表目标用户时,运维方必须显式配置时区。
- 刷新会改变请求头,并可能新增一份 reason 为 `change` 的完整 `request/header` 快照。`refreshIntervalMs` 用新鲜度换取完整持久快照的数量与大小;设为 `0` 时,每个整秒渲染结果发生变化的步骤都会记录新值。
- 系统不会仅为刷新时间而创建请求。长时间运行的工具会保留先前读数,直至下一步骤开始组装。
- 时长反映持久追加边界处的 harness 处理时间,不包含消息进入日志之前的客户端网络延迟。若要保留客户端来源时间戳,需要单独的持久输入契约。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-16-durable-per-step-time-context.md: 2d7076d51dbe1a64e5042230bddc6844141ff265
2026-07-16-durable-per-step-time-context.zh.md: 432e0305cf44dcce1053c6580c9f0039309a7af4
2026-07-16-durable-per-step-time-context.md: 4bc17b3c08707fcaa4f0f431e71ddbe567a03c9e
2026-07-16-durable-per-step-time-context.zh.md: 836c0f83fbe9d6120741a261cf25ce7d8c227bdf

View File

@@ -12,13 +12,13 @@ A process-local refresh cache makes displayed time depend on state that cannot s
## Decision
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-time-context` is an opt-in function plugin in `packages/context/time-context/`. It registers a prepended `agent/pre-step` listener and, when an injection is due, calls `agent.inject()` for a pre-step attempt whose signal is not already aborted. The injected `context/message` carries source `{ kind: 'plugin', plugin: 'time-context' }` and append surface metadata; a suppressed attempt appends nothing.
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-time-context` is an opt-in function plugin in `packages/context/time-context/`. The `context/` group holds bounded request-context enrichments that define neither a tool nor a service, and shipped examples do not mount this plugin because its time-zone disclosure and token cost are deployment policy. It registers a prepended `agent/pre-step` listener and, when an injection is due, calls `agent.inject()` for a pre-step attempt whose signal is not already aborted. The injected `user/message` carries source `{ kind: 'plugin', plugin: 'time-context' }` and append surface metadata; a suppressed attempt appends nothing.
The listener records preparation context before a possible `step/start`. Its prepended registration runs before ordinary automatic compaction listeners, so pressure estimation and any resulting surface rewrite observe a newly appended reading. A later pre-step listener can cancel or fail the attempt before the step opens; the reading remains because the durable log is append-only and this plugin performs no rollback.
The optional `timeZone` config resolves the Node process's IANA zone once at plugin load when omitted; an explicit value is validated by `Intl.DateTimeFormat`. The timestamp includes the numeric UTC offset and resolved IANA zone.
The optional `refreshIntervalMs` config is manually validated at plugin load as a non-negative safe integer. Omission or `0` injects on every eligible preparation attempt. A positive value scans the raw session events for the most recent `context/message` with this plugin's source and injects when none exists, wall time moved backward, or the event is at least the configured age. The raw event timestamp governs even after compaction shadows the message, so scheduling persists across turns and process resume without a timer or process-local cache.
The optional `refreshIntervalMs` config is manually validated at plugin load as a non-negative safe integer. Omission or `0` injects on every eligible preparation attempt. A positive value scans the raw session events for the most recent `user/message` with this plugin's source and injects when none exists, wall time moved backward, or the event is at least the configured age. The raw event timestamp governs even after compaction shadows the message, so scheduling persists across turns and process resume without a timer or process-local cache.
### Text and elapsed baselines
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ Time sampled while preparing turn <turn>, step 1: <timestamp>
Elapsed since the preceding model-visible message: <duration-or-unavailable>.
```
The baseline is the latest preceding user, assistant, tool-result, context, or steering message. This includes the accepted prompt that opened an ordinary message turn. If no model-visible message exists, the duration is `unavailable`.
The baseline is the latest preceding user, assistant, tool-result, or steering message. This includes the accepted prompt that opened an ordinary message turn. If no model-visible message exists, the duration is `unavailable`.
An injected later-step reading is:
@@ -48,11 +48,7 @@ The plugin contributes nothing to system-prompt assembly. `request/header` conta
## Testing
Unit and real-loop tests pin formatting, both elapsed baselines, interval omission and zero, threshold boundaries, cross-turn and per-session scheduling, backward-clock behavior, invalid config, resumed raw-event lookup after compaction, aborted-signal behavior, later-listener cancellation and failure, listener disposal, source and surface metadata, cumulative multi-step visibility, and absence from request headers. A keyless subprocess e2e boots the real Loader and stdio app, drives two turns, and verifies the persisted context events externally.
## Supersedes
This decision supersedes the dynamic system-prompt storage and refresh policy in [Optional time-context plugin](2026-07-14-time-context-plugin.md). It keeps the package location, opt-in deployment stance, timestamp formatting, process-zone default, and load-time validation. Durable history replaces the `context:time` prompt section, process-local refresh cache, and request-header deltas; `refreshIntervalMs` controls durable append frequency instead of prompt replacement.
Unit and real-loop tests pin formatting, both elapsed baselines, interval omission and zero, threshold boundaries, cross-turn and per-session scheduling, backward-clock behavior, invalid config, resumed raw-event lookup after compaction, aborted-signal behavior, later-listener cancellation and failure, listener disposal, source and surface metadata, cumulative multi-step visibility, and absence from request headers. A keyless subprocess e2e boots the real Loader with the Headless composition, drives two ordered one-shot turns, and verifies the persisted plugin-attributed messages externally.
## Alternatives considered
@@ -61,10 +57,13 @@ This decision supersedes the dynamic system-prompt storage and refresh policy in
- **Inject from a background timer** — rejected because idle time has no pending request to consume the value, and timer-driven injection would create durable turns solely to report time passing.
- **Expose time only through a tool** — rejected because ordinary temporal reasoning would require an avoidable tool round trip and would not guarantee a reading before every step.
- **Use `agent/session-prefix`** — rejected because one loop-instance prefix cannot represent distinct step timestamps and does not accumulate historically attributable readings.
- **Mutate assembled requests or register independent prompt variables** — rejected because request-local insertion bypasses the durable surface and separate providers can sample different instants. One attributed context message records the timestamp and elapsed baseline atomically.
- **Default to UTC or add a time-zone detection dependency** — rejected because an explicitly mounted plugin follows its process environment unless the operator selects an IANA zone, while no server-side library can infer a remote user's zone.
- **Mount the plugin in shipped compositions or place it in `core/`** — rejected because disclosure, time zone, freshness, and history cost are deployment choices for an optional context leaf, not product-spine policy.
## Consequences
- Omission or `0` records every eligible preparation attempt; a positive interval reduces append frequency and history growth while preserving durable scheduling across resume.
- Timing context remains append-only until compaction shadows older surface nodes, including a preparation reading left by a later cancellation or failure.
- The first-step duration normally measures from the prompt that opened the turn, while later-step durations measure model and tool processing since the preceding step context.
- An omitted `timeZone` still reflects the deployment process rather than a remote user, and elapsed time still uses durable harness append boundaries rather than client-origin timestamps.
- An omitted `timeZone` still reflects the deployment process rather than a remote user, and elapsed time still uses durable harness append boundaries rather than client-origin timestamps. Supporting client-origin time requires a separate durable input contract.

View File

@@ -12,13 +12,13 @@ Status: implemented
## 决策
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-time-context` 是位于 `packages/context/time-context/`、需要显式启用的函数插件。它注册一个前置的 `agent/pre-step` 监听器,并在需要注入时,为信号尚未取消的预步骤尝试调用 `agent.inject()`。注入的 `context/message` 携带来源 `{ kind: 'plugin', plugin: 'time-context' }` 和追加表层元数据;受间隔抑制的尝试不会追加任何内容。
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-time-context` 是位于 `packages/context/time-context/`、需要显式启用的函数插件。`context/` 分组容纳有界的请求上下文增强,这些增强既不定义工具也不定义服务;已交付示例不挂载此插件,因为时区披露与 token 成本属于部署策略。它注册一个前置的 `agent/pre-step` 监听器,并在需要注入时,为信号尚未取消的预步骤尝试调用 `agent.inject()`。注入的 `user/message` 携带来源 `{ kind: 'plugin', plugin: 'time-context' }` 和追加表层元数据;受间隔抑制的尝试不会追加任何内容。
监听器在可能出现的 `step/start` 之前记录准备上下文。它采用前置注册,因此先于普通自动压缩监听器运行,使压力估算和由此产生的表层重写都能观察到新追加的读数。后续预步骤监听器可能在步骤开启前取消尝试或使其失败;持久日志仅追加,且本插件不执行回滚,因此该读数会保留下来。
省略可选配置 `timeZone` 时,插件在加载时解析一次 Node 进程的 IANA 时区;显式值由 `Intl.DateTimeFormat` 校验。时间戳包含数字 UTC 偏移和解析后的 IANA 时区。
插件在加载时手动校验可选配置 `refreshIntervalMs`,其值必须为非负安全整数。省略或设为 `0` 时,每次符合条件的准备尝试都会注入。设为正数时,插件扫描原始会话事件,查找来源属于本插件的最新 `context/message`;不存在此类事件、系统挂钟向后移动,或该事件已达到配置时长时,插件执行注入。即使压缩已隐藏消息,调度仍以原始事件时间戳为准,因此该机制无需计时器或进程本地缓存,也能跨轮次和进程恢复持续生效。
插件在加载时手动校验可选配置 `refreshIntervalMs`,其值必须为非负安全整数。省略或设为 `0` 时,每次符合条件的准备尝试都会注入。设为正数时,插件扫描原始会话事件,查找来源属于本插件的最新 `user/message`;不存在此类事件、系统挂钟向后移动,或该事件已达到配置时长时,插件执行注入。即使压缩已隐藏消息,调度仍以原始事件时间戳为准,因此该机制无需计时器或进程本地缓存,也能跨轮次和进程恢复持续生效。
### 文本与时长基线
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ Time sampled while preparing turn <turn>, step 1: <timestamp>
Elapsed since the preceding model-visible message: <duration-or-unavailable>.
```
基线是前一条用户消息、助手消息、工具结果、上下文消息或 steering中途引导消息。对于普通消息轮次这包括开启轮次的已接受提示词。如果不存在模型可见消息时长为 `unavailable`
基线是前一条用户消息、助手消息、工具结果或 steering中途引导消息。对于普通消息轮次这包括开启轮次的已接受提示词。如果不存在模型可见消息时长为 `unavailable`
后续步骤的注入读数为:
@@ -48,11 +48,7 @@ Elapsed since the preceding step context: <duration-or-unavailable>.
## 测试
单元测试和真实 agent loop智能体循环测试固定格式化、两种时长基线、间隔省略和零值、阈值边界、跨轮次和各会话独立调度、挂钟后退行为、无效配置、压缩后基于恢复会话的原始事件查找、已取消信号行为、后续监听器取消和失败、监听器 dispose资源释放、来源与表层元数据、多步骤累计可见性以及请求头中不存在时间上下文。无密钥子进程 e2e 测试通过真实 Loader 和 stdio 应用启动,驱动两个轮次,并从外部校验持久化的上下文事件
## 取代的决策
本决策取代[可选时间上下文插件](2026-07-14-time-context-plugin.md)中的动态系统提示词存储和刷新策略。它保留包位置、选择加入式部署、时间戳格式、进程时区默认值和加载时校验。持久历史取代 `context:time` 提示词区段、进程本地刷新缓存和请求头增量;`refreshIntervalMs` 用于控制持久追加频率,而非提示词替换。
单元测试和真实 agent loop智能体循环测试固定格式化、两种时长基线、间隔省略和零值、阈值边界、跨轮次和各会话独立调度、挂钟后退行为、无效配置、压缩后基于恢复会话的原始事件查找、已取消信号行为、后续监听器取消和失败、监听器 dispose资源释放、来源与表层元数据、多步骤累计可见性以及请求头中不存在时间上下文。无密钥子进程 e2e 测试使用 Headless 组合启动真实 Loader依次驱动两个单次任务轮次,并从外部校验持久化且来源归属于插件的消息
## 考虑过的替代方案
@@ -61,10 +57,13 @@ Elapsed since the preceding step context: <duration-or-unavailable>.
- **通过后台计时器注入**——不予采纳,因为空闲期间没有待处理请求消费该值,而且计时器驱动的注入会仅为报告时间流逝而创建持久轮次。
- **只通过工具提供时间**——不予采纳,因为普通时间推理会产生本可避免的工具往返,也不能保证每个步骤之前都有读数。
- **使用 `agent/session-prefix`**——不予采纳,因为一个 loop 实例前缀无法表示不同的步骤时间戳,也不会累计具有历史归属的读数。
- **修改已组装的请求或注册独立提示词变量**——不予采纳,因为请求内插入会绕过持久表层,不同提供方也可能在不同时间采样。一条带来源归属的上下文消息会原子地记录时间戳和时长基线。
- **默认使用 UTC 或增加时区检测依赖**——不予采纳,因为显式挂载的插件默认遵循其进程环境,除非操作方选择 IANA 时区,而任何服务端库都无法推断远程用户的时区。
- **在已交付组合中挂载插件,或把它放进 `core/`**——不予采纳,因为披露内容、时区、新鲜度和历史成本是可选上下文叶节点的部署选择,不是产品主干策略。
## 后果
- 省略 `refreshIntervalMs` 或设为 `0` 时,每次符合条件的准备尝试都会留下记录;正数间隔会减少追加频率和历史增长,同时使持久调度在恢复后继续生效。
- 时间上下文仅追加并保留到压缩隐藏旧表层节点为止,其中也包括后续取消或失败所留下的准备读数。
- 第一个步骤的时长通常从开启轮次的提示词起算,后续步骤的时长则反映自上一条步骤上下文以来的模型与工具处理时间。
- 省略 `timeZone` 时仍采用部署进程而非远程用户的时区,时长仍采用 harness 的持久追加边界而非客户端来源时间戳。
- 省略 `timeZone` 时仍采用部署进程而非远程用户的时区,时长仍采用 harness 的持久追加边界而非客户端来源时间戳。若要支持客户端来源的时间,需要另行建立持久输入契约。

View File

@@ -1,39 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: Startup slogans replace the configured TUI welcome line
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-20-tui-startup-slogans.zh.md)
> **Superseded** for the slogan/animation half by the [banner sweep Agent Note](2026-07-21-tui-banner-sweep.md): the slogan bank and typewriter reveal shipped, read as weird in use, and were replaced by a subtitle-free banner with a whole-banner sweep. The removal of the configured demo welcome and the animation-lifecycle groundwork (start after `ui.start()`, clear through `detachListeners`) stand.
## Problem
The TUI header subtitle came from a `welcome` config the demo leaf set to "TUI agent ready. Give it a coding task." — instructional filler that told a returning user nothing, restated what the product is on every boot, and had a hardcoded twin (`'ready.'`) as the schema default in two packages. The product wanted a startup moment with some character instead of a static banner caption.
## Decision
- `examples/tui-agent/cordis.yml` no longer configures `welcome`; the config key stays for deployments and fixtures that need a fixed, deterministic subtitle (the Code Mode overlay and every snapshot/scripted fixture keep theirs).
- When `welcome` is unset, `dsh-tui` picks one member of an exported `STARTUP_SLOGANS` bank per boot (`pickStartupSlogan`, injectable random source) and reveals it with a typewriter animation: one character per 40 ms frame, a `▌` block cursor trailing until complete. The reveal starts only after `ui.start()` succeeds and its interval is cleared on dispose alongside the other listeners.
- The slogan bank is presentation copy, deliberately not config: deployments that want controlled wording already have `welcome`. Slogans are ASCII-only by contract because the reveal slices per character.
- `dsh-tui-demo` forwards `welcome` only when configured instead of defaulting it, so the app no longer decides the TUI's idle subtitle.
- The keyless PTY boot scenario now waits for the reveal cursor (`▌` — the only source of that glyph in an empty transcript) instead of the removed welcome text.
The same change restores `packages/ui/tui/src/index.ts` to 100 % per-file coverage, which the color-scheme merge had broken on the integration branch: the editor border-color reassignment inside `applyColorScheme` was dead (the `setStatus` call right after re-derives it) and is removed, and the color-scheme query's `.then`/`.catch` arrows became named, tested handlers (`applyReportedScheme`, `ignoreSchemeQueryFailure` — the latter pinned by a test whose terminal throws on the DSR query write).
## Alternatives considered
**A fixed cooler slogan.** Rejected: one string re-read on every boot decays into wallpaper exactly like the line it replaces; a small rotating bank keeps the moment alive at no complexity cost.
**Making the bank and reveal speed configurable.** Rejected: that is two new knobs for presentation copy; `welcome` is already the escape hatch for deployments with an opinion, and the no-hardcoded-tunables rule targets deployment-varying behavior, not brand copy.
**Animating in `HeaderComponent` itself.** Rejected: the component would need a TUI handle and its own lifecycle; the chat already owns a render loop, timers, and a disposal path, so the reveal lives beside the other `createTuiChat` effects and `detachListeners` clears it.
## Consequences
- Boot output is no longer byte-deterministic when `welcome` is unset (random slogan, timed frames). Every recorded or snapshot surface pins `welcome` explicitly, so no snapshot changed; the PTY smoke anchors on the reveal cursor and the session-id line instead.
- The `welcome` schema default disappeared from both `dsh-tui` and `dsh-tui-demo`; a direct caller passing no welcome now gets a slogan, not `'ready.'`.
- Adding a slogan is a one-line bank edit; tests assert membership, not specific text.
## Testing
`packages/ui/tui/tests/tui.spec.ts` pins deterministic bank selection with an injected random source, the reveal (a bank member fully rendered, cursor frames observed), the configured-welcome path rendering verbatim with no cursor, and dispose stopping a mid-reveal animation. `examples/tui-agent/tests/tui-keyless-smoke.e2e.ts` boots the real tree in a PTY and waits on the reveal cursor. Verified live in tmux (mid-reveal frame `no map below▌` then the full slogan).

View File

@@ -1,39 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: 启动 slogan 取代配置化的 TUI 欢迎语
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-20-tui-startup-slogans.md) | 中文
> **已被取代**slogan/动画的那一半由[横幅扫入 Agent Note](2026-07-21-tui-banner-sweep.md)取代slogan 库和打字机动画上线后实际使用中显得怪异,已替换为无副标题的横幅加整体扫入。移除示例配置中欢迎语的决定与动画生命周期基础设施(`ui.start()` 后启动、经 `detachListeners` 清除)保持不变。
## Problem
TUI 头部副标题来自一个 `welcome` 配置,示例叶子配置把它设为 "TUI agent ready. Give it a coding task."——一句说明书式的填充语,对老用户毫无信息量,每次启动都在复述产品是什么,而且它还有一个硬编码的孪生兄弟(`'ready.'`)作为两个包里的 schema 默认值。产品需要的是一个有性格的启动时刻,而不是一条静态横幅说明。
## Decision
- `examples/tui-agent/cordis.yml` 不再配置 `welcome`;该配置键保留给需要固定、确定性副标题的部署与 fixtureCode Mode overlay 和所有快照/脚本化 fixture 都保留各自的欢迎语)。
- `welcome` 未设置时,`dsh-tui` 每次启动从导出的 `STARTUP_SLOGANS` 库里挑选一条(`pickStartupSlogan`,随机源可注入),并以打字机动画逐字显示:每帧 40 ms 一个字符,完成前尾随一个 `▌` 块状光标。动画只在 `ui.start()` 成功后启动,其定时器与其他监听器一起在 dispose 时清除。
- slogan 库是展示文案,刻意不做成配置:想控制措辞的部署已经有 `welcome` 这个出口。按契约 slogan 只含 ASCII因为逐字显示按字符切片。
- `dsh-tui-demo` 只在配置了 `welcome` 时才转发它,不再填默认值,应用不再替 TUI 决定空闲副标题。
- 无 key 的 PTY 启动场景改为等待逐字显示的光标(`▌`——空 transcript 里该字形的唯一来源),不再等待已删除的欢迎文本。
同一变更把 `packages/ui/tui/src/index.ts` 恢复到 100% 的单文件覆盖率(颜色方案合并曾在集成分支上破坏它):`applyColorScheme` 里对编辑器边框颜色的重新赋值是死代码(紧随其后的 `setStatus` 调用会重新推导它),已删除;颜色方案查询的 `.then`/`.catch` 箭头函数改为具名、有测试的处理器(`applyReportedScheme``ignoreSchemeQueryFailure`——后者由一个让终端在 DSR 查询写入时抛错的测试固定)。
## Alternatives considered
**换一条更酷的固定 slogan。** 否决:一条每次启动都重读的字符串会和它取代的那行一样退化成墙纸;一个小的轮换库以零复杂度代价让这个时刻保持新鲜。
**把 slogan 库和显示速度做成配置。** 否决:那是为展示文案新增两个旋钮;对措辞有主张的部署已经有 `welcome` 这个出口,而「插件里不许硬编码可调参数」规则针对的是随部署变化的行为,不是品牌文案。
**在 `HeaderComponent` 内部做动画。** 否决:组件将需要持有 TUI 句柄和自己的生命周期;聊天层已经拥有渲染循环、定时器和释放路径,所以逐字显示与 `createTuiChat` 的其他资源放在一起,由 `detachListeners` 清除。
## Consequences
- `welcome` 未设置时启动输出不再字节级确定(随机 slogan、定时帧。所有录制或快照表面都显式固定 `welcome`因此没有快照变化PTY 冒烟测试改为锚定逐字显示光标和会话 id 行。
- `welcome` 的 schema 默认值从 `dsh-tui``dsh-tui-demo` 中消失;不传 welcome 的直接调用方现在得到的是 slogan而不是 `'ready.'`
- 新增一条 slogan 只需在库里加一行;测试断言成员归属,不断言具体文本。
## Testing
`packages/ui/tui/tests/tui.spec.ts` 固定以下行为:注入随机源后的确定性选取、逐字显示(库中某条完整渲染、观察到光标帧)、配置了 welcome 时逐字动画不启动且原文渲染、以及 dispose 停止进行中的动画。`examples/tui-agent/tests/tui-keyless-smoke.e2e.ts` 在 PTY 里启动真实配置树并等待显示光标。已在 tmux 中实机验证(中途帧 `no map below▌`,随后是完整 slogan

View File

@@ -1,41 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: Auto-titled terminal from the first message
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-21-tui-auto-pane-title.zh.md)
> **Superseded** by the [session-title consolidation Agent Note](../simplification/2026-07-22-tui-titles-from-session-title-service.md): the TUI-local `autoTitle` generation is removed; titles come from the log-backed session-title service, and the terminal rename consumes `session/title` events.
> **Superseded** for the default and the resume behavior by the [auto-title default-on Agent Note](2026-07-21-tui-auto-title-default-on.md): `autoTitle` now defaults on, and a resumed session re-derives its title from the stored first message instead of keeping the static one. The OSC 0 path, the one-shot latch, the model-summary shape, the fire-and-forget call, and every failure fallback below stand.
## Problem
The TUI's terminal title is a single static string (`title`, default `DeepSeek Harness`) shared by every session. A user who runs one agent per tmux pane or terminal tab sees the same label on all of them, so panes are indistinguishable at a glance and the tab bar carries no signal about what each session is doing.
## Decision
- `TuiConfig` gains an `autoTitle` boolean (default `false`). When it is on, the TUI issues one background model call after the first user message of a fresh session and replaces the terminal title with a short, model-generated label; the static `title` is the pre-title and the fallback.
- The label is a model summary, not a truncation of the prompt. The request carries a fixed task instruction (summarize the request as a short title of two to five lowercase words, no punctuation) plus the user's first message and no tools; the TUI takes the first non-empty line of the reply and caps it at 40 characters (39 plus an ellipsis).
- The title is set through `runtime.terminal.setTitle`, the same OSC 0 path the static `title` already uses. No new terminal-control surface is introduced, and pi-tui keeps ownership of terminal writes.
- The call is fire-and-forget and one-shot per session. A `titleSettled` latch guards it: with `autoTitle` off it is pre-settled and never runs; on a resumed session whose first `user/message` is already logged it is pre-settled so the static title stands; a whitespace-only first message is skipped without consuming the slot. Any failure, an empty reply, a missing `llm` service, or a missing agent provider/model leaves the static title untouched. A dedicated `AbortController` cancels an in-flight request on shutdown.
- The title call reaches `ctx.llm.stream` directly rather than through `agent.send`, so it never appends to the session or transcript and cannot perturb the agent loop.
- The feature defaults off and is enabled only in the interactive product config (`examples/tui-agent/cordis.yml`) and the scripted PTY fixture. Enabling it in the shared `dsh-tui-demo` schema default would fire an extra model call in keyless replay and boot scenarios that send no user message.
## Alternatives considered
**Truncate the first user message instead of a model title.** Rejected: the user chose a short model-made label; a truncated raw prompt is noisy, often begins with boilerplate, and rarely reads as a title.
**Rename the window (OSC 2) or the tmux window.** Rejected: OSC 0 sets only `pane_title`, so it labels the pane without renaming or leaking into the user's window title; the user confirmed OSC is the right lever.
**Default the feature on.** Rejected: enabling it in the shared demo schema perturbs keyless replay and boot snapshots and spends a model call on every fresh session; opt-in per deployment keeps the default surface inert.
**Fold this into the log-backed session-title work (PR #451).** Rejected: that change is session metadata persisted to the log; this is a terminal label with no persistence. Keeping them independent leaves each self-contained and avoids a shared dependency.
**Block the first turn until the title resolves.** Rejected: awaiting the title before sending the user's message adds latency to the actual request; fire-and-forget makes the rename invisible to the turn.
## Consequences
- When enabled, a fresh session spends one extra, tool-less model call with a single short user message and a few output tokens; off by default, it costs nothing.
- Because the title call stamps `sessionId`, it shares the session's `llm-replay` cursor: enabling `autoTitle` in a replay-backed snapshot scenario would consume a recorded script entry. This is why the default is off and the scripted PTY fixture answers the call with a tool-branching adapter rather than replay.
- `packages/ui/tui/tests/tui.spec.ts` pins the behavior with a mock `llm` adapter: a generated title replaces the static one, over-long output is truncated with an ellipsis, a whitespace-only first message keeps the one-shot slot, empty or failing replies leave the title, a resumed session never fires, and the feature-off / no-service / missing-provider / missing-model paths keep the static title. A shutdown test asserts the in-flight request is aborted.
- `examples/tui-agent/tests/tui-keyless-smoke.e2e.ts` proves the real Loader-booted path: the scripted adapter answers the tool-less title call with a fixed string, and the conversation scenario asserts the OSC 0 sequence reaches the PTY. Boot scenarios send no user message, so they never fire the call.

View File

@@ -1,41 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: 从首条消息自动命名终端
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-21-tui-auto-pane-title.md) | 中文
> **已被取代**:见[标题归一 Agent Note](../simplification/2026-07-22-tui-titles-from-session-title-service.md)。TUI 本地的 `autoTitle` 生成已移除;标题来自日志承载的 session-title 服务,终端重命名消费 `session/title` 事件。
> **已被取代**(就默认值与恢复行为而言),见[自动标题默认开启 Agent Note](2026-07-21-tui-auto-title-default-on.md)`autoTitle` 现默认开启,恢复会话会从已存储的首条消息重新推导标题,而非保留静态标题。下文的 OSC 0 路径、一次性门闩、模型概括形态、发出后不等待其返回的调用,以及每一条失败兜底,均仍然成立。
## Problem
TUI 的终端标题是一个所有会话共用的静态字符串(`title`,默认 `DeepSeek Harness`)。在 tmux 每个窗格或每个终端标签页各跑一个 agent智能体的用户看来它们的标签全都一样因此窗格一眼看去无从区分标签栏也不携带任何关于各会话正在做什么的信号。
## Decision
- `TuiConfig` 新增布尔字段 `autoTitle`(默认 `false`。开启后TUI 会在全新会话的首条用户消息之后发起一次后台模型调用,并用一个简短的、模型生成的标签替换终端标题;静态 `title` 是替换前的初值,也是兜底。
- 该标签是模型概括而非对提示词的截断。请求携带一段固定的任务指令将该请求概括为两到五个小写单词、不含标点的简短标题加上用户的首条消息且不带工具TUI 取回复的首个非空行并截断到 40 个字符39 个字符加一个省略号)。
- 标题通过 `runtime.terminal.setTitle` 设置——静态 `title` 已经在用的同一条 OSC 0 路径。不引入任何新的终端控制面,终端写入仍归 pi-tui 所有。
- 该调用发出后不等待其返回,且每会话仅一次。一个 `titleSettled` 门闩守护它:`autoTitle` 关闭时它预先置为已结算、从不运行;在首条 `user/message` 已入日志的恢复会话中它预先结算,因此静态标题得以保留;仅含空白的首条消息被跳过且不消耗名额。任何失败、空回复、缺少 `llm` 服务、或缺少 agent 的 `provider``model`,都会让静态标题保持不动。一个专用的 `AbortController` 在关闭时取消尚在进行的请求。
- 标题调用直接抵达 `ctx.llm.stream`,而非经由 `agent.send`,因此它从不追加进会话或 transcript文本记录也无法扰动 agent loop智能体循环
- 该功能默认关闭,仅在交互式产品配置(`examples/tui-agent/cordis.yml`)与脚本化 PTY fixture测试前置数据中开启。若在共享的 `dsh-tui-demo` schema 默认值里开启,会在不发送任何用户消息的无密钥回放与启动场景中多发一次模型调用。
## Alternatives considered
**截断首条用户消息,而非用模型生成标题。** 否决:用户选择的是简短的、模型制作的标签;截断后的原始提示词嘈杂、常以样板文字开头,且很少读起来像标题。
**重命名窗口OSC 2或 tmux 窗口。** 否决OSC 0 只设置 `pane_title`,因此它标记窗格而不重命名、也不泄漏进用户的窗口标题;用户确认 OSC 是正确的手段。
**让该功能默认开启。** 否决:在共享的 demo schema 里开启会扰动无密钥回放与启动快照,并在每个全新会话上花掉一次模型调用;按部署选择性开启可让默认面保持惰性。
**并入日志支撑的会话标题工作PR #451** 否决:那项改动是持久化到日志的会话元数据;本项是不做持久化的终端标签。让二者相互独立可使各自自成一体,并避免共享依赖。
**阻塞首轮直到标题就绪。** 否决:在发送用户消息前先等待标题,会给实际请求增加延迟;发出后不等待其返回可让重命名对该轮次不可见。
## Consequences
- 开启时,全新会话会多花一次无工具的模型调用,只带单条简短的用户消息和少量输出 token默认关闭时它不产生任何开销。
- 由于标题调用会打上 `sessionId`,它与会话的 `llm-replay` 游标共享:在以回放支撑的快照场景中开启 `autoTitle` 会消耗一条录制脚本条目。这正是它默认关闭、且脚本化 PTY fixture 用按工具分支的适配器而非回放来回答该调用的原因。
- `packages/ui/tui/tests/tui.spec.ts` 用一个 mock `llm` 适配器固定该行为:生成的标题替换静态标题、过长输出以省略号截断、仅含空白的首条消息保留一次性名额、空回复或失败回复保留标题、恢复的会话从不触发,以及功能关闭 / 无服务 / 缺提供方 / 缺模型各路径都保留静态标题。一项关闭测试断言尚在进行的请求被中止。
- `examples/tui-agent/tests/tui-keyless-smoke.e2e.ts` 证明真实的经 Loader 启动的路径:脚本化适配器以固定字符串回答无工具的标题调用,对话场景断言 OSC 0 序列抵达 PTY。启动场景不发送用户消息因此它们从不触发该调用。

View File

@@ -1,6 +0,0 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-21-tui-auto-title-default-on.md: 35809e1ef6bade3e09c34b17608eff5f8fb5bd22
2026-07-21-tui-auto-title-default-on.zh.md: aa20cfde1359605f2ac5a8f0427f4518c611ecd1

View File

@@ -1,32 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: Auto-title on by default, re-derived on resume
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-21-tui-auto-title-default-on.zh.md)
> **Superseded** by the [session-title consolidation Agent Note](../simplification/2026-07-22-tui-titles-from-session-title-service.md): the TUI-local `autoTitle` generation is removed; titles come from the log-backed session-title service, and the terminal rename consumes `session/title` events.
## Problem
The [auto-title Agent Note](2026-07-21-tui-auto-pane-title.md) shipped `autoTitle` off by default and, on a resumed session, kept the static title because the first `user/message` was already logged. In use both choices defeated the feature's purpose. A per-session descriptive pane title is what makes one tmux pane or terminal tab distinguishable from the next; leaving it off by default means the product ships an inert feature that almost no user turns on, and skipping re-derivation on resume means a resumed session — exactly the long-lived session most worth labelling — falls back to the shared static string. The user asked for a descriptive per-session name to be the normal experience.
## Decision
- `autoTitle` defaults **on** (`z.boolean().default(true)`, mirrored by `resolveTuiConfig`'s `?? true`). A deployment with an `llm` service and an agent provider/model gets a model-made pane title on every session without opting in; one without them keeps the static title, so default-on is inert where the call cannot run.
- A **resumed** session re-derives the title on mount from its already-logged first `user/message`: `createTuiChat` scans `agent.session.events` for the first such event and feeds its text to the same one-shot `generateTitle`. The title is never persisted (the session header carries no title field), so it is always derived, never restored.
- The one-shot latch is now simply `titleSettled = !resolved.autoTitle`. The prior pre-settle-on-resume clause is gone: on resume `generateTitle` runs once from the stored first message and then latches, so a message that arrives *after* the resume does not re-title. A fresh session has no stored `user/message` at mount, so the resume scan is a no-op and the live `session/event` listener titles the first message instead.
- Everything else from the [auto-title Agent Note](2026-07-21-tui-auto-pane-title.md) stands unchanged: the OSC 0 `runtime.terminal.setTitle` path, the model-summary shape (two-to-five lowercase words, first non-empty line, 40-char cap), the fire-and-forget `ctx.llm.stream` call that never touches the session or transcript, the shutdown `AbortController`, and every failure fallback (empty reply, missing `llm`, missing provider/model, whitespace-only prompt).
## Alternatives considered
**Keep the feature off by default.** Rejected: this is a direct reversal of the [auto-title Agent Note](2026-07-21-tui-auto-pane-title.md)'s "default off" decision at the user's request. Off-by-default ships an inert feature; the descriptive name is only useful if it is the normal experience. The keyless-replay concern that motivated off-by-default is addressed by pinning `autoTitle: false` in the replay-backed snapshot scenarios rather than by suppressing it for every deployment.
**Persist the derived title in the session header.** Rejected: the header has no title field and adding one would make a terminal label into session metadata — the boundary the [auto-title Agent Note](2026-07-21-tui-auto-pane-title.md) already drew against the log-backed session-title work. Re-deriving from the stored first message costs one tool-less call on resume and keeps the label a pure function of the conversation.
**Re-derive on resume from the latest message instead of the first.** Rejected: the title summarises what the session is *about*, which its opening request captures; a mid-conversation message would make the pane label drift as the work moves on.
## Consequences
- A fresh session with a working `llm` now spends one extra tool-less model call by default (previously only when opted in); a resumed session spends one on mount. Deployments without an `llm` or provider/model are unaffected.
- The replay-backed `examples/tui-agent/tests/tui.snapshot.ts` must opt **out**: it pins `autoTitle: false`, because a default-on title request is not among the recorded turns and `installLlmReplay` fails loud on an unrecorded request. The unit `packages/ui/tui/tests/tui.snapshot.ts` needs no opt-out — it mounts no `llm` service, so `generateTitle` short-circuits and the default flip is inert there. The interactive `examples/tui-agent/cordis.yml` and the scripted PTY fixture already set `autoTitle: true`, so the keyless smoke's OSC 0 assertion is unchanged.
- `packages/ui/tui/tests/tui.spec.ts` pins the new defaults: the config-default test expects `autoTitle: true`; the disabled-path test now sets `autoTitle: false` explicitly; and the former "resumed session never fires" test is rewritten to assert re-derivation from the stored first message and that a later live message does not re-title. `docs/config-catalog.md` regenerates to "On by default".

View File

@@ -1,32 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: 自动标题默认开启,恢复时重新推导
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-21-tui-auto-title-default-on.md) | 中文
> **已被取代**:见[标题归一 Agent Note](../simplification/2026-07-22-tui-titles-from-session-title-service.md)。TUI 本地的 `autoTitle` 生成已移除;标题来自日志承载的 session-title 服务,终端重命名消费 `session/title` 事件。
## Problem
[自动标题 Agent Note](2026-07-21-tui-auto-pane-title.md) 交付时 `autoTitle` 默认关闭,并且在恢复会话中因首条 `user/message` 已入日志而保留静态标题。实际使用中这两个选择都违背了该功能的初衷。让一个 tmux 窗格或终端标签页区别于下一个的,正是每会话各异的描述性窗格标题;默认关闭意味着产品交付了一个几乎无人开启的惰性功能,而恢复时不重新推导,则意味着恢复会话——恰恰是最值得标记的长命会话——退回到共用的静态字符串。用户要求把每会话的描述性名称做成常态体验。
## Decision
- `autoTitle` 默认**开启**`z.boolean().default(true)``resolveTuiConfig``?? true` 与之对齐)。带有 `llm` 服务与 agent 提供方/模型的部署无需选择性开启即可在每个会话获得模型制作的窗格标题;不具备它们的部署保留静态标题,因此在调用无法运行处,默认开启是惰性的。
- **恢复**会话在挂载时从其已入日志的首条 `user/message` 重新推导标题:`createTuiChat``agent.session.events` 中扫描首个此类事件,并把其文本喂给同一个一次性的 `generateTitle`。标题从不持久化(会话头不携带标题字段),因此它始终是推导得来,而非恢复而来。
- 一次性门闩现在只是 `titleSettled = !resolved.autoTitle`。此前"恢复即预先结算"的分句已删除:恢复时 `generateTitle` 从已存储的首条消息运行一次随后上闩,因此恢复*之后*到达的消息不会再改标题。全新会话在挂载时没有已存储的 `user/message`,因此恢复扫描是空操作,改由实时的 `session/event` 监听器为首条消息命名。
- [自动标题 Agent Note](2026-07-21-tui-auto-pane-title.md) 的其余一切保持不变OSC 0 的 `runtime.terminal.setTitle` 路径、模型概括形态两到五个小写单词、首个非空行、40 字符上限)、从不触碰会话或 transcript文本记录的发出后不等待其返回的 `ctx.llm.stream` 调用、关闭时的 `AbortController`,以及每一条失败兜底(空回复、缺 `llm`、缺提供方/模型、仅含空白的提示词)。
## Alternatives considered
**让该功能保持默认关闭。** 否决:这是应用户要求,对[自动标题 Agent Note](2026-07-21-tui-auto-pane-title.md)"默认关闭"决策的直接反转。默认关闭交付的是惰性功能;只有当描述性名称成为常态体验时它才有用。当初促成默认关闭的无密钥回放顾虑,改由在以回放支撑的快照场景中固定 `autoTitle: false` 来处理,而非为每个部署都压制该功能。
**把推导出的标题持久化进会话头。** 否决:会话头没有标题字段,加一个会把终端标签变成会话元数据——正是[自动标题 Agent Note](2026-07-21-tui-auto-pane-title.md)已经对日志支撑的会话标题工作划出的边界。从已存储的首条消息重新推导,代价是恢复时一次无工具调用,并让标签保持为对话的纯函数。
**恢复时从最新消息而非首条消息重新推导。** 否决:标题概括的是会话*关于什么*,而这由其开场请求捕获;一条对话中途的消息会让窗格标签随工作推进而漂移。
## Consequences
- 带可用 `llm` 的全新会话现在默认多花一次无工具的模型调用(此前只在选择性开启时才有);恢复会话在挂载时花掉一次。不具备 `llm` 或提供方/模型的部署不受影响。
- 以回放支撑的 `examples/tui-agent/tests/tui.snapshot.ts` 必须选择**关闭**:它固定 `autoTitle: false`,因为默认开启的标题请求不在录制轮次之列,而 `installLlmReplay` 对未录制的请求会显式报错。单元 `packages/ui/tui/tests/tui.snapshot.ts` 无需选择关闭——它不挂载 `llm` 服务,因此 `generateTitle` 提前短路,默认值的翻转在那里是惰性的。交互式的 `examples/tui-agent/cordis.yml` 与脚本化 PTY fixture测试前置数据已设 `autoTitle: true`,因此无密钥冒烟测试的 OSC 0 断言保持不变。
- `packages/ui/tui/tests/tui.spec.ts` 固定新的默认值config 默认测试期望 `autoTitle: true`;关闭路径测试现在显式设 `autoTitle: false`;此前的"恢复会话从不触发"测试改写为断言从已存储首条消息重新推导,并断言之后的实时消息不会再改标题。`docs/config-catalog.md` 重新生成为"On by default"。

View File

@@ -1,35 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: The banner sweeps in; the subtitle line is gone
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-21-tui-banner-sweep.zh.md)
> **Superseded** by the [no-banner Agent Note](2026-07-21-tui-no-banner.md): the banner itself was removed, taking the sweep with it.
## Problem
The [startup-slogans Agent Note](2026-07-20-tui-startup-slogans.md) replaced the instructional welcome line with a random slogan bank revealed by a per-character typewriter. In use the quotes read as weird — random flavor text in a tool's header — and the animation was slow (40 ms/char over a full sentence) while animating only one line of a four-line banner. This note supersedes that decision's slogan half; the removal of the configured demo welcome and the animation-lifecycle groundwork stand.
## Decision
- The slogan bank, `pickStartupSlogan`, and the typewriter reveal are deleted. When `welcome` is unset the banner simply has **no subtitle line** — title and model/session detail only. The `welcome` config remains for deployments and fixtures that want a fixed subtitle, rendered frame-deterministically with no animation.
- The startup animation is now the **whole banner**: `HeaderComponent` gains a `revealWidth` clip, and the header box wipes in left-to-right over ~24 frames at 15 ms (~360 ms total, ~60 fps), started after `ui.start()` succeeds and cleared through the same `detachListeners` path the typewriter used. `stopBannerReveal` also resets the clip so a disposed-mid-sweep header re-renders whole.
- The PTY smoke's boot marker changes from the typewriter cursor (`▌`) to the banner's top-right corner (`╮`), which only renders once the sweep completes.
## Alternatives considered
**Keep the animation as-is and only change the copy.** Rejected: any fixed or rotating phrase re-read on every boot decays into wallpaper; the user's judgment was that the quotes themselves, not just their content, were wrong for the surface.
**Animate per banner line (top-down) instead of a left-right sweep.** Rejected: with only four lines the animation would have four visible steps — closer to a flicker than a reveal; the horizontal sweep uses the full terminal width for a smooth motion at the same total duration.
**Character-level clipping via `revealWidth` on styled text.** Adopted with `truncateToWidth` from pi-tui, the same ANSI-aware clipper the header already uses for width overflow, so the sweep cannot tear escape sequences.
## Consequences
- Boot output with `welcome` unset is again animation-dependent but no longer random: every boot sweeps the same banner. Configured welcomes (all snapshot/scripted fixtures, the Code Mode overlay) stay frame-deterministic and unchanged.
- The `STARTUP_SLOGANS`/`pickStartupSlogan` exports are gone; no consumer outside the deleted tests referenced them.
- The default banner is one line shorter (no subtitle), so PTY assertions anchored on banner geometry use the corner glyph rather than any subtitle text.
## Testing
`packages/ui/tui/tests/tui.spec.ts` pins: the sweep completes to a full banner (both corners + title) and produced at least one clipped mid-sweep frame; a configured welcome renders verbatim with no clipped frames; the unset-welcome banner has no subtitle; and dispose clears the sweep's own interval handle. The PTY smoke boots on the `╮` completion marker across the tui-demo bin, the dsh CLI, and the personal-overlay scenarios. Verified live in tmux.

View File

@@ -1,35 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: 横幅整体扫入;副标题行移除
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-21-tui-banner-sweep.md) | 中文
> **已被取代**:由[移除启动横幅 Agent Note](2026-07-21-tui-no-banner.md)取代:横幅本身已移除,扫入动画随之移除。
## Problem
[启动 slogan Agent Note](2026-07-20-tui-startup-slogans.md) 用随机 slogan 库加逐字打字机动画取代了说明书式的欢迎行。实际使用中这些引语显得怪异——工具头部出现随机的风味文案——而且动画很慢(每字符 40 ms扫完一整句却只动画四行横幅中的一行。本 note 取代该决定中 slogan 的那一半;移除示例配置中欢迎语的决定与动画生命周期的基础设施保持不变。
## Decision
- 删除 slogan 库、`pickStartupSlogan` 和打字机动画。`welcome` 未设置时横幅直接**没有副标题行**——只有标题和模型/会话详情。`welcome` 配置保留给想要固定副标题的部署与 fixture无动画、逐帧确定地渲染。
- 启动动画现在作用于**整个横幅**`HeaderComponent` 增加 `revealWidth` 裁剪,头部盒子以约 24 帧、每帧 15 ms总计约 360 ms、约 60 fps从左到右扫入`ui.start()` 成功后启动,经打字机动画用过的同一条 `detachListeners` 路径清除。`stopBannerReveal` 同时重置裁剪,因此扫入中途被 dispose 的头部会重新完整渲染。
- PTY 冒烟测试的启动标记从打字机光标(`▌`)改为横幅右上角(`╮`),它只在扫入完成后才渲染。
## Alternatives considered
**保留动画原样、只改文案。** 否决:任何每次启动都被重读的固定或轮换语句都会退化成墙纸;用户的判断是引语本身——而不只是内容——对这个表面来说就是错的。
**按横幅行逐行(自上而下)动画而非左右扫入。** 否决:只有四行时动画只有四个可见步骤——更像闪烁而不是展开;水平扫入用满终端宽度,在相同总时长内动作更平滑。
**用 `revealWidth` 对带样式文本做字符级裁剪。** 采用 pi-tui 的 `truncateToWidth`——头部处理宽度溢出时已在使用的同一个 ANSI 感知裁剪器——因此扫入不可能撕裂转义序列。
## Consequences
- `welcome` 未设置时启动输出再次依赖动画但不再随机:每次启动扫入同一幅横幅。配置了欢迎语的场景(全部快照/脚本化 fixture、Code Mode overlay保持逐帧确定且不变。
- `STARTUP_SLOGANS`/`pickStartupSlogan` 导出移除;除被删除的测试外没有消费者引用它们。
- 默认横幅少一行(无副标题),因此锚定横幅几何的 PTY 断言使用角落字形而非任何副标题文本。
## Testing
`packages/ui/tui/tests/tui.spec.ts` 固定:扫入完成为完整横幅(两个角 + 标题且产生了至少一个裁剪的中途帧配置的欢迎语原文渲染且无裁剪帧未设置欢迎语的横幅没有副标题dispose 清除扫入自己的定时器句柄。PTY 冒烟测试在 tui-demo bin、dsh CLI 和个人 overlay 场景中以 `╮` 完成标记启动。已在 tmux 中实机验证。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-21-tui-borderless-banner.md: 37263854b6cc77283215c3c1378f9908ff966611
2026-07-21-tui-borderless-banner.zh.md: ca796e49cb9d3a9abc0acd64a39448bc3f9ad50e
2026-07-21-tui-borderless-banner.md: 2fcb414c11f91df0914b17aa973e45746bbdfc67
2026-07-21-tui-borderless-banner.zh.md: 8f80b21e6425bb38fff52529f1df8d262c34338f

View File

@@ -6,34 +6,41 @@ English | [中文](2026-07-21-tui-borderless-banner.zh.md)
## Problem
The [no-banner Agent Note](2026-07-21-tui-no-banner.md) removed the boxed startup banner: it deleted `HeaderComponent` and its sweep, moved the model into the footer, dropped the session id, and rendered `welcome` as the transcript's first line. The user's verdict reversed that: bring the banner back — "just remove the border". The four-row box frame was the objectionable chrome, not the identifying facts it carried (model, session id) nor the sweep-in motion.
An intermediate no-banner design removed the boxed startup banner: it deleted `HeaderComponent` and its sweep, moved the model into the footer, dropped the session id, and rendered `welcome` as the transcript's first line. The user's verdict reversed that: bring the banner back — "just remove the border". The four-row box frame was the objectionable chrome, not the identifying facts it carried (model, session id) nor the sweep-in motion.
## Decision
- `HeaderComponent` and its left-to-right sweep return, but render **borderless**: no `╭─╮`/`╰─╯` corners and no `│` side bars. Each line is a single leading space plus `truncateToWidth`-clipped content, so the sweep's width clip can never tear an escape sequence and no fixed frame is drawn.
- The header carries the title (`DEEPSEEK HARNESS`), a `<model> • <session-id>` detail line, and — when `welcome` is set — a muted subtitle. With `welcome` unset the header is title + detail only.
- The model **also** stays in the footer's left segment. The no-banner note's footer model prefix is kept, not reverted, so the driving model stays glanceable after the transient banner scrolls out of view.
- `HeaderComponent` and its left-to-right sweep return, but render **borderless**: no `╭─╮`/`╰─╯` corners and no `│` side bars. Each line is a single leading space plus `truncateToWidth`-clipped content, so the sweep's width clip can never tear an escape sequence and no fixed frame is drawn. The reveal advances through about 24 frames at 15 ms each.
- The header carries the title (`DEEPSEEK HARNESS`), a `<model> • <session-id>` detail line, and — when `welcome` is set — a muted subtitle. With `welcome` unset the header is title + detail only: there is no fixed or random slogan.
- The model **also** stays in the footer's left segment, so the driving model remains glanceable after the transient banner scrolls out of view.
- `welcome` reverts to a banner subtitle; the transcript-first-line notice is removed from `rebuildTranscript`.
- The sweep animates only when `welcome` is unset. A configured `welcome` renders the whole banner immediately, keeping fixtures and snapshots frame-deterministic. The sweep starts after `ui.start()` succeeds and is cleared through the same `detachListeners` path via `stopBannerReveal`, which also resets the clip so a header disposed mid-sweep re-renders whole.
This supersedes the [no-banner Agent Note](2026-07-21-tui-no-banner.md) (which superseded the [banner-sweep Agent Note](2026-07-21-tui-banner-sweep.md)): the banner and its sweep return borderless, while the model's footer home the no-banner note added stays.
This note owns the current result of the discarded startup variants: random slogans with a per-character typewriter, a boxed whole-banner sweep, and no banner. The example composition does not set `welcome`; deployments and deterministic fixtures may still provide one. The model's persistent footer home from the no-banner variant remains.
## Alternatives considered
**Keep the box but thin it or use lighter glyphs.** Rejected: the instruction was "just remove the border"; any surrounding glyph is the frame chrome the user objected to.
**Drop the model from the footer now that the banner shows it again.** Rejected: the banner is transient and scrolls away with the transcript, while the footer keeps the model visible for the whole session — the reason the no-banner note put it there, deliberately preserved.
**Keep a random or fixed slogan when `welcome` is unset.** Rejected because repeated flavor copy becomes wallpaper and the per-character reveal was slow while animating only one line. An unset welcome therefore produces no subtitle, and the whole banner supplies the startup motion.
**Leave the session id out, as the no-banner note decided.** Rejected: with the box gone the detail line costs one row, and the user asked for the banner "as before", which carried `model • session-id`.
**Remove the banner entirely.** Rejected because the persistent footer is a good home for the model but not for the full identifying detail, while putting `welcome` in the transcript makes presentation configuration behave like conversation content.
**Reveal the banner top-down.** Rejected because four row-sized steps read as a flicker. The horizontal width clip uses the terminal span for smooth motion and reuses the ANSI-aware truncation path.
**Drop the model from the footer now that the banner shows it again.** Rejected: the banner is transient and scrolls away with the transcript, while the footer keeps the model visible for the whole session; that persistent location is deliberately preserved.
**Leave the session id out of the banner.** Rejected: with the box gone the detail line costs one row, and the user asked for the banner "as before", which carried `model • session-id`.
## Consequences
- Boot output with `welcome` unset is animation-dependent again (the sweep); configured welcomes stay frame-deterministic, so every snapshot and scripted fixture keeps a fixed subtitle.
- The demo no longer supplies instructional welcome filler; an unset `welcome` means a subtitle-free banner, while the config remains the deterministic escape hatch for deployments and fixtures.
- The model now appears twice at boot — banner detail and footer — intended redundancy: the banner is transient, the footer persistent.
- `/clear` empties the transcript but not the header, so the banner and its configured subtitle survive `/clear`, unlike the no-banner welcome line that `/clear` wiped.
- `/clear` empties the transcript but not the header, so the banner and its configured subtitle survive `/clear`, unlike a transcript-based welcome line.
- All pi-tui terminal snapshots and the examples/tui-agent replay snapshots re-recorded (`test:snapshot:refresh`): banner rows return with no box glyphs; footer rows keep the model prefix.
- Anything that anchored on banner absence re-anchors on its presence: the PTY smoke boots on the detail line's `main-session-` id (revealed late in the sweep) and asserts `DEEPSEEK`/`HARNESS` present with no box corners.
## Testing
`packages/ui/tui/tests/tui.spec.ts` pins: the borderless banner sweeps to natural completion — no box corners, title and `main-session` detail present — with at least one clipped mid-sweep frame; a configured `welcome` renders the whole banner with no clipped frame; the unset-welcome banner has no subtitle; and dispose clears the sweep interval mid-sweep. The tui-agent and dsh-CLI PTY smokes boot on the `main-session-` detail marker and assert no box corners. Snapshots verify the full frames.
`packages/ui/tui/tests/tui.spec.ts` pins: the borderless banner sweeps to natural completion — no box corners, title and `main-session` detail present — with at least one clipped mid-sweep frame; a configured `welcome` renders the whole banner with no clipped frame; the unset-welcome banner has no subtitle; and dispose clears the sweep interval mid-sweep. Independent color-scheme cases cover reported light/dark transitions, a same-scheme no-op, and a terminal that throws on the DSR query write; `applyColorScheme` relies on `setStatus` to rederive the editor border instead of repeating the dead assignment that had broken per-file coverage. The tui-agent and dsh-CLI PTY smokes boot on the `main-session-` detail marker and assert no box corners. Snapshots verify the full frames.

View File

@@ -6,34 +6,41 @@ Status: implemented
## Problem
[移除横幅 Agent Note](2026-07-21-tui-no-banner.md) 删掉了带框的启动横幅:它删除了 `HeaderComponent` 及其扫入动画,把模型移入页脚,丢弃了会话 id并把 `welcome` 渲染为 transcript 的第一行。用户的裁决把这一切反转:把横幅拿回来——"just remove the border"。令人反感的装饰是那四行盒子边框,而不是它承载的识别信息(模型、会话 id也不是扫入动效。
一个中间的无横幅设计删掉了带框的启动横幅:它删除了 `HeaderComponent` 及其扫入动画,把模型移入页脚,丢弃了会话 id并把 `welcome` 渲染为 transcript 的第一行。用户的裁决把这一切反转:把横幅拿回来——"just remove the border"。令人反感的装饰是那四行盒子边框,而不是它承载的识别信息(模型、会话 id也不是扫入动效。
## Decision
- `HeaderComponent` 及其从左到右的扫入动画回归,但以**无边框**方式渲染:没有 `╭─╮`/`╰─╯` 边角,也没有 `│` 侧边。每一行都是一个前导空格加上经 `truncateToWidth` 裁剪的内容,因此扫入的宽度裁剪永远不会撕裂转义序列,也不绘制任何固定边框。
- 头部承载标题(`DEEPSEEK HARNESS`)、一条 `<model> • <session-id>` 详情行,以及——当设置了 `welcome` 时——一条弱化的副标题。`welcome` 未设置时头部只有标题加详情。
- 模型**同时**保留在页脚的左段。移除横幅那版 note 加入的页脚模型前缀被保留而非回退,因此在短暂的横幅滚出视野后,会话使用的模型仍可一瞥可见。
- `HeaderComponent` 及其从左到右的扫入动画回归,但以**无边框**方式渲染:没有 `╭─╮`/`╰─╯` 边角,也没有 `│` 侧边。每一行都是一个前导空格加上经 `truncateToWidth` 裁剪的内容,因此扫入的宽度裁剪永远不会撕裂转义序列,也不绘制任何固定边框。扫入大约经过 24 帧完成,每帧间隔 15 ms。
- 头部承载标题(`DEEPSEEK HARNESS`)、一条 `<model> • <session-id>` 详情行,以及——当设置了 `welcome` 时——一条弱化的副标题。`welcome` 未设置时头部只有标题加详情:不含固定或随机标语
- 模型**同时**保留在页脚的左段,因此在短暂的横幅滚出视野后,会话使用的模型仍可一瞥可见。
- `welcome` 恢复为横幅副标题transcript 第一行的通知从 `rebuildTranscript` 中移除。
- 仅当 `welcome` 未设置时才播放扫入动画。配置了 `welcome` 会立即渲染整个横幅,使 fixture 和快照保持帧确定性。扫入在 `ui.start()` 成功后启动,并经与之前相同的 `detachListeners` 路径通过 `stopBannerReveal` 清理;后者还会重置裁剪,使扫入中途被销毁的头部重新完整渲染。
note 取代[移除横幅 Agent Note](2026-07-21-tui-no-banner.md)(后者取代了[横幅扫入 Agent Note](2026-07-21-tui-banner-sweep.md)):横幅及其扫入动画以无边框方式回归,而移除横幅那版 note 为模型设立的页脚归宿得以保留。
Agent Note 统一记录几种已弃用启动方案的当前结论:带逐字打字机效果的随机标语、带边框的整幅横幅扫入动画,以及完全移除横幅。示例组装不设置 `welcome`;部署和确定性 fixture 仍可提供该值。无横幅方案为模型设置的常驻页脚位置继续保留。
## Alternatives considered
**保留盒子但做细或改用更轻的字符。** 否决:指令是 "just remove the border";任何环绕的字符都是用户所反对的边框装饰。
**既然横幅重新显示模型,就把模型从页脚移除。** 否决:横幅是短暂的,会随 transcript 滚走,而页脚在整个会话中保持模型可见——这正是移除横幅那版 note 把它放在那里的原因,此处刻意保留
**在未设置 `welcome` 时保留随机或固定标语。** 否决:反复出现的氛围文案很快失去信息价值,而逐字揭示仅为一行制作动画,速度又慢。因此,未设置 `welcome` 时不显示副标题,由整个横幅提供启动动效
**移除横幅那版 note 那样,把会话 id 留在外面。** 否决:盒子去掉后详情行只占一行,且用户要求横幅"和以前一样",而以前它承载 `model • session-id`
**完全移除横幅** 否决:常驻页脚很适合显示模型,却无法承载完整识别详情;把 `welcome` 放入 transcript 还会使展示配置表现成对话内容
**自上而下揭示横幅。** 否决:按四行分成四步看起来像闪烁。横向宽度裁剪利用终端横向空间实现平滑动效,并复用 ANSI 感知的截断路径。
**既然横幅重新显示模型,就把模型从页脚移除。** 否决:横幅是短暂的,会随 transcript 滚走,而页脚在整个会话中保持模型可见;这个常驻位置被刻意保留。
**将会话 id 留在横幅之外。** 否决:盒子去掉后详情行只占一行,且用户要求横幅"和以前一样",而以前它承载 `model • session-id`
## Consequences
- `welcome` 未设置时的启动输出再次依赖动画(扫入);配置了欢迎语则保持帧确定性,因此每个快照和脚本 fixture 都保留一个固定副标题。
- demo 不再提供教学性质的欢迎填充文案;`welcome` 未设置就表示横幅没有副标题,而该配置仍是部署和 fixture 获得确定性输出的配置手段。
- 模型现在在启动时出现两次——横幅详情与页脚——这是有意的冗余:横幅短暂,页脚常驻。
- `/clear` 清空 transcript 但不清头部,因此横幅及其配置的副标题在 `/clear` 后存活,不同于`/clear` 清掉的移除横幅那版的欢迎行。
- `/clear` 清空 transcript 但不清头部,因此横幅及其配置的副标题在 `/clear` 后存活,不同于基于 transcript 的欢迎行。
- 全部 pi-tui 终端快照与 examples/tui-agent 回放快照重新录制(`test:snapshot:refresh`):横幅行以无盒子字符方式回归;页脚行保留模型前缀。
- 一切锚定横幅缺失的内容改为锚定其存在PTY 冒烟测试以详情行的 `main-session-` id 为启动标记(它在扫入后段才被揭示),并断言 `DEEPSEEK`/`HARNESS` 出现且无盒子角。
## Testing
`packages/ui/tui/tests/tui.spec.ts` 固定:无边框横幅扫入至自然完成——无盒子角、标题与 `main-session` 详情出现——且至少有一帧扫入中途被裁剪;配置的 `welcome` 完整渲染横幅且无裁剪帧;未设置 `welcome` 的横幅无副标题销毁会在扫入中途清掉扫入定时器。tui-agent 与 dsh CLI 的 PTY 冒烟测试以 `main-session-` 详情标记为启动标记并断言无盒子角。快照验证完整帧。
`packages/ui/tui/tests/tui.spec.ts` 固定:无边框横幅扫入至自然完成——无盒子角、标题与 `main-session` 详情出现——且至少有一帧扫入中途被裁剪;配置的 `welcome` 完整渲染横幅且无裁剪帧;未设置 `welcome` 的横幅无副标题;销毁会在扫入中途清掉扫入定时器。独立的配色方案用例覆盖终端报告的浅色/深色转换、相同方案下的空操作,以及写入 DSR 查询时抛出异常的终端;`applyColorScheme` 依靠 `setStatus` 重新推导编辑器边框,而不再重复那个导致逐文件覆盖率未达标的无效赋值。tui-agent 与 dsh CLI 的 PTY 冒烟测试以 `main-session-` 详情标记为启动标记并断言无盒子角。快照验证完整帧。

View File

@@ -1,39 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: No startup banner
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-21-tui-no-banner.zh.md)
> **Superseded** by the [borderless-banner Agent Note](2026-07-21-tui-borderless-banner.md): the banner and its sweep return without the box. The model's footer home this note added stays.
## Problem
The TUI opened with a boxed product banner ("DEEPSEEK HARNESS" + model/session detail), most recently with a sweep-in animation ([banner sweep Agent Note](2026-07-21-tui-banner-sweep.md)). The user's verdict: remove it. A product title re-read on every boot is chrome, the box spends four rows before any content, and the identifying facts it carried (model, session) have better homes.
## Decision
- `HeaderComponent`, the sweep animation, and its lifecycle wiring are deleted. The TUI mounts straight into the transcript; startup renders nothing above the separator.
- The model name moves into the footer status line's left segment (`<model> <cwd> ↑tokens ↓tokens`), so the session's driving model stays visible at all times, not just at boot. The session id is no longer displayed — it lives in the session log and `./.sessions` filenames, where `dsh --resume <id>` and the `/resume` selector retrieve it.
- `welcome`, when configured, renders as the transcript's first line (a muted notice) inside `rebuildTranscript`, so palette swaps preserve it. Unset renders nothing. Fixtures keep their configured welcomes; the PTY smoke's boot marker becomes the footer's model name, the only mounted-TUI text guaranteed to render regardless of cwd length.
This supersedes the [banner sweep Agent Note](2026-07-21-tui-banner-sweep.md) entirely: both the sweep and the banner it animated are gone.
## Alternatives considered
**Keep a one-line header (no box).** Rejected: the only load-bearing fact was the model name, and the footer already aggregates session status; a dedicated header row for one fact is the same chrome, smaller.
**Show the session id in the footer too.** Rejected: a 36-char UUID dominates the 100-column footer and clips the status segment; it identifies the session for resume, which is a log/filesystem concern, not a glanceable one.
**Print the welcome outside the transcript (above the separator).** Rejected: any fixed region above the transcript is a banner again; as a transcript line it scrolls away naturally and survives rebuilds through the same path as every other transcript element.
## Consequences
- Startup output is fully deterministic again — no animation frames at all; the interval-lifecycle machinery from the two animation iterations is gone.
- All 26 pi-tui terminal snapshots re-recorded (`test:snapshot:refresh`): banner rows gone, footer rows gain the model prefix.
- Anything that anchored on banner text (`DEEPSEEK`, box corners) re-anchors on the footer model name; `main-session-` no longer appears in boot output.
- `/clear` now wipes the welcome line too: it is an ordinary transcript line, and `/clear` empties the transcript (the old banner survived `/clear` only by sitting outside it).
- The footer's left segment is wider; on narrow terminals the right status segment clips earlier.
## Testing
`packages/ui/tui/tests/tui.spec.ts` pins: no box corners/product title and an empty transcript when `welcome` is unset, with the model in the footer; a configured welcome as the first transcript line without a banner; and the welcome surviving a palette-swap transcript rebuild. The PTY smoke boots on the footer model name and asserts `DEEPSEEK HARNESS` is absent. Snapshots verify the full frames.

View File

@@ -1,39 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: 移除启动横幅
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-21-tui-no-banner.md) | 中文
> **已被取代**,见[无边框横幅 Agent Note](2026-07-21-tui-borderless-banner.md):横幅及其扫入动画回归,只是去掉了盒子。本 note 为模型设立的页脚归宿得以保留。
## Problem
TUI 启动时展示一个带框的产品横幅("DEEPSEEK HARNESS" + 模型/会话详情),最近一版还带扫入动画([横幅扫入 Agent Note](2026-07-21-tui-banner-sweep.md))。用户的裁决:删掉它。每次启动都被重读的产品标题是装饰,盒子在任何内容之前先占掉四行,而它承载的识别信息(模型、会话)有更好的去处。
## Decision
- 删除 `HeaderComponent`、扫入动画及其生命周期接线。TUI 直接挂载进 transcript启动时分隔线之上不渲染任何东西。
- 模型名移入页脚状态行的左段(`<model> <cwd> ↑tokens ↓tokens`),会话使用的模型因此始终可见,而不只是启动时。会话 id 不再显示——它存在于会话日志和 `./.sessions` 文件名中,`dsh --resume <id>``/resume` 选择器会从中获取该 id。
- 配置了 `welcome` 时,它作为 transcript 的第一行(一条弱化的通知)在 `rebuildTranscript` 内渲染因此调色板切换会保留它。未设置则什么也不渲染。fixture 保留各自配置的欢迎语PTY 冒烟测试的启动标记改为页脚的模型名——无论 cwd 多长都保证渲染的唯一挂载后文本。
本 note 完全取代[横幅扫入 Agent Note](2026-07-21-tui-banner-sweep.md):扫入动画和它所动画的横幅都已移除。
## Alternatives considered
**保留单行头部(去掉盒子)。** 否决:唯一有承载价值的信息是模型名,而页脚已经聚合会话状态;为一条信息保留专用头部行仍是同一种装饰,只是小一点。
**把会话 id 也放进页脚。** 否决36 字符的 UUID 会占满 100 列页脚并裁掉状态段;它的用途是恢复会话的标识,属于日志/文件系统关注点,不是需要一瞥可见的信息。
**把欢迎语渲染在 transcript 之外(分隔线上方)。** 否决transcript 上方任何固定区域都会再次变成横幅;作为 transcript 行它自然滚走,并通过与其他 transcript 元素相同的路径在重建后保留。
## Consequences
- 启动输出再次完全确定——没有任何动画帧;两轮动画迭代留下的定时器生命周期机制全部移除。
- 全部 26 个 pi-tui 终端快照重新录制(`test:snapshot:refresh`):横幅行消失,页脚行增加模型前缀。
- 锚定横幅文本(`DEEPSEEK`、盒子角)的内容改为锚定页脚模型名;启动输出中不再出现 `main-session-`
- `/clear` 现在也会清掉欢迎行:它是普通的 transcript 行,而 `/clear` 清空 transcript旧横幅能在 `/clear` 后存活只因为它在 transcript 之外)。
- 页脚左段变宽;窄终端上右侧状态段更早被裁剪。
## Testing
`packages/ui/tui/tests/tui.spec.ts` 固定:`welcome` 未设置时无盒子角/产品标题、transcript 为空、模型在页脚;配置的欢迎语作为 transcript 第一行且无横幅;欢迎语在调色板切换的 transcript 重建后保留。PTY 冒烟测试以页脚模型名为启动标记并断言 `DEEPSEEK HARNESS` 不出现。快照验证完整帧。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-21-tui-verbose-status-line.md: f277afd3a874b30a29dc0ef193740f636d22290b
2026-07-21-tui-verbose-status-line.zh.md: 9fa7cf29c67245382bbee6b72f2710c5550d7f54
2026-07-21-tui-verbose-status-line.md: 71584ee91a911cc8652512ec26b00dae8c818f36
2026-07-21-tui-verbose-status-line.zh.md: bda3c5e8394f7707916c6fc76045b1a6f38fa95b

View File

@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ While a turn ran, the [full-screen TUI](2026-07-17-dedicated-full-screen-tui-fro
- While a turn runs, the status line above the editor shows a derived phase label with elapsed time, keeping the trailing `— Enter sends steering, Esc cancels` hint. The four phases and their labels are `waiting` → "Waiting for the first token", `thinking` → "Thinking", `responding` → "Responding", and `executing` → "Executing tools".
- The phase is presentation state the TUI derives from live session events, not a session event or agent status of its own. `step/start` enters `waiting`; an `assistant/chunk` reasoning delta or reasoning block-start enters `thinking`; a text delta or text block-start enters `responding`; a `tool/call` enters `executing`. The event map is merge-extensible, so every other event kind falls through a default and leaves the phase unchanged.
- The label reports two clocks — `<phase> <phase-elapsed> · total <step-elapsed>` — except `waiting`, which shows only the step total. The phase clock resets on a genuine phase change or a new step; the step clock resets on `step/start`. Durations format as `8s` below a minute and `1m05s` at or above one. Tool time between `step/end` and the next `step/start` accrues to the finishing step's total.
- A single `RunningStatus` controller — the loader, the phase, the two baselines, and a refresh timer — exists only while a turn runs. A one-second `setInterval` refreshes the elapsed time; a phase event refreshes it immediately. `clearStatus` clears the interval, stops the loader, and drops the controller, so any transition to idle or disposed leaves no live timer, matching the [banner sweep](2026-07-21-tui-banner-sweep.md)'s timer hygiene. A mid-turn palette rebuild (`setStatus` re-derives the editor border on a terminal color-scheme change) carries the phase and both baselines across, so a running status never snaps back to `waiting`.
- A single `RunningStatus` controller — the loader, the phase, the two baselines, and a refresh timer — exists only while a turn runs. A one-second `setInterval` refreshes the elapsed time; a phase event refreshes it immediately. `clearStatus` clears the interval, stops the loader, and drops the controller, so any transition to idle or disposed leaves no live timer, matching the [borderless banner](2026-07-21-tui-borderless-banner.md)'s timer hygiene. A mid-turn palette rebuild (`setStatus` re-derives the editor border on a terminal color-scheme change) carries the phase and both baselines across, so a running status never snaps back to `waiting`.
## Alternatives considered

View File

@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ Status: implemented
- 轮次运行期间,编辑器上方的状态行显示一个派生的阶段标签及已用时长,并保留末尾的 `— Enter sends steering, Esc cancels` 提示。四个阶段及其标签为 `waiting` → "Waiting for the first token"、`thinking` → "Thinking"、`responding` → "Responding"、`executing` → "Executing tools"。
- 阶段是 TUI 从实时会话事件派生出的呈现状态,而非它自有的会话事件或 agent 状态。`step/start` 进入 `waiting``assistant/chunk` 的 reasoning 分片或 reasoning 块开始(`block-start`)进入 `thinking`text 分片或 text 块开始进入 `responding``tool/call` 进入 `executing`。该事件映射可合并扩展,因此其余任何事件类型都落入默认分支,保持阶段不变。
- 标签汇报两个时钟——`<phase> <phase-elapsed> · total <step-elapsed>`——但 `waiting` 只显示步骤总时长。阶段时钟在真正发生阶段切换或进入新步骤时重置;步骤时钟在 `step/start` 时重置。时长在不足一分钟时格式化为 `8s`,达到或超过一分钟时格式化为 `1m05s``step/end` 与下一个 `step/start` 之间的工具时间计入结束步骤的总时长。
- 单一的 `RunningStatus` 控制器——loader、阶段、两个基准时刻以及一个刷新定时器——仅在轮次运行期间存在。一个每秒触发的 `setInterval` 刷新已用时长;阶段事件则立即刷新。`clearStatus` 清除该 interval、停止 loader 并丢弃控制器,因此任何向 idle 或 disposed 的转变都不会遗留活动定时器,与 [banner 扫入动画](2026-07-21-tui-banner-sweep.md)的定时器清理保持一致。轮次进行中的调色板重建(终端颜色方案变化时 `setStatus` 会重新派生编辑器边框)会将阶段与两个基准时刻一并沿用过来,因此运行中的状态绝不会退回 `waiting`
- 单一的 `RunningStatus` 控制器——loader、阶段、两个基准时刻以及一个刷新定时器——仅在轮次运行期间存在。一个每秒触发的 `setInterval` 刷新已用时长;阶段事件则立即刷新。`clearStatus` 清除该 interval、停止 loader 并丢弃控制器,因此任何向 idle 或 disposed 的转变都不会遗留活动定时器,与[无边框横幅](2026-07-21-tui-borderless-banner.md)的定时器清理保持一致。轮次进行中的调色板重建(终端颜色方案变化时 `setStatus` 会重新派生编辑器边框)会将阶段与两个基准时刻一并沿用过来,因此运行中的状态绝不会退回 `waiting`
## 曾考虑的替代方案

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-25-session-list-browsing-and-manual-order.md: 586995bf459aeaee88672863977f7acf2a7061a3
2026-07-25-session-list-browsing-and-manual-order.zh.md: 432d5167a57d30bc04a0b4faf213e4341f07bd2f

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
# Agent Note: Session List Browsing and Manual Workspace Order
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-25-session-list-browsing-and-manual-order.zh.md)
## Problem
[Workspace UI Complete Product Flow](2026-07-25-workspace-ui-product-flow.md) shipped the first form of the grouped session list and explicitly scoped out operations such as Rename and drag ordering. The design file (figma 239-10458 and its companion screens) has since filled in those interactions: the list must switch to an ungrouped flat view, session rows need a hover detail card and an action menu, workspaces need renaming, and sessions need manual ordering inside their group.
Two existing mechanisms stood in the way. First, the host durably promoted the active session to the front of its workspace account on every `session/event` (activity pinning), so any manual order would be scrambled by the next activity — two ordering authorities cannot coexist. Second, the browsing area was split across two packages: ui-sidebar owned the list, search, and header rows while ui-workspace only borrowed a picker slot for its popover; every new workspace-domain dialog required cross-package wiring, and ownership grew more twisted with each one.
## Decision
### Flat view and viewing state
The group-by menu offers two modes, WorkSpace / In one list. Flat mode renders every session (fork children included) as a top-level row, strictly newest-first by `updatedAt`, with no parent/child adjacency; the Intent placeholder renders as the first row. The mode choice persists in the browser (`dsh.workspace.view`) across reloads.
### Row interactions
- Session rows show a detail card after a 500ms hover dwell (full title / relative time / status line; the status line has only running/idle until the wire grows a status field). The card and the row menu are mutually exclusive: no card while a menu is open or a drag is in flight.
- Session-row … menu: Rename / Fork session / Delete session, visual-only this iteration; workspace-header … menu: Rename (wired) / Delete workspace (visual-only). Menus close when the pointer leaves them.
- Supporting primitives: `Menu` gains label entries, danger rows, and `closeOnPointerLeave`; a new `HoverCard` (portaled placement, open delay, disabled guard).
### workspace.rename
`workspace.rename({ workspaceId, title })`: the title is trimmed and must be non-blank; both the same-title no-op and the duplicate check evaluate inside the host's serialized workspace-creation chain (shared with create, so concurrent create/rename cannot interleave a duplicate or an out-of-order fake success), and a conflict returns `workspace-name-conflict`. Durability goes through `setTitle`'s mutate path, and the `domain/changed` listener broadcasts the `host/workspace-changed` frame automatically. The UI is a standard modal with a client-side duplicate pre-check.
### Manual order: insertSessionBefore replaces activity pinning
The `session/event``touchSession` activity-pinning chain is deleted wholesale; the workspace account order is now manually owned — new sessions prepend at attach, and explicit reordering goes through `workspace.insertSessionBefore({ workspaceId, sessionId, beforeSessionId? })` (DOM insertBefore semantics: with an anchor it inserts before it, omitted appends to the end). The entity throws a typed `WorkspaceMoveInvalidError` only for unaccounted session/anchor ids; the handler maps exactly that to the business code `workspace-move-invalid`, while storage failures stay internal.
The UI is HTML5 drag on root rows inside a group (workspace grouping only, outside search; fork children ride with their parent and are not draggable). Order authority stays entirely host-side: drop only sends the RPC, the client performs zero local reordering, and the view refreshes from the response upsert and the changed frame; a failed move changes nothing. The client's upsert rejects snapshots older (`updatedAt`) than the installed projection so a late unary response cannot roll back a newer frame.
### Shell/region split
ui-sidebar shrinks to the column-geometry shell: brand row, fold state machine, New Session, Settings, and one `sidebar.workspaces` hole; the shell↔region contract is two facts, `{ wide, expandSidebar }`. ui-workspace fully owns the browsing region (section header, search, grouped tree and flat list, every workspace dialog, drag) plus its groupBy store; the rail-state search/new-workspace icons belong to the region too and request shell expansion via `expandSidebar()`. The picker splits into the core `WorkspaceCreateFlow` (composed directly inside the region) and the thin `WorkspacePicker` wrapper (still filling ui-conversation's hero slot); the old `sidebar.workspace` picker slot and its declaration-aware deferral are deleted with it.
## Alternatives considered
**Keep activity pinning; treat drag as a transient adjustment** — the manual order would be scrambled by the next session activity, making it a fiction; two coexisting ordering authorities cannot be explained to the user. A middle ground — freeze pinning per workspace after the first drag — adds a state tier with murkier semantics; deleting outright is cleaner.
**Numeric index in the reorder payload**`{ index }` drifts during the drag window: after the host prepends a new session (e.g. Intent materialization) the same index points at a different row. Anchor-style insertBefore is naturally immune to prepends and filtered projections.
**Optimistic reordering on drop** — client-first reordering needs failure rollback, one more entangled state in the object layer; local/LAN round-trips are millisecond-scale, so waiting for the host response is imperceptible. With a single order authority (trust the host completely), the frontend never invents an order.
**Keep the rename dialog in ui-sidebar (smallest change)** — that is the problem itself: workspace-domain dialogs scattered in a borrowed slot, with each addition (the Delete confirmation is coming) repeating the cross-package wiring. Review first considered moving only the rename modal; the ruling was to give the whole browsing region to ui-workspace and leave the shell geometry-only.
**Keep parent/child adjacency in flat mode** — contradicts strict recency (a child newer than its parent's sibling cannot slot adjacently), and the flat view's purpose is dropping the hierarchy; flattening fully and disabling drag in flat mode (no persistence carrier) is more consistent.
## Consequences
- Manual order is the sole authority over the workspace account: an order the user arranges is never scrambled by activity; the cost is losing float-to-top-on-activity, whose signal now rides the row status dot and time label. The `WorkspaceView.sessionIds` wire contract is reworded to the manual-order semantics.
- The two-fact shell/region contract funnels every future workspace-domain feature (Delete confirmation, cross-group moves, Ungrouped adoption) into the single ui-workspace package; ui-sidebar no longer evolves with session-list features.
- Flat mode supports neither reordering nor a create-in-workspace entry point (switching back to grouped view is required) — an accepted scope reduction.
- Wiring the three session-menu items and workspace Delete, and growing the wire status enum, remain future iterations.
## Testing
Package-level suites cover the derivations (deriveGroups/deriveFlat), row components, both apply registrations and passthroughs, host entity move semantics, and the rename/insertSessionBefore RPC implementations with their fixture stubs; the `apps/web` keyless snapshots regress the assembled application; delivery acceptance additionally runs a 12-item playwright (chromium headless) checklist (grouped default, flat switch and persistence, hover-card appearance and suppression, both menus, the full rename chain, drag persistence) and drives the real host over the wire for rename success / duplicate rejection / `workspace-move-invalid`.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
# Agent Note: Session List Browsing and Manual Workspace Order
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-25-session-list-browsing-and-manual-order.md) | 中文
## Problem
[Workspace UI 完整产品流](2026-07-25-workspace-ui-product-flow.md)交付了分组 session 列表的首个形态,并把 Rename、拖拽排序等操作明确划出当期范围。设计稿(figma 239-10458 及关联画面)随后补齐了这些交互:列表要能切换成不分组的平铺视图、session 行悬停要出详情卡与操作菜单、workspace 要能改名、组内 session 要能手动排序。
两条既有机制挡在前面。其一,host 在每条 `session/event` 上把活跃 session durable 地提到 workspace 账本最前(活动置顶),任何手动排序都会被下一次活动打乱——两种排序权威不可调和。其二,浏览区域被劈在两个包里:ui-sidebar 拥有列表、搜索和组头行,ui-workspace 只借一个 picker 坑放弹层;每加一个 workspace 域的对话框都要跨包接线,归属越来越拧。
## Decision
### 平铺视图与浏览态
group-by 菜单提供 WorkSpace / In one list 两种模式。平铺模式把所有 session(含 fork 子)一律作为顶层行,严格按 `updatedAt` 新→旧排序,不保持父子相邻;Intent 占位行渲染在列表首行。模式选择持久化在浏览器(`dsh.workspace.view`),刷新保持。
### 行交互
- session 行悬停 500ms 出详情卡(全名/相对时间/状态行;状态本期只有 running/idle 两态,枚举扩展待 wire 增补 status 字段)。卡片与行菜单互斥:菜单开启或拖拽进行中不出卡。
- session 行 … 菜单:Rename / Fork session / Delete session,本期纯视觉;workspace 组头 … 菜单:Rename(已接线)/ Delete workspace(纯视觉)。菜单鼠标移出即关。
- 支撑件:`Menu` 新增 label 条目、danger 行、`closeOnPointerLeave`;新增 `HoverCard`(portal 定位、开启延时、disabled 守卫)。
### workspace.rename
`workspace.rename({ workspaceId, title })`:title trim 后非空;同名 no-op 与重名查重都在 host 的 workspace 创建串行链内求值(与 create 共链,并发 create/rename 不能穿插出重名或乱序假成功),冲突回 `workspace-name-conflict`。落盘经 `setTitle` 的 mutate 通道,`domain/changed` 监听自动广播 `host/workspace-changed` 帧。UI 为标准 Modal,client 侧另做重名预检。
### 手动排序:insertSessionBefore 取代活动置顶
`session/event``touchSession` 活动置顶链整体删除;workspace 账本序改为纯手动拥有——新 session attach 时前插,显式重排走 `workspace.insertSessionBefore({ workspaceId, sessionId, beforeSessionId? })`(DOM insertBefore 语义:锚给了插锚前,缺省 append 到末尾)。实体只对不在账的 session/锚抛类型化的 `WorkspaceMoveInvalidError`,handler 仅把它映射为业务码 `workspace-move-invalid`,存储故障保持 internal。
UI 为组内 root 行的 HTML5 拖拽(仅 workspace 分组、非搜索态;fork 子随父不单独拖)。顺序权威完全在 host:drop 只发 RPC,client 零本地重排,视图靠响应体 upsert 与 changed 帧刷新;失败即无事发生。client 的 upsert 拒绝比已装载投影更旧(`updatedAt`)的快照,防迟到的一元响应回滚更新的帧。
### 壳/区域切分
ui-sidebar 缩为列几何壳:品牌行、折叠状态机、New Session、Settings,以及一个 `sidebar.workspaces` 洞;壳与区域的契约只有两个事实 `{ wide, expandSidebar }`。ui-workspace 全权拥有浏览区域(section header、搜索、分组树与平铺、全部 workspace 对话框、拖拽)及其 groupBy store;rail 态的搜索/新建图标也归区域,经 `expandSidebar()` 请求壳展开。picker 拆为核心件 `WorkspaceCreateFlow`(区域内直接组件组合)与薄包装 `WorkspacePicker`(继续填 ui-conversation 的 hero 坑);原 `sidebar.workspace` picker 坑与声明感知延迟注册随之删除。
## Alternatives considered
**保留活动置顶、拖拽仅作临时调整** —— 手动序在下一次 session 活动即被打乱,形同虚设;两种排序权威并存无法向用户解释。也考虑过「拖过一次即冻结该 workspace 的活动置顶」的折中,状态多一档、语义更难讲,直接删除更干净。
**排序报文用数字下标** —— `{ index }` 在拖拽窗口期会漂移:host 前插新 session(如 Intent 材料化)后同一下标指向别的行。锚点式 insertBefore 对前插与过滤投影天然免疫。
**drop 后乐观重排** —— client 先行重排需失败回滚,对象层多一块纠缠态;本地/局域网往返毫秒级,等 host 响应的简单方案肉眼无感。顺序权威单一化(完全信 host)后,前端永不发明顺序。
**rename 对话框留在 ui-sidebar(最小改动)** —— 正是问题本身:workspace 域的对话框散落在借来的坑里,每加一个(Delete 确认框将至)都重演跨包接线。评审中先议了「只挪 rename Modal」的中间态,最终裁定整个浏览区域归 ui-workspace,壳只留几何。
**平铺模式保持父子相邻成组** —— 与「严格按时间」矛盾(子新于兄则插不进相邻位),且平铺本意就是取消层级;拉平并禁用平铺下的拖拽(无持久化载体)更一致。
## Consequences
- 手动序是唯一的 workspace 账本序权威:用户排好的顺序不再被活动打乱;代价是「最近活跃浮到最上」的行为消失,活跃感知转由行内状态点与时间标签承担。`WorkspaceView.sessionIds` 的 wire 契约随之改为手动序措辞。
- 壳/区域两事实契约把 workspace 域的后续功能(Delete 确认、跨组移动、Ungrouped 收编)全部收进 ui-workspace 单包;ui-sidebar 不再随 session 列表功能演进。
- 平铺模式不支持排序与分组入口(建到指定 workspace 需切回分组视图),是拍板接受的范围收窄。
- session 菜单三项与 workspace Delete 的功能接线、状态枚举扩 wire,留待后续迭代。
## Testing
包级用例覆盖派生(deriveGroups/deriveFlat)、行组件、两处 apply 注册与透传、host 实体移位语义、rename/insertSessionBefore 的 RPC 实现与 fixture 桩;`apps/web` keyless snapshot 回归覆盖装配后的应用;交付验收另以 playwright(chromium headless)过 12 项清单(分组默认、平铺切换与持久化、hover 卡出现与抑制、双菜单、rename 全链、拖拽落盘),并对真 host 直打 wire 验证 rename 成功/重名拒绝/`workspace-move-invalid` 三径。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-06-17-ts-build-config.md: 1275a635242ea887c941db9dc0554fd33acd4102
2026-06-17-ts-build-config.zh.md: 7691118dd152874e2849f1ace686069c9ea3f61f
2026-06-17-ts-build-config.md: 17036438b83a77f72b49f55abf29632af3f4ffef
2026-06-17-ts-build-config.zh.md: 70e49c61deba418894a48be3016898d1d85c78a0

View File

@@ -43,6 +43,8 @@ In-package relative imports use explicit `.ts` specifiers.
- Referenced package/vendor projects keep the same emit behavior as build, so typecheck refreshes their `lib/types` outputs instead of using a separate no-emit graph. Project-specific strictness changes live in the owning `packages/*/*/tsconfig.json` or `vendor/*/tsconfig.json`.
- The no-emit aggregates disable `rewriteRelativeImportExtensions`; they emit nothing and include tests that import helpers across project-reference boundaries. Package/vendor emit projects keep the rewrite enabled.
Composite projects keep their incremental build information inside their project-local `lib/` output. `pnpm run clean` derives live output directories from the root TypeScript project-reference graph, removes legacy root build information, and removes deleted `packages/*/*` directories that contain only known generated residue. It preserves `node_modules` for every package that still has a `package.json`, and refuses to remove a manifest-less directory containing unknown files. Build does not invoke clean automatically, so ordinary builds retain incremental state.
The command orchestration shape is:
```sh
@@ -55,6 +57,9 @@ tsx scripts/verify-node-next-types.ts
pnpm run typecheck:
tsc -b
pnpm run clean:
tsx scripts/clean.ts
```
`pnpm run demo:*` still runs `src` directly through tsx and root paths, without a compile step.
@@ -63,6 +68,8 @@ tsc -b
- **Keep `tsdown`/oxc as the TypeScript transformer** — oxc's transform is not `tsc` behavior (decorator transform differs, bundled JS differs from per-file emit), and its bundled `.d.ts` conflicts with Cordis' internal relative module augmentation shape.
- **One root strict program over packages, vendor, examples, tests, and scripts** — vendor source triggers type errors outside this project's ownership under the root strict flags; project references with per-project strictness are the boundary that works.
- **Clean before every build** — this would discard the incremental state owned by `tsc` and the bundler even when the workspace layout is unchanged.
- **Remove every package-level `node_modules`** — valid package dependency links do not cause the workspace-discovery failure, and deleting them would turn build cleanup into dependency reinstallation.
## Consequences
@@ -76,5 +83,6 @@ Build responsibilities are clearer:
- `lib/index.*` is the publish runtime output and is generated by the bundler, currently `tsdown`.
- `pnpm run verify-node-next-types` scans built declarations for relative specifiers without file extensions, then typechecks a temporary external ESM consumer with `moduleResolution: "NodeNext"` against the built `types`/`exports` surface, so declaration specifier regressions fail before publish.
- The `typecheck` command uses `tsconfig.json`. Examples, tests, and scripts are checked by the root no-emit project, while packages and vendor modules keep the same emit behavior as `build`. Package and vendor source stays behind project-reference boundaries.
- After changing branches or updating a checkout that deleted packages, contributors can run `pnpm run clean` to remove stale package directories before rebuilding. Unknown files in a manifest-less package directory require manual classification instead of being deleted.
The Cordis vendor copy now has one more type-structure divergence from upstream. During upstream sync, that divergence must be reapplied or explicitly retired.

View File

@@ -43,6 +43,8 @@ Status: implemented
- 被引用的包/vendor 项目保持与构建相同的输出行为,因此类型检查会刷新它们的 `lib/types` 输出,而无需使用独立的 no-emit 图。项目特定的严格度变更放在各自的 `packages/*/*/tsconfig.json``vendor/*/tsconfig.json` 中。
- 两个 no-emit 聚合禁用 `rewriteRelativeImportExtensions`;它们不输出任何文件,且包含跨 project-reference 边界导入 helper 的测试。包/vendor 的 emit 项目保持重写开启。
复合项目将增量构建信息保存在各项目本地的 `lib/` 输出中。`pnpm run clean` 会根据根 TypeScript project-reference 图确定当前有效的输出目录,删除遗留的根目录构建信息,并删除已删除包留下且仅包含已知生成残留的 `packages/*/*` 目录。对于仍有 `package.json` 的每个包,该命令都会保留 `node_modules`;如果不含 `package.json` 的目录中存在未知文件,则拒绝删除。构建不会自动调用 clean因此常规构建会保留增量状态。
命令编排结构如下:
```sh
@@ -55,6 +57,9 @@ tsx scripts/verify-node-next-types.ts
pnpm run typecheck:
tsc -b
pnpm run clean:
tsx scripts/clean.ts
```
`pnpm run demo:*` 仍通过 tsx 和根路径直接运行 `src`,无需编译步骤。
@@ -63,6 +68,8 @@ tsc -b
- **继续使用 `tsdown`/oxc 作为 TypeScript 转换器**oxc 的转换行为与 `tsc` 不同(装饰器转换有差异、打包 JS 与逐文件输出不同),且其打包 `.d.ts` 与 Cordis 内部的相对模块增强结构冲突。
- **用一个根目录严格程序覆盖包、vendor、示例、测试和脚本**vendor 源码在根目录严格标志下会触发不属于本项目所有权范围的类型错误;带有逐项目严格度的 project references 才是可行的边界。
- **每次构建前都执行清理**:即使工作区布局没有变化,这也会丢弃 `tsc` 和打包器拥有的增量状态。
- **删除所有包级 `node_modules`**:有效的包依赖链接不会导致工作区发现失败,而删除这些链接会使构建清理变成重新安装依赖。
## 后果
@@ -76,5 +83,6 @@ tsc -b
- `lib/index.*` 是发布用的运行时输出,由打包器(当前为 `tsdown`)生成。
- `pnpm run verify-node-next-types` 扫描构建出的声明文件,检查是否存在缺少文件扩展名的相对说明符,然后以 `moduleResolution: "NodeNext"` 对构建出的 `types`/`exports` 接口进行临时外部 ESM 消费方的类型检查,确保声明说明符的回归在发布前被捕获。
- `typecheck` 命令使用 `tsconfig.json`。示例、测试和脚本由根 no-emit 项目检查,包和 vendor 模块保持与 `build` 相同的输出行为。包和 vendor 源码始终处于 project-reference 边界之后。
- 切换分支或更新工作副本后,如果其中删除了包,贡献者可在重新构建前运行 `pnpm run clean`,删除残留的包目录。不含 `package.json` 的包目录如果存在未知文件,必须手动判定其类别,不能直接删除。
Cordis 的 vendor 副本现在与上游多了一处类型结构差异。在上游同步时,该差异必须被重新应用或明确废弃。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-06-20-core-data-structures-catalog.md: d7e9d3d9b14fe723e3396c8167fe714b7613e2b5
2026-06-20-core-data-structures-catalog.zh.md: 8d2f16a46216cba8df0539be0abd2f1ad840eec3
2026-06-20-core-data-structures-catalog.md: ef100f96b06c454cfd1ec092cc7fd23e712bdf7a
2026-06-20-core-data-structures-catalog.zh.md: 4ace2b8c8a6b08e7721c1df8003ccfbdb128daf1

View File

@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ The durability requirement was specific: the doc shows the **literal** current t
- Complete type declarations and their JSDoc are pasted verbatim into a dedicated ` ```ts type-equiv ` fence. A concise ` ```ts public-api ` fence carries the source-equivalent ambient projection for a class whose implementation bodies do not belong in the catalog. `doc-typecheck` recognizes both and skips them (the bare declarations are not standalone-compilable), and **excludes them from the opt-out ratio** — they are a separately-checked category, not unchecked sketches.
- A new `scripts/verify-type-equiv.ts` extracts each block via the TypeScript parser and asserts that its declaration structure and every JSDoc comment match the declared symbol, ignoring only formatting whitespace and non-JSDoc comments. Ordinary blocks retain the complete declaration. A `public-api` projection retains a class's public fields, constructor, accessors, and methods with their original JSDoc while removing implementation bodies and private or protected members. This is chosen over a compiled `_Check` assertion because source names and documentation identity, not assignability, are the properties the catalog preserves.
- Provenance lives in a central `scripts/type-equiv.manifest.json` (`{ doc, symbol, source }` entries), **not** in directive comments in the prose. The script enforces a **1:1 correspondence**: every type-equiv block has exactly one manifest entry and vice versa, so a block can never be silently unchecked and an entry can never rot.
- Provenance lives in a central `scripts/type-equiv.manifest.json` (`{ doc, symbol, source }` entries), **not** in directive comments in the prose. The script enforces a **1:1 correspondence** between each primary type-equiv block and one manifest entry, so a block can never be silently unchecked and an entry can never rot. A paired `.zh.md` block reuses the unsuffixed sibling's entry only when the complete tracked fence sequence matches in order, kind, and byte-exact body; otherwise the gate checks it independently, finds no manifest entry, and fails.
- Wired into `doc-sync`, so relevant documentation changes run it locally and CI runs it with the other documentation checks.
### Maintenance is the author's job, with a gate backstop

View File

@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ Status: implemented
- 完整的类型声明及其 JSDoc 会逐字粘贴到专用的 ` ```ts type-equiv ` 围栏中。简洁的 ` ```ts public-api ` 围栏承载与源码等价的类环境投影,用于实现体不应进入目录的类。`doc-typecheck` 会识别并跳过这两种围栏(裸声明无法独立编译),并且**将它们排除在 opt-out 比例之外**——它们是单独受检的类别,而不是未经检查的草图。
- 新增的 `scripts/verify-type-equiv.ts` 通过 TypeScript 解析器提取每个块,并断言其声明结构和每条 JSDoc 注释都与所声明的符号匹配,只忽略格式空白和非 JSDoc 注释。普通块保留完整声明。`public-api` 投影保留类的公共字段、构造函数、访问器和方法及其原始 JSDoc同时移除实现体以及私有或受保护成员。之所以选择它而非编译式 `_Check` 断言,是因为目录所保留的是源码名称与文档一致性,而不是可赋值性。
- 来源信息存放在集中的 `scripts/type-equiv.manifest.json``{ doc, symbol, source }` 条目)中,**而非**行文中的指令注释。脚本强制执行 **1:1 对应**每个 type-equiv 块恰好有一条 manifest 条目,反之亦然;因此一个块永远不会被静默漏检,一条条目也永远不会腐烂。
- 来源信息存放在集中的 `scripts/type-equiv.manifest.json``{ doc, symbol, source }` 条目)中,**而非**行文中的指令注释。脚本每个 type-equiv 块一条 manifest 条目之间强制执行 **1:1 对应**,因此一个块永远不会被静默漏检,一条条目也永远不会腐烂。只有当配对 `.zh.md` 块的完整受跟踪围栏序列在顺序、类型和按字节精确的正文上均与无后缀兄弟文件匹配时,才会复用后者的条目;否则门禁会独立检查该块,发现没有 manifest 条目后失败。
- 接入 `doc-sync`因此相关文档变更会在本地运行它CI 也会与其他文档检查一起运行它。
### 维护是作者的职责,门禁作为兜底

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.md: 4bc02878a0ea3f998e411ecc2b064c1626eacf3c
2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.zh.md: 90a0c2f07f68b0fb4e26cd1c4b537a30a829b10f
2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.md: 3732e6812a3f1f40242aa5a83a0bf1d1bc4d6139
2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.zh.md: a870e063230a34b807eed2f4ffc1c6067cb3aedc

View File

@@ -6,14 +6,14 @@ English | [中文](2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.zh.md)
## Problem
This repo's README and docs tree are read by people and agents inside and outside the company, in both English and Chinese. Maintaining a second language by hand, with no mechanism, is how translations rot: one side moves on, the other silently lies, and no gate notices. The repo's standing answer to invariants of this kind is to encode them as a mechanical check (see [quality gates](2026-06-11-quality-gates.md) and [doc-sync enforcement](2026-06-11-doc-sync-enforcement.md)), so the bilingual policy ships with one.
This repo's documentation corpus is read by people and agents inside and outside the company, in both English and Chinese. Maintaining a second language by hand, with no mechanism, is how translations rot: one side moves on, the other silently lies, and no gate notices. The repo's standing answer to invariants of this kind is to encode them as a mechanical check (see [quality gates](2026-06-11-quality-gates.md) and [doc-sync enforcement](2026-06-11-doc-sync-enforcement.md)), so the bilingual policy ships with one.
## Decision
- **Paired sibling files with equal authority.** A documentation pair is three sibling files: English `foo.md`, Chinese `foo.zh.md`, and a consistency record `foo.i18n.yaml`. Neither language is canonical — a document may be authored and reviewed Chinese-first and translated to English afterwards, or the reverse; what binds the pair is that both sides must say the same thing, and pairs merge whole (both languages plus the record, never one alone). Policy: [docs/i18n/README.md](../../../../docs/i18n/README.md); translation rules: [docs/i18n/translation-rules.md](../../../../docs/i18n/translation-rules.md); terminology source of truth: [docs/i18n/terminology.md](../../../../docs/i18n/terminology.md).
- **A sidecar record of both blob hashes makes consistency checkable.** `foo.i18n.yaml` holds the full git blob hash of each side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. An edit to either side without re-confirming the pair is then mechanically detectable as a pure content comparison — no history lookup — and the hashes are computable for files edited in the same PR, which a commit-hash record is not. Re-recording (`verify-translation-pairing --write`) produces a reviewable yaml diff: confirming consistency is an explicit, visible act in the PR.
- **`verify-translation-pairing` joins `doc-sync`.** The gate ([scripts/verify-translation-pairing.ts](../../../../scripts/verify-translation-pairing.ts)) enforces: required pairs exist, every existing pair is complete (all three files) and consistent (both hashes match, switcher links both ways, structural signatures identical), excluded (generated or bilingual-by-construction) files stay unpaired, and date-named documents on or after the manifest's `requiredSince` cutoff have complete pairs. The `required` list in [scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json](../../../../scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json) is a ratchet: each merged translation batch adds its files, so coverage only grows.
- **The enforcement frontier advances in coherent review batches.** A related set enters `required` only when reviewers can evaluate it as a unit. The core frontier groups [architecture](../../../../docs/architecture.md), the [Cordis primer](../../../../docs/cordis-primer.md), [defensive patterns](../../../../docs/defensive-patterns.md), the [glossary](../../../../docs/glossary.md), and [testing](../../../../docs/testing.md) because their terminology, links, and contributor contracts inform one another; admitting only part would leave the enforced corpus internally inconsistent. A site-published pair uses `pairedPages()` so the root locale projects `.zh.md` and `/en/` projects `.md`; creating a counterpart alone does not publish it.
- **`verify-translation-pairing` joins `doc-sync`.** The gate ([scripts/verify-translation-pairing.ts](../../../../scripts/verify-translation-pairing.ts)) enforces: every discovered, non-excluded source has a complete pair; every existing pair is complete (all three files) and consistent (both hashes match, switcher links both ways, structural signatures identical); and excluded generated, instruction, or bilingual-by-construction files stay unpaired. [scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json](../../../../scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json) contains only explicit exclusions, so no requirement can bypass discovery and receive a weaker check. Source-oriented code gates consume a `.zh.md` fence sequence as a derivative only when its unsuffixed sibling has the same tracked fences in the same order with byte-identical bodies; an incomplete, reordered, reclassified, or changed sequence stays independent, so the owning code gate or pairing gate reports the mismatch.
- **One corpus-wide requirement.** Every document in scope requires a complete pair from creation; the policy has no per-file rollout state, date cutoff, or README-specific class. README discovery covers every case-insensitive README basename outside vendored, dependency, and ignored build-output trees, including future top-level directories. A site-published pair uses `pairedPages()` so the root locale projects `.zh.md` and `/en/` projects `.md`; creating a counterpart alone does not publish it.
- **Pairing records are metadata, not Cordis Loader configuration.** Cordis configuration discovery accepts actual `.cordis.yml` and `.cordis.yaml` files while excluding `*.i18n.yaml`, even when the document name contains `cordis`. This preserves validation of executable Loader entries without parsing translation hashes as configuration.
- **Translation is agent work with human review.** The committed workflow is [.agents/skills/dsh-translate-docs](../../../skills/dsh-translate-docs/SKILL.md), following the same pattern as [dsh-code-review](../../../skills/dsh-code-review/SKILL.md): the skill carries the workflow and defers to the docs as sources of truth. The skill directs the orchestrating agent to delegate translation writing to a subagent.
@@ -40,5 +40,5 @@ Paired sibling files with locale suffixes are the dominant Chinese big-tech conv
- Every pair adds a third file to the tree. The record is machine-written (`--write`), so the cost is directory noise, not maintenance effort; in exchange, "who confirmed these consistent, and when" is answerable from git blame on the yaml.
- When the two sides disagree, no mechanical rule picks a winner — the PR review does. That is the price of equal authority, accepted deliberately: the alternative (a canonical language) forbids Chinese-first authoring.
- Generated docs (`cordis-catalog/`, `tool-catalog/`, `module-graph.md`) are excluded for now; the planned follow-up is to teach their generators to emit Chinese alongside English, at which point they leave the exclusion list.
- Rollout is incremental by design: documents outside `required` are visible backlog (`--list`), not red CI, so pairs land in reviewable batches without a big-bang PR. A date-named document dated on or after the manifest's `requiredSince` cutoff merges bilingual or not at all, so new date-named Agent Notes do not enlarge that backlog.
- The exclusions-only manifest makes every current and future in-scope document mandatory through the same path. There is no explicit requirement, cutoff, or class entry that can fall outside discovery while appearing enforced.
- The recorded hashes double as the update tool (`git cat-file -p <hash>` recovers either side's last-confirmed text for a minimal diff-based update), so re-translation of whole files is never forced by the mechanism.

View File

@@ -6,14 +6,14 @@ Status: implemented
## 问题
本仓库的 README 与 docs 目录树会被公司内外的人和 agent智能体以中英两种语言阅读。在没有机制的情况下纯靠手工维护第二语言正是译文腐烂的根源一侧持续演进另一侧默默失实而没有门禁会注意到。对于这类不变式本仓库一贯的做法是将其编码为机械检查见[质量门禁](2026-06-11-quality-gates.md)与 [doc-sync 强制](2026-06-11-doc-sync-enforcement.md)),因此双语政策随附一道门禁一起交付。
本仓库的文档语料会被公司内外的人和 agent智能体以中英两种语言阅读。在没有机制的情况下纯靠手工维护第二语言正是译文腐烂的根源一侧持续演进另一侧默默失实而没有门禁会注意到。对于这类不变式本仓库一贯的做法是将其编码为机械检查见[质量门禁](2026-06-11-quality-gates.md)与 [doc-sync 强制](2026-06-11-doc-sync-enforcement.md)),因此双语政策随附一道门禁一起交付。
## 决策
- **配对兄弟文件,两种语言同权。** 一对文档由三个兄弟文件组成:英文 `foo.md`、中文 `foo.zh.md`,以及一份一致性记录 `foo.i18n.yaml`。没有哪种语言是正典:一篇文档可以先用中文撰写和评审、之后再译成英文,反之亦可;约束配对的是:两侧必须表达相同的内容,且配对整体合并(两种语言加记录,绝不单独落一侧)。政策见 [docs/i18n/README.md](../../../../docs/i18n/README.md);翻译规则见 [docs/i18n/translation-rules.md](../../../../docs/i18n/translation-rules.md);术语真源见 [docs/i18n/terminology.md](../../../../docs/i18n/terminology.md)。
- **伴随记录保存两侧 blob hash使一致性可检查。** `foo.i18n.yaml` 保存两侧文件在上一次确认一致时各自的完整 git blob hash。此后修改了任一侧而未重新确认配对都能被机械检测出来纯内容比较无需查询历史而且同一个 PRPull Request内改动的文件也能计算出 hashcommit hash 式的记录做不到这一点。重新记录(`verify-translation-pairing --write`)会产生一份可评审的 yaml diff确认一致在 PR 中是一个显式、可见的动作。
- **`verify-translation-pairing` 加入 `doc-sync`。** 门禁([scripts/verify-translation-pairing.ts](../../../../scripts/verify-translation-pairing.ts))强制执行以下规则:required 的配对必须存在;任何已存在的配对必须完整(三个文件齐全)且一致(两个 hash 匹配、切换行双向互链、结构签名一致);被排除的文件(生成物或本身即双语的)不得配对;凡文件名以日期开头且日期不早于 manifest元数据清单`requiredSince` 分界日期的文档,也必须有完整配对。[scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json](../../../../scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json) 中的 `required` 清单只进不退:每个合并的翻译批次将自己的文件加入其中,覆盖面只增不减
- **执行红线按连贯的评审批次推进。** 一组相关文档只有在评审者能够将其作为整体评估时,才进入 `required`。核心红线将[架构](../../../../docs/architecture.md)、[Cordis 入门](../../../../docs/cordis-primer.md)、[防御性模式](../../../../docs/defensive-patterns.md)、[术语表](../../../../docs/glossary.md)和[测试](../../../../docs/testing.md)归为一组,因为它们的术语、链接和贡献者契约相互关联;只纳入其中一部分会使受门禁约束的文档集合内部不一致。发布到文档站的配对使用 `pairedPages()`,由根 locale 投影 `.zh.md`,由 `/en/` 投影 `.md`;仅创建对侧文件并不会发布它。
- **`verify-translation-pairing` 加入 `doc-sync`。** 门禁([scripts/verify-translation-pairing.ts](../../../../scripts/verify-translation-pairing.ts))强制执行以下规则:每个已发现且未排除的源文档都有完整配对;每个现有配对都完整(三个文件齐全)且一致(两个 hash 匹配、切换行双向互链、结构签名一致);被排除的生成文档、指令文档或本身即双语的文档不得配对。[scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json](../../../../scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json) 只包含显式排除项,因此任何要求都无法绕过发现流程而接受较弱的检查。只有当 `.zh.md` 围栏序列与其无后缀兄弟文件拥有顺序相同、正文按字节一致的同一组受跟踪围栏时,面向源码的代码门禁才会将其作为派生内容消费;不完整、顺序变更、重分类或已改动的序列仍会独立受检,因此由其所属的代码门禁或配对门禁报告不匹配
- **全语料统一要求。** 范围内的每篇文档从创建起就必须有完整配对;政策没有逐文件推进状态、日期分界或 README 专用类别。README 发现会覆盖 vendor 源码、依赖目录与被忽略的构建产物目录之外所有文件名不区分大小写匹配 README 的文件,包括今后新增的顶层目录。发布到文档站的配对使用 `pairedPages()`,由根 locale 投影 `.zh.md`,由 `/en/` 投影 `.md`;仅创建对侧文件并不会发布它。
- **配对记录是元数据,而不是 Cordis Loader 配置。** Cordis 配置发现会接受实际的 `.cordis.yml``.cordis.yaml` 文件,同时排除 `*.i18n.yaml`,即使文档名中包含 `cordis` 也不例外。这样既能继续校验可执行的 Loader 配置项,又不会把翻译 hash 当作配置来解析。
- **翻译是 agent 的工作,由人评审。** 仓库内置的工作流是 [.agents/skills/dsh-translate-docs](../../../skills/dsh-translate-docs/SKILL.md),与 [dsh-code-review](../../../skills/dsh-code-review/SKILL.md) 模式相同skill技能承载工作流并将文档作为真源。该 skill 要求编排 agent 把翻译写作委派给 subagent。
@@ -40,5 +40,5 @@ Status: implemented
- 每个配对给目录树多添一个文件。记录由机器写入(`--write`),代价是目录噪音而非维护负担;换来的是「谁在何时确认过这对文档一致」可以从 yaml 的 git blame 直接回答。
- 两侧说法冲突时,没有机械规则裁决谁赢,由 PR 评审裁决。这是同权的代价,且是有意接受的:另一个选项(正典语言)会禁止中文先行撰写。
- 生成文档(`cordis-catalog/``tool-catalog/``module-graph.md`)暂被排除;计划中的后续工作是让生成器在输出英文的同时输出中文,届时将这些文件移出排除清单。
- 推进天然是渐进的:`required` 之外的文档是可见的 backlog待翻清单`--list`),而非红色的 CI因此配对按可评审的批次落地无需一个巨型 PR。凡文件名以日期开头且日期不早于 manifest 中 `requiredSince` 分界日期的文档都必须配齐双语文件,因此新建的日期命名 Agent Note 不会增加这份 backlog
- 只含排除项的 manifest 通过同一路径,要求当前及今后纳入范围的每篇文档都必须配对。不存在显式要求、分界或类别条目可以落在发现范围之外,却看似已经强制执行
- 记录的 hash 兼作更新工具(`git cat-file -p <hash>` 能还原任一侧上次确认的文本,用于基于 diff 的最小更新),因此这套机制从不强迫整篇重译。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-04-doc-tiers-and-budgets.md: 7acdba8bfd96d183c418b3935d7b8e7f237d3607
2026-07-04-doc-tiers-and-budgets.zh.md: 0f07a92740d31dd13cb523d73ac8a3699d666d30
2026-07-04-doc-tiers-and-budgets.md: a52c40a9a147fd39fdec4c61079822f1b1115227
2026-07-04-doc-tiers-and-budgets.zh.md: d03c2046c9963e4d62d2a7221d4563f60d3f4953

View File

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Standing docs accumulated repeated rules, retold incidents, duplicated package m
- **A tier taxonomy with one home per fact.** [docs/AGENTS.md](../../../../docs/AGENTS.md) is the documentation standard: it assigns every Markdown tier a single job (standing orders, system map, type catalog, decision records, incident stories, how-tos, per-package contracts, generated catalogs, workflows), forbids restating a fact outside its home tier (link instead), and carries the slop checklist used when writing or reviewing any doc.
- **A narrow, hard budget gate.** [scripts/verify-doc-budgets.ts](../../../../scripts/verify-doc-budgets.ts) joins `doc-sync`: every doc listed in [scripts/doc-budgets.manifest.json](../../../../scripts/doc-budgets.manifest.json) must stay under its word ceiling (`wc -w` semantics, whole file), and a budgeted file that is missing fails the gate so a rename cannot silently orphan its budget. Scope is deliberately only the accretion-prone standing docs — the root and subtree `AGENTS.md` files, `architecture.md`, `packages/README.md`, and the standing policy docs they evict content into (`docs/testing.md`, `docs/defensive-patterns.md`). Reference docs, Agent Notes, and package READMEs are unbudgeted: length is legitimate there when every row is a fact, and review plus the slop checklist govern them.
- **Ceilings are an enforcement frontier that ratchets.** A ceiling sits at least 5% above the doc's current size — working headroom, so routine wording edits pass while real growth still trips the gate — and ratchets down, keeping that margin, as the doc is brought to its target budget (root `AGENTS.md` ≤ 1,500 words; `architecture.md` ≤ 1,800; subtree `AGENTS.md` ≤ 600; `packages/README.md` ≤ 600) — the same rollout mechanism as the [translation-pairing `required` list](2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.md). When the gate goes red the fix is to relocate or condense per the taxonomy; raising a ceiling is permitted only with explicit justification in the PR description, the manifest diff being the reviewable act.
- **Ceilings are an enforcement frontier that ratchets.** A ceiling sits at least 5% above the doc's current size — working headroom, so routine wording edits pass while real growth still trips the gate — and ratchets down, keeping that margin, as the doc is brought to its target budget (root `AGENTS.md` ≤ 1,500 words; `architecture.md` ≤ 1,800; subtree `AGENTS.md` ≤ 600; `packages/README.md` ≤ 600). When the gate goes red the fix is to relocate or condense per the taxonomy; raising a ceiling is permitted only with explicit justification in the PR description, the manifest diff being the reviewable act.
- **A thin workflow skill, contracts in docs.** [.agents/skills/dsh-doc-standards](../../../skills/dsh-doc-standards/SKILL.md) carries the placement/audit/red-gate workflow and defers to the standard as its source of truth, the same split as [dsh-translate-docs](../../../skills/dsh-translate-docs/SKILL.md) over the i18n contract.
## Alternatives considered

View File

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Status: implemented
- **每项事实只归属一处的层级分类。**[docs/AGENTS.md](../../../../docs/AGENTS.md) 是文档标准:它为每种 Markdown 层级分配单一职责(常设指令、系统图、类型目录、决策记录、事件故事、操作指南、各包契约、生成式目录、工作流),禁止在事实归属层级之外重复陈述(应改为链接),并包含编写或评审任何文档时使用的赘余检查清单。
- **范围窄且严格的预算门禁。**[scripts/verify-doc-budgets.ts](../../../../scripts/verify-doc-budgets.ts) 接入 `doc-sync`[scripts/doc-budgets.manifest.json](../../../../scripts/doc-budgets.manifest.json) 列出的每份文档都必须低于其字数上限(采用 `wc -w` 语义,统计整个文件);预算内文件缺失也会使门禁失败,使重命名无法悄然遗落其预算。范围刻意只涵盖容易膨胀的常设文档——根目录和子树中的 `AGENTS.md` 文件、`architecture.md``packages/README.md`,以及它们将内容移入的常设策略文档(`docs/testing.md``docs/defensive-patterns.md`。参考文档、Agent Note 和包 README 不设预算:只要每一行都是事实,长度在这些位置就是合理的;评审和赘余检查清单负责约束它们。
- **上限是只进不退的执行红线。** 上限设定为文档当前字数的至少 105%(留出工作余量,使日常措辞调整能通过,而真正的膨胀仍会触发门禁),并随着文档被精简到目标预算而同步下调、保持该余量(根 `AGENTS.md` ≤ 1,500 词;`architecture.md` ≤ 1,800子树 `AGENTS.md` ≤ 600`packages/README.md` ≤ 600推进机制与[翻译配对的 `required` 清单](2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.md)相同。门禁变红时,修复方式是按分类体系迁移或压缩内容;只有在 PRPull Request描述中给出明确理由时才允许提高上限manifest元数据清单的 diff 本身即为可评审的动作。
- **上限是只进不退的执行红线。** 上限设定为文档当前字数的至少 105%(留出工作余量,使日常措辞调整能通过,而真正的膨胀仍会触发门禁),并随着文档被精简到目标预算而同步下调、保持该余量(根 `AGENTS.md` ≤ 1,500 词;`architecture.md` ≤ 1,800子树 `AGENTS.md` ≤ 600`packages/README.md` ≤ 600。门禁变红时修复方式是按分类体系迁移或压缩内容只有在 PRPull Request描述中给出明确理由时才允许提高上限manifest元数据清单的 diff 本身即为可评审的动作。
- **精简的工作流 skill技能契约归文档。**[.agents/skills/dsh-doc-standards](../../../skills/dsh-doc-standards/SKILL.md) 承载放置/审计/红灯门禁工作流,并以文档标准为真源,与 [dsh-translate-docs](../../../skills/dsh-translate-docs/SKILL.md) 和 i18n 契约之间的分工相同。
## 曾考虑的替代方案

View File

@@ -1,6 +0,0 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-06-parallel-github-ci-gates.md: 5c276f6a75936021369bc5ad9494c9aa6e4e3fc3
2026-07-06-parallel-github-ci-gates.zh.md: 7d98f842ef1d60a3a5b727f975cb1d93ea6f253c

View File

@@ -1,50 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: Parallel GitHub CI gates
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-06-parallel-github-ci-gates.zh.md)
## Problem
The keyless GitHub CI gates are mostly orthogonal: typecheck, lint, documentation freshness, coverage, snapshot replay, build, package-publication hygiene, demo smoke, and built-bin smoke fail for different reasons and do not need each other's runtime state. Running them as one ordered command chain makes the workflow wall clock equal the sum of those gates, while splitting every short leaf into its own GitHub job repeats checkout, Node setup, pnpm restore, and install work until orchestration overhead becomes the bottleneck.
The original broad-lane split stopped meeting that balance as the workspace grew. On the merge of PR #404, Linux static, coverage, snapshot, and artifact jobs took 148, 195, 94, and 230 seconds; Windows static and artifacts took 251 and 482 seconds. Package-manager packing once per package dominated both artifact validators, coverage needlessly rebuilt output before a source-only suite, and CPU-heavy gates contended inside the static and coverage lanes.
The artifact boundary remains load-bearing. `publint`, `verify-node-next-types`, compiled invariant loading, and built-bin smoke tests need emitted `lib/` output. Sharding cannot race those consumers ahead of build or replace their published-artifact signal with source execution.
## Decision
The production topology below is historical and is superseded by [Evidence-based larger hosted runners](2026-07-22-evidence-based-larger-hosted-runners.md). The larger-runner decision removes its shard selectors and workflow jobs; this note preserves why that earlier topology was implemented.
[CI](../../../../.github/workflows/ci.yml) treats one minute for non-Windows jobs and three minutes for Windows jobs as observed performance targets, not cancellation deadlines. Hosted-runner variance should leave complete timing evidence and useful failure logs instead of cancelling an otherwise-correct gate. The [serial cross-platform CI reference](2026-07-21-serial-cross-platform-ci-reference.md) independently runs the complete unsharded primary Node aggregate on Linux, macOS, and Windows so the optimized lane inventory is not its own completeness oracle.
In that topology, [scripts/run-gates.ts](../../../../scripts/run-gates.ts) was the common bounded scheduler and GitHub supplied explicit shard names for the expensive gate families. `scripts/static-shards.ts` partitioned static gates into foundation, documentation-type, API-contract, catalog, prose, documentation-projection, and documentation-build ownership and rejected a missing or duplicate gate assignment. Linux lint used disjoint A-C, D-M, N-S, and T-Z package-source and package-test lanes, while Windows used complete package-source and package-test lanes; both included a repository complement starting from `.` so new top-level targets could not disappear between shards and owned the single cross-file duplication run. `scripts/coverage-shards.ts` assigned every workspace package to exactly one source-coverage lane. Directory filters retained a trailing separator because Vitest positional filters match substrings and would otherwise admit prefix-named siblings. Each coverage lane included only its owned source files, repeated the exhaustive companion topology test, and ran without a preceding build because the complete coverage suite passes from a tree with every generated `lib/` removed.
Snapshot replay used two explicit multi-file lanes and eight scenario partitions of the large ACP file. `scripts/snapshot-shards.ts` owned that inventory, and its test discovered every file admitted by the snapshot config. Each snapshot job installed dependencies while its Linux runner prepared Bubblewrap, built the shipped runtime, and ran only its assigned replay surface. The suite retained bounded concurrency of five subprocesses because replay spent most of its time waiting on child protocol I/O. Fixture guards still inspected the complete ACP scenario table in every partition.
Cold standalone documentation typechecking rebuilds the complete project-reference graph, so a dedicated documentation-type lane builds once and checks Markdown blocks against those declarations. The Linux documentation lane uses VitePress's MPA build to retain page rendering and dead-link validation within the observed non-Windows target; separate blocking Windows build and production-site lanes preserve the emitted-package and shipped-site checks without putting both critical paths in one job.
Artifacts use two lanes: one metadata lane for `publint`, NodeNext declarations, and compiled invariant loading, plus one built-bin smoke lane. Each lane produces its own build before its consumers. Repeating the short build costs runner minutes but avoids an upload/download dependency and keeps each job's critical path bounded.
[scripts/publint-all.ts](../../../../scripts/publint-all.ts) calls publint's supported API in-process against an in-memory publication view made from each manifest's declared files and npm's mandatory metadata files. This preserves the distinction between workspace files and published files without spawning a package-manager pack command 103 times. [scripts/verify-built-package-invariants.mjs](../../../../scripts/verify-built-package-invariants.mjs) stages those structurally validated manifest-declared `lib/` files below the real package, then imports the compiled self-reference through plain Node and Cordis Loader normalization. A companion that reaches an undeclared runtime chunk still fails.
Compatibility lanes run the source worker and Zstandard runtime smokes on every advertised Node line. TypeScript checks the source graph once in a dedicated primary Node 24 lane; repeating the same compiler analysis in runtime compatibility jobs added time without runtime-specific signal.
The workflow caches the pnpm store, keys each immutable ESLint cache to its owning lint shard, preserves native PowerShell for Windows measurements, and retains one aggregate `all checks passed` status for branch protection. Windows reuses the three exhaustive lint partitions and groups foundation/catalog/prose plus documentation-type/API-contract gates behind shared runner setups; only scheduling differs from the Linux partitions. Windows build and production-site validation remain blocking, while the wider Windows static, lint, and artifact matrix remains observational.
## Alternatives considered
- **Keep the broad lanes** - minimizes workflow YAML, but it preserves the measured multi-minute feedback loop.
- **Run every leaf gate as a separate GitHub job** - maximizes fan-out, but short generators and prose checks would spend more time preparing a runner than checking the repository.
- **Upload one build to artifact consumers** - avoids repeated compilation, but upload/download and dependency scheduling lengthen wall time; the clean build is short enough to repeat inside bounded lanes.
- **Keep package-manager packing in both publication gates** - delegates inventory selection to pnpm, but repeats more than 200 package-manager processes. The manifest structural gate plus publication-view fixtures make the optimized inventory contract explicit and fail on an on-disk but unpublished dependency.
- **Keep build before coverage** - provides emitted output the source suite no longer consumes; a clean-tree coverage proof showed it was pure latency.
- **Typecheck on every Node version** - repeats compiler work while the compatibility smokes already exercise actual Node-specific loading and compression behavior.
## Consequences
The shard inventories and matrix jobs described above are not part of the current repository contract. The superseding larger-runner decision keeps the complete primary inventory in one process and uses the serial suite as its independent completeness oracle.
The optimized publication validators rely on the manifest `files` contract enforced by `verify-package-invariants`. If publication rules grow beyond that contract, the structural gate and both staged views must change together.
Compatibility jobs no longer claim that TypeScript itself was exercised under every Node runtime. They prove runtime-sensitive source loading on Node 22, 24, and 26, while the primary runtime owns the single source-graph typecheck.

View File

@@ -1,50 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: 并行 GitHub CI 门禁
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-06-parallel-github-ci-gates.md) | 中文
## 问题
无密钥 GitHub CI 门禁大多相互正交类型检查、lint、文档新鲜度、覆盖率、快照重放、构建、包package的发布卫生检查、demo 冒烟和已构建二进制冒烟会因不同原因失败,也不需要彼此的运行时状态。将它们作为一条有序命令链运行,会使工作流墙钟时间等于所有门禁耗时之和;而把每个短小叶子拆成独立 GitHub job又会反复执行 checkout、Node 设置、pnpm 恢复和安装,直到编排开销成为瓶颈。
随着 workspace 增长原有的宽车道拆分不再满足这一平衡。PRPull Request#404 合并时Linux 的静态、覆盖率、快照和产物 job 分别耗时 148、195、94 和 230 秒Windows 的静态和产物 job 分别耗时 251 和 482 秒。每个包都调用一次包管理器打包主导了两个产物验证器的耗时覆盖率在仅运行源码的套件前无谓地重建输出CPU 密集型门禁则在静态与覆盖率车道内争用资源。
产物边界仍然承载关键约束。`publint``verify-node-next-types`、已编译不变量加载和已构建二进制冒烟测试都需要生成的 `lib/` 输出。分片不能让这些消费方抢在构建前运行,也不能用源码执行取代它们对已发布产物的信号。
## 决策
下述生产拓扑已经成为历史,并由[基于证据采用更大的托管 runner](2026-07-22-evidence-based-larger-hosted-runners.md) 取代。更大 runner 的决策移除了其分片选择器和工作流 job本文保留早期拓扑为何被实现的记录。
[CI](../../../../.github/workflows/ci.yml) 将非 Windows job 的一分钟和 Windows job 的三分钟视为观测所得的性能目标,而非取消截止时间。托管 runner 的波动应留下完整计时证据和有用的失败日志,而不是取消本来正确的门禁。[串行跨平台 CI 参考](2026-07-21-serial-cross-platform-ci-reference.md)会在 Linux、macOS 和 Windows 上独立运行完整、未分片的主 Node 聚合,使优化后的车道清单不会成为自身完整性的唯一判据。
在该拓扑中,[scripts/run-gates.ts](../../../../scripts/run-gates.ts) 是通用的有界调度器GitHub 则为昂贵的门禁族提供显式分片名称。`scripts/static-shards.ts` 将静态门禁划分为基础、文档类型、API 契约、目录、正文、文档投影和文档构建等归属并拒绝缺失或重复的门禁分配。Linux lint 使用互不重叠的 A-C、D-M、N-S、T-Z 包源码和包测试车道Windows 则使用完整的包源码与包测试车道;两者都包含从 `.` 开始的仓库补集,使新增顶层目标无法消失在分片之间,并负责唯一一次跨文件重复检查。`scripts/coverage-shards.ts` 把每个 workspace 包恰好分配给一个源码覆盖率车道。目录过滤器保留尾部分隔符,因为 Vitest 位置过滤器按子字符串匹配,否则会纳入具有同名前缀的相邻项。每个覆盖率车道只包含其拥有的源码文件,重复运行穷尽式伴随拓扑测试,并且不先执行构建,因为从删除了所有生成式 `lib/` 的树开始,完整覆盖率套件仍可通过。
快照重放使用两个显式多文件车道,以及大型 ACPAgent Client Protocol文件的八个场景分区。`scripts/snapshot-shards.ts` 拥有该清单,其测试会发现快照配置允许的每个文件。每个快照 job 在其 Linux runner 准备 Bubblewrap 的同时安装依赖,随后构建已发布运行时,并且只运行分配给它的重放表面。该套件保留五个子进程的有界并发,因为重放的大部分时间都在等待子进程协议 I/O。fixture测试前置数据守卫仍会在每个分区中检查完整 ACP 场景表。
冷启动的独立文档类型检查会重建完整的项目引用图,因此专用文档类型车道只构建一次,再用这些声明检查 Markdown 块。Linux 文档车道使用 VitePress 的 MPA 构建,在观测所得的非 Windows 目标内保留页面渲染与死链接验证;单独的阻塞式 Windows 构建和生产站点车道保留已生成包与已发布站点检查,同时避免把两条关键路径放进同一个 job。
产物使用两个车道:一个元数据车道负责 `publint`、NodeNext 声明和已编译不变量加载,另一个负责已构建二进制冒烟。每个车道都会在其消费方之前自行构建。重复短时构建会消耗 runner 分钟数,但避免了上传/下载依赖,并使每个 job 的关键路径保持有界。
[scripts/publint-all.ts](../../../../scripts/publint-all.ts) 在进程内针对内存发布视图调用 publint 支持的 API该视图由每份清单声明的文件和 npm 强制元数据文件构成。这样无需生成 103 次包管理器打包命令,也能保留 workspace 文件与已发布文件之间的区别。[scripts/verify-built-package-invariants.mjs](../../../../scripts/verify-built-package-invariants.mjs) 在真实包下暂存这些经过结构验证、由清单声明的 `lib/` 文件,再通过纯 Node 和 Cordis Loader 规范化导入已编译的自引用。若伴随项触及未声明的运行时分片,仍会失败。
兼容性车道会在每条声明支持的 Node 版本线上运行源码 worker 和 Zstandard 运行时冒烟。TypeScript 在专用的主 Node 24 车道中只检查一次源码图;在运行时兼容性 job 中重复同一编译器分析只会增加耗时,不会提供运行时特有信号。
工作流缓存 pnpm store将每个不可变 ESLint 缓存的键绑定到其所属 lint 分片,为 Windows 测量保留原生 PowerShell并保留一个聚合的 `all checks passed` 状态用于分支保护。Windows 复用三个穷尽式 lint 分区,并在共享 runner 设置后组合基础/目录/正文门禁与文档类型/API 契约门禁;只有调度方式与 Linux 分区不同。Windows 构建和生产站点验证继续阻塞,而更广泛的 Windows 静态、lint 和产物矩阵仍为观察性检查。
## 曾考虑的替代方案
- **保留宽车道**:最大限度减少工作流 YAML但会保留观测到的数分钟反馈周期。
- **让每个叶子门禁分别成为 GitHub job**:最大化扇出,但短小的生成器和正文检查准备 runner 的时间会超过检查仓库的时间。
- **向产物消费方上传一次构建**:避免重复编译,但上传/下载和依赖调度会延长墙钟时间;干净构建足够短,可以在有界车道内重复。
- **在两个发布门禁中保留包管理器打包**:把清单选择委托给 pnpm但会重复启动 200 多个包管理器进程。清单结构门禁加发布视图 fixture 使优化后的清单契约显式化,并会在存在磁盘上有但未发布的依赖时失败。
- **在覆盖率前保留构建**:提供源码套件已不再消费的生成输出;干净树覆盖率证明表明这只是纯粹的延迟。
- **在每个 Node 版本上执行类型检查**:重复编译器工作,而兼容性冒烟已经验证实际的 Node 特有加载与压缩行为。
## 后果
上述分片清单和矩阵 job 不属于当前仓库契约。取而代之的更大 runner 决策在单个进程中保留完整主清单,并以串行套件作为独立完整性判据。
优化后的发布验证器依赖由 `verify-package-invariants` 强制执行的清单 `files` 契约。如果发布规则超出该契约,结构门禁和两个暂存视图必须一起变化。
兼容性 job 不再声称 TypeScript 本身已在每个 Node 运行时下执行。它们证明 Node 22、24 和 26 上对运行时敏感的源码加载,而主运行时负责唯一一次源码图类型检查。

Some files were not shown because too many files have changed in this diff Show More