mirror of
https://github.com/deepseek-ai/deepseek-harness
synced 2026-08-15 21:04:50 +00:00
ci: remove critical setup variance
This commit is contained in:
Tianyi Cui
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
|
||||
2026-07-22-evidence-based-larger-hosted-runners.md: 360c8f58f9650b466e7fbc8455a4a234cfc86e70
|
||||
2026-07-22-evidence-based-larger-hosted-runners.zh.md: 2a82c5fd0124c9d8d1dba72b2ca6eed92415580c
|
||||
2026-07-22-evidence-based-larger-hosted-runners.md: c0fae2841f21c431d6416cd5d421929d70197abb
|
||||
2026-07-22-evidence-based-larger-hosted-runners.zh.md: 51c73a8a631af4f1254c795d09585770fc4e68bb
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -16,9 +16,9 @@ The organization keeps twelve x64 larger-runner pools in the repo-restricted `ds
|
||||
|
||||
Production CI uses five larger-runner executions and one standard-runner aggregator. The primary Node inventory is not sharded:
|
||||
|
||||
- `node 24 / complete` uses one 96-core Linux runner. One checkout, setup, pnpm- and ESLint-cache restore, and install feeds all 42 primary gates. `run-gates` starts up to 8 independent gates; ESLint and coverage use at most 16 workers, and snapshot replay uses at most 8. Build starts as soon as the first short gates release scheduler slots, while snapshot replay and publication consumers retain explicit dependencies on emitted `lib/` output. Pull requests restore both caches without saving them, so cache compression and upload do not extend the required job; the master serial reference refreshes those caches outside the pull-request critical path. An uncached exact-head trace put ESLint at 38.11 seconds and coverage at 37.10 seconds, so the small ESLint restore remains useful on the critical path. The read-only job does not persist checkout credentials.
|
||||
- `node 24 / complete` uses one 96-core Linux runner. One checkout, direct selection of the image's preinstalled Node 24 toolcache, pnpm- and ESLint-cache restore, and install feeds all 42 primary gates. `run-gates` starts up to 10 independent gates; ESLint and coverage use at most 16 workers, and snapshot replay uses at most 8. Build starts as soon as the first short gates release scheduler slots, while snapshot replay and publication consumers retain explicit dependencies on emitted `lib/` output. Pull requests restore both caches without saving them, so cache compression and upload do not extend the required job; the master serial reference refreshes those caches outside the pull-request critical path. An uncached exact-head trace put ESLint at 38.11 seconds and coverage at 37.10 seconds, so the small ESLint restore remains useful on the critical path. The read-only job does not persist checkout credentials.
|
||||
- Node 22.19 and Node 26 use the 4- and 32-core Linux pools for their runtime compatibility smokes. Python 3.10 uses the 8-core Linux pool for the complete keyless SDK suite. These are environment contracts, not slices of the primary Node gate inventory.
|
||||
- `windows node 24 / complete` uses one 32-core Windows runner. One setup feeds the required package build, required production site build, and complete observational portability inventory. Required failures fail the job; observational failures are reported as non-blocking. ESLint stays single-threaded because 16 ESLint workers took 174.54 seconds, coverage uses at most 12 workers, and the outer scheduler retains 16 slots. The job restores only the small master-refreshed ESLint cache and performs a clean pnpm install instead of restoring or saving the many-file package store. All six Windows larger-runner sizes completed install and the production-site benchmark without mutating the machine-wide Developer Mode registry key, so the pull-request critical path omits that redundant step.
|
||||
- `windows node 24 / complete` uses one 32-core Windows runner. One preparation wave feeds the required package build, required production site build, and complete observational portability inventory. Required failures fail the job; observational failures are reported as non-blocking. ESLint stays single-threaded because 16 ESLint workers took 174.54 seconds, coverage uses at most 12 workers, and the outer scheduler retains 16 slots. The job restores only the small master-refreshed ESLint cache and performs a clean pnpm install instead of restoring or saving the many-file package store. All six Windows larger-runner sizes completed install and the production-site benchmark without mutating the machine-wide Developer Mode registry key, so the pull-request critical path omits that redundant step.
|
||||
|
||||
The former gate-level and coarse primary shard jobs are absent from the workflow. Their static, lint, coverage, snapshot, and scenario shard selectors are also absent from the repository, so an unused diagnostic path cannot preserve a second CI architecture.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ Repository work gains little above 16 Windows cores, but the 32-core pool can st
|
||||
|
||||
The larger client package graph makes cache mechanics and scheduler pressure part of the measured workload. In [one exact-head production run](https://github.com/deepseek-harness/deepseek-harness/actions/runs/29912577681), Linux spent 39 seconds in repository gates but 69 seconds in the complete job, while Windows spent 117 seconds in repository gates and 228 seconds in the complete job. The Windows pnpm cache downloaded its 154 MB archive in about two seconds but spent 27 seconds extracting it, followed by a 23-second install and a 14-second post-job save. A [cacheless all-size trace](https://github.com/deepseek-harness/deepseek-harness/actions/runs/29913033155) completed the same 32-core Windows install in 27 seconds. Production therefore avoids the Windows package-store cache, uses restore-only caches on latency-critical pull-request jobs, and bounds outer concurrency so typecheck, lint, coverage, and build do not oversubscribe one host.
|
||||
|
||||
Two host effects remain part of the decision. A standard Node 26 job once spent 36 of its 67 seconds in `Set up job`, which is why environment contracts use distinct larger-runner pools instead of standard capacity. A Linux candidate spent 18 seconds registering a 50 KB Bubblewrap package because the hosted image scanned 202,507 package-database files. [`scripts/prepare-ci-bubblewrap.sh`](../../../../scripts/prepare-ci-bubblewrap.sh) instead verifies and extracts the pinned payload into the ephemeral runner directory, runs a functional confinement probe, and overlaps that preparation with dependency installation.
|
||||
Three host effects remain part of the decision. A standard Node 26 job once spent 36 of its 67 seconds in `Set up job`, which is why environment contracts use distinct larger-runner pools instead of standard capacity. The setup-node action later spent 3.68 seconds printing cached Linux environment details and 46.56 seconds doing the same on Windows after both had already found Node 24.18.0 in the hosted toolcache. The two latency-critical jobs select the newest preinstalled 24.x directory directly, verify its major, and fail loud if the image no longer carries it; compatibility jobs retain setup-node because selecting a non-default runtime is their contract. A Linux candidate also spent 18 seconds registering a 50 KB Bubblewrap package because the hosted image scanned 202,507 package-database files. [`scripts/prepare-ci-bubblewrap.sh`](../../../../scripts/prepare-ci-bubblewrap.sh) instead verifies and extracts the pinned payload into the ephemeral runner directory, runs a functional confinement probe, and overlaps that preparation with dependency installation.
|
||||
|
||||
Inner and outer worker limits are separate controls. An [exact-head 32-worker ESLint experiment](https://github.com/deepseek-harness/deepseek-harness/actions/runs/29918329463) slowed lint to 52.28 seconds and coverage to 42.71 seconds, where an adapter idle-timeout test failed. Production therefore retains 16 ESLint workers and admits only 8 independent repository gates at once, leaving capacity for the worker pools owned by those gates.
|
||||
Inner and outer worker limits are separate controls. An [exact-head 32-worker ESLint experiment](https://github.com/deepseek-harness/deepseek-harness/actions/runs/29918329463) slowed lint to 52.28 seconds and coverage to 42.71 seconds, where an adapter idle-timeout test failed. A later 8-gate trace reduced coverage to 35.17 seconds but delayed the production-site build until the aggregate reached 41.06 seconds. Production therefore retains 16 ESLint workers and admits 10 independent repository gates at once, leaving capacity for the worker pools owned by those gates without starving later independent work.
|
||||
|
||||
Linux coverage caps each project at 16 workers, while Windows keeps the 12-worker cap. The process-bound project contains exactly four suite files, so its fork count cannot reach either cap. Thirty-two forks crashed Node 24's CJS lexer twice, and a later 16-fork run reproduced the worker loss and invalid coverage result. The single Vitest invocation therefore uses threads for the broad inventory and reserves forks for suites that exercise process-global state or `process` APIs. That narrow fork inventory includes the local bash process-plumbing suite: under aggregate gate contention its thread worker completed every test but intermittently missed the stdin-error callback needed for per-file function coverage. A 32-worker all-gate run on the 96-core host slowed coverage to 44.6 seconds and made a compute-budget regression cross its one-second threshold, so production stops at 16. This preserves the suites' isolation contracts and deterministic coverage while avoiding forked execution for ordinary test files.
|
||||
Linux coverage caps each project at 16 workers, while Windows keeps the 12-worker cap. The process-bound project contains exactly five suite files, so its fork count cannot reach either cap. Thirty-two forks crashed Node 24's CJS lexer twice, and a later 16-fork run reproduced the worker loss and invalid coverage result. The single Vitest invocation therefore uses threads for the broad inventory and reserves forks for suites that exercise process-global state, `process` APIs, or timing-sensitive process I/O. That narrow fork inventory includes the local bash process-plumbing suite: under aggregate gate contention its thread worker completed every test but intermittently missed the stdin-error callback needed for per-file function coverage. It also includes the pi-ai adapter suite after two hosted aggregate runs delayed an idle-watchdog socket-close observation past its 100-millisecond test deadline. A 32-worker all-gate run on the 96-core host slowed coverage to 44.6 seconds and made a compute-budget regression cross its one-second threshold, so production stops at 16. This preserves the suites' isolation contracts and deterministic coverage while avoiding forked execution for ordinary test files.
|
||||
|
||||
The workflow retains two manual measurement suites. `suite=larger-runner-benchmark` compares isolated critical lanes across every size, and `suite=consolidated-runner-benchmark` compares whole aggregates. Complete serial Linux, macOS, and Windows references run only when `master` moves; pull requests run only the optimized jobs.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -16,9 +16,9 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
生产 CI 包含 5 次大型运行器执行和 1 个标准运行器聚合作业。主 Node 门禁清单不再分片：
|
||||
|
||||
- `node 24 / complete` 使用一台 96 核 Linux 运行器。只需执行一次代码检出、设置、pnpm 和 ESLint 缓存恢复以及安装，即可供全部 42 项主门禁使用。`run-gates` 最多同时启动 8 项相互独立的门禁；ESLint 和覆盖率最多使用 16 个工作线程，快照回放最多使用 8 个。第一批短门禁释放调度器槽位后，构建会立即启动，而快照回放和发布消费方仍显式依赖生成的 `lib/` 输出。拉取请求会恢复这两项缓存但不保存，因此缓存压缩和上传不会延长必需作业；master 上的串行参考会在拉取请求关键路径之外刷新这两项缓存。一次未使用缓存的分支头精确运行轨迹显示，ESLint 耗时 38.11 秒，覆盖率耗时 37.10 秒，因此在关键路径上恢复这个较小的 ESLint 缓存仍有价值。该只读作业不会持久化代码检出凭据。
|
||||
- `node 24 / complete` 使用一台 96 核 Linux 运行器。只需执行一次代码检出、直接选择托管映像中预装的 Node 24 toolcache、恢复 pnpm 和 ESLint 缓存以及安装，即可供全部 42 项主门禁使用。`run-gates` 最多同时启动 10 项相互独立的门禁；ESLint 和覆盖率最多使用 16 个工作线程，快照回放最多使用 8 个。第一批短门禁释放调度器槽位后，构建会立即启动，而快照回放和发布消费方仍显式依赖生成的 `lib/` 输出。拉取请求会恢复这两项缓存但不保存，因此缓存压缩和上传不会延长必需作业；master 上的串行参考会在拉取请求关键路径之外刷新这两项缓存。一次未使用缓存的分支头精确运行轨迹显示，ESLint 耗时 38.11 秒，覆盖率耗时 37.10 秒，因此在关键路径上恢复这个较小的 ESLint 缓存仍有价值。该只读作业不会持久化代码检出凭据。
|
||||
- Node 22.19 和 Node 26 分别使用 4 核和 32 核 Linux 池运行各自的运行时兼容性冒烟测试。Python 3.10 使用 8 核 Linux 池运行完整的无密钥 SDK 套件。这些作业属于环境契约，并非主 Node 门禁清单的分片。
|
||||
- `windows node 24 / complete` 使用一台 32 核 Windows 运行器。一次设置供必需的包构建、必需的生产网站构建以及完整的观测性可移植性清单共用。任何必需项失败都会使作业失败；观测项失败则报告为非阻塞。ESLint 保持单线程，因为 16 个 ESLint 工作线程耗时 174.54 秒；覆盖率最多使用 12 个工作线程，外层调度器则保留 16 个槽位。该作业仅恢复由 master 刷新的较小 ESLint 缓存，并在干净环境中执行 pnpm 安装，而不恢复或保存包含大量文件的包存储。全部 6 种 Windows 大型运行器规格都在未修改系统级 Developer Mode 注册表项的情况下完成了安装和生产网站基准测试，因此拉取请求关键路径省略了这个多余步骤。
|
||||
- `windows node 24 / complete` 使用一台 32 核 Windows 运行器。一轮准备工作供必需的包构建、必需的生产网站构建以及完整的观测性可移植性清单共用。任何必需项失败都会使作业失败；观测项失败则报告为非阻塞。ESLint 保持单线程，因为 16 个 ESLint 工作线程耗时 174.54 秒；覆盖率最多使用 12 个工作线程，外层调度器则保留 16 个槽位。该作业仅恢复由 master 刷新的较小 ESLint 缓存，并在干净环境中执行 pnpm 安装，而不恢复或保存包含大量文件的包存储。全部 6 种 Windows 大型运行器规格都在未修改系统级 Developer Mode 注册表项的情况下完成了安装和生产网站基准测试，因此拉取请求关键路径省略了这个多余步骤。
|
||||
|
||||
原有的门禁级和粗粒度主流程分片作业已从工作流中移除。相应的静态、lint、覆盖率、快照和场景分片选择器也已从仓库中移除，因此未使用的诊断路径无法继续维系第二套 CI 架构。
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ Windows 仓库工作在超过 16 核后收益很小，但 32 核池可以让完
|
||||
|
||||
客户端包依赖图增大后，缓存机制和调度器压力也成为实测工作负载的一部分。在[一次分支头精确的生产运行](https://github.com/deepseek-harness/deepseek-harness/actions/runs/29912577681)中，Linux 的仓库门禁耗时 39 秒，完整作业耗时 69 秒；Windows 的仓库门禁耗时 117 秒，完整作业耗时 228 秒。Windows pnpm 缓存的 154 MB 归档下载耗时约 2 秒，但解压耗时 27 秒，随后安装耗时 23 秒，作业结束后的保存又耗时 14 秒。一次[无缓存的全规格运行轨迹](https://github.com/deepseek-harness/deepseek-harness/actions/runs/29913033155)在 27 秒内完成了同一台 32 核 Windows 运行器上的安装。因此，生产环境不使用 Windows 包存储缓存，在对延迟敏感的拉取请求作业中使用只恢复不保存的缓存，并限制外层并发度，以免类型检查、lint、覆盖率和构建在同一台主机上过度争用资源。
|
||||
|
||||
两项主机效应仍构成这项决策的依据。一个标准 Node 26 作业曾在总共 67 秒的耗时中，把 36 秒用在 `Set up job` 上，因此各项环境契约使用不同的大型运行器池，而非标准容量。一个 Linux 候选作业在注册 50 KB 的 Bubblewrap 包时耗时 18 秒，因为托管映像扫描了 202,507 个包数据库文件。[`scripts/prepare-ci-bubblewrap.sh`](../../../../scripts/prepare-ci-bubblewrap.sh) 改为验证固定包内容并将其解压到临时运行器目录，执行功能性隔离探针，并让这项准备工作与依赖安装重叠执行。
|
||||
3 项主机效应仍构成这项决策的依据。一个标准 Node 26 作业曾在总共 67 秒的耗时中，把 36 秒用在 `Set up job` 上，因此各项环境契约使用不同的大型运行器池，而非标准容量。setup-node action 在 Linux 和 Windows 均已从托管 toolcache 找到 Node 24.18.0 后，仍分别花费 3.68 秒和 46.56 秒输出缓存的环境详情。两个延迟关键作业会直接选择最新的预装 24.x 目录并验证其主版本号；如果映像不再提供该目录，作业会明确报错并失败。兼容性作业仍使用 setup-node，因为选择非默认运行时正是它们的契约。一个 Linux 候选作业还在注册 50 KB 的 Bubblewrap 包时耗时 18 秒，因为托管映像扫描了 202,507 个包数据库文件。[`scripts/prepare-ci-bubblewrap.sh`](../../../../scripts/prepare-ci-bubblewrap.sh) 改为验证固定包内容并将其解压到临时运行器目录，执行功能性隔离探针，并让这项准备工作与依赖安装重叠执行。
|
||||
|
||||
内层与外层工作线程上限是相互独立的控制机制。一次[分支头精确、使用 32 个工作线程的 ESLint 实验](https://github.com/deepseek-harness/deepseek-harness/actions/runs/29918329463)使 lint 耗时增至 52.28 秒、覆盖率耗时增至 42.71 秒；同一次运行中，一项适配器空闲超时测试失败。因此，生产环境将 ESLint 工作线程上限维持在 16 个，并且同时最多只运行 8 项相互独立的仓库门禁，为这些门禁自身的工作线程池留出容量。
|
||||
内层与外层工作线程上限是相互独立的控制机制。一次[分支头精确、使用 32 个工作线程的 ESLint 实验](https://github.com/deepseek-harness/deepseek-harness/actions/runs/29918329463)使 lint 耗时增至 52.28 秒、覆盖率耗时增至 42.71 秒；同一次运行中，一项适配器空闲超时测试失败。后来一次同时运行 8 项门禁的运行轨迹将覆盖率耗时降至 35.17 秒，但生产网站构建被延后，直到聚合流程耗时达到 41.06 秒时才完成。因此，生产环境将 ESLint 工作线程上限维持在 16 个，并且同时最多运行 10 项相互独立的仓库门禁，既为这些门禁自身的工作线程池留出容量，又避免后续独立工作因资源不足而迟迟无法启动。
|
||||
|
||||
Linux 覆盖率把每个项目的工作线程上限设为 16 个，Windows 则保留 12 个工作线程的上限。进程约束项目恰好包含 4 个套件文件，因此它的 fork 数量不可能达到任一上限。32 个 fork 曾两次导致 Node 24 的 CJS 词法分析器崩溃，后来一次使用 16 个 fork 的运行又复现了工作进程丢失和无效的覆盖率结果。因此，单次 Vitest 调用会对大范围测试清单使用线程，只为涉及进程全局状态或 `process` API 的套件保留 fork。这份有限的 fork 清单还包含本地 bash 进程通路套件：在聚合门禁争用资源时，该套件的工作线程虽然完成了所有测试，却会间歇性漏记逐文件函数覆盖率所需的 stdin 错误回调。在 96 核主机上使用 32 个工作线程运行全部门禁时，覆盖率耗时变慢至 44.6 秒，还使一项计算预算回归超过其 1 秒阈值，因此生产环境将工作线程数限制在 16 个以内。这样既能保留这些套件的隔离契约和覆盖率结果的确定性，又能避免以 fork 方式执行普通测试文件。
|
||||
Linux 覆盖率把每个项目的工作线程上限设为 16 个，Windows 则保留 12 个工作线程的上限。进程约束项目恰好包含 5 个套件文件，因此它的 fork 数量不可能达到任一上限。32 个 fork 曾两次导致 Node 24 的 CJS 词法分析器崩溃，后来一次使用 16 个 fork 的运行又复现了工作进程丢失和无效的覆盖率结果。因此，单次 Vitest 调用会对大范围测试清单使用线程，只为涉及进程全局状态、`process` API 或对时间敏感的进程 I/O 的套件保留 fork。这份有限的 fork 清单还包含本地 bash 进程通路套件：在聚合门禁争用资源时，该套件的工作线程虽然完成了所有测试，却会间歇性漏记逐文件函数覆盖率所需的 stdin 错误回调。两次托管聚合运行都将空闲看门狗对套接字关闭的观测延迟到超过其 100 毫秒测试截止时间，因此这份清单还包含 pi-ai 适配器套件。在 96 核主机上使用 32 个工作线程运行全部门禁时，覆盖率耗时变慢至 44.6 秒，还使一项计算预算回归超过其 1 秒阈值，因此生产环境将工作线程数限制在 16 个以内。这样既能保留这些套件的隔离契约和覆盖率结果的确定性，又能避免以 fork 方式执行普通测试文件。
|
||||
|
||||
工作流保留 2 项手动测量套件。`suite=larger-runner-benchmark` 比较所有规格下相互独立的关键通道，`suite=consolidated-runner-benchmark` 比较完整聚合流程。只有在 `master` 移动时，才运行完整的 Linux、macOS 和 Windows 串行参考；拉取请求只运行优化后的作业。
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
47
.github/workflows/ci.yml
vendored
47
.github/workflows/ci.yml
vendored
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ jobs:
|
||||
DSH_COVERAGE_MAX_WORKERS: '16'
|
||||
DSH_ESLINT_CACHE: '1'
|
||||
DSH_ESLINT_CONCURRENCY: '16'
|
||||
DSH_GATE_CONCURRENCY: '8'
|
||||
DSH_GATE_CONCURRENCY: '10'
|
||||
DSH_PUBLINT_CONCURRENCY: '16'
|
||||
DSH_SNAPSHOT_MAX_CONCURRENCY: '8'
|
||||
steps:
|
||||
@@ -46,21 +46,11 @@ jobs:
|
||||
with:
|
||||
persist-credentials: false
|
||||
|
||||
- uses: actions/setup-node@v6
|
||||
with:
|
||||
node-version: ${{ env.PRIMARY_NODE_VERSION }}
|
||||
|
||||
- name: Enable corepack and resolve pnpm store path
|
||||
id: pnpm-store
|
||||
run: |
|
||||
corepack enable
|
||||
echo "path=$(pnpm store path --silent)" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"
|
||||
|
||||
# Pull requests consume the default-branch cache but do not put cache
|
||||
# compression and upload on the paid latency-critical path.
|
||||
- uses: actions/cache/restore@v4
|
||||
with:
|
||||
path: ${{ steps.pnpm-store.outputs.path }}
|
||||
path: /home/runner/.local/share/pnpm/store/v11
|
||||
key: ${{ runner.os }}-node-${{ env.PRIMARY_NODE_VERSION }}-pnpm-${{ hashFiles('pnpm-lock.yaml') }}
|
||||
restore-keys: |
|
||||
${{ runner.os }}-node-${{ env.PRIMARY_NODE_VERSION }}-pnpm-
|
||||
@@ -72,8 +62,17 @@ jobs:
|
||||
restore-keys: |
|
||||
${{ runner.os }}-node-${{ env.PRIMARY_NODE_VERSION }}-eslint-full-
|
||||
|
||||
- name: Install dependencies and prepare bubblewrap
|
||||
- name: Select preinstalled Node, install dependencies, and prepare bubblewrap
|
||||
run: |
|
||||
node_root="$(printf '%s\n' "$RUNNER_TOOL_CACHE"/node/"${PRIMARY_NODE_VERSION}".*/x64 | sort -V | tail -n 1)"
|
||||
if [[ ! -d "$node_root" ]]; then
|
||||
echo "preinstalled Node ${PRIMARY_NODE_VERSION}.x not found in $RUNNER_TOOL_CACHE" >&2
|
||||
exit 1
|
||||
fi
|
||||
echo "$node_root/bin" >> "$GITHUB_PATH"
|
||||
export PATH="$node_root/bin:$PATH"
|
||||
[[ "$(node --version)" == "v${PRIMARY_NODE_VERSION}."* ]]
|
||||
corepack enable
|
||||
pnpm install --frozen-lockfile &
|
||||
install_pid=$!
|
||||
bash scripts/prepare-ci-bubblewrap.sh &
|
||||
@@ -171,10 +170,6 @@ jobs:
|
||||
steps:
|
||||
- uses: actions/checkout@v6
|
||||
|
||||
- uses: actions/setup-node@v6
|
||||
with:
|
||||
node-version: ${{ env.PRIMARY_NODE_VERSION }}
|
||||
|
||||
- uses: actions/cache/restore@v4
|
||||
with:
|
||||
path: .cache/eslint
|
||||
@@ -184,9 +179,25 @@ jobs:
|
||||
|
||||
# Extracting the many-file pnpm store cache is slower on this image than
|
||||
# a clean parallel install, and saving it adds more latency after gates.
|
||||
- name: Enable corepack and install (immutable)
|
||||
- name: Select preinstalled Node and install (immutable)
|
||||
shell: pwsh
|
||||
run: |
|
||||
$nodeRoot = Get-ChildItem -Path "$env:RUNNER_TOOL_CACHE\node" -Directory |
|
||||
Where-Object { $_.Name -like "$env:PRIMARY_NODE_VERSION.*" } |
|
||||
Sort-Object { [version]$_.Name } |
|
||||
Select-Object -Last 1
|
||||
if ($null -eq $nodeRoot) {
|
||||
throw "preinstalled Node $env:PRIMARY_NODE_VERSION.x not found in $env:RUNNER_TOOL_CACHE"
|
||||
}
|
||||
$nodeBin = Join-Path $nodeRoot.FullName 'x64'
|
||||
if (-not (Test-Path $nodeBin -PathType Container)) {
|
||||
throw "preinstalled Node x64 directory not found at $nodeBin"
|
||||
}
|
||||
Add-Content -Path $env:GITHUB_PATH -Value $nodeBin
|
||||
$env:PATH = "$nodeBin;$env:PATH"
|
||||
if ((node --version) -notlike "v$env:PRIMARY_NODE_VERSION.*") {
|
||||
throw "selected unexpected Node version $(node --version)"
|
||||
}
|
||||
corepack enable
|
||||
pnpm install --frozen-lockfile
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -28,11 +28,13 @@ const testIncludes = [
|
||||
'scripts/**/*.spec.ts',
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
// These suites exercise process-global state or process APIs that worker threads cannot isolate.
|
||||
// These suites exercise process-global state, process APIs, or timing-sensitive process I/O
|
||||
// that worker threads cannot isolate reliably under aggregate gate contention.
|
||||
// Keep the narrow exception in forks while the rest of the inventory avoids per-file processes.
|
||||
const processBoundTests = [
|
||||
'packages/bash/bash-local/tests/run.spec.ts',
|
||||
'packages/context/time-context/tests/time-context.spec.ts',
|
||||
'packages/llm/llm-pi-ai/tests/adapter.spec.ts',
|
||||
'packages/ui/app-boot/tests/app-boot.spec.ts',
|
||||
'packages/workflow/workflow-workerthread/tests/session.spec.ts',
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user