mirror of
https://github.com/coleam00/bolt.new-any-llm
synced 2024-12-27 22:33:03 +00:00
WIP: Add information about development process
This commit is contained in:
parent
6003c165ef
commit
704aee4390
52
PROJECT.md
Normal file
52
PROJECT.md
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
|
||||
# Project management of bolt.diy
|
||||
|
||||
First off: this sounds funny, we know. "Project management" comes from a world of enterprise stuff and this project is
|
||||
far from being enterprisy ;)
|
||||
|
||||
But we need to organize ourselves somehow, right?
|
||||
|
||||
So here's how we structure long-term vision, mid-term capabilities of the software and short term improvements.
|
||||
|
||||
## Strategic epics (long-term)
|
||||
|
||||
Strategic epics define areas in which the product evolves. Usually, these epics don’t overlap. They shall allow the core
|
||||
team to define what they believe is most important and should be worked on with the highest priority.
|
||||
|
||||
You can find the [epics as issues](https://github.com/stackblitz-labs/bolt.diy/labels/epic) which are probably never
|
||||
going to be closed.
|
||||
|
||||
What's the benefit / purpose of epics?
|
||||
|
||||
1. Prioritization
|
||||
|
||||
E. g. we could say “managing files is currently more important that quality”. Then, we could thing about which features
|
||||
would bring “managing files” forward. It may be different features, such as “upload local files”, “import from a repo”
|
||||
or also undo/redo/commit.
|
||||
|
||||
In a more-or-less regular meeting dedicated for that, the core team discusses which epics matter most, sketch features
|
||||
and then check who can work on them. After the meeting, they update the roadmap (at least for the next development turn)
|
||||
and this way communicate where the focus currently is.
|
||||
|
||||
2. Grouping of features
|
||||
|
||||
By linking features with epics, we can keep them together and document *why* we invest work into a particular thing.
|
||||
|
||||
## Features (mid-term)
|
||||
|
||||
We all know probably a dozen of methodologies following which features are being described (User story, business
|
||||
function, you name it).
|
||||
|
||||
However, we intentionally describe features in a more vague manner. Why? Everybody loves crisp, well-defined
|
||||
acceptance-criteria, no? Well, every product owner loves it. because he knows what he’ll get once it’s done.
|
||||
|
||||
But: **here is no owner of this product**. Therefore, we grant *maximum flexibility to the developer contributing a
|
||||
feature* – so that he can bring in his ideas and have most fun implementing it.
|
||||
|
||||
The feature therefore tries to describe *what* should be improved but not in detail *how*.
|
||||
|
||||
## PRs as materialized features (short-term)
|
||||
|
||||
Once a developer starts working on a feature, he/she can open a draft-PR asap to discuss / describe / share, how he/she
|
||||
is going to tackle the problem.
|
||||
|
||||
Once it’s merged, a squashed commit contains the whole PR description which allows for a good change log.
|
@ -12,6 +12,13 @@ bolt.diy was originally started by [Cole Medin](https://www.youtube.com/@ColeMed
|
||||
|
||||
https://thinktank.ottomator.ai
|
||||
|
||||
## Project management
|
||||
|
||||
Bolt.diy is a community effort! Still, the core team of contributors aims at organizing the project in way that allows
|
||||
you to understand where the current areas of focus are.
|
||||
|
||||
If you want to know what we are working on, what we are planning to work on, or if you want to contribute to the
|
||||
project, please check the [project management guide](./PROJECT.md) to get started easily.
|
||||
|
||||
## Requested Additions - Feel Free to Contribute!
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1 +1 @@
|
||||
{ "commit": "e064803955604198c6aac7b257efd0ad8503cb73", "version": "0.0.3" }
|
||||
{ "commit": "6003c165ef9347d5a9f97ea711f84d37d65b5c0c" }
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user