Fixed typo in PROJECT.md

This commit is contained in:
Christopher Filkins 2025-02-07 08:42:01 -08:00
parent 3be18e3f9d
commit 138f50ce43

View File

@ -14,20 +14,15 @@ Here's how we structure long-term vision, mid-term capabilities of the software
Strategic epics define areas in which the product evolves. Usually, these epics dont overlap. They shall allow the core
team to define what they believe is most important and should be worked on with the highest priority.
You can find the [epics as issues](https://github.com/stackblitz-labs/bolt.diy/labels/epic) which are probably never
going to be closed.
You can find the [epics as issues](https://github.com/stackblitz-labs/bolt.diy/labels/epic) which are probably nevern going to be closed.
What's the benefit / purpose of epics?
1. Prioritization
E. g. we could say “managing files is currently more important that quality”. Then, we could thing about which features
would bring “managing files” forward. It may be different features, such as “upload local files”, “import from a repo”
or also undo/redo/commit.
E. g. we could say “managing files is currently more important that quality”. Then, we could think about which features would bring “managing files” forward. It may be different features, such as “upload local files”, “import from a repo” or also undo/redo/commit.
In a more-or-less regular meeting dedicated for that, the core team discusses which epics matter most, sketch features
and then check who can work on them. After the meeting, they update the roadmap (at least for the next development turn)
and this way communicate where the focus currently is.
In a more-or-less regular meeting dedicated for that, the core team discusses which epics matter most, sketch features and then check who can work on them. After the meeting, they update the roadmap (at least for the next development turn) and this way communicate where the focus currently is.
2. Grouping of features