2a66b7c4e0
Codex convergence findings on the delegate-and-fold fix (code path verified
correct, prose only):
- The hook-bridges RFC claimed a downstream `block` "carries the bridge context
too" for BOTH seams. True for `tools/post-execute` (PostToolDecision.block has
an additionalContext field) but false for `agent/prompt-submit`
(PromptDecision.block is `{kind,reason}` with no context field). The code is
already correct — a blocked prompt drops the context, which is right since the
prompt never reaches the model. Reworded the RFC to state the per-seam
difference accurately.
- Two test comments narrated "Before the fix…", which the current-state-only
doc rule forbids. Reworded to describe the behavior, not its history.
- Documented on concatContext (both bridges) why the merged block carries a
single source: a HookContext holds one MessageSource and the seam cannot
represent mixed provenance; rendering distinguishes only by source.kind, so a
downstream plugin's text stays framed as plugin context.
hooks/ — hook bridges + shared protocol
The hooks subsystem lets users extend the agent at lifecycle points the way Claude Code and Codex do — by pointing a bridge plugin at an existing hooks.json (or settings) so those external shell hooks run faithfully. The canonical extension surface itself is the harness's typed interception seams (the interception-seams RFC); a "native hook" is just an ordinary cordis plugin on those seams. These packages are the bridges that translate the external shell-hook protocol onto that same surface, plus the shared wire-protocol library they build on.
| Package | Role | Shape |
|---|---|---|
hook-protocol/ |
Shared wire-protocol core: matcher primitive, exit-code/stdout codec, runHook (via ctx.bash), most-restrictive merge, hook/* session events |
library (no plugin) |
hooks-claude/ |
Bridge for a Claude Code hooks.json / settings |
plugin |
hooks-codex/ |
Bridge for a Codex hooks.json |
plugin |
Codex deliberately reimplements a subset of the Claude Code protocol (same hooks.json shape, 5 events vs CC's many, command-only, regex-only matcher, no env/substitution), so hook-protocol owns the genuinely-identical primitives and each bridge owns only what differs (its per-event stdin payload, env, and the mapping of a hook's neutral outcome onto the harness's typed Decisions). See hook-protocol/README.md.