Files
deepseek-harness/docs/rfc/implemented/architecture/2026-06-18-shared-persistence-write-coordinator.md
2026-07-13 16:24:32 +08:00

6.2 KiB

RFC: Shared persistence write coordinator

Status: implemented

Problem

dsh-session-persistence-jsonl and dsh-session-persistence-sqlite intentionally prove the same SessionPersistence contract over different storage media, but their write-path orchestration was duplicated: per-session state, session/created adoption, backend-specific prefix reads, write-behind buffers, serialized flush chains, HMR seeding, and dispose drains. The pure seed-prefix collision and serializability guards had already moved into the seam package; the remaining orchestration was still correctness-heavy and received the same fixes twice. A code-level diff showed the two backends were byte-identical — or same-algorithm — for ALL of it: the four maps (states/buffers/chains/inits), installWritePath, initFor, onCreated's four cases, flush, drain, serialize, adopt, adoptLivePrefix, assertVersion, and the create/append/load skeletons. Only the storage primitives (write bytes vs. INSERT rows) differed.

Decision

Extract a backend-agnostic PersistenceCoordinator into dsh-session-persistence. The coordinator owns the orchestration once; each first-party backend composes one (new PersistenceCoordinator(ctx, this)), implements a small PersistenceBackend hook interface, and delegates its four public service methods (create/append/load/list) to it.

Composition, not inheritance. The coordinator is a concrete class the backend holds, not a base class the backend extends. The RFC's risk — "a coordinator must not make unusual backends fight an inheritance hierarchy" — is avoided: a backend exposes only the hooks; it cannot reach the coordinator's private orchestration state, and the public SessionPersistence service shape is unchanged, so a third-party backend MAY still implement the abstract service directly without the coordinator at all.

The hook interface (PersistenceBackend<TornMarker>)

Six methods (five required + an optional lifecycle hook) — the only seam between the coordinator and storage:

  • name — backend label for the dispose-failure AggregateError.
  • loadStored(id) — read a stored prefix by id, scanning ANY storage scope (every JSONL cwd bucket; SQLite's id is globally unique). Used by resume/load and, via !== undefined, the create-collision probe.
  • loadLive(id, cwd) — read a stored prefix SCOPED to cwd. Deliberately distinct from loadStored: HMR live-adoption must only adopt a persisted log at the SAME cwd as the live session; a same-id log at a different cwd is a collision, not a resume. Collapsing the two reintroduces a cross-cwd adoption bug. SQLite ignores cwd.
  • appendBatch(meta, events, isMaterialized) — durably append a contiguous batch, lazily materializing the session ATOMICALLY when not yet materialized (the materialize-write and the first event batch must commit together — a crash between them must not leave a materialized-but-empty session; this is why there is no separate materialize hook).
  • commitRepair(meta, tornMarker, closers) — make a crash repair durable: truncate the torn tail (iff tornMarker !== undefined) and append closers. NOT required to be atomic — JSONL legitimately truncates-then-appends in two fsync'd steps, SQLite does DELETE+INSERT in one transaction. Used by load (truncate + synthetic closers) and live-adoption (truncate only, closers = []).
  • list() — list all stored metadata.
  • close?() — optional lifecycle teardown (SQLite closes its db handle; JSONL omits it), awaited in the dispose effect AFTER the quiescence drain so a close failure never masks a drain error.

The opaque torn marker

The single design choice that keeps the seam clean: the crash-repair "where is the torn tail" token is OPAQUE to the coordinator. The coordinator computes the synthetic closers (it owns interruptedTurnClosers from dsh-session), but it only ever tests tornMarker !== undefined and passes the value straight back to commitRepair — it never inspects it. Each backend picks its own marker type: JSONL uses the byte offset to truncate to, SQLite the seq to delete from (both happen to be number). The JSONL backend folds its committedBytes < buffer.byteLength comparison INSIDE the hook so the returned marker is already number | undefined; without that fold the coordinator would have to know about byte lengths.

Testing

The shared runPersistenceContract (public-API contract) keeps running for every backend. A new runCoordinatorContract (tests/coordinator-contract.ts) holds the write-path orchestration — adoption, HMR, collision, dispose-drain, crash-tail repair — and runs once per backend through a CoordinatorFixture (an in-memory reference + jsonl + sqlite). The per-backend specs shrank to storage mechanics only (JSONL: path safety, fsync rollback, bucket listing; SQLite: schema version, scanRows, transaction rollback). A through-coordinator torn-tail→load→commitRepair test per real backend (via a corruptTail fixture hook) keeps the coordinator's torn-marker repair branch covered under the 100% per-file gate — the contract crash test only produces synthetic closers, never a torn marker, so it could not reach that branch.

Alternatives considered

  • A base class the backends extend — rejected for composition: a backend exposes only the hooks, cannot reach the coordinator's private orchestration state, and a third-party backend may still implement the abstract service directly without the coordinator at all.
  • A wider hook surface — each candidate hook folded away: there is no separate materialize hook (the materialize-write must commit atomically with the first event batch inside appendBatch), no separate create-collision probe (it is loadStored(id) !== undefined), and no coordinator pass-through for list() (listing needs none of the orchestration).

Consequences

The coordinator adds one indirection and an opaque torn marker, but centralizes correctness-heavy orchestration previously duplicated by every backend. Its hook surface stays narrow: collision checks reuse loadStored, materialization stays atomic inside appendBatch, and listing bypasses the coordinator. New backends implement storage primitives rather than copy the event-buffer-flush lifecycle.