440384fdb4
# Conflicts: # .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-14-session-persistence.md # .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-20-package-hierarchy.md # .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-02-tool-render-intent-union.md # .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-06-14-acp-agent-client-protocol.md # .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-06-14-acp-multi-session.md # .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-06-18-acp-terminal-and-tool-rendering.md # .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-19-model-facing-goal-tools.i18n.yaml # .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-19-model-facing-goal-tools.md # .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-19-model-facing-goal-tools.zh.md # .agents/notes/implemented/simplification/2026-07-04-trim-acp-bridge-unreachable-surface.md # docs/architecture.i18n.yaml # docs/cookbook/extension-cookbook.i18n.yaml # docs/cookbook/extension-cookbook.md # docs/cookbook/extension-cookbook.zh.md # docs/core-data-structures/approval.md # docs/core-data-structures/user-interaction.md # docs/event-producer-consumer.md # docs/persistence-catalog.md # docs/testing.md # docs/tool-catalog.md # examples/acp-agent/tests/fixtures/live-mode-switching-2026-07-07.session.jsonl # examples/acp-agent/tests/snapshots/cordis-inspect-jsdoc/stdout.expected.jsonl # examples/acp-agent/tests/snapshots/permission-switching/session.jsonl # packages/goal/tool-goal/README.md # packages/ui/acp/README.md # packages/ui/acp/acp-feature-support.md # packages/ui/acp/src/index.ts # packages/ui/acp/tests/bridge.spec.ts # packages/ui/acp/tests/dispose.spec.ts # packages/ui/acp/tests/edges.spec.ts # packages/ui/acp/tests/turns.spec.ts
Post-mortems
English | 中文
Incident write-ups: a bug reached a place it shouldn't have (a real user, a merged PR, a release), and the interesting part is why our process let it through, not just the one-line fix.
A post-mortem is NOT an Agent Note (which records a deliberate design decision and its rejected alternatives, or proposes future work). It is a backward-looking record of a failure: what broke, the mechanism, why every safety net missed it, and the concrete guardrails added so the same class of bug fails loudly next time.
Write one when a bug is subtle (the mechanism is non-obvious and a careful engineer would re-derive it the hard way), systemic (the reason it escaped is a gap in tests/tooling/conventions, not a one-off typo), and costly to rediscover (it cost real debugging time, and would cost it again). Link the guardrails (tests, AGENTS.md rules, ADRs) the post-mortem motivated.
Every post-mortem opens with an Executive summary: one short paragraph a busy reader can absorb in thirty seconds — what broke, the root cause in plain terms, why it escaped, and the durable lesson — before the detailed Summary / Timeline / Root cause / Guardrails sections that follow.
| # | Title |
|---|---|
| 0001 | ACP server crashed on connect: export default dropped the plugin's inject |
| 0002 | Filesystem snapshot tools were permanently disabled by a literal !!js object |