Exact-size ceilings turned every two-word wording fix into a gate event. The policy amends to: a ceiling sits at least 5% above the doc's current size (pre-rewrite) and keeps that margin when ratcheted to target — routine edits pass, real growth still trips the gate. Amended together in all four policy homes (docs/AGENTS.md § Budgets, the doc-tiers RFC, the gate script's module comment, the skill's ratchet rule) plus the manifest values, so prose and mechanics stay consistent.
4.9 KiB
name, description
| name | description |
|---|---|
| dsh-doc-standards | Use when writing, moving, reviewing, or auditing documentation in the deepseek-harness repo — choosing where content belongs, trimming doc slop, responding to a verify-doc-budgets gate failure, or requests like "improve the docs", "audit the docs for slop", "where should this be documented", "this doc is too long". |
Applying the DeepSeek Harness Documentation Standard
The contract lives in docs/AGENTS.md — the tier taxonomy, the word budgets, and the slop checklist. This skill is the workflow for applying it: placing content, auditing the corpus, and handling a red budget gate. It is guidance, not a script; keep judgment active and prefer a few well-proven fixes over a mass rewording pass.
Sources of truth (read, don't re-summarize)
- docs/AGENTS.md — the taxonomy ("one home per fact"), budgets, slop checklist.
- docs/rfc/README.md — when a decision earns an RFC and how to file it; docs/postmortem/README.md — when an incident earns a postmortem.
- docs/i18n/README.md — the bilingual pairing contract; editing either side of a pair obligates the counterpart in the same change.
- Root AGENTS.md — the standing orders whose budget discipline this skill protects.
Placing content
Run the placement test in the standard's taxonomy table, then check the constraints that make a placement expensive or wrong:
- Paired docs (
pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --list) cost a zh counterpart update and a--writere-record on every edit — prefer an unpaired home for content that will churn. - Generated catalogs are never hand-edited; if the fact belongs there, change the generator's source.
- Before renaming or moving any doc, grep for inbound references:
verify-md-linkscatches Markdown links,verify-doc-refscatchesdocs/*.mdcitations in TypeScript comments, but nothing catches heading-anchor fragments — grep#the-headingacross the repo yourself (one anchor is hardcoded inscripts/gen-cordis-catalog.ts). - A move is atomic: remove from the old home, add to the new home, and fix every inbound link in the same change.
Auditing the corpus
The audit is a hunt for the standard's slop checklist, cheapest probes first:
- Measure:
pnpm run verify-doc-budgets --list, thengit ls-files '*.md' | grep -v '^vendor/' | xargs wc -w | sort -rn | head -30to spot unbudgeted outliers. - Hunt narrated history:
rg -n -g '!vendor' -t md "no longer|used to|previously|was moved|renamed"— judge each hit; some are legitimate (quoting a contrast against a live alternative), most are drift. - Hunt duplication: take each standing-doc rule, grep one distinctive phrase from it across all Markdown; more than one home means all but one become links.
- Hunt catalog restatement: compare README event/tool tables against the generated catalogs and JSDoc; hand copies get replaced by links.
- Hunt spec-speak in
implemented/RFCs: migration plans, test checklists, future-tense "should" — an implemented RFC describes what is. - Classify each finding: a mechanical trim lands as a small PR; a restructure or removal that changes what a doc promises gets a proposed RFC first (follow dsh-find-simplifications for the RFC shape).
Compression discipline: every load-bearing rule survives — as one to three lines plus a link to the home that carries its why. Cut stories, duplicates, and status annotations; never silently drop a rule. If a cut rule has no durable home to link, create it (usually an RFC or postmortem) in the same change.
When verify-doc-budgets goes red
- Relocate: does the new content belong in a linked home (RFC, postmortem, cookbook, README) with a one-line pointer left behind?
- Condense: can existing prose in the doc pay for the addition — a story compressed to its rule, a duplicate converted to a link?
- Only then raise the ceiling: edit
scripts/doc-budgets.manifest.jsonand justify the raise explicitly in the PR description. After any rewrite that shrinks a budgeted doc, ratchet its ceiling down to the new size plus working headroom (at least 5%) in the same PR.
Validation and PR hygiene
For docs-only changes run at least pnpm run doc-sync, pnpm run lint, and git diff --check; if a paired doc was touched, update the counterpart (see dsh-translate-docs) and re-record with pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write. Open a draft PR while the audit is still expanding; in the PR body, list what was trimmed/moved with word deltas, what was deliberately kept long and why, and which checks ran. The first audit cycle's deferred work list lives in the doc-tiers-and-budgets RFC § Deferred work.