Hand fixes for the findings --fix cannot touch, mirroring the fixes
already applied on the fe-docs feature branch (same file, same shape)
so its eventual rebase resolves cleanly:
- restore the return the no-confusing-void-expression autofix ate in
useAbsentSnapshot (typed S | undefined; hook call kept for hook-order
stability, undefined returned explicitly);
- re-type DOM queries the no-unnecessary-type-assertion autofix broke:
getByRole<HTMLButtonElement>(...) generics instead of the removed
as-casts (the eslint program and the client tsconfig aggregate
disagree about these casts; the generic form satisfies both);
- justified eslint-disable for the deliberate legacy paths: keyCode 229
IME-composition detection, execCommand clipboard fallbacks, lib.dom
clipboard optionality, and the any-typed Reflect.get/this probes in
test fakes;
- drop the dead react/no-danger directive (eslint-plugin-react is not
loaded, so the rule never applied) keeping its shiki rationale;
- delete the tautological 'Z' comparison and the renameTarget null
check already implied by renameBlocked;
- css-module non-null assertions replaced by type widening
(Button className, TAG_CLASS Record) per the established pattern;
- misc: max-len comment wraps, void generic drop in the deferred test
helper, unused type imports, floating selectWorkspace promises voided,
member-delimiter newlines in inline type literals.
unbound-method flags destructuring a method-style member (method
signatures are bivariant and exempt from the this-context check).
These contract members are all plain callbacks — declare them as
property-style function types so consumers can destructure them
without a false this-binding hazard. Type-level only.
Mechanical --fix output over the newly linted .tsx files (indent,
arrow-parens, comma-dangle, member-delimiter-style, unnecessary type
assertions), plus the three generic-arrow test hooks converted to
function declarations up front: the comma-dangle fixer strips the
<T,> disambiguation comma and turns them into parse errors otherwise.
The question composer card is capped against the viewport and scrolls its
option list. `.options` is a flex column whose children defaulted to
`flex-shrink: 1`, so a short seat shrank the rows before overflowing the
scroll container: a row collapsed to its 42px minimum while `.optionCopy`
kept the taller height its wrapped copy needs, and `align-items: center`
then painted that copy outside the row's border box — over the question
title above and the next row below. Measured 6.5px of spill at 900x440 on
the shipped client, 10px at 380px tall, with `.options` reporting
scrollHeight === clientHeight and therefore offering no scrollbar.
`.option` and `.custom` now declare `flex-shrink: 0`, so the shortfall
reaches the scroll container that already owns `overflow-y: auto` — the
behavior the cap was designed for. Only rows whose copy wraps could
reproduce this, which is why the recorded scenario now asks a question
with long option descriptions; the web e2e asserts at three squeezed seat
heights that every row's children stay inside its border box, guarded
against holding vacuously by requiring a wrapped row and a scrolling list.
Both todo one-line surfaces truncate the active hint with overflow: hidden
and text-overflow: ellipsis. A "+N" appended to the first active task's name
therefore sat at the far end of the truncatable text, so a long task name or a
narrow viewport clipped exactly the part that reports the other running tasks,
leaving a parallel plan indistinguishable from a sequential one.
planSummary now returns activeContent and activeExtra as separate fields
instead of one joined activeHint, and each surface renders the count in its own
flex: none span beside the ellipsized name: .activeExtra in the collapsed plan
strip header, .extra in the todo_write row. Putting the count in front of the
name was rejected — the task name is what the reader looks for first.
The parallel-plan cases in todo-panel.spec.tsx now assert the count is a
separate element from the name, and both fail if the two are rejoined. The
assembled web snapshot re-records: the flex gap supplies the visual space, so
the transcript reads "实现 fixture 样本+1" with no space in the text nodes.
Lifting the single-in_progress cap makes a list shape reachable that the
web surfaces never received. Two sites derived their one-line summary with
todos.find(t => t.status === 'in_progress') — the collapsed TodoPanel header
and the todo_write row — which was total under the old cap and silently
dropped every active item but the first once several could match: a plan
with three running tasks collapsed to the name of one. The expanded list
was always correct, so neither PR's tests covered it.
Both sites now take planSummary in contract/todo-plan-model.ts, the
domain-shared face both the skeleton and toolviews domains may import; the
duplicated derivation was why one find could be fixed while the other
stayed wrong. The hint names the first active item and suffixes +<n> for
the rest, so the collapsed line reports how many tasks are running.
The web fixture's todo sample now runs two items in_progress, so the
assembled web transcript replays a parallel plan: the row reads
'1/4 已完成 · 实现 fixture 样本 +1' over the built bundles.
