docs: fix round-3 review findings — §/used-to/v1 residuals, zh stamp example, budget freeze honored

Delete the three §-citation residuals (web-app cordis.patch.yml, two
client design.md §-headers); recast the two CSS used-to narrations and
hmr's four v1 labels as current-state prose; narrow the zh exemption
example to 'this cut' (「本版本」 legitimately renders 'This version');
extend the candidate gate list with the post-battery shapes (§\d with a
committed-owner carve-out, 'used to', bare v1) on both sides and
re-record; honor the over-target ceiling freeze — docs/AGENTS.md
condensed to 1320 and the ceiling restored to 1320.

.agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-08-09-committed-artifact-citations.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-08-09-committed-artifact-citations.md
-2026-08-09-committed-artifact-citations.md: 890555df2968d706ba732aa8a3507bf81d187e3f
-2026-08-09-committed-artifact-citations.zh.md: 7eb446cca8fc0109814a8b2669a9a7031db9647b
+2026-08-09-committed-artifact-citations.md: 31b2d52b423a080579b3ca95cf077859d0bf4c91
+2026-08-09-committed-artifact-citations.zh.md: b69bb8743d10e2d1e194905d6d0de2d3d3667b1d

.agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-08-09-committed-artifact-citations.md

@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ One repo-wide purge applied these rules across the prose surfaces, including the
 ## Alternatives considered
 
 - **Commit the design ledgers and audit documents so the ordinals resolve.** Rejected: session transcripts are working artifacts, not maintained references; committing them would create a parallel, ungated decision corpus beside Agent Notes, and their internal numbering would still drift.
-- **A mechanical gate for the banned vocabulary.** Deferred: the vocabulary is unbounded natural language, and the audit's recall batteries need judgment to separate leakage from legitimate prose ("wait" the noun, contrastive "actually", runtime old/new states). A narrow high-precision gate (for example `\(decision \d`, `\(audit [A-Z]\d`, `\bcut \d`, `this cut`, a bare `\bT\d\b`, and `P-I`) is the candidate if the pattern recurs; review of the purge itself caught residuals in exactly those last four shapes, so they lead the candidate list.
+- **A mechanical gate for the banned vocabulary.** Deferred: the vocabulary is unbounded natural language, and the audit's recall batteries need judgment to separate leakage from legitimate prose ("wait" the noun, contrastive "actually", runtime old/new states). A narrow high-precision gate (for example `\(decision \d`, `\(audit [A-Z]\d`, `\bcut \d`, `this cut`, a bare `\bT\d\b`, `P-I`, `used to `, a bare `\bv1\b`, and `§\d` — the last excluding citations whose section numbering has a committed owner, such as web-styling.md's own §N) is the candidate if the pattern recurs; review of the purge itself caught residuals in exactly these post-battery shapes, so they lead the candidate list.
 - **Delete the rationale that cited dead artifacts.** Rejected: the factual clauses were preserved or restated; only citations, review choreography, and derivation transcripts were removed, per the prose standard's complete-proposition rule.
 
 ## Verification

.agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-08-09-committed-artifact-citations.zh.md

@@ -16,14 +16,14 @@ Status: implemented
 - 决策有已提交归属文档的设计会话序号替换为该决策的名称——曾以「决策 21」记录的序号如今是「纯文本引用决策」，归属于 [web 输入状态机 note](../architecture/2026-07-25-web-input-machine-and-slash-pipeline.md)；该序号本身在仓库内无从解析，已全部移除。没有归属文档的序号予以删除，其事实性语句改写为可独立成立的表述。
 - 已修复的回归以现在时反事实句固定下来（「没有 X 就会发生 Y」、「朴素的 X 会……」），绝不写成仓库历史（「过去曾 Y」）。
 - 已实现的 Agent Note 陈述已交付的现实：「推迟到后续 PR」的说法若其目标已经交付，就改为点名那篇已交付的 note。
-- 已录制的 fixture（测试前置数据）、快照与已归档的 Agent Note 不受此约束：已录制的模型输出与封存的历史保持原有行文。在 note 的变更故事段落内，历史阶段名称（「首版交付了 X」）属于安全的现状表述；指示性版本戳（「本版」「this cut」）在任何地方都仍被禁止。
+- 已录制的 fixture（测试前置数据）、快照与已归档的 Agent Note 不受此约束：已录制的模型输出与封存的历史保持原有行文。在 note 的变更故事段落内，历史阶段名称（「首版交付了 X」）属于安全的现状表述；指示性切次戳（"this cut"）在任何地方都仍被禁止。
 
 一次全仓库清理把这些规则应用到了各个行文表面，包括生成器持有的模板（`scripts/gen-doc-graphs.ts`、`scripts/gen-tool-catalog.ts`、typert 生成器的页面提示语，改后重新生成）、type-equiv 源码 JSDoc（改后把文档页重新粘贴）以及双语对侧文件（改后重新记录配对）。
 
 ## 曾考虑的替代方案
 
 - **把设计台账与审计文档提交入库，让序号得以解析。**不予采纳：会话 transcript 是工作产物，不是持续维护的参考资料；提交它们会在 Agent Note 之外形成一套平行且不受门禁约束的决策语料，其内部编号也仍会漂移。
-- **为被禁词汇建一道机械门禁。**暂缓：这类词汇是无界的自然语言，审计中以查全为目标的成批检索需要人工判断，才能把泄漏与正当行文区分开（作名词的「wait」、表转折的「actually」、运行时的新旧状态）。若该模式再次出现，候选方案是一道窄而高查准的门禁（例如 `\(decision \d`、`\(audit [A-Z]\d`、`\bcut \d`、`this cut`、裸 `\bT\d\b` 与 `P-I`）；对本次清扫自身的评审恰好在后四种形态中发现残留，因此它们位居候选清单之首。
+- **为被禁词汇建一道机械门禁。**暂缓：这类词汇是无界的自然语言，审计中以查全为目标的成批检索需要人工判断，才能把泄漏与正当行文区分开（作名词的「wait」、表转折的「actually」、运行时的新旧状态）。若该模式再次出现，候选方案是一道窄而高查准的门禁（例如 `\(decision \d`、`\(audit [A-Z]\d`、`\bcut \d`、`this cut`、裸 `\bT\d\b`、`P-I`、`used to `、裸 `\bv1\b` 与 `§\d`——最后一种需排除章节编号有已提交归属的引用，如 web-styling.md 自身的 §N）；对本次清扫自身的评审恰好在这些电池之外的形态中发现残留，因此它们位居候选清单之首。
 - **删除引用了失效产物的设计理由。**不予采纳：事实性语句都得到保留或改写；依行文标准的完整命题规则，删掉的只有引用、评审编排与推导过程记录。
 
 ## 验证