Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into ci/offload-coverage-to-vm-backup

This commit is contained in:
Chinesezjc
2026-07-27 15:50:35 +08:00
174 changed files with 3678 additions and 566 deletions

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-20-routed-model-context-and-compaction-policy.md: b637ba24d4ba5fc25c8cdd515a821ee97883a326
2026-07-20-routed-model-context-and-compaction-policy.zh.md: 084e762ec29ddc0aecb0bf422c147b9d3122726b
2026-07-20-routed-model-context-and-compaction-policy.md: b00c744e4ac79983a1f492d710e7b1542278c4f4
2026-07-20-routed-model-context-and-compaction-policy.zh.md: 88e26aa7a99e8deb434d9a8fd80784be410a999a

View File

@@ -14,9 +14,9 @@ Neither obvious configuration owner is sufficient. Compact-basic is optional and
### Adapters own exact-route capacity
`LlmAdapter.resolveModelContext(provider, model)` optionally returns `LlmModelContext` for one exact route. `LlmService.resolveModelContext()` selects the registered route owner, validates a positive integer `contextWindow`, and returns a detached value. The query is independent of `listModels()`: an unlisted dynamic model may have capacity metadata, and `undefined` means only that the adapter cannot describe capacity.
`LlmAdapter.resolveModel(provider, model, signal?)` returns aggregate metadata for one exact route, with optional `LlmModelContext` under its `context` field. `LlmService.resolveModelInfo()` selects the registered route owner, validates a positive integer `contextWindow`, and returns detached metadata. The query is independent of `listModels()`: an unlisted dynamic model may have capacity metadata, and an absent `context` means only that the adapter cannot describe capacity.
The hand-rolled DeepSeek adapter accepts optional `contextWindow` on each configured model plus an adapter-wide `defaultContextWindow`. Exact model capacity wins; an entry without capacity and an unlisted pass-through id inherit the adapter default, or return `undefined` when it is absent. The two built-in model entries each publish an exact 128,000-token capacity. The pi-ai adapter resolves capacity from the same catalog descriptor that authoritatively resolves the request model.
The hand-rolled DeepSeek adapter accepts optional `contextWindow` on each configured model plus an adapter-wide `defaultContextWindow`. Exact model capacity wins; an entry without capacity and an unlisted pass-through id inherit the adapter default, or omit `context` when it is absent. The two built-in model entries each publish an exact 128,000-token capacity. The pi-ai adapter resolves capacity from the same catalog descriptor that authoritatively resolves the request model.
### Token measurement remains model-agnostic

View File

@@ -14,9 +14,9 @@ Status: implemented
### 适配器拥有精确路由容量
`LlmAdapter.resolveModelContext(provider, model)` 可以为一条精确路由返回 `LlmModelContext``LlmService.resolveModelContext()` 选择已注册的路由所属方,验证 `contextWindow` 为正整数,并返回分离。该查询独立于 `listModels()`:不在目录中的动态模型也可以拥有容量元数据,而 `undefined` 只表示适配器无法描述容量。
`LlmAdapter.resolveModel(provider, model, signal?)` 返回一条精确路由的聚合元数据,其中可选的 `LlmModelContext` 位于 `context` 字段下`LlmService.resolveModelInfo()` 选择已注册的路由所属方,验证 `contextWindow` 为正整数,并返回分离的元数据。该查询独立于 `listModels()`:不在目录中的动态模型也可以拥有容量元数据,而缺少 `context` 只表示适配器无法描述容量。
手写 DeepSeek 适配器允许每个已配置模型提供可选 `contextWindow`,并支持适配器级 `defaultContextWindow`。精确模型容量优先;未提供容量的模型项与未列出的透传 id 会继承适配器默认值,若默认值也不存在则返回 `undefined`。两个内置模型项都公开精确的 128,000 token 容量。pi-ai 适配器从同一个目录描述符解析容量,该描述符也用于权威解析请求模型。
手写 DeepSeek 适配器允许每个已配置模型提供可选 `contextWindow`,并支持适配器级 `defaultContextWindow`。精确模型容量优先;未提供容量的模型项与未列出的透传 id 会继承适配器默认值,若默认值也不存在则省略 `context`。两个内置模型项都公开精确的 128,000 token 容量。pi-ai 适配器从同一个目录描述符解析容量,该描述符也用于权威解析请求模型。
### Token 计量保持模型无关

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-24-adapter-owned-reasoning-effort-capabilities.md: cc66e4ec151fcc04445a91f4a3527cbddd130c33
2026-07-24-adapter-owned-reasoning-effort-capabilities.zh.md: e0d28e1aca370068478e8fb1704defeaac3ab351

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
# Agent Note: Adapter-owned reasoning effort capabilities
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-24-adapter-owned-reasoning-effort-capabilities.zh.md)
## Problem
Reasoning strength was adapter configuration only, so a conversation could not discover or change the selected model's supported levels between requests. Promoting one adapter's level union into `dsh-llm` would make every provider and model adopt names it may not support, while a provider-specific options bag would make the loop unable to validate or durably reconstruct the effective request.
## Decision
`dsh-llm` represents a reasoning effort as the opaque branded `ReasoningEffortId`. One adapter-owned `resolveModel(provider, model, signal?)` query returns `LlmResolvedModelInfo`: exact model identity plus optional context and reasoning metadata. `LlmService.resolveModelInfo()` validates and detaches that aggregate. When present, `reasoning.efforts` is a non-empty ordered list of ids with display metadata and may name one configured default. The core requires an explicit or configured effort to appear exactly in that list and never clamps or aliases a value.
`LlmCallConfig` and `GenerateOptions` carry the optional effort. The agent loop prepares the post-`agent/request` config under the active turn signal before writing `request/header`, so defaults and dynamic changes are model-visible only after becoming durable facts. The prepared call retains the exact adapter registration across asynchronous exact-model resolution, durable header logging, and dispatch; direct `LlmService.stream()` calls likewise capture their final registration before awaiting resolution. A route with no registered adapter retains its proposed config so an `llm/stream` middleware can own and short-circuit it; terminal dispatch still rejects an unhandled route. A resumed loop retains the logged effort only when its initial provider/model route is unchanged; a route change discards the previous model's opaque id.
The native DeepSeek adapter advertises `off`, `high`, and `max` when deployment policy permits thinking, and defaults to the configured effort or `high`. Its adapter-owned `off` maps to `thinking.type: disabled` with no `reasoning_effort`; `high` and `max` enable thinking and carry their official wire effort. A `thinking: disabled` deployment publishes only `off` and rejects attempts to enable thinking before provider I/O. The pi-ai adapter publishes each exact model's `getSupportedThinkingLevels()` result unchanged, including `off`, preserves an absent profile default as a provider default, and leaves provider wire-value mapping inside pi-ai. Its common stream options represent `off` by omitting `reasoning`, as required by pi-ai's own API.
## Alternatives considered
**Define the pi-ai `ThinkingLevel` union in core.** Rejected because current pi-ai canonical names are an adapter implementation detail; a future provider can expose a different identifier without requiring a core release.
**Carry an untyped provider options object.** Rejected because the loop could neither validate a selected value nor put a stable provider-neutral fact in the request header.
**Clamp unsupported levels.** Rejected because a silent substitution makes the user's selected control differ from the logged request intent and hides stale deployment configuration.
**Normalize every adapter to a core-owned level list or remove `off`.** Rejected because the selectable vocabulary belongs to the exact model capability. A client can render an adapter's `off` option without requiring every adapter to expose it.
## Consequences
Clients can query one exact route once and render its identity, context capacity, and adapter-owned reasoning choices without knowing a global enum or synthesizing `off`. Adapter configuration remains the deployment-default and policy owner, while `agent/request` can replace the effective effort on each step within that policy. Invalid exact identity, context, or reasoning metadata fails with `INVALID_MODEL_INFO`, `INVALID_MODEL_CONTEXT`, or `INVALID_MODEL_REASONING`; unsupported explicit or configured values fail with `UNSUPPORTED_REASONING_EFFORT` before provider I/O.
The aggregate exact-model query is asynchronous and may fail for adapters backed by authoritative catalogs. Its optional signal is the caller's cancellation boundary; an asynchronous adapter must settle promptly after abort so loop disposal can reach quiescence. Keyless service, adapter, loop, session, and request-header tests pin validation, defaulting, dynamic changes, logging, resume behavior, HMR registration ownership, and cancellation; runnable snapshots pin the resolved effort in real assembled request headers, while key-gated adapter tests exercise provider serialization.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
# Agent Note适配器持有的推理强度能力
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-24-adapter-owned-reasoning-effort-capabilities.md) | 中文
## 问题
推理强度过去只能在适配器中配置,因此对话无法在多次请求之间发现或更改所选模型支持的等级。若将某个适配器的等级联合类型提升到 `dsh-llm`,所有提供方和模型都必须采用一套自身可能并不支持的名称;若改用提供方特有的 options 对象,主循环又无法校验最终生效的请求,也无法通过持久化记录准确重建该请求。
## 决策
`dsh-llm` 使用不透明的品牌类型 `ReasoningEffortId` 表示推理强度。由适配器持有的单次 `resolveModel(provider, model, signal?)` 查询返回 `LlmResolvedModelInfo`,其中包含确切模型身份以及可选的上下文和推理元数据。`LlmService.resolveModelInfo()` 会校验该聚合结果并返回分离值。`reasoning.efforts` 存在时,是包含展示元数据的非空有序 ID 列表,并可指定一个由配置确定的默认值。核心要求显式指定或配置指定的推理强度与列表中的某个 ID 完全一致,且绝不自动调整或为值提供别名。
`LlmCallConfig``GenerateOptions` 携带可选的推理强度。agent loop智能体循环在活跃轮次信号的控制下准备 `agent/request` 处理完成后的配置,再写入 `request/header`,因此默认值和动态变更只有成为持久化事实后才对模型可见。准备完成的调用在异步确切模型解析、请求头持久记录和分派全程保留同一项确切的适配器注册;直接调用 `LlmService.stream()` 时,也会在等待解析前捕获最终的适配器注册。没有已注册适配器的路由会保留原定配置,使 `llm/stream` 中间件可以接管并短路该请求;若仍未得到处理,最终分发会拒绝该路由。恢复后的主循环仅在初始提供方/模型路由未变时保留日志中记录的推理强度;如果路由发生变化,则丢弃上一模型的不透明 ID。
当部署策略允许思考时,原生 DeepSeek 适配器声明 `off``high``max`,默认使用配置指定的推理强度,若未配置则使用 `high`。由适配器持有的 `off` 映射为 `thinking.type: disabled`,且不带 `reasoning_effort``high``max` 会启用思考并携带各自的官方协议强度值。配置为 `thinking: disabled` 的部署仅声明 `off`,并会在提供方 I/O 前拒绝启用思考的尝试。pi-ai 适配器原样发布每个确切模型的 `getSupportedThinkingLevels()` 结果,其中包括 `off`profile 未指定默认值时保留提供方默认行为,并将提供方协议值的映射留在 pi-ai 内部。按照 pi-ai 自身 API 的要求,其通用流选项通过省略 `reasoning` 来表示 `off`
## 备选方案
**在核心中定义 pi-ai 的 `ThinkingLevel` 联合类型。** 不予采纳pi-ai 当前的规范名称属于适配器实现细节;未来的提供方可以暴露不同的标识符,而无需为此发布新的核心版本。
**携带无类型约束的提供方 options 对象。** 不予采纳:主循环既无法校验选定值,也无法在请求头中写入稳定且与提供方无关的事实。
**自动调整不支持的等级。** 不予采纳:静默替换会导致用户选定的控制项与日志记录的请求意图不一致,还会掩盖陈旧的部署配置。
**将每个适配器规范化为核心持有的等级列表,或移除 `off`。** 不予采纳:可选值集合属于确切模型的能力。客户端可以渲染某个适配器的 `off` 选项,而无需要求所有适配器都暴露该选项。
## 影响
客户端只需查询一次确切路由,即可渲染其身份、上下文容量和由适配器持有的推理选项,而无需了解全局枚举或自行合成 `off`。适配器配置仍是部署默认值和策略的归属方,`agent/request` 则可以在该策略范围内为每个步骤替换实际生效的推理强度。确切身份、上下文或推理元数据无效时,分别抛出 `INVALID_MODEL_INFO``INVALID_MODEL_CONTEXT``INVALID_MODEL_REASONING`;显式指定或配置指定的值不受支持时,会在提供方 I/O 前抛出 `UNSUPPORTED_REASONING_EFFORT`
确切模型元数据的聚合查询采用异步方式并且对于由权威目录支持的适配器可能失败。可选信号构成调用方的取消边界异步适配器必须在信号中止后迅速完成结算使主循环的资源释放达到完全停稳。无密钥的服务、适配器、主循环、会话和请求头测试为校验、默认值解析、动态变更、日志记录、恢复行为、HMR热模块替换期间的注册所有权和取消提供回归保障可运行快照锁定实际组装请求头中的已解析推理强度仅在有密钥时运行的适配器测试则覆盖提供方序列化。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-06-29-todo-write-tool.md: df1bee2801b0e01b290b63f6edbe2e5b1be80cb7
2026-06-29-todo-write-tool.zh.md: 7fa5cb2aad2b32ef0662df04ff6576be14a3a8e7
2026-06-29-todo-write-tool.md: 760373d64f462e3717a174d5793e6d47ab76b0b4
2026-06-29-todo-write-tool.zh.md: fd29e6049e6a729c2c7e78860ad7c065422da60e

View File

@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ The harness gives the model bash and subagent tools but no way to record a struc
## Decision
Add a model-facing `todo_write(todos: [{ content, status }])` tool whose whole-list state lives on the event-sourced session log as a new `todo/write` `SessionEventMap` variant. Interactive hosts render from the durable event; the TUI folds it directly, while the [automation-only ACP bridge](../simplification/2026-07-23-acp-automation-only-protocol.md) deliberately omits todo presentation.
Add a model-facing `todo_write(todos: [{ content, status }])` tool whose whole-list state lives on the event-sourced session log as a new `todo/write` `SessionEventMap` variant. Interactive hosts render from the durable event: the TUI folds it directly, the web client projects it into `ConversationSnapshot.todos` ([web todo display](2026-07-23-web-todo-display.md)), while the [automation-only ACP bridge](../simplification/2026-07-23-acp-automation-only-protocol.md) deliberately omits todo presentation.
### Whole-list replace, three-state status
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ The model sends the entire list every call; the new list replaces the old (last-
### State on the session log, not a service
The list is appended as a `todo/write` event carrying the full `{ todos }` snapshot. The harness is event-sourced — the LLM history, tool calls, and turn structure all live on the log — so the todo list lives there too. This buys durability, replay, and resume reconstruction for free: a reopened session re-derives the current list from the latest `todo/write`, with no separate persistence backend, in-memory service to rehydrate, or extra wiring. An in-memory `ctx.todos` service would have to reinvent all of that.
The list is appended as a `todo/write` event carrying the full `{ todos }` snapshot. The harness is event-sourced — the LLM history, tool calls, and turn structure all live on the log — so the todo list lives there too. This buys durability, replay, and resume reconstruction for free: a reopened session re-derives the current list from the latest `todo/write`, with no separate persistence backend, in-memory service to rehydrate, or extra wiring. An in-memory `ctx.todos` service would have to reinvent all of that. (Full-log consumers get this reconstruction outright; the web client's paged window gets it from the tail history page's host-computed projection — see the [web todo display note](2026-07-23-web-todo-display.md).)
### NOT a surface event

View File

@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ harness 为模型提供了 bash 和 subagent 工具,却没有办法记录结
## 决策
新增一个面向模型的 `todo_write(todos: [{ content, status }])` 工具,其整列表状态作为新的 `todo/write` `SessionEventMap` 变体存储在事件溯源的会话日志上。交互式宿主从持久事件渲染TUI 直接折叠它,而[仅面向自动化的 ACPAgent Client Protocol桥接层](../simplification/2026-07-23-acp-automation-only-protocol.md)有意省略 todo 展示。
新增一个面向模型的 `todo_write(todos: [{ content, status }])` 工具,其整列表状态作为新的 `todo/write` `SessionEventMap` 变体存储在事件溯源的会话日志上。交互式宿主从持久事件渲染TUI 直接折叠它,web 客户端将其投影进 `ConversationSnapshot.todos`[web todo 展示](2026-07-23-web-todo-display.md)而[仅面向自动化的 ACPAgent Client Protocol桥接层](../simplification/2026-07-23-acp-automation-only-protocol.md)有意省略 todo 展示。
### 整列表替换,三态 status
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ harness 为模型提供了 bash 和 subagent 工具,却没有办法记录结
### 状态在会话日志上,而非服务
列表作为 `todo/write` 事件追加到日志,携带完整的 `{ todos }` 快照。harness 是事件溯源的——LLM大语言模型历史、工具调用和轮次结构都在日志上——所以 todo 列表也在那里。这免费获得了持久性、回放和恢复重建:重新打开的会话从最新的 `todo/write` 重新推导当前列表,无需独立的持久化后端、无需重新注水的内存服务、无需额外接线。一个内存中的 `ctx.todos` 服务需要重新发明以上所有。
列表作为 `todo/write` 事件追加到日志,携带完整的 `{ todos }` 快照。harness 是事件溯源的——LLM大语言模型历史、工具调用和轮次结构都在日志上——所以 todo 列表也在那里。这免费获得了持久性、回放和恢复重建:重新打开的会话从最新的 `todo/write` 重新推导当前列表,无需独立的持久化后端、无需重新注水的内存服务、无需额外接线。一个内存中的 `ctx.todos` 服务需要重新发明以上所有。(全量 log 消费者直接获得这份重建web 客户端的分页窗口则从尾页 history 携带的 host 计算投影获得——见 [web todo 展示 Note](2026-07-23-web-todo-display.md)。)
### 不是 surface 事件

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-17-dedicated-full-screen-tui-front-door.md: aac67ffec89606d04d5abfd233d0469e2241b102
2026-07-17-dedicated-full-screen-tui-front-door.zh.md: 0f64e2ce14b18d315f75913b82c731e77758e377
2026-07-17-dedicated-full-screen-tui-front-door.md: 8d7c7b00c8d9b15ea3f2419ed44ca88209e60dad
2026-07-17-dedicated-full-screen-tui-front-door.zh.md: 49e9541c9f98c9f3beba11945ff452fc38bd9ede

View File

@@ -22,9 +22,9 @@ The selected front door receives the exact generated or resumed `SessionId` used
The TUI rebuilds the transcript from the active `session.surface` and reprojects it whenever an event carries a `surfaceOp`, so resumed and compacted history matches the model-visible conversation. It renders Markdown text and reasoning, token totals, the latest `todo/write` plan, and tool cards produced through each tool definition's `presentCall` and `presentResult` methods. Long card bodies retain a configurable head/tail preview with the hidden-line count; one terminal control expands or collapses every card. Pending chunks and tool calls update the same components that completed events settle.
Editor input calls `agent.send()` while idle and `agent.steer()` while a turn is running. Cancellation, reasoning visibility, tool-card expansion, redraw, transcript clearing, and exit are terminal-only controls. The idle footer derives context occupancy from `tokenMeter` and shows the selected model; during a run, elapsed activity and the Escape interrupt hint replace that summary. `/status` remains available in either state and appends a detailed terminal-only snapshot: session identity and timestamps, selected model and reasoning visibility, lifecycle counts folded from the event log, the same deduplicated usage buckets and KV-cache rate as the footer, and context use from `tokenMeter` plus the selected model's advertised capacity. The plugin registers the shared `userInteraction` provider and presents queued questions in a wide bottom-left keyboard panel with batch progress, numbered options, and aligned descriptions; agent behavior and answer logging remain owned by their existing services.
Editor input calls `agent.send()` while idle and `agent.steer()` while a turn is running. Cancellation, reasoning visibility, tool-card expansion, redraw, transcript clearing, and exit are terminal-only controls. The idle footer derives context occupancy from `tokenMeter` and shows the selected model and explicit reasoning effort; during a run, elapsed activity and the Escape interrupt hint replace that summary. `/status` remains available in either state and appends a detailed terminal-only snapshot: session identity and timestamps, selected model, reasoning effort/default state and reasoning visibility, lifecycle counts folded from the event log, the same deduplicated usage buckets and KV-cache rate as the footer, and context use from `tokenMeter` plus the selected model's advertised capacity. The plugin registers the shared `userInteraction` provider and presents queued questions in a wide bottom-left keyboard panel with batch progress, numbered options, and aligned descriptions; agent behavior and answer logging remain owned by their existing services.
The `/model` command presents the advisory `ctx.llm` catalog as a keyboard selector and changes only this TUI session's target; argument forms remain available for direct selection. Agent-scoped prompt-assembly and request waterfalls snapshot one provider/model pair per step, so `{{provider}}` / `{{model}}` interpolation and request routing cannot split when a command arrives during assembly. The latest logged request header restores a used target; a selection that never reaches a request remains process-local.
The `/model` command presents the advisory `ctx.llm` catalog as a keyboard selector and changes only this TUI session's target; argument forms remain available for direct selection. Each model row owns the adapter-advertised reasoning-effort order and default: Shift+Tab cycles that row's efforts, includes provider-default behavior when the adapter advertises no default, and leaves models without selectable metadata unchanged. Agent-scoped prompt-assembly and request waterfalls snapshot one provider/model/reasoning-effort target per step, so `{{provider}}` / `{{model}}` interpolation and request routing cannot split when a command arrives during assembly. The latest logged request header restores a used target; a selection that never reaches a request remains process-local.
### Terminal ownership
@@ -49,4 +49,4 @@ The implemented [TUI terminal-state snapshot Agent Note](../testing/2026-07-18-t
- The TUI carries a pi-tui dependency and a strict TTY requirement; non-TTY deployments use the Headless app or a structured protocol.
- Session projection makes resume and compaction consistent with the durable conversation, but one configured session owns the transcript and editor.
- Tool packages extend terminal cards through their existing presentation methods without adding tool-specific branches to the TUI.
- Model selection uses adapter-advertised metadata without turning catalog membership into request validation; unused selections are not durable state.
- Model and reasoning-effort selection use adapter-advertised metadata without turning catalog membership into request validation; unused selections are not durable state.

View File

@@ -22,9 +22,9 @@ DeepSeek Harness 将 [`@deepseek-ai/dsh-tui`](../../../../packages/ui/tui/README
TUI 从活跃的 `session.surface` 重建 transcript文本记录并在事件携带 `surfaceOp` 时重新投影因此恢复或压缩后的历史与模型可见会话保持一致。TUI 渲染 Markdown 文本与推理、token 用量、最新 `todo/write` 计划,以及各工具定义通过 `presentCall``presentResult` 方法生成的工具卡片。较长的工具卡片正文会保留可配置的头尾预览,并显示隐藏行数;一个终端控制可以展开或收起全部卡片。进行中的分片与工具调用会更新同一组组件,随后由完成事件收束状态。
agent 空闲时,编辑器输入调用 `agent.send()`;轮次运行中则调用 `agent.steer()`。取消、推理显隐、工具卡片展开、重绘、清空 transcript 和退出都只是终端控制。空闲态页脚根据 `tokenMeter` 得出上下文占用率并显示所选模型agent 运行期间,该摘要会替换为带已用时长的活动指示和 Escape 中断提示。`/status` 在这两种状态下均可用,并会追加一份仅在终端显示的详细快照,其中包括会话标识与时间戳、所选模型及推理显隐状态、从事件日志归并得出的生命周期计数、与页脚一致的去重用量分项和 KV 缓存命中率,以及 `tokenMeter` 给出的上下文用量和所选模型公布的容量。插件注册共享的 `userInteraction` 提供方在左下角宽幅键盘操作面板中呈现排队的问题面板显示批次进度、带编号的选项和对齐的描述agent 行为和答案日志仍由既有服务负责。
agent 空闲时,编辑器输入调用 `agent.send()`;轮次运行中则调用 `agent.steer()`。取消、推理显隐、工具卡片展开、重绘、清空 transcript 和退出都只是终端控制。空闲态页脚根据 `tokenMeter` 得出上下文占用率,并显示所选模型和显式选定的推理强度agent 运行期间,该摘要会替换为带已用时长的活动指示和 Escape 中断提示。`/status` 在这两种状态下均可用,并会追加一份仅在终端显示的详细快照,其中包括会话标识与时间戳、所选模型、推理强度(或默认状态)及推理显隐状态、从事件日志归并得出的生命周期计数、与页脚一致的去重用量分项和 KV 缓存命中率,以及 `tokenMeter` 给出的上下文用量和所选模型公布的容量。插件注册共享的 `userInteraction` 提供方在左下角宽幅键盘操作面板中呈现排队的问题面板显示批次进度、带编号的选项和对齐的描述agent 行为和答案日志仍由既有服务负责。
`/model` 命令将建议性的 `ctx.llm` 目录呈现为键盘选择器,并且只更改当前 TUI 会话的目标带参数的形式仍可直接选择目标。agent 作用域内的 prompt 组装和请求两条 waterfall瀑布式事件会为每个 step 快照一次同一个提供方/模型字段组合,因此即使命令在组装期间到达,`{{provider}}` / `{{model}}` 插值与请求路由也不会分裂。系统通过日志中最新的请求头恢复已经使用过的目标;未被请求使用的选择只保留在当前进程中。
`/model` 命令将建议性的 `ctx.llm` 目录呈现为键盘选择器,并且只更改当前 TUI 会话的目标;带参数的形式仍可直接选择目标。每个模型行都持有适配器公布的推理强度顺序和默认值:按 Shift+Tab 可循环切换该行的推理强度;如果适配器没有公布默认值,循环中还会包含提供方默认行为;没有可选元数据的模型则保持不变。agent 作用域内的 prompt 组装和请求两条 waterfall瀑布式事件会为每个步骤快照一次同一个提供方/模型/推理强度目标,因此即使命令在组装期间到达,`{{provider}}` / `{{model}}` 插值与请求路由也不会分裂。系统通过日志中最新的请求头恢复已经使用过的目标;未被请求使用的选择只保留在当前进程中。
### 终端所有权
@@ -49,4 +49,4 @@ agent 空闲时,编辑器输入调用 `agent.send()`;轮次运行中则调
- TUI 会引入 pi-tui 依赖并严格要求 TTY非 TTY 部署使用 Headless app 或结构化协议。
- 会话投影使恢复和压缩与持久会话保持一致,但只有一个已配置会话拥有 transcript 和编辑器。
- 工具包通过既有呈现方法扩展终端卡片,无需在 TUI 中增加工具专用分支。
- 模型选择使用适配器提供的目录元数据,但不会把目录成员关系变成请求校验;未使用的选择不属于持久化状态。
- 模型和推理强度选择使用适配器公布的元数据,但不会把目录成员关系变成请求校验;未使用的选择不属于持久化状态。

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-23-web-todo-display.md
2026-07-23-web-todo-display.md: 830f55c86c893c4942a1a9d3b8529395d5f5e38b
2026-07-23-web-todo-display.zh.md: e68928d7eddaaa92ac831722a738ee2002342b38

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
# Agent Note: Web todo display — snapshot side-effect channel + two render surfaces
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-23-web-todo-display.zh.md)
## Problem
`todo_write` appends `todo/write` whole-list snapshots to the session log; the TUI renders a persistent plan panel (the automation-only ACP bridge deliberately omits todo presentation). The web client dropped the event entirely: the host mux stream already forwards every session event, but `todo/write` is not a surface type (it never folds into `ConversationSnapshot.nodes`), and no side-effect branch accumulated it — the browser had no consumption point and no display surface.
## Decision
Consume `todo/write` as a Session side effect, not a surface node, and render it on two surfaces matching the split the TUI already draws.
### Side-effect channel, converging with window replay
`applyEventSideEffects` gains a `todo/write` case (whole list, last write wins). Unlike partial/openCalls, `rebuildDerivedFromWindow` deliberately does NOT reset it: the value is session-level — taken from the tail history page's full-log projection — and an arbitrary window may not contain the latest write, so an older-page prepend keeps it and only an in-window or live write overwrites it. Every `installWindow` caller is a tail request (`doOpen`, its gap re-pull, `repairGap`; `loadOlder` prepends without it), which the host answers with the projection or omits it only when the full log holds no `todo/write` — so an absent field is the authoritative empty list and is assigned as such. That distinction matters on rollback: a live write whose host crashed before persisting leaves the log empty, and preserving the prior value instead would strand the rolled-back plan on screen indefinitely. `ConversationSnapshot.todos` is the read surface. This follows the event's own contract ("log-only UI state; never derived history"): surfacing each write as a conversation node would render superseded lists as if they were still standing.
### TodoPanel: the durable list as a persistent strip
The panel mounts through the `conversation.input.dock` slot (a plain registrant plugin, `todoDockEntry`, the QueueDock posture: `inject: ['slots', 'conversation']` as the load-order seam, `order: -1` above the queue rows), hidden while empty, collapsible with the in-progress item as the collapsed one-line hint; ✓/●/○ glyphs mirror the TUI plan panel. It reads `snapshot.todos` via the standard-kit `useSession` hook the dock entry receives — no store, no service, no ctx. The inner component stays props-complete and framework-free; the dock adapter is a one-line wrapper.
### TodoRow: the per-call row through the keyed toolview slot
The dedicated `todo_write` chat row is a plain registrant plugin (`todoToolview`, mounted from `apply`) that registers into the keyed `conversation.chat.toolview` slot via `ctx.slots.register` — the same seam and load-order posture as the bash sample (`inject: ['slots', 'conversation']`), but a product registration. The summary derives from call args (`N/M done · active item`); unparseable args fall back to the generic row summary; clicking opens the details column with the raw args. No `ToolEventView` is added for todo — presentation is client-owned, and the durable list renders from the session event, not the tool card.
## Alternatives considered
- **Fold todo writes into `nodes` as surface entries** — replayed windows would render every superseded list; the event is deliberately not a surface type.
- **Hardcoding the panel inside `ConversationRoot`** — the original landing spot before the input-dock slot existed; the dock is the architecture's home for always-on strips above the composer, and a hardcode bypasses the slot registry's disposal and ordering.
- **Details column for the panel** — the details slot is single-occupant and selection-driven, a different lifetime than an always-on strip.
- **Host-computed view (a todo `ToolEventView`)** — presentation belongs to the client; the wire already carries the whole snapshot in the event payload.
## Consequences
Replay correctness is owned by one code path: any future change to window rebuild keeps todos consistent for free, and the fixture (fx-alpha turn 65) plus the assembled keyless snapshot (`apps/web/tests/todo-display.snapshot.ts`) pin the full chain (row summary and state, dock panel content, collapse round-trip) over the built client graph. `todos` is a required `ConversationSnapshot` field, so scripted fakes in specs must carry it. The TUI panel is untouched (the automation-only ACP bridge deliberately omits todo presentation); the web surfaces render the same event, adding one wire field and no new event type. That field is how cold-load reconstruction stays host-backed: the tail history page carries `todos` — the full-log latest `todo/write`, computed independently of the page window (the same backscan posture the view pairing uses) — so a reopened session restores the plan even when the last write precedes the window; that value survives an older-page prepend, is overwritten by any later write, and resets to empty when a tail response carries no projection.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
# Agent Note: Web todo 展示——快照副作用通道 + 两个渲染面
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-23-web-todo-display.md) | 中文
## Problem
`todo_write``todo/write` 的整份列表快照追加进会话日志TUI 渲染一块常驻的 plan 面板(自动化专用的 ACP 桥接刻意不做 todo 呈现。Web 客户端把这个事件整个丢弃了host mux 流本已转发每一个会话事件,但 `todo/write` 不是 surface 类型(它从不 fold 进 `ConversationSnapshot.nodes`),也没有任何副作用分支累积它——浏览器既无消费点,也无展示面。
## Decision
`todo/write` 当作 Session 副作用消费,而非 surface 节点,并在两个面上渲染它,这两个面正对应 TUI 已经绘制的那套划分。
### 副作用通道,与窗口回放收敛
`applyEventSideEffects` 新增一个 `todo/write` 分支(整份列表,后写覆盖先写)。与 partial/openCalls 不同,`rebuildDerivedFromWindow` 刻意不重置它:该值是会话级的——取自尾页 history 携带的全量 log 投影——而任意窗口未必包含最近一次写入,因此往前翻页保留它,只有窗口内或实时的写入才会覆盖。`installWindow` 的每个调用方都是尾页请求(`doOpen`、其补洞重拉、`repairGap``loadOlder` 只往前拼接、不走它),而 host 对尾页请求要么带上投影、要么仅在全量 log 没有任何 `todo/write` 时省略——因此字段缺失就是权威的空列表,直接照此赋值。这个区分在回滚场景上要紧:实时写入若在 host 持久化前崩溃log 里就是空的,此时保留旧值会让已回滚的计划永远留在屏幕上。`ConversationSnapshot.todos` 是读取面。这遵循事件自身的契约(「仅日志 UI 状态,绝非派生历史」):把每次写入作为对话节点呈现,会让已被取代的列表看起来仍然有效。
### TodoPanel长驻列表作为一条常驻横条
面板经 `conversation.input.dock` slot 挂载(普通注册者插件 `todoDockEntry`QueueDock 同款姿势:`inject: ['slots', 'conversation']` 载序 seam`order: -1` 排在队列条上方),空列表时隐藏,可折叠——折叠态以进行中项作为单行提示;✓/●/○ 字形与 TUI plan 面板一致。它经 dock entry 收到的标准件 `useSession` hook 读取 `snapshot.todos`——无 store、无 service、无 ctx。内部组件保持 props 完备且框架无关dock 适配件只是一行包装。
### TodoRow经 keyed toolview slot 的逐调用行
专用的 `todo_write` 对话行是一个普通注册者插件(`todoToolview`,由 `apply` 挂载),经 `ctx.slots.register` 注册进 keyed 的 `conversation.chat.toolview` slot——与 bash 样例同一接缝、同一载序姿态(`inject: ['slots', 'conversation']`),但属产品级注册。摘要由调用 args 推导(`N/M done · active item`);无法解析的 args 回退到通用行摘要;点击会以原始 args 打开 details 列。todo 不新增任何 `ToolEventView`——呈现归客户端所有,常驻列表从会话事件渲染,而非工具卡。
## Alternatives considered
- **把 todo 写入作为 surface 条目折叠进 `nodes`**——回放的窗口会渲染每一份已被取代的列表;该事件被刻意设计成非 surface 类型。
- **面板硬编码进 `ConversationRoot`**——input-dock slot 出现之前的原始落点dock 是本架构给"composer 上方常开横条"安排的家,硬编码绕开了 slot 注册表的 disposal 与定序。
- **面板放进 details 列**——details slot 单占用且由选中驱动,生命周期不同于一条常开横条。
- **host 计算的视图(一个 todo `ToolEventView`**——呈现属于客户端;协议已在事件载荷里携带整份快照。
## Consequences
回放正确性由一条代码路径掌管:未来对窗口重建的任何改动都免费保持 todos 一致fx-alpha 第 65 轮的 fixture测试前置数据加 assembled keyless snapshot`apps/web/tests/todo-display.snapshot.ts`在构建产物客户端全图上钉住整条链行摘要与状态、dock 面板内容、折叠往返)。`todos``ConversationSnapshot` 的必填字段,所以 spec 里脚本化的 fake 必须带上它。TUI 面板未受改动(自动化专用的 ACP 桥接刻意不做 todo 呈现Web 各面渲染同一个事件,只新增一个协议字段,不新增事件类型。冷加载重建正是靠这个字段由 host 兜底history 尾页附带 `todos`——全量 log 上最新一次 `todo/write` 的投影,独立于分页窗口计算(与 view 配对同一种 backscan 姿势)——因此重开会话时即使最后一次写入落在窗口之前,计划也照常恢复;该值跨往前翻页保留,之后的任何写入照常覆盖,而尾页响应不带投影时复位为空。

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-24-web-gui-browser-e2e-lane.md: c4e34b3f44162c7021cb25681eea7e49ac78f672
2026-07-24-web-gui-browser-e2e-lane.zh.md: 466e1c0fc16aac21b87b68cfedaec4fb22a417e2
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/testing/2026-07-24-web-gui-browser-e2e-lane.md
2026-07-24-web-gui-browser-e2e-lane.md: d9e0a9660ecd6aeb75e835e68f92c0a268423872
2026-07-24-web-gui-browser-e2e-lane.zh.md: e8c7d1c4596f20d88bd08423549fb6a9f7b0654b

View File

@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ A plain shared-fixture module (the [testing-policy sanctioned shape](../../../..
`launchWebScaffold()` boots the real web composition from the shipped `apps/cli/cordis.yml` through the vendored Loader's include mechanism — the same tree and mechanism `AppCLIEntry` drives for `dsh web`. Divergences ride include patches over that tree, the ACP `cordis.snapshot.yml` pattern expressed in-process: temp `persistenceRoot`, `workspace-context` disabled (recorded fixtures must not embed this repo's AGENTS.md), `session-title-llm` disabled (its fire-and-forget title call would race the loop for the session's replay cursor), the webserver row pinned to port 0 with the built dist, and in keyless modes `llm-deepseek` disabled. A patch id that stops matching a row fails the boot sweep loudly instead of drifting. The boot runs `chdir`'d to the temp workspace so the api-gateway's `process.cwd()` session default, tool cwds, and fixtures agree; the `dsh web` bin's own glue (argv, profile json, AppCLIEntry) stays held by the keyless CLI smokes in `smoke-real.e2e.ts`. Setup rollback and ordinary close both dispose the Cordis tree before removing the two owned temp roots, attempt every cleanup independently, and report cleanup failures without masking the setup failure.
Keyless model displacement is the disabled adapter row plus `installLlmReplay` filling the open seam on the settled root ctx in providers-catalog mode — never catch-all: with the adapter row disabled no adapter exists, so catch-all would leave `resolveModelContext` unroutable and `compact-basic`'s post-step pressure check would warn every step instead of being provably inert (the published 128k `contextWindow` keeps it inert for small fixtures). The direct install rather than an inserted replay plugin row is deliberate: it returns the `ReplayHandle` the teardown consumption check needs. A scenario with no fixture leaves the seam empty, so a stray stream fails loud with NO_ADAPTER.
Keyless model displacement is the disabled adapter row plus `installLlmReplay` filling the open seam on the settled root ctx in providers-catalog mode — never catch-all: with the adapter row disabled no adapter exists, so catch-all would leave `resolveModelInfo` unroutable and `compact-basic`'s post-step pressure check would warn every step instead of being provably inert (the published 128k `contextWindow` keeps it inert for small fixtures). The direct install rather than an inserted replay plugin row is deliberate: it returns the `ReplayHandle` the teardown consumption check needs. A scenario with no fixture leaves the seam empty, so a stray stream fails loud with NO_ADAPTER.
`seedSession()` seeds cold sessions through the real persistence API — a throwaway `Context` mounting `SessionStore` + `SessionPersistenceJsonl` against the host's root, `create()` + `append()`, one `utimes` backdate for deterministic sidebar order (the `semantic-checkpoint.snapshot.ts` precedent) — never raw file writes, so the seeder knows nothing of bucket hashing, filename encoding, or compression, and the host's zstd default needs no boot knob. Seeds are validated at seed time (parseable, ending in `turn/end` — an open final turn would be mutated by resume's crash repair).

View File

@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ Web GUI 以一条真实组装链交付——chromium 页面 → client 插件 bu
`launchWebScaffold()` 通过 vendored Loader 的 include 机制,从交付的 `apps/cli/cordis.yml` 启动真实 web 组合——与 `AppCLIEntry``dsh web` 驱动的是同一棵树、同一套机制。差异全部经 include patch 覆盖在这棵树上,即 ACP `cordis.snapshot.yml` 模式的进程内表达:临时 `persistenceRoot`;禁用 `workspace-context`(录制的 fixture 不得嵌入本仓库的 AGENTS.md禁用 `session-title-llm`其发后不管的标题调用会与循环争抢会话的回放游标webserver 行钉到端口 0 加已构建 dist无密钥模式下禁用 `llm-deepseek`。patch 的 id 一旦不再匹配任何行boot 扫描会大声失败而不是漂移。boot 在临时工作区 `chdir` 下运行,使 api-gateway 的 `process.cwd()` 会话默认值、工具 cwd 与 fixture 一致;`dsh web` bin 自身的胶水argv、profile json、AppCLIEntry仍由 `smoke-real.e2e.ts` 中的无密钥 CLI 冒烟把守。初始化回滚和正常关闭都会先对 Cordis 树执行 dispose资源释放再删除 scaffold 持有的两个临时根目录;每项清理都会独立尝试,并会报告清理失败而不掩盖初始化失败。
无密钥的模型替换 = 禁用适配器行的 patch 加 `installLlmReplay` 在停稳的根 ctx 上以提供方目录providers-catalog模式填充开放的 seam——绝不用 catch-all适配器行被禁用后不存在任何适配器catch-all 会让 `resolveModelContext` 无路由可走,`compact-basic` 的步后压力检查将步步告警,而不是被可证明地闲置(发布的 128k `contextWindow` 使该路径对小 fixture 保持闲置)。选择直接安装而非插入回放插件行是刻意的:直接安装返回收尾消费检查所需的 `ReplayHandle`。没有 fixture 的场景让 seam 保持空置,任何离群的流式调用都会以 NO_ADAPTER 大声失败。
无密钥的模型替换 = 禁用适配器行的 patch 加 `installLlmReplay` 在停稳的根 ctx 上以提供方目录providers-catalog模式填充开放的 seam——绝不用 catch-all适配器行被禁用后不存在任何适配器catch-all 会让 `resolveModelInfo` 无路由可走,`compact-basic` 的步后压力检查将步步告警,而不是被可证明地闲置(发布的 128k `contextWindow` 使该路径对小 fixture 保持闲置)。选择直接安装而非插入回放插件行是刻意的:直接安装返回收尾消费检查所需的 `ReplayHandle`。没有 fixture 的场景让 seam 保持空置,任何离群的流式调用都会以 NO_ADAPTER 大声失败。
`seedSession()` 通过真实持久化 API 播种冷会话——一次性 `Context` 挂载 `SessionStore` + `SessionPersistenceJsonl` 指向 host 的根目录,`create()` + `append()`,一次 `utimes` 回拨保证侧栏顺序确定(`semantic-checkpoint.snapshot.ts` 先例——绝不裸写文件因此播种器对桶哈希、文件名编码、压缩一无所知host 的 zstd 默认值也无需任何启动开关。种子在播种时即校验(可解析、以 `turn/end` 结尾——未闭合的最终轮次会被恢复resume的崩溃修复改写