refactor(agent): align delivery method names

This commit is contained in:
Turtle
2026-07-24 15:08:36 +08:00
parent 9848a9542b
commit b02b438667
113 changed files with 462 additions and 405 deletions

View File

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ When an interface documents two valid ways to signal something — an adapter ma
## Async state is not synchronous state
`agent.send()` does not flip status before returning; a background task's completion races turn boundaries; `reader.close()` fires for both EOF and disposal. Never gate control flow on a status you only just requested — drive lifecycle off the events/promises that actually fire (`agent/status`, `task.done`), and observe the transition (saw `running` THEN `idle`) instead of treating status as a per-send result: several queued sends run as consecutive turns under one `running` interval, while cancellation or disposal can discard unstarted items. The guard cuts both ways: if the awaited transition can never occur (EOF with no work submitted → never `running`), the wait hangs — handle the "nothing to wait for" branch explicitly.
`agent.followup()` does not flip status before returning; a background task's completion races turn boundaries; `reader.close()` fires for both EOF and disposal. Never gate control flow on a status you only just requested — drive lifecycle off the events/promises that actually fire (`agent/status`, `task.done`), and observe the transition (saw `running` THEN `idle`) instead of treating status as a per-follow-up result: several queued follow-ups run as consecutive turns under one `running` interval, while cancellation or disposal can discard unstarted items. The guard cuts both ways: if the awaited transition can never occur (EOF with no work submitted → never `running`), the wait hangs — handle the "nothing to wait for" branch explicitly.
## Dispose must reach quiescence, not just request it