fix(subagent): close continuation lifecycle gaps

This commit is contained in:
Dudu-0223
2026-07-30 21:21:14 +08:00
committed by Tianyi Cui
parent 853f4d5cfb
commit a91b20f6be
29 changed files with 365 additions and 142 deletions

View File

@@ -341,7 +341,7 @@ interface SubagentProvider {
}
```
Provider `start()` fulfills only with a ready run. The service mints a unique `runId`, snapshots `local` from the provider's exact `localAgent`, observes the result, emits `subagent/start`, and returns the same run; rejection implies provider cleanup and emits no lifecycle pair. Each continuable Activation emits the same observe-only pair for its residency epoch, so a cold resume is a new epoch with its own `runId`. The paired `subagent/end` carries the same identity and the final output or infrastructure failure. Both events are observe-only and contain listener exceptions.
Provider `start()` fulfills only with a ready run. The service mints a unique `runId`, snapshots `local` from the provider's exact `localAgent`, observes the result, emits `subagent/start`, and returns the same run; rejection implies provider cleanup and emits no lifecycle pair. Each continuable Activation emits the same observe-only pair for its residency epoch, so a cold resume is a new epoch with its own `runId`. The paired `subagent/end` carries the same identity and the final output or infrastructure failure. Both events are observe-only and contain listener exceptions. Their `provider` field is provenance for the run or Activation epoch, not a claim that the provider remains registered when the edge is emitted.
## In-process backends: depth and seed