mirror of
https://github.com/deepseek-ai/deepseek-harness
synced 2026-08-15 21:04:50 +00:00
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into worktree/pr975-retarget-20260730
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
|
||||
user-interaction.md: 798a9790f424683775284a98421be08e6e1399e3
|
||||
user-interaction.zh.md: 12bfcffe4fe4caaacb54e90126eac55e333d64a5
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write docs/core-data-structures/user-interaction.md
|
||||
user-interaction.md: 2483382eee07d379b13d456149096c8afab70e4b
|
||||
user-interaction.zh.md: 57f57277975597fff712705cc741ae8e78643642
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -20,6 +20,30 @@ interface AskUserQuestionOption {
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Presentation intent
|
||||
|
||||
`AskUserQuestionIntent` is the optional declaration that a question IS a decision of a known shape. It is tagged on `kind` so intents can be added; a UI that does not recognise a tag renders the generic option list. An intent shapes presentation only — a UI honouring it answers with the same option labels a generic UI would send, so the caller reads one answer shape either way. `approve` names the affirmative option instead of relying on option order. `ask()` rejects the two assertions no type can carry: an `approve` naming none of its own question's options, and an intent on a question with no `detail`.
|
||||
|
||||
```ts type-equiv
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* A caller-declared presentation intent: the question IS a decision of this
|
||||
* shape, so a UI that recognises the tag may present it as such instead of as a
|
||||
* generic option list. Tagged so further intents can be added; a UI that does
|
||||
* not know a tag renders the generic flow, and the answer encoding is identical
|
||||
* either way — an intent shapes presentation only, never the protocol.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
type AskUserQuestionIntent = {
|
||||
/** A plan submitted for review: `detail` is the plan markdown `ask()` requires, and the decision approves or declines it. */
|
||||
kind: 'plan-review'
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* The option label that approves the plan; every other option declines it.
|
||||
* Named rather than positional so no UI infers the verdict from option order.
|
||||
* An `approve` naming no option of its own question is rejected at `ask()`.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
approve: string
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Question item
|
||||
|
||||
`AskUserQuestionItem` is one question in a request. The caller supplies a stable `id`, which is echoed back with the answer so batched questions remain routable. Optional `detail` carries supporting text that providers render with the question but keep out of selectable option labels.
|
||||
@@ -39,6 +63,8 @@ interface AskUserQuestionItem {
|
||||
options?: AskUserQuestionOption[]
|
||||
/** Whether more than one option may be selected. Defaults to single-select. */
|
||||
multiSelect?: boolean
|
||||
/** Optional presentation intent for capable UIs; absent asks for the generic option list. */
|
||||
intent?: AskUserQuestionIntent
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -20,6 +20,30 @@ interface AskUserQuestionOption {
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## 呈现意图
|
||||
|
||||
`AskUserQuestionIntent` 是一项可选声明:某个问题本身就是一次已知形状的决定。它按 `kind` 打标签,因此意图可以扩充;不认识某个标签的 UI 渲染通用选项列表。意图只塑造呈现 —— 遵循它的 UI 回答的仍是通用 UI 会发送的那些 option label,因此调用方两种情况下读到的都是同一种回答形态。`approve` 指名肯定选项,而不依赖选项顺序。有两项断言是任何类型都承载不了的,`ask()` 会拒绝它们:`approve` 未命中该问题自身的任一选项,以及意图落在没有 `detail` 的问题上。
|
||||
|
||||
```ts type-equiv
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* A caller-declared presentation intent: the question IS a decision of this
|
||||
* shape, so a UI that recognises the tag may present it as such instead of as a
|
||||
* generic option list. Tagged so further intents can be added; a UI that does
|
||||
* not know a tag renders the generic flow, and the answer encoding is identical
|
||||
* either way — an intent shapes presentation only, never the protocol.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
type AskUserQuestionIntent = {
|
||||
/** A plan submitted for review: `detail` is the plan markdown `ask()` requires, and the decision approves or declines it. */
|
||||
kind: 'plan-review'
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* The option label that approves the plan; every other option declines it.
|
||||
* Named rather than positional so no UI infers the verdict from option order.
|
||||
* An `approve` naming no option of its own question is rejected at `ask()`.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
approve: string
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## 问题条目
|
||||
|
||||
`AskUserQuestionItem` 是请求中的一个问题。调用方提供稳定的 `id`,它会随答案原样返回,使批量问题仍可路由。可选的 `detail` 携带辅助文本;提供方会将其随问题渲染,但不会放入可选 option label。
|
||||
@@ -39,6 +63,8 @@ interface AskUserQuestionItem {
|
||||
options?: AskUserQuestionOption[]
|
||||
/** Whether more than one option may be selected. Defaults to single-select. */
|
||||
multiSelect?: boolean
|
||||
/** Optional presentation intent for capable UIs; absent asks for the generic option list. */
|
||||
intent?: AskUserQuestionIntent
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user