DeepSeek/deepseek-harness
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/deepseek-ai/deepseek-harness synced 2026-08-15 21:04:50 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

docs(rfc): classify RFCs by kind via path-encoded subdirectories

Browse Source 
Add a second axis to every RFC — its class (feature, bug-fix,
simplification, architecture, process, testing) — encoded in the path
as docs/rfc/{lifecycle}/{class}/file.md. The folder is the label, so
the closed set is enforced by structure rather than a parsed field.

Two new doc-sync gates back it:
- verify-rfc-classification: every RFC sits in a valid class folder and
  the README index lists it under the matching lifecycle→class heading.
- verify-doc-refs: every docs/*.md path cited in a packages|examples TS
  comment resolves — closes a drift class verify-md-links can't see, and
  catches the four comment refs this reorg moved.

The README gains a Classification section explaining the taxonomy and
per-class index sub-sections. A self-referential process RFC records why
the scheme is path-encoded and gated.
This commit is contained in:
Tianyi Cui
2026-06-20 22:29:45 +08:00
parent 906705e353
commit 605587e79c
92 changed files with 673 additions and 293 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
docs/AGENTS.md
View File

@@ -4,12 +4,12 @@ Conventions for authoring everything under `docs/` (architecture, RFCs, cookbook
## Cross-reference with machine-checkable links, never free prose
When one doc refers to another doc, an RFC, a package README, or any file in the repo, link it with a **relative Markdown link** to the actual path — `[capability seams](rfc/implemented/2026-06-13-capability-seams.md)`, `[architecture.md](architecture.md)`. Do NOT refer to it by bare prose or by a number ("see ADR 0009", "per RFC 005"): a number is not checkable, goes stale the moment a file is renamed, and forces the reader to go hunting. A relative link is verified mechanically — `pnpm run verify-md-links` (part of `doc-sync`, see [the cross-link lint RFC](rfc/implemented/2026-06-18-markdown-cross-link-lint.md)) fails CI and the pre-push hook if any relative target does not exist, so a rename that orphans a link is caught before review rather than rotting silently.
When one doc refers to another doc, an RFC, a package README, or any file in the repo, link it with a **relative Markdown link** to the actual path — `[capability seams](rfc/implemented/architecture/2026-06-13-capability-seams.md)`, `[architecture.md](architecture.md)`. Do NOT refer to it by bare prose or by a number ("see ADR 0009", "per RFC 005"): a number is not checkable, goes stale the moment a file is renamed, and forces the reader to go hunting. A relative link is verified mechanically — `pnpm run verify-md-links` (part of `doc-sync`, see [the cross-link lint RFC](rfc/implemented/process/2026-06-18-markdown-cross-link-lint.md)) fails CI and the pre-push hook if any relative target does not exist, so a rename that orphans a link is caught before review rather than rotting silently.
This is why the RFC tree carries no stable numbers: files are named `yyyy-mm-dd-topic-title.md` and referred to by link, so they survive moves between `proposed/`/`implemented/`/`rejected/` without a dangling reference. When you move or rename a doc, the gate tells you every inbound link you still need to fix.
This is why the RFC tree carries no stable numbers: files are named `yyyy-mm-dd-topic-title.md` and referred to by link, so they survive moves between lifecycle folders (`proposed/`/`implemented/`/`rejected/`) and class folders without a dangling reference. When you move or rename a doc, the gate tells you every inbound link you still need to fix.
The gate checks file *existence*, not `#anchor` validity — a link to a real file with a wrong heading fragment still passes. Prefer linking the file (and a heading when it helps the reader), but don't rely on the gate to catch a stale anchor.
## RFCs
Design decisions and proposals live in [rfc/](rfc/) — one kind of doc, grouped by lifecycle into `proposed/`/`implemented/`/`rejected/`. See [rfc/README.md](rfc/README.md) for the naming scheme and when to write one.
Design decisions and proposals live in [rfc/](rfc/) — one kind of doc, grouped by lifecycle (`proposed/`/`implemented/`/`rejected/`) then by class (`feature`/`bug-fix`/`simplification`/`architecture`/`process`/`testing`). See [rfc/README.md](rfc/README.md) for the class definitions, the naming scheme, and when to write one.