Merge branch 'worktree-subprocess-consumers' into worktree-process-service-seam

This commit is contained in:
Tianyi Cui
2026-07-27 00:22:29 +08:00
87 changed files with 1935 additions and 1665 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-26-subprocess-consumer-migration.md: 805f27ba2e72a7f29d1b32053add95b8c33a62e2
2026-07-26-subprocess-consumer-migration.zh.md: 41bdf04bc03517cf9fe10a61a565e442ecee5520

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
# Agent Note: The subprocess seam goes Node-shaped and every eligible spawner rides it
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-26-subprocess-consumer-migration.zh.md)
## Problem
The [subprocess seam](2026-07-26-subprocess-seam.md) shipped shaped for exactly one consumer family: batch-collected stdout/stderr, batch stdin, a single escalating `kill()`. That was deliberate scope control, and its own note records "migrate the other spawn sites" as rejected-for-now. Review on the introducing PR reversed that deferral: the stacked follow-up should reshape the interface toward Node's API and move the remaining process-running places onto the service. The remaining spawners each carried a private copy of some slice of the same mechanics — lsp-local had its own detached-tree signalling (POSIX group + Windows taskkill + liveness polling), subagent-subprocess had the dispose ladder and its own scrub, mcp-client and pty-local and the SDK helper each had a third/fourth/fifth copy of the credential scrub — and none of it was swappable or centrally testable.
## Decision
The seam's vocabulary is now Node-shaped, and every spawner that can ride the service does:
- **Per-stream stdio dispositions** on `SubprocessSpawnSpec`: `'pipe'` (the raw `Readable`/`Writable`, for consumer-owned protocol framing), `'inherit'` (diagnostics to the parent's stream), and collect mode `{ maxBytes, spill? }` — the original bounded tail-keep shape, with the spill file now optional so a diagnostic tail (a language server's stderr) buffers without touching disk. stdin is `'ignore'`, `'pipe'`, or `{ data }` (write-and-close batch).
- **`SubprocessOutcome` carries exit facts only** (Node's close-event vocabulary); collected output stays readable through `handle.collected` after settlement (spill fds seal at the settle boundary), so batch and streaming callers share one access path and nothing is copied into the outcome.
- **Tree-scoped termination, split Node-style**: `kill(signal?)` sends one signal and is a no-op after settlement; `terminate()` owns the SIGTERM→grace→SIGKILL escalation (and serves the spec's abort signal); `waitForExit()` polls tree liveness (POSIX group probe; direct-child boundary on Windows); `dispose(graces)` is the cooperative stdin-EOF→SIGTERM→SIGKILL ladder absorbed from `subagent-subprocess`, memoized per handle. Windows tree termination (`taskkill /T`, injectable) moved in from lsp-local, so tree semantics are platform-correct for every consumer.
- **One scrub definition**: `scrubbedParentEnv()`/`SENSITIVE_ENV_PATTERN` live on the seam. Spawners that cannot route the spawn itself through the service — pty-local (node-pty owns the fork) and mcp-client (the MCP SDK owns the transport spawn) — import the function, so environment policy is single-sourced even where process ownership is not; the SDK helper's `scrubEnvironment()` defaults through it as well.
Migrations landed with the reshape: **bash-local/bash-sandbox** (collect modes + batch stdin; the bash `kill()` maps to `terminate()` so `task_kill` keeps escalation semantics), **lsp-local** (piped protocol streams + a no-spill collected stderr tail; `LspConnection` takes the seam's spawn function; its private tree-op helpers deleted), **subagent-acp** (piped ndjson streams + inherited stderr; spawn failure surfaces through `done` rejection into the same startup race; disposal is `handle.dispose` with the plugin's configured graces). **`dsh-subagent-subprocess` is deleted** — the dispose ladder and scrub are the seam's; the unused isolated-config-dir helper died with it (no consumer existed).
Compositions mounting lsp-local or subagent-acp now load `dsh-subprocess-local` (the plugins inject `'subprocess'`); the acp/lsp test fixtures gained the row.
## Alternatives considered
**Keep the batch-only seam and let stream consumers stay bespoke.** The introducing note's position, rejected by review: it leaves three private copies of tree signalling and five of the scrub, and any future runner (containerized executor, remote process host) would have to pick which private copy to fork. The Node-shaped dispositions cover all three observed stream shapes without widening the outcome type or buffering piped streams.
**A single `stdio: 'pipe' | 'inherit' | 'collect'` mode for all three streams at once.** Rejected: real consumers mix modes per stream (lsp: pipe/pipe/collect; acp: pipe/pipe/inherit; bash: data/collect/collect). Per-stream dispositions are exactly Node's shape and avoid a second spawn call for the mixed cases.
**Migrate pty-local and mcp-client spawns too.** Rejected on ownership grounds, not scope: node-pty's `fork()` allocates the terminal itself, and the MCP SDK's `StdioClientTransport` spawns internally — neither call site is ours to route. They adopt the shared scrub (the part that is policy), and their READMEs say why the spawn stays put.
**Migrate the test-support launchers (acp-snapshot, loader-smoke) and the SDK package-manager runner.** Rejected: the support packages are deliberately dependency-light test infrastructure that must not depend on product seams, and the SDK wizard's `stdio: 'inherit'`-with-redirect semantics plus its out-of-composition lifecycle (no cordis context at all) make the service a poor fit; it shares the scrub instead.
## Consequences
Bought: one implementation of tree signalling, escalation, the dispose ladder, bounded collection, and the scrub, tested once in `dsh-subprocess-local`'s suites (including injected-platform Windows coverage that lsp-local's private copy never had); lsp-local and subagent-acp shed their process plumbing and their children now survive plugin reloads and die with composition teardown like bash's; a whole package (`dsh-subagent-subprocess`) is gone. The seam README's "one consumer family" limitation is retired.
Cost: the seam is wider — three stdio modes and four termination verbs instead of one of each — so a future backend implements more surface; the compositions for lsp-local/subagent-acp each carry the subprocess row now; and `SubprocessOutcome` no longer carries output, a breaking shape change inside the still-unreleased stack (the PR2 layer was updated in place rather than shimmed, per the pre-release stance). pty-local/mcp-client/SDK/test-support spawns remain outside the service by ownership, with the scrub as the shared floor.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
# Agent Note: 进程 seam 转向 Node 形状,所有具备条件的 spawn 调用点一并迁入
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-26-subprocess-consumer-migration.md) | 中文
## 问题
[进程 seam](2026-07-26-subprocess-seam.md) 交付时恰好只为一个消费方家族塑形:批量收集的 stdout/stderr、批量 stdin、单一的升级式 `kill()`。那是有意的范围控制,其自身的 Agent Note 也把「迁移其余 spawn 调用点」记为暂缓否决项。引入该 seam 的 PRPull Request上的评审推翻了这一暂缓决定堆叠其上的后续变更应当把接口向 Node 的 API 方向重塑,并把其余运行进程之处迁到该服务上。其余各 spawn 调用点此前各自持有同一套机制中某个切片的私有副本——lsp-local 自带 detached 进程树信号发送POSIX 进程组 + Windows taskkill + 存活轮询subagent-subprocess 自带 dispose资源释放阶梯和自己的凭据清除mcp-client、pty-local 与 SDK helper 则各自持有凭据清除的第三、第四、第五份副本——而这一切既不可替换,也无法集中测试。
## 决策
这道 seam 的词汇如今已是 Node 形状,凡能接入该服务的 spawn 调用点均已迁入:
- **按流划分的 stdio 处置方式disposition**,位于 `SubprocessSpawnSpec` 上:`'pipe'`(原始的 `Readable`/`Writable`,供消费方自有的协议分帧使用)、`'inherit'`诊断输出直通父进程的流以及收集模式collect`{ maxBytes, spill? }`——即最初的有界尾部保留形状,只是 spill 文件改为可选,使诊断尾部(例如语言服务器的 stderr无需落盘即可缓冲。stdin 则为 `'ignore'``'pipe'``{ data }`(写完即关闭的批量形式)。
- **`SubprocessOutcome` 只承载退出事实**Node close 事件的词汇);收集到的输出在结算后仍可经 `handle.collected` 读取spill 文件描述符在结算边界封存),因此批量与流式调用方共用一条访问路径,也没有任何内容被复制进这份结果。
- **以进程树为范围的终止,按 Node 风格拆分**`kill(signal?)` 只发送一个信号,结算后为空操作;`terminate()` 拥有 SIGTERM→宽限期→SIGKILL 升级(并承接 spec 的 abort 信号);`waitForExit()` 轮询进程树存活状态POSIX 进程组探测Windows 上以直接子进程为界);`dispose(graces)` 是从 `subagent-subprocess` 吸收来的协作式 stdin EOF→SIGTERM→SIGKILL 阶梯,按句柄 memoize 化。Windows 进程树终止(`taskkill /T`,可注入)自 lsp-local 迁入,因此每个消费方拿到的进程树语义在各平台上都正确。
- **凭据清除只有一份定义**`scrubbedParentEnv()`/`SENSITIVE_ENV_PATTERN` 定义在 seam 上。无法把 spawn 本身路由到该服务的调用点——pty-localnode-pty 拥有 fork与 mcp-clientMCP SDK 拥有传输层的 spawn——改为导入该函数因此即便进程所有权无法统一环境策略仍是单一来源SDK helper 的 `scrubEnvironment()` 默认同样委托给它。
各项迁移随这次重塑一并落地:**bash-local/bash-sandbox**(收集模式 + 批量 stdinbash 的 `kill()` 映射到 `terminate()`,因此 `task_kill` 保有升级语义),**lsp-local**(管道化的协议流 + 无 spill 的 stderr 收集尾部;`LspConnection` 改为接收 seam 的 spawn 函数;其私有的进程树操作辅助函数已删除),**subagent-acp**(管道化的 ndjson 流 + inherit 的 stderrspawn 失败经 `done` 的 reject 汇入同一个启动竞态dispose 就是携带插件所配置宽限期的 `handle.dispose` 调用)。**`dsh-subagent-subprocess` 已删除**——dispose 阶梯与凭据清除归 seam 所有;无人使用的隔离配置目录辅助函数随之消亡(其消费方本就不存在)。
挂载 lsp-local 或 subagent-acp 的组合如今都加载 `dsh-subprocess-local`(这两个插件注入 `'subprocess'`acp/lsp 测试 fixture测试前置数据补上了这一行组合配置。
## 曾考虑的替代方案
**保持只支持批量的 seam让流式消费方继续各自为政。**这正是引入该 seam 的 Agent Note 当初的立场,评审将其否决:这样会留下三份进程树信号发送的私有副本和五份凭据清除的私有副本,而未来任何运行器(容器化执行器、远程进程宿主)都得挑选去 fork 哪一份私有副本。Node 形状的处置方式覆盖已观察到的全部三种流形状,既不拓宽结果类型,也不缓冲管道化的流。
**用单个 `stdio: 'pipe' | 'inherit' | 'collect'` 模式一次性统辖全部三条流。**否决真实消费方按流混用模式lsppipe/pipe/collectacppipe/pipe/inheritbashdata/collect/collect。按流划分的处置方式恰好就是 Node 的形状,也免去了混用场景的第二个 spawn 调用。
**把 pty-local 与 mcp-client 的 spawn 也一并迁移。**基于所有权而非范围否决node-pty 的 `fork()` 自行分配终端MCP SDK 的 `StdioClientTransport` 在内部完成 spawn——这两处调用点都不归我们路由。它们采纳共享的凭据清除那正是属于策略的部分并在各自的 README 中说明 spawn 为何留在原地。
**迁移 test-support 启动器acp-snapshot、loader-smoke与 SDK package-manager 运行器。**否决support 各包package是刻意保持轻依赖的测试基础设施不得依赖产品 seam而 SDK 向导那套附带重定向的 `stdio: 'inherit'` 语义,加上其完全脱离组合的生命周期(根本没有 cordis 上下文),使该服务并不合用;它改为共享凭据清除。
## 后果
换来的是进程树信号发送、升级、dispose 阶梯、有界收集与凭据清除各自只剩一份实现,且只在 `dsh-subprocess-local` 的测试套件中测试一次(其中包括 lsp-local 的私有副本从未有过的、以注入平台方式实现的 Windows 覆盖lsp-local 与 subagent-acp 卸下了自己的进程管道,其子进程如今像 bash 的一样,在插件重载后存活、随组合拆除而终止;一个完整的包(`dsh-subagent-subprocess`就此消失。seam README 中「只有一个消费方家族」的限制说明也随之退役。
代价是:这道 seam 变宽了stdio 模式从一种变为三种、终止动词从一个变为四个未来的后端因此要实现更宽的表面lsp-local/subagent-acp 的各组合如今都多出 subprocess 这一行组合配置;`SubprocessOutcome` 也不再承载输出这是仍未发布的堆叠变更内部的一次破坏性形状变更依照预发布立场PR2 那一层被就地更新,而非加 shim。pty-local/mcp-client/SDK/test-support 的 spawn 因所有权归属留在该服务之外,以凭据清除作为共享底线。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-26-subprocess-seam.md: abfc43c1a960edd498b0960a191153008e39834c
2026-07-26-subprocess-seam.zh.md: 7fba975181b7871b34a8bc0e77d826e1ee2647f5
2026-07-26-subprocess-seam.md: 5cf0e596603b4cd3240e5d9a114d95f413c6410b
2026-07-26-subprocess-seam.zh.md: 31c37ae07f9456078673ccd005bd44c74ffa672e

View File

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ English | [中文](2026-07-26-subprocess-seam.zh.md)
A new `subprocess/` capability family owns "run and manage a process"; the bash family keeps "run a bash command" and consumes it:
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-subprocess` (interface)** — the abstract `SubprocessService` owning `ctx.subprocess` with one method, `spawn(spec): SubprocessHandle`, and the shared vocabulary: the fully-explicit `SubprocessSpawnSpec` (argv, cwd, per-stream caps, spill cap, grace — no defaults; deployment-varying knobs stay with the calling seam's config, per the `dsh-bash` request/spec template and the no-hidden-defaults rule), `SubprocessHandle` with non-consuming offset-based readers, `SubprocessOutcome` with deliberately no timeout/cancel classification, and the `DSH_ENV_PREFIX`/`DshEnvironment`/`CollectedOutput` types. `argv` is never shell-interpreted.
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-subprocess` (interface)** — the abstract `SubprocessService` owning `ctx.subprocess` with one method, `spawn(spec): SubprocessHandle`, and the shared vocabulary: the fully-explicit `SubprocessSpawnSpec` (argv, cwd, per-stream stdio dispositions, grace — no defaults; deployment-varying knobs stay with the calling seam's config, per the `dsh-bash` request/spec template and the no-hidden-defaults rule), `SubprocessHandle` with non-consuming offset-based readers, `SubprocessOutcome` with deliberately no timeout/cancel classification, and the shared scrub plus `DSH_ENV_PREFIX`/`DshEnvironment`/`CollectedOutput` types. `argv` is never shell-interpreted. (The [consumer-migration Agent Note](2026-07-26-subprocess-consumer-migration.md) later widened the stdio and termination vocabulary Node-ward.)
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-subprocess-local` (implementation)** — `LocalSubprocessService` over the former `run.ts` plumbing (`spawn.ts`): detached groups, tail-keep truncation with private bounded spill files, credential scrub with the two-channel `DSH_*` merge, group kill escalation, and disposal that kills and joins every still-running managed process. It has no config; every limit arrives on the spec. The terminal `ENV_OVERRIDES` (`TERM=dumb` etc.) did NOT move — that is bash-tool presentation policy and stays in `dsh-bash-local`, merged through the ordinary env channel.
- **`dsh-bash-local` (consumer)** — `inject: ['subprocess']`; maps each resolved `BashExecSpec` onto a `SubprocessSpawnSpec` (`['bash', '-c', command]`), keeps its config, `resolve()` defaulting, fused-deadline `timedOut`/`aborted` classification, the `[stderr]`-marked background read merge with its consuming cursor, and the `onProcessDone` subclass hook. `dsh-bash-sandbox` is unchanged apart from redeclaring the inherited inject; it still wraps at the command-string level and re-enters the inherited spawn path.
- **`dsh-bash` (seam)** — re-exports the moved vocabulary from `dsh-subprocess`, so no bash consumer changes an import; `BashExecRequest`/`BashExecSpec`/`BashProcess` and the sandbox facts remain bash-owned.
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ Background-process lifetime moved from the executor to the subprocess service: t
**Leave the process plumbing inside `dsh-bash-local` (status quo).** Rejected for the same reason the [task registry split](2026-07-26-task-registry-seam.md) landed: the boundary is stable and already documented in-code (`run.ts`'s module doc said "this layer reacts to an abort signal; the executor owns deadlines and classifies causes"), and keeping it private makes every future non-shell runner either fork the mechanics or depend on a bash-named package for non-bash work. The user-visible driver for this stack was exactly this split.
**Migrate the repo's other spawn sites (lsp-local, pty-local, subagent-subprocess, sdk package-manager, test-support launchers) onto `ctx.subprocess` in the same change.** Rejected as scope creep with real design risk: those sites have materially different stream and lifecycle needs — node-pty ownership (pty), LSP framing over long-lived stdio with tree-kill fallbacks (lsp), stdin-EOF-first disposal ladders and no output buffering (subagent transports) — and forcing them under a handle shaped for bounded batch output would either bloat the seam or misfit the consumers. The seam ships proven against its one real consumer family, per the shape-interfaces-around-current-consumers rule; the others are named as deferred work in the seam README.
**Migrate the repo's other spawn sites (lsp-local, pty-local, subagent-subprocess, sdk package-manager, test-support launchers) onto `ctx.subprocess` in the same change.** Rejected as scope creep with real design risk at this PR's scale: those sites have materially different stream and lifecycle needs — node-pty ownership (pty), LSP framing over long-lived stdio with tree-kill fallbacks (lsp), stdin-EOF-first disposal ladders and no output buffering (subagent transports) — and forcing them under a handle shaped for bounded batch output would either bloat the seam or misfit the consumers. The seam shipped proven against its one real consumer family, per the shape-interfaces-around-current-consumers rule. Review then asked for exactly that follow-up as a stacked PR; the [consumer-migration Agent Note](2026-07-26-subprocess-consumer-migration.md) records the Node-ward reshape and which sites moved (and which stayed, by ownership).
**Put `run_in_background`/task semantics into the process seam instead.** Rejected: that boundary already exists — `ctx.tasks` owns ids, ownership, and notices, and the bash tool adapts a `BashProcess` into task hooks. The process seam sits *below* the bash executor, not beside the task registry.

View File

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Status: implemented
新的 `subprocess/` 能力家族拥有「运行并管理一个进程」bash 家族保留「运行一条 bash 命令」,并成为前者的消费方:
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-subprocess`(接口)**——拥有 `ctx.subprocess` 的抽象 `SubprocessService`(仅一个方法:`spawn(spec): SubprocessHandle`),以及共享词汇:完全显式的 `SubprocessSpawnSpec`argv、cwd、按流划分的上限、spill 上限、宽限期,一律不设默认值;随部署变化的旋钮依照 `dsh-bash` 的 request/spec 模板与无隐藏默认值规则,留在调用方 seam 的配置里)、携带基于偏移量的非消费式读取器的 `SubprocessHandle`、刻意不含超时/取消分类的 `SubprocessOutcome`,以及 `DSH_ENV_PREFIX`/`DshEnvironment`/`CollectedOutput` 类型。`argv` 绝不经过 shell 解释。
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-subprocess`(接口)**——拥有 `ctx.subprocess` 的抽象 `SubprocessService`(仅一个方法:`spawn(spec): SubprocessHandle`),以及共享词汇:完全显式的 `SubprocessSpawnSpec`argv、cwd、按流划分的 stdio 处置方式disposition、宽限期,一律不设默认值;随部署变化的旋钮依照 `dsh-bash` 的 request/spec 模板与无隐藏默认值规则,留在调用方 seam 的配置里)、携带基于偏移量的非消费式读取器的 `SubprocessHandle`、刻意不含超时/取消分类的 `SubprocessOutcome`,以及共享的凭据清除与 `DSH_ENV_PREFIX`/`DshEnvironment`/`CollectedOutput` 类型。`argv` 绝不经过 shell 解释。[消费方迁移 Agent Note](2026-07-26-subprocess-consumer-migration.md) 其后将 stdio 与终止词汇拓宽为 Node 形状。)
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-subprocess-local`(实现)**——`LocalSubprocessService`,构建在原 `run.ts` 管道(现为 `spawn.ts`之上detached 进程组、带私有有界 spill 文件的尾部保留截断、带双通道 `DSH_*` 合并的凭据清除、进程组 kill 升级,以及会终止每个仍在运行的受管进程并等待其退出的 dispose。该实现没有任何配置每项限制都随 spec 到达。终端相关的 `ENV_OVERRIDES``TERM=dumb` 等)并未迁移:那是 bash 工具的呈现策略,留在 `dsh-bash-local` 里,经普通 env 通道合并。
- **`dsh-bash-local`(消费方)**——`inject: ['subprocess']`;把每个解析后的 `BashExecSpec` 映射为一个 `SubprocessSpawnSpec``['bash', '-c', command]`),并保留自身配置、`resolve()` 默认值补全、基于融合 deadline 的 `timedOut`/`aborted` 分类、带 `[stderr]` 标记的后台读取合并及其消费游标,以及 `onProcessDone` 子类钩子。`dsh-bash-sandbox` 除了重新声明继承来的 inject 之外没有变化;它仍在命令字符串层面做包装,并重新进入继承的 spawn 路径。
- **`dsh-bash`seam**——把迁走的词汇从 `dsh-subprocess` 重导出,因此没有任何 bash 消费方需要改动导入;`BashExecRequest`/`BashExecSpec`/`BashProcess` 与沙箱事实仍归 bash 所有。
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ Status: implemented
**把进程管道留在 `dsh-bash-local` 里(维持现状)。**否决的理由与[任务注册表拆分](2026-07-26-task-registry-seam.md)得以落地的理由相同:这条边界既稳定,也早已记录在代码里(`run.ts` 的模块文档曾写明「this layer reacts to an abort signal; the executor owns deadlines and classifies causes」而若继续将它保持私有未来每个非 shell 运行器就只能要么 fork 这套机制,要么为非 bash 工作去依赖一个以 bash 命名的包。这组堆叠变更对用户可见的动因正是这一拆分。
**在同一变更中把仓库其余 spawn 调用点lsp-local、pty-local、subagent-subprocess、sdk package-manager、test-support 各启动器)迁到 `ctx.subprocess` 上。**作为带有真实设计风险的范围蔓延否决。这些调用点在流与生命周期上的需求存在实质差异node-pty 所有权pty、长生命周期 stdio 上的 LSP 分帧加进程树终止回退lsp、以 stdin EOF 打头的 dispose 阶梯和完全不缓冲输出subagent 传输层)。把它们强行纳入一个按有界批量输出塑形的句柄之下,要么会让这道 seam 膨胀,要么会让句柄与消费方错配。依照「接口围绕当前消费方塑形」的规则,该 seam 在其唯一真实的消费方家族上得到验证后交付;其余调用点已在 seam README 中列为暂缓工作
**在同一变更中把仓库其余 spawn 调用点lsp-local、pty-local、subagent-subprocess、sdk package-manager、test-support 各启动器)迁到 `ctx.subprocess` 上。**在本 PRPull Request的规模下作为带有真实设计风险的范围蔓延否决。这些调用点在流与生命周期上的需求存在实质差异node-pty 所有权pty、长生命周期 stdio 上的 LSP 分帧加进程树终止回退lsp、以 stdin EOF 打头的 dispose 阶梯和完全不缓冲输出subagent 传输层)。把它们强行纳入一个按有界批量输出塑形的句柄之下,要么会让这道 seam 膨胀,要么会让句柄与消费方错配。依照「接口围绕当前消费方塑形」的规则,该 seam 当时在其唯一真实的消费方家族上得到验证后交付。评审随后恰恰要求以堆叠 PR 的形式完成这项后续工作;[消费方迁移 Agent Note](2026-07-26-subprocess-consumer-migration.md) 记录了向 Node 形状的重塑,以及哪些调用点迁入(哪些因所有权归属而留在原地)
**改把 `run_in_background`/任务语义放进进程 seam。**否决:那条边界已经存在。`ctx.tasks` 拥有 id、所有权与通知bash 工具则把 `BashProcess` 适配成任务钩子。进程 seam 位于 bash 执行器*之下*,而不是与任务注册表并列。