Move comment to svr_chansess_checksignal() where it belongs

This commit is contained in:
Matt Johnston 2021-10-11 15:13:42 +08:00
parent 661d8ca225
commit cc59c08605

View File

@ -82,6 +82,14 @@ static int sesscheckclose(const struct Channel *channel) {
return chansess->exit.exitpid != -1;
}
/* Handler for childs exiting, store the state for return to the client */
/* There's a particular race we have to watch out for: if the forked child
* executes, exits, and this signal-handler is called, all before the parent
* gets to run, then the childpids[] array won't have the pid in it. Hence we
* use the svr_ses.lastexit struct to hold the exit, which is then compared by
* the parent when it runs. This work correctly at least in the case of a
* single shell spawned (ie the usual case) */
void svr_chansess_checksignal(void) {
int status;
pid_t pid;
@ -127,18 +135,9 @@ void svr_chansess_checksignal(void) {
/* we use this to determine how pid exited */
ex->exitsignal = -1;
}
}
}
/* Handler for childs exiting, store the state for return to the client */
/* There's a particular race we have to watch out for: if the forked child
* executes, exits, and this signal-handler is called, all before the parent
* gets to run, then the childpids[] array won't have the pid in it. Hence we
* use the svr_ses.lastexit struct to hold the exit, which is then compared by
* the parent when it runs. This work correctly at least in the case of a
* single shell spawned (ie the usual case) */
static void sesssigchild_handler(int UNUSED(dummy)) {
struct sigaction sa_chld;